Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dannerkongen
|
Posted - 2011.02.08 20:07:00 -
[1]
OMFG
best fps ever now on frostbite2
|
Zhim'Fufu
|
Posted - 2011.02.08 20:11:00 -
[2]
Eh. I can't get into the hype machine anymore until late beta or after release and the first few patches. Been burned too many times on super hyped games that turned out to be total barkers even after getting a few patches under their belt.
Originally by: Response to bitter carebear tears in local [19:44:46] CCP Incognito > sorry i can't talk about game mechanics. you need to use your brains and figure it out.
|
Vogue
Short Bus Pole Dancers
|
Posted - 2011.02.08 20:18:00 -
[3]
I am looking forward to this as its going to use the frostbite 2 engine. Battlefield Bad Company 2 used frostbite 1.5. Though that trailer shows nothing of the new engine.
.................................................. One man with courage is a majority
|
Reiisha
Evolution IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.02.08 23:45:00 -
[4]
I was going to rip it a new one.
Then i got suckered in by the rearrangement of the BF theme. God that sounds awesome.
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
Alotta Baggage
Amarr Imperial Manufactorum Armada Assail
|
Posted - 2011.02.08 23:57:00 -
[5]
Anyone who bought Medal of Honor limited edition gets a beta key when they start the beta
Originally by: Magnus Andronicus ur character looks like a f***ing clown dude.
|
Logan LaMort
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 00:04:00 -
[6]
Wasn't excited for it until I heard it was on Frostbite. BF2 really put me off the Battlefield series of games, I mean it was fun, but I really hated the engine.
But I came back with BC2 and had a hell of a lot of fun, so I'm hoping it'll be similar but with BF 1942/BF2 gameplay. I miss 64 players.
|
Alotta Baggage
Amarr Imperial Manufactorum Armada Assail
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 00:12:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Logan LaMort Wasn't excited for it until I heard it was on Frostbite. BF2 really put me off the Battlefield series of games, I mean it was fun, but I really hated the engine.
But I came back with BC2 and had a hell of a lot of fun, so I'm hoping it'll be similar but with BF 1942/BF2 gameplay. I miss 64 players.
The said PC version will be 64 player
Hope they bring back the 1942 feel though, best one of the lot imho
Originally by: Magnus Andronicus ur character looks like a f***ing clown dude.
|
Zhim'Fufu
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 06:57:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Zhim''Fufu on 09/02/2011 06:56:55
Originally by: Alotta Baggage The said PC version will be 64 player
This is why I still play mw1. Nothing like a small map with 50+ players all fragging at once.
Originally by: Response to bitter carebear tears in local [19:44:46] CCP Incognito > sorry i can't talk about game mechanics. you need to use your brains and figure it out.
|
baltec1
Antares Shipyards Phalanx Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 09:09:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Alotta Baggage
Originally by: Logan LaMort Wasn't excited for it until I heard it was on Frostbite. BF2 really put me off the Battlefield series of games, I mean it was fun, but I really hated the engine.
But I came back with BC2 and had a hell of a lot of fun, so I'm hoping it'll be similar but with BF 1942/BF2 gameplay. I miss 64 players.
The said PC version will be 64 player
Hope they bring back the 1942 feel though, best one of the lot imho
2142 for me. Titan mode was like an enhanced planetside, I loved it when both titans came along side eachother and boarding actions
|
Dannerkongen
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 12:55:00 -
[10]
Originally by: baltec1
Originally by: Alotta Baggage
Originally by: Logan LaMort Wasn't excited for it until I heard it was on Frostbite. BF2 really put me off the Battlefield series of games, I mean it was fun, but I really hated the engine.
But I came back with BC2 and had a hell of a lot of fun, so I'm hoping it'll be similar but with BF 1942/BF2 gameplay. I miss 64 players.
The said PC version will be 64 player
Hope they bring back the 1942 feel though, best one of the lot imho
2142 for me. Titan mode was like an enhanced planetside, I loved it when both titans came along side eachother and boarding actions
titan mode was awesome! made me buy 2142 too, but i couldnt deal with the hoovering tanks shooting blue light.
i hear a lot say vietnam was the best but i never really played it. i only play bf2 and mostly running the AIX mod. servers r more or less dead tho :(
im crossing fingers they wont **** it up with perks and childish crap liek that. just stick with a few weapon unlocks.
ps. for a serious laff dl this
|
|
Reiisha
Evolution IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 13:40:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Logan LaMort Wasn't excited for it until I heard it was on Frostbite. BF2 really put me off the Battlefield series of games, I mean it was fun, but I really hated the engine.
But I came back with BC2 and had a hell of a lot of fun, so I'm hoping it'll be similar but with BF 1942/BF2 gameplay. I miss 64 players.
BF2 and 2142 are running the original 1942 engine. BC2 is Frostbite 1.5 ;p
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
Logan LaMort
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 19:41:00 -
[12]
The original BF 1942 (And the DC mod) was just fun to play and because it wasn't really complex the engine didn't really cause problems for me.
Thing with BF2 though, as fun as it was to play, it was the little things that kinda just annoyed me. If you sniped a lot you'd noticed the view distance wasn't amazing, and far away objects seemed glitchy graphically, plus the physics were kinda off too.
I also blame EA & BF2 for starting DLC, download these awesome weapons that are better than regular for only $5, download these awesome vehicles for only $5... download these awesome new maps... for only $5
Since then I avoided the Battlefield series but eventually bought BC2 for cheap... and it was awesome, a really nice engine that feels just right, fun gameplay and I even bought the Vietnam DLC because it was actually a good expansion to gameplay, a mini expansion at $10. Just a shame it's not 64 mayhem.
So yeah, looking forward to BF3. A solid engine and I really hope solid gameplay, plus 64 players, **** yeah
|
Captain Die
Suicide by Cop
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 21:03:00 -
[13]
ROGER THAT! --- DIE - EVE-O's SADOMASICHIST I WHO HAVE NOTHING! |
Barakkus
|
Posted - 2011.02.09 23:48:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Logan LaMort Since then I avoided the Battlefield series but eventually bought BC2 for cheap... and it was awesome, a really nice engine that feels just right, fun gameplay and I even bought the Vietnam DLC because it was actually a good expansion to gameplay, a mini expansion at $10. Just a shame it's not 64 mayhem.
I got BC2 on steam for cheap couple months ago. Single player was decent, not stellar, but multiplayer sucked ass. No prone, enormous maps with everyone just sitting up in their sniper spots killing you from half way across the map with no killcams to be able to pinpoint anyone. It was basically, spawn, get sniped, spawn, get sniped, spawn, get run over by a tank or blasted to hell, spawn, get sniped. Pretty much terrible multiplayer experience imo. - - [SERVICE] Corp Standings For POS anchoring
|
Logan LaMort
|
Posted - 2011.02.10 00:22:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Barakkus
Originally by: Logan LaMort Since then I avoided the Battlefield series but eventually bought BC2 for cheap... and it was awesome, a really nice engine that feels just right, fun gameplay and I even bought the Vietnam DLC because it was actually a good expansion to gameplay, a mini expansion at $10. Just a shame it's not 64 mayhem.
I got BC2 on steam for cheap couple months ago. Single player was decent, not stellar, but multiplayer sucked ass. No prone, enormous maps with everyone just sitting up in their sniper spots killing you from half way across the map with no killcams to be able to pinpoint anyone. It was basically, spawn, get sniped, spawn, get sniped, spawn, get run over by a tank or blasted to hell, spawn, get sniped. Pretty much terrible multiplayer experience imo.
The lack of prone was a bit jarring at first, but considering the intense foliage you can hide in I'm kinda thankful for it in a way, plus I guess I've played a lot of prone absent games so it wasn't such an issue for me.
Strange you had no killcams, I think every server I played on had the killcam enabled. Ironically I hate killcams
As for dying a lot it did happen to me quite a bit at first, but moving with team mates and keeping behind cover is a must and the large maps help to break up the tunneling effect of two teams. The maps in the Vietnam DLC are a lot more smaller and routed, you get some pretty instense battles between the teams on those (I prefer the Vietnam ones a lot more).
Each to their own though, I have to admit, I am sniping sinner. Shooting people with a no scoped, no crosshair sniper rifle was the first thing I picked up when I played online pc games for the first time back in the UT/MoH:AA/CoD/BF1942 era and I damn well have been sniping since
|
Barakkus
|
Posted - 2011.02.10 23:22:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Barakkus on 10/02/2011 23:22:46
Originally by: Logan LaMort Strange you had no killcams, I think every server I played on had the killcam enabled. Ironically I hate killcams
I must have just picked the worst server to try and play on then. I just assumed the multiplayer had no killcam when I was running through.
Maybe give it another go, Black Ops was so horribly done (coding wise) I'm looking for something else. I LOVE Black Ops, but the fact that I can only play like 3 matches without having to actually reboot to get MW:2 quality performance killed it for me, and every "performance" patch they do just makes it worse. - - [SERVICE] Corp Standings For POS anchoring
|
Sidus Isaacs
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.02.10 23:35:00 -
[17]
Another game with mindless combat glorifying war? I am sure this brings a lot of new original content and mechanics to the fps genre that we have not already seen in the countless clones like it.
Also the trailer sucks, looks like they ripped something form an only war movie and stuck battlefield all over it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html |
Alotta Baggage
Amarr Imperial Manufactorum Armada Assail
|
Posted - 2011.02.10 23:53:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Sidus Isaacs Another game with mindless combat glorifying war? I am sure this brings a lot of new original content and mechanics to the fps genre that we have not already seen in the countless clones like it.
Also the trailer sucks, looks like they ripped something form an only war movie and stuck battlefield all over it.
War is awesome and fap worthy
Originally by: Magnus Andronicus ur character looks like a f***ing clown dude.
|
Buxaroo
Gallente Reikoku IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.02.11 02:13:00 -
[19]
I am sooooooo jonesing for some BF right now. And it's going to be a true PC game, none of that limited scrub 32 player bull****. 64 players, jets, big ass maps, prone (as long as there isn't dolphin diving I am cool with it), and DX10/11. About time we get another BF, so tired of the ADD/console-fied Call of Duty Games that litters the shelves every 6 months like some ****ty hollywood sequel
|
Zhim'Fufu
|
Posted - 2011.02.11 03:31:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Buxaroo I am sooooooo jonesing for some BF right now. And it's going to be a true PC game, none of that limited scrub 32 player bull****. 64 players, jets, big ass maps, prone (as long as there isn't dolphin diving I am cool with it), and DX10/11. About time we get another BF, so tired of the ADD/console-fied Call of Duty Games that litters the shelves every 6 months like some ****ty hollywood sequel
MW1 tbh for large scale shooter goodness. Best of class even if the maps are totally in the muscle memory area by this time.
Originally by: Response to bitter carebear tears in local [19:44:46] CCP Incognito > sorry i can't talk about game mechanics. you need to use your brains and figure it out.
|
|
AlleyKat
Gallente The Unwanted.
|
Posted - 2011.02.12 17:04:00 -
[21]
asghitughaohg[owthjg[ojfsd[ogihj'oyitrhjsifgjh'wstrijghsdgfi 'a p'adfgj pateyjh]#adfgj'#pa #qaep oyt45 35'p jadfg9idf'#gqa34tgjafsdgj qaerg ja#dfg ag
Opps, sorry about that - I was just wiping the keyboard clean.
I genuinely felt the warm raising of hairs on the back of my neck, followed by a glorious sensation of my nerve-endings creating new connections to my central nervous system to better prepare my brain for the awesomeness ahead.
Bring it. |
Reiisha
EVE University
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 07:36:00 -
[22]
Gameplay trailer.
Still a bit reserved because of how BC2 PC turned out, but still... It looks like a return to form.
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
Alotta Baggage
Amarr Imperial Manufactorum Armada Assail
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 07:39:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Reiisha Gameplay trailer.
Still a bit reserved because of how BC2 PC turned out, but still... It looks like a return to form.
*Goes off to change pants*
Originally by: Magnus Andronicus ur character looks like a f***ing clown dude.
|
Shoopa Whoopa
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 08:19:00 -
[24]
Enjoy your DLC. |
Gibbo5771
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 11:48:00 -
[25]
Edited by: Gibbo5771 on 24/02/2011 11:49:35 If this is anything like BFBC2 its going to be crap, tiny boring maps. Nice graphics at least but I prefer better gameplay like Bf2, cant beat a L96A1 hitting someone on the head from 800 meters away
Oh and im redownloading BF2 on steam now, put me in the mood for it :| :| :| :|
|
Deganos
Caldari Kornova Mining Corporation
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 12:33:00 -
[26]
Edited by: Deganos on 24/02/2011 12:35:03
Originally by: Sidus Isaacs Another game with mindless combat glorifying war? I am sure this brings a lot of new original content and mechanics to the fps genre that we have not already seen in the countless clones like it.
Also the trailer sucks, looks like they ripped something form an only war movie and stuck battlefield all over it.
Can't have a FPS thread in here without these typical posts.
I think he's expecting a shooter where you don't actually shoot. Wouldn't that be original ?!?
EDIT: I think I got trolled here, foolish me...
|
Natasja Podinski
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 19:41:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Alotta Baggage
Originally by: Reiisha Gameplay trailer.
Still a bit reserved because of how BC2 PC turned out, but still... It looks like a return to form.
*Goes off to change pants*
loose or tight?
btw. HOLY SHAT AWESOME VIDE0 Please make your signature more EVE Related.StevieSG |
Barakkus
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 20:50:00 -
[28]
Ok, I might just have to get this after seeing that gameplay trailer. It's going to blow CoD out of the water.
...and it appears they finally added prone :P - - [SERVICE] Corp Standings For POS anchoring
|
Natasja Podinski
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 21:07:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Barakkus ...and it appears they finally added prone :P
could always prone in bf Please make your signature more EVE Related.StevieSG |
Zyck
Dark-Rising
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 21:28:00 -
[30]
WANT 64 MAN RUSH
|
|
Hannibal 'Bambi' Lecter
It rubs the lotion on its skin
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 21:36:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Natasja Podinski
Originally by: Barakkus ...and it appears they finally added prone :P
could always prone in bf
Yup, it's CoD that you can't go prone on.
|
Barakkus
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 21:44:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Hannibal 'Bambi' Lecter
Originally by: Natasja Podinski
Originally by: Barakkus ...and it appears they finally added prone :P
could always prone in bf
Yup, it's CoD that you can't go prone on.
I want what you're smoking. - - [SERVICE] Corp Standings For POS anchoring
|
Logan LaMort
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 23:43:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Barakkus
Originally by: Hannibal 'Bambi' Lecter
Originally by: Natasja Podinski
Originally by: Barakkus ...and it appears they finally added prone :P
could always prone in bf
Yup, it's CoD that you can't go prone on.
I want what you're smoking.
Battlefield 1942 to Battlefield (Insert latest version) has always had prone, Bad Company 2 didn't have prone (Not played 1 so I don't know). Bad Company has a different play style to the regular Battlefield series.
Battlefield 3, being the real sequel to Battlefield 2 carries on with the more traditional gameplay style, including prone.
CoD 1 - 4 have always had prone too, not sure about any after that as I haven't played them.
|
Barakkus
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 23:47:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Logan LaMort
Battlefield 1942 to Battlefield (Insert latest version) has always had prone, Bad Company 2 didn't have prone (Not played 1 so I don't know). Bad Company has a different play style to the regular Battlefield series.
Battlefield 3, being the real sequel to Battlefield 2 carries on with the more traditional gameplay style, including prone.
CoD 1 - 4 have always had prone too, not sure about any after that as I haven't played them.
Yeah I was referring to the CoD without prone comment. MW:2 and Black Ops both have prone as well. I'm sure WaW had it too.
I was unaware the other Battlefield's had prone, my only experience was BFBC2, which was one of the major things I didn't like about BFBC2 (as noted on page 1). - - [SERVICE] Corp Standings For POS anchoring
|
Alotta Baggage
Amarr Imperial Manufactorum Armada Assail
|
Posted - 2011.02.24 23:56:00 -
[35]
I got BC2 last night while I was tripping out on my sleep meds (I haz prescription) and found out I got it this morning. I really like it, especially the Vietnam expansion I apparently bought too
Originally by: Magnus Andronicus ur character looks like a f***ing clown dude.
|
Reiisha
EVE University
|
Posted - 2011.02.25 01:54:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Gibbo5771 Edited by: Gibbo5771 on 24/02/2011 11:49:35 If this is anything like BFBC2 its going to be crap, tiny boring maps. Nice graphics at least but I prefer better gameplay like Bf2, cant beat a L96A1 hitting someone on the head from 800 meters away
Oh and im redownloading BF2 on steam now, put me in the mood for it :| :| :| :|
It's not like BC2. For one, PC version seems to be the main focus, with maps and content specially made for it. Also, 64 player maps are back. Since consoles are still limited at 24 players, i suspect they're not getting any of the large PC maps at all.
