| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Andrea Jars
   |
Posted - 2011.01.29 10:43:00 -
[1]
I hardly ever post on the forums, but this is something which should get some attention.
At the current time it's virtually impossible to have certain roles for certain PoS up to a higher level.
Meaning that you have to grant roles which you don't want permanently added to some corp members in order to give them more options at building.
Same applies for the ueage of research, if people want to use a corp PoS for research they have 2 options.
A: fly to the PoS with the BPO and put it in the lab to research it. ( This is a not very good idea )
B: Use a corphangar to put the BPO in and research it remotely from there. ( This also puts the very expensive BPO's at risk from thieves that might sneak into a corp)
There is no C, which would allow you as a member of the corp to selevt your own hangar as where to research from.
Building is also kinda off.
Worst case scenario: You have certain people building high valued items and someone who has nothing to do with those builds but who's pee'd off and has the role to access those builds can virtually mess you up by cancelling the builds close before they end.
As a Corp you haven't got the option to set access and roles to that regard to only certain PoS which is an oversight in my opinion.
Clearly there should be the option to tweak a role to be granted to only a certain PoS or several PoS but not to all.
This would allow more diversity in the useage or PoS without limiting a lot of people or increasing the risks for a corporation.
Certainly with the current infiltration chances of a corporation the options to increase certain securities should be upped too.
Your opinions on this please.
Kind regards,
Andrea
|
Laechyd Eldgorn
Caldari
Certified Household Sweeping Consulting
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 11:51:00 -
[2]
I think this is intended feature to give a possibility to steal bpo's and other stuff. |
Bunyip
Gallente
Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 14:37:00 -
[3]
POSes don't need tweaking. They need a complete overhaul from the ground up. This issue is just one of the many issues I've tried to fix in my Depots document.
Neither supported or not supported - this issue is just fixing a symptom while the disease rages on.
========
"The civilized man is rude, as laws protect him from recompense; the savage is not, for his actions can meet a bloody end." - Robert E. Howard |
Abigail Jars
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 16:08:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Laechyd Eldgorn
I think this is intended feature to give a possibility to steal bpo's and other stuff.
Just as there has to be the possibility to steal them an owner should have more than the crude basic options to protect them.
|
Maxx Overseer
Gallente
Decrypt Enterprise
|
Posted - 2011.01.31 07:35:00 -
[5]
I do agree the POSes needs lots of work...
--- --- ---
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |