|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.02.25 18:40:00 -
[1]
I support this product and/or service.
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.02.25 20:59:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Forever A Clone The idea that anyone in eve (bar goons) would trust someone who lauds himself as a liar in every aspect of his life is laughable.
Please tell me more.
I do not understand.
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.02.26 13:57:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Chribba I'm an Eve Online "celebrity" who thinks I should post in every thread even if it's a contentless one word post.
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.02.26 14:53:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Profiteering Edited by: Profiteering on 26/02/2011 14:36:38 Mittani, Im just saying we dont know if your lying or not at all period. You may have things to lie about you that you didnt show in your post. The only reason your probably going to be a good leader is all those other goonswarm candidates will be elected at the most....You shouldnt call people deluded, you should convince them instead of calling them names, Good way to get another voter moron.
He's not lying. It's not like getting on the CSM is going to ~magically~ allow him to tell CCP to do anything he wants, because we all know that the current CSM structure gets almost nothing proposed done. Ever.
It's just a group that CCP bounces ideas off of then says "Hey look, the guys you people elected agree with us!!! PRAISE THE CSM! PLAYER INTERACTION!!"
PS Get over yourself.
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.02.27 13:19:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Disgruntled Flying Monkey
Originally by: Kalrand
Originally by: Disgruntled Flying Monkey so if you think you can change it by controlling all the seats then you truly are kalmad
I think you missed my point if you think I'm part of any effort to control anything.
Obviously I wasnt talking about you
You're really bad at this.
Stop while you're behind.
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.02.27 21:22:00 -
[6]
I, for one, think that CCP should remove jump bridges and remove local (or even delay it).
This will make 0.0 a completely tedious place to live and everyone and their brother will have a bot out there, because **** actually living there.
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.02.28 05:01:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Marconus Orion Edited by: Marconus Orion on 28/02/2011 04:36:17
Originally by: EnderCapitalG I, for one, think that CCP should remove jump bridges and remove local (or even delay it).
This will make 0.0 require effort to live there and everyone and their brother will have fun killing bots who don't know who is in system out there.
FYP
It is amusing to see you pull the "This will cause more bots!" card if local and jump bridges are removed.
EDIT: You also just proved the point of how lazy people would move out of 0.0 if logistic, power projection and the instant Intel from local were nerfed. It would be too hard for you and you are unwilling to adapt.
But this all does come down to opinion on what 0.0 should be. Everyone thinks their version is the right one. The more we debate, the more everyone becomes entrenched into their opinion and the sounds of the opposing become more and more quiet in your mind.
I wasn't being sarcastic.
Please. Nerf. Jump. Bridges.
Local, too. Why? It'll give me a reason to finally quit this game as I laugh at those who want to live in the wasteland of 0.0
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.02.28 21:21:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Captain'o'Captain
Originally by: The Mittani
Originally by: Captain'o'Captain
I hardly think a drake army fleet qualifies for "powerbloc" considering all it had to prove itself was an already failing alliance, which was blobed out every single time.
1/10, you didn't even get the fleet doctrine right
umm maybe not and I rly CBA to go through the KB's right now, however the second part is true and you can pretty much ask any IT member, the alliance was long dead before your coalition even invaded, and some1 even told me that the only reason they fought you for the 3 odd months was to get their supers in delve build, after that happend x13 and finfleet and dice packed their bags and left. I'm sure a "spy master" like yourself would know that...
It was all over the news and forums that Maelstroms were the flavor of the month. How did you miss that?
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.03.01 00:02:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Camios
Originally by: The Mittani
Originally by: Camios
Here, and the linked article is full of venom and madness. You can't really think CCP is going to work with one that does so much against them.
CSM will never have control over CCP, period. Mittani wants to go to Iceland to fight CCP, that's just a silly thing to do. You hate too much, dude.
i've met chronotis. he did a ******ed thing with the tech bottleneck; it is the case. he's a nice enough guy, but the implementation of the dys/prom tweak was shortsighted, unless you're part of the tribal liberation force.
csming isn't a job for a sycophant, sorry kiddo
Let's forget for a moment the content of your toughts, if that implementation was good or terribly wrong.
Your saying
"I am the strong man you want for the CSM, I'll kick their ass, vote for me!"
sounds really like a populist try to ride the discontent. We don't need "charismatic leaders" on the CSM, we need analytic and reasonable people to do a long and tiring work, like Trebor did.
If you are elected and you act as you tell us, we are going to miss CSM5, and all what they did.
What you're saying is, we should add more **** to the backlog that will never be addressed, right?
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.03.01 13:48:00 -
[10]
Originally by: OhThis GuyAgain Why aren't you making promises to those living in Empire that CCP will never fulfill and just add to the backlog?
|
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.03.01 14:35:00 -
[11]
Originally by: OhThis GuyAgain
Originally by: EnderCapitalG
Originally by: OhThis GuyAgain Why aren't you making promises to those living in Empire that CCP will never fulfill and just add to the backlog?
Well, when you put it that way...
Maybe I should be clearer. I understand that making wild empty promises to pander to our dreams is silly. There are indeed many candidates promising those in High- and Low- Sec players "oh I'll fix this for you and improve this and do that", but those aren't the people I (or any other thinking Eve citizen) consider as better options.
It's the other candidates who recognize the need to be realistic, but as Empire-experienced and Empire-dwelling players also understand and are directly interested in improving the parts of the game that those who aren't in Null-Sec are very concerned about.
Because, let's face it: even if The Mittani and Co. fix the CSM, they're going to try as hard as possible to address the issues that concern them most--the things that are the biggest and most unbalanced issues... for them. That's all well and good, and the 0.0 people should have every reason to vote for him (them?). However, the rest of us are ideally looking for someone who isn't about making empty promises, but at least has the concerns of Empire players dear to their hearts.
So sure, even if we've "seen the light" and are disillusioned about CSM candidates who promise to "fix game feature X" and "improve game detail Y", we still look at The Mittani and see... someone who cares very much about Eve... as it applies to him living in 0.0.
So in this context (and not "promise to fix this or that"), I ask: In what ways would the average Empire player see the benefits of voting for you? How will a CSM with The Mittani in it help alleviate the issues that are relatively unique to the Space of gate guns and CONCORD?
It's been stated multiple times that the CSM isn't for solving issues or really bringing them up with CCP (Again, the massive backlog). It's a sounding board that CCP bounces ideas off of. Also, we know how Empire currently is as most of us have alts that live in Empire along with ours in 0.0 (This is because you can't live in 0.0 without Empire due to the currently broken mechanics of 0.0) so it's not like anyone would advocate CCP trying to dismantle Empire or nerf it.
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.03.03 15:20:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Mynxee
Originally by: The Mittani There are a scandalous number of features lost in CCP's backlog, and only a tiny proportion have anything to do with nullsec. There's an even greater number of proposals the CSM has approved that are in an separate backlog.
They're all in the same backlog, which is just a Hansoft database. In that database, CSM items are tagged so that they can be identified as CSM items and so that it is easier to do a query for all CSM items in the backlog to produce a working list of what has not yet been selected for implementation.
Related to that, a useful effort by CSM 6 would be to identify backlogged CSM items that have become obsolete due to EVE's evolution. There are likely to be at least a few such items in there. CCP doesn't seem to do any focused weeding out of items. However, it is possible that teams who are reviewing the backlog to identify stories to propose during sprint planning could notice obsolete CSM items (now that they are finally identifiable as CSM items!) and bring them to the CSM's attention. But at the end of the day, this is a task that the CSM should probably do as a "special project", maybe every other term. Would require working from a list provided by CSM advocates, since CSM does not have even read access to the backlog (although that has been requested via our advocates and directly to CCP Oveur in the October meeting).
Why would it matter if the items are obscure or not? CCP obviously isn't working on it as it is.
Gotta walk in stations guys WALK IN STATIONS
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.03.09 13:41:00 -
[13]
Seleene has his own thread, so why would you spam that **** here?
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.03.10 23:14:00 -
[14]
Originally by: General Windypops The problem isn't so much Mittens. I actually think he'd be a pretty decent CSM chair (though I think he's totally misunderstood how much 'power' it would give him). It's the fact that he's trying to pad the whole CSM with his cronies, drowning out any independent voices.
The rest of nullsec is his croniOH WAIT
Sup windy
|
EnderCapitalG
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.03.20 12:50:00 -
[15]
It can be two things, honestly:
1) CCP has a lax documentation policy so all the lazy coders didn't write any for their code. 2) CCP is forcing the coders to produce so much code for each expansion (remember, it was two a year) that they didn't have time to document the code before moving onto the next thing to be done because they'd miss the launch date.
|
|
|
|