I'm looking forward to Karkand without fog :>
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
Alotta Baggage
Amarr Imperial Manufactorum Armada Assail
|
Posted - 2011.02.25 05:04:00 -
[37]
Hope BF3 has gravity impact rounds like BC2, makes me feel really good when I land that headshot from so far away I had to lead up 2 minutes
Originally by: Magnus Andronicus ur character looks like a f***ing clown dude.
|
Reiisha
EVE University
|
Posted - 2011.02.25 09:24:00 -
[38]
Every Battlefield game so far has had bullet physics, i don't expect BF3 to be any different. I do suspect that they toned down destruction to only destroy walls etc, not letting buildings collapse, which is a major strain on servers in multiplayer and a big reason why there's so little variety in buildings in BC2.
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
baltec1
Antares Shipyards Phalanx Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.02.25 09:28:00 -
[39]
I am looking forwards to having much more room for flying choppers. But I do hope they do not have target painters for the missiles again. That is my single biggest hate in BC2.
|
Alotta Baggage
Amarr Imperial Manufactorum Armada Assail
|
Posted - 2011.02.25 11:02:00 -
[40]
Originally by: baltec1 I am looking forwards to having much more room for flying choppers. But I do hope they do not have target painters for the missiles again. That is my single biggest hate in BC2.
My one hate is on the Vietnam expansion on Operation Hastings where you have 1 NVA guy who somehow gets a Huey spawned at a flag and camps the US spawn. As there are no handheld AA weapons and no AA guns on the map it gets tedious
Originally by: Magnus Andronicus ur character looks like a f***ing clown dude.
|
|
Logan LaMort
|
Posted - 2011.02.25 11:26:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Reiisha Every Battlefield game so far has had bullet physics, i don't expect BF3 to be any different. I do suspect that they toned down destruction to only destroy walls etc, not letting buildings collapse, which is a major strain on servers in multiplayer and a big reason why there's so little variety in buildings in BC2.
Actually according to a recent interview, with all the progress they've made in shaping Frostbite 2.0 engine for BF3, there's going to be a lot more destruction, collapsing buildings included. The destruction will also be realistic, for example an RPG hitting a building will cause nearby windows to shatter with the blastwave
They've also apparently noted their lack of environmental detail in the previous games and have made a huge effort to make maps a lot more... 'real'.
Trying not to be too excited but it looks like it could shape up really well.
Battlefield 3 article
|
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
|
Posted - 2011.02.26 08:16:00 -
[42]
if it's anything like Battlefield 2, I can't wait for this game... mostly cause I can't wait to artillery my own carrier full of my own men.
There are spaiz you know... they must be rooted out. Can't trust nobody. _______________________
"Just because I seem like an idiot doesn't mean I am one." ~Unknown |
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
|
Posted - 2011.02.26 08:41:00 -
[43]
Originally by: baltec1
Originally by: Alotta Baggage
Originally by: Logan LaMort Wasn't excited for it until I heard it was on Frostbite. BF2 really put me off the Battlefield series of games, I mean it was fun, but I really hated the engine.
But I came back with BC2 and had a hell of a lot of fun, so I'm hoping it'll be similar but with BF 1942/BF2 gameplay. I miss 64 players.
The said PC version will be 64 player
Hope they bring back the 1942 feel though, best one of the lot imho
2142 for me. Titan mode was like an enhanced planetside, I loved it when both titans came along side eachother and boarding actions
almost everyone in IDLE played 2142, was lots of fun all going and jumping on the same server
I think my favorite thing in that game was landing a jump pod on someones head
|
Grek Forto
Crosshair Corp
|
Posted - 2011.02.26 15:57:00 -
[44]
Edited by: Grek Forto on 26/02/2011 15:57:14 I have high hopes for Battlefield 3. The lack of prone and the irritating plastic-feeling weapons in Bad Company 2 made me cringe. Also, 64 players FTW.
|
AlleyKat
Gallente The Unwanted.
|
Posted - 2011.02.26 16:18:00 -
[45]
Originally by: ShahFluffers if it's anything like Battlefield 2, I can't wait for this game... mostly cause I can't wait to artillery my own carrier full of my own men.
A friend said there is not going to be a commander mode, haven't looked into it myself, but it would be a shame if this wasn't part of the multi-player.
AK EVE-ONLINE Video-Making Tutorials Vid - New Tricks |
Reiisha
EVE University
|
Posted - 2011.02.26 20:40:00 -
[46]
Originally by: baltec1 I am looking forwards to having much more room for flying choppers. But I do hope they do not have target painters for the missiles again. That is my single biggest hate in BC2.
I disagree - Choppers and jets in BF2 were far too overpowered. With Gulf coming back i still have nightmares about the MEC spawn being camped to death by nearly every vehicle on the map and J10's completely owning Wake.
Tracers are a choice infantry can make, a choice very few people actually do make though. I'm usually the only one in a 32-player server who takes them, maybe one or two others across both teams, and only when i'm playing engineer. It also takes a bit of skill to actually hit a decent chopper pilot with a tracer.
There are only so many vehicles on any given map. Quite frankly it seems like a pretty stupid idea to put 8 vehicles on a 64 player map which are able to own it completely and leave the other 56 players hanging out as 'targets'. Vehicles should be good, but (especially flying) vehicles should not be the pwnmobiles they were in BF2, and tracers are a good solution for this. Even though many people complain about them being nerfed to hell in BC2, it's just that they require a bit more skill to use effectively. A tank with a driver, gunner and 3rd engineer for support can't be taken down by 1 infantry, you'll need 2 or 3 engineers (depending on perks and explosive choice) to take one of those down. A competently flown chopper in BC2 is still very dangerous - When people who can'y fly them complain about being hit too easily i tend to ignore them. I've seen more than enough of those hovering as still as possible, being shot down (without a tracer even sometimes), and then complaining that choppers can be downed too easily.
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
Selinate
Amarr Red Water Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.02.26 20:46:00 -
[47]
Another FPS marketing itself on it's military theme and brand new "awesome" graphics engine?
Who would've thought.
I got burned out on FPS's after the PS3 and 360 came out and everyone started cluster ****ing their brand spankin' new FPS's at the same time, claiming how awesome they were, started a ton of hype, and then they come out and what do we have? A half-assed game with barely anything worth mentioning.
I do like FPS's, don't get me wrong, but you'll have to excuse me if I don't get hyped up on this one.
|
Reiisha
EVE University
|
Posted - 2011.02.26 20:55:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Selinate Another FPS marketing itself on it's military theme and brand new "awesome" graphics engine?
Who would've thought.
I got burned out on FPS's after the PS3 and 360 came out and everyone started cluster ****ing their brand spankin' new FPS's at the same time, claiming how awesome they were, started a ton of hype, and then they come out and what do we have? A half-assed game with barely anything worth mentioning.
I do like FPS's, don't get me wrong, but you'll have to excuse me if I don't get hyped up on this one.
\
You haven't played BF2 then, have you :)
BF3 being a PC game first is a huge deal.
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
Selinate
Amarr Red Water Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.02.26 20:57:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Reiisha
You haven't played BF2 then, have you :)
BF3 being a PC game first is a huge deal.
No, and I really don't intend to, tbh. I'm burnt out on this type of FPS.
However, if it comes out and gets raving reviews, then I'll consider it. Until then.. meh.
|
Synthica
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.02.27 10:30:00 -
[50]
Edited by: Synthica on 27/02/2011 10:31:17
Originally by: Selinate
Originally by: Reiisha
You haven't played BF2 then, have you :)
BF3 being a PC game first is a huge deal.
No, and I really don't intend to, tbh. I'm burnt out on this type of FPS.
However, if it comes out and gets raving reviews, then I'll consider it. Until then.. meh.
With all due respect but comparing the battlefield series with the average FPS is a goddamn sin. If you played BF2 on clan level you would know exactly what makes battlefield stand out above the rest.
BC 2 was a good game to. I rly love it's sound effects. Hadn't been from when I played Company of Heroes that I had heard such nice sound effects in a game. (explosion sound effects make me horny ) Gameplay was also good but not on the same lvl as BF 2. It felt a bit consolized but was still a solid game nonetheless, miles above the CoD series.
|
|
Reiisha
EVE University
|
Posted - 2011.02.28 13:14:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Selinate
Originally by: Reiisha
You haven't played BF2 then, have you :)
BF3 being a PC game first is a huge deal.
No, and I really don't intend to, tbh. I'm burnt out on this type of FPS.
However, if it comes out and gets raving reviews, then I'll consider it. Until then.. meh.
As Synthica says, Battlefield has always been a little different from most shooters. It seems to have found a happy medium between ultra-realism (original OFP, Arma) and arcade (MW etc) - There's really nothing like it, other than that it is a "military shooter series", but that is in theme only.
If you haven't played any of the Battlefield games, getting Battlefield 2 or 2142 out of the bargain bins (seriously, they're $5 each now) is not a bad idea! :)
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
Selinate
Amarr Red Water Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.02.28 17:46:00 -
[52]
Edited by: Selinate on 28/02/2011 17:48:03 And so, CoD fans would say the same of CoD, Medal of Honor fans would say the same thing of Medal of Honor, why shouldn't I assume BF fans would do the same thing for BF?
Like I said, and just like with every other FPS that comes out, unless it gets absolutely rave reviews, I won't bother considering it.
EDIT: And why would I want such an old multiplayer game? I doubt there are many people flooding the servers anymore.
|
Logan LaMort
|
Posted - 2011.02.28 22:57:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Selinate Edited by: Selinate on 28/02/2011 17:48:03 And so, CoD fans would say the same of CoD, Medal of Honor fans would say the same thing of Medal of Honor, why shouldn't I assume BF fans would do the same thing for BF?
Like I said, and just like with every other FPS that comes out, unless it gets absolutely rave reviews, I won't bother considering it.
EDIT: And why would I want such an old multiplayer game? I doubt there are many people flooding the servers anymore.
Played both the original CoDs and MoHs online back in the day, quite similar multiplayer experience that you still get with most games now. 32 players or less, various multiplayer modes with team deathmatch being the most popular, both with more focus on single player. Fun but samey.
Battlefield when it first came out was a rare gem, huge maps, lots of players, vehicles, not so hard as flashpoint but still required a good amount of team work and a lot of hilarious happenings if you're playing with friends. There was jus so much that could happen in a single match that at the time just didn't really exist elsewhere. It was a dedicated multiplayer experience and fun as hell. Still played by a few people today.
Battlefield 2 came out and it was pretty amazing, it offered all what the last game had but a lot more refinement into it. There were some things I didn't like about it, mostly to do with EAs greed, but I'd bet the success of BF2 influenced the modern day settings for both CoD and MoH, as all three games were originally WW2 based, but unlike CoD and MoH the sequel to BF1942 wasn't BF1943, it was a modern day battlefield. The one thing I really didn't like about it was that BF2 was a lot easier to pick up, 1942 was a lot less forgiving, but more rewarding.
Anyway, I loved CoD, I loved MoH, but after the first 3 games of those series they completely burnt me out. I mean it was all the same, it still is all the same. From what I've seen of BF3 however, there's a real improvement to the different experience you had with this game which I haven't really found anywhere else since.
Okay it could turn out utter crap, and I don't blame you for waiting with reviews because to be perfectly honest, games really seem to have gone downhill a lot the past years. I'd at least keep your eye on it though, it has the potential to be an awesome online experience
|
Reiisha
EVE University
|
Posted - 2011.03.01 01:05:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Selinate Edited by: Selinate on 28/02/2011 17:48:03 And so, CoD fans would say the same of CoD, Medal of Honor fans would say the same thing of Medal of Honor, why shouldn't I assume BF fans would do the same thing for BF?
Like I said, and just like with every other FPS that comes out, unless it gets absolutely rave reviews, I won't bother considering it.
EDIT: And why would I want such an old multiplayer game? I doubt there are many people flooding the servers anymore.
CoD, Medal of Honor and their ilk all rely on set pieces, but nothing else. In terms of gameplay they're basic Counterstrike clones - Hitscan weapons, very fast movement, very little environmental interaction other than cover, no vehicles, small maps in both single and multiplayer.
BF2 is, as i said, somewhere in between the uber-arcade of CoD and co and the ultra realism of ArmA/OFP. It moves somewhat slower, there's weapon physics for every weapon (bullet drop and travel time, for example), vehicles are an integral part of any map and maps are a lot larger, for that matter, leading to much more 'epic' fights. Multiplayer only of course, which brings me to this: The game is still one of the more popular multiplayer games around, even after 5+ years. It also caters to a slightly older audience because it's not as visceral as CoD and co - In that the slower movement and (proper) weapon physics cause one to be more tactical in his game.
Again, the game is $5. I guarantee you that it will be money well spent.
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
Reiisha
EVE University
|
Posted - 2011.03.02 12:58:00 -
[55]
New trailer! (thanks to Buxaroo)
Looking pretty damn awesome. Feels different from MW's style of singleplayer.
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
digitalwanderer
Gallente DF0 incorporated
|
Posted - 2011.03.02 18:15:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Reiisha New trailer! (thanks to Buxaroo)
Looking pretty damn awesome. Feels different from MW's style of singleplayer.
With the quality of the graphics and sound witnessed in that video,add 64 player matches for the PC version,as well as destructible terrain with the ability to knock down buildings up to 7 stories high,does Dust 514 have any chance at all since it's still using the unreal 3 engine,wich is getting a little old and doesn't have destuctible environments at all(engine doesn't support it).
|
Grek Forto
Crosshair Corp
|
Posted - 2011.03.02 19:03:00 -
[57]
It's funny how nowadays, 64 players and prone are advertisable features. Frakking consoles...
|
digitalwanderer
Gallente DF0 incorporated
|
Posted - 2011.03.02 20:18:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Grek Forto It's funny how nowadays, 64 players and prone are advertisable features. Frakking consoles...
If you take out the DX11 caliber graphics and animation,wich only the PC version will support,the way better sound and physics effects and the destructible environments,sure 64 players and prone on it's own is nothing new...
|
Buxaroo
Gallente Reikoku
|
Posted - 2011.03.02 20:19:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Grek Forto It's funny how nowadays, 64 players and prone are advertisable features. Frakking consoles...
Quoted for the truth. I remember when Joint Ops had 128 players.....and that was like 4 years ago. How sad that consoles are dumbing down PC games. That's why BF3 is the next great hope for PC gaming right now. And DICE know this. They are gonna do gangbusters.
|
Reiisha
EVE University
|
Posted - 2011.03.02 20:51:00 -
[60]
Originally by: Buxaroo
Originally by: Grek Forto It's funny how nowadays, 64 players and prone are advertisable features. Frakking consoles...
Quoted for the truth. I remember when Joint Ops had 128 players.....and that was like 4 years ago. How sad that consoles are dumbing down PC games. That's why BF3 is the next great hope for PC gaming right now. And DICE know this. They are gonna do gangbusters.
Joint Ops also had no physics worth speaking of, IIRC, making it quite easy on the server.
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|
|
VicturusTeSaluto
Metafarmers MeatSausage EXPRESS
|
Posted - 2011.03.02 20:58:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Buxaroo
Originally by: Grek Forto It's funny how nowadays, 64 players and prone are advertisable features. Frakking consoles...
Quoted for the truth. I remember when Joint Ops had 128 players.....and that was like 4 years ago. How sad that consoles are dumbing down PC games. That's why BF3 is the next great hope for PC gaming right now. And DICE know this. They are gonna do gangbusters.
And planetside with 400-500 player battles. In 2003.
|
Buxaroo
Gallente Reikoku
|
Posted - 2011.03.02 21:57:00 -
[62]
Edited by: Buxaroo on 02/03/2011 21:57:51
Originally by: Reiisha
Originally by: Buxaroo
Originally by: Grek Forto It's funny how nowadays, 64 players and prone are advertisable features. Frakking consoles...
Quoted for the truth. I remember when Joint Ops had 128 players.....and that was like 4 years ago. How sad that consoles are dumbing down PC games. That's why BF3 is the next great hope for PC gaming right now. And DICE know this. They are gonna do gangbusters.
Joint Ops also had no physics worth speaking of, IIRC, making it quite easy on the server.
True. But it was definitely a step in the right direction and showed that it could be done.
Originally by: VicturusTeSaluto
Originally by: Buxaroo
Originally by: Grek Forto It's funny how nowadays, 64 players and prone are advertisable features. Frakking consoles...
Quoted for the truth. I remember when Joint Ops had 128 players.....and that was like 4 years ago. How sad that consoles are dumbing down PC games. That's why BF3 is the next great hope for PC gaming right now. And DICE know this. They are gonna do gangbusters.
And planetside with 400-500 player battles. In 2003.
Oh yeah, I was a big planetside player. I am def looking forward to Planetside Next coming out this year. But that was a MMO though :P
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |