Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
PointlessWitch
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
My first "Grids my gears" thread. I'm hoping CCP will see a new group of "small things".
WARNING: This topic is opinionated and your just wasting time arguing.
- No 'Ship Maintenance Array' Divisions
- No Corporate Hangar log
- Ships randomly exploding when you store them in Ship Arrays.
- POS' don't have individual rights (you give someone the Config Starbase Equipment role and they can screw with ALL corporate POS.)
- Corporate Roles system is too expanded (there should be much more narrowed down positions).
--- Roles should be broken down into rights. --- * Communications Officer is broken down into: Chats, EVE Mails, Mailing Lists, Bulletins, and Alliance Mailing --- * Accountant is broken down into: Pay Bills, View Bills, View Accounts --- * Starbase Config Equipment is broken down into: Access Arrays, Access Fuel Bay, Anchor, Unanchor, Online, Offline.
- No easier way to distribute bookmarks (They are coordinates, not items. Make them coordinates. Who cares if people can make super awesome safe spots.)
- Fleet 'Loot' log is screwed up. (items shouldn't be showing up 3 or 4 times when only 1 exists)
- Can't move items in a POS when your in a pod (what kind of a Nerf is this!?)
What am i missing?
HIGHLIGHTED RESPONSES
Barakkus +9001 * Corporation Interface is a mess. +1 * The UI in general and lack of ability to customize it much. +1 * Faction navy agresssion mechanics in highsec in regards to gcc and timers. It's just all messed up and buggy as ****.
Seleia O'Sinnor +1 * bookmarks not being highlighted when selected in places while in solar map view and scanning * renaming of containers at a pos has to be done by anchoring it. this is insane. +1 * not be able to open containers in hangars at a POS +1 * be able to give names to some pos modules and some others cannot be named +1 * hangar names are all the same in every module, would be nice to name them individually in every module +1 * copying bookmarks: why only 5 at a time? +1 * bookmarks are "slow" as hell, opening a container/hangar with 10 bookmarks in it could take as much as 30 seconds +1 * not being able to lock a target within the force field of a pos and repair shields/armor/hull +1 * setting up a pos is a burning white pain: queuing of anchoring would be fine +1 * moving pos modules for anchoring: let the arrowed cube stay the same size indepent of the current zoom, like for scanning probes +1 * lack of corp bookmarks
Obsidian Hawk +1 * corp / alliance interface +9001 +1 * a lack of alliance hangers at towers. +1 +1 * no alliance labs. +1 |
Barakkus
732
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
Corporation Interface is just a huge mess.
The UI in general and lack of ability to customize it much.
Faction navy agresssion mechanics in highsec in regards to gcc and timers. It's just all messed up and buggy as ****. |
Seleia O'Sinnor
Arklight Project Fade 2 Black
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
* bookmarks not being highlighted on the solar map when selected in places * renaming of containers at a pos has to be done by anchoring it. this is insane. * not be able to open containers in hangars at a pos * be able to give names to some pos modules and some others cannot be named * hangar names are all the same in every module, would be nice to name them individually in every module * copying bookmarks: why only 5 at a time? * bookmarks are "slow" as hell, opening a container/hangar with 10 bookmarks in it could take as much as 30 seconds * not being able to lock a target within the force field of a pos and repair shields/armor/hull * setting up a pos is a burning white pain: queuing of anchoring would be fine * moving pos modules for anchoring: let the arrowed cube stay the same size indepent of the current zoom, like for scanning probes * lack of corp bookmarks |
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation RONA Directorate
114
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lack of mitnal style moderation on forums. If we had that there would be no whining.
oh and the corp / alliance interface
an lack of alliance hangers at towers.
and alliance labs. |
Lois Chenet
Banana Airlines
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
Local. What have I become? |
Tyrhineld Malukker
Krannon of Sherwood Carthage Empires
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Top things I dislike about EVE:
1 - Corporations are allowed to wardec Chribba.
2 - CCP's attitude towards players (hopefully changing as per their dev blogs)
3 - Capital warfare & nullsec are not balanced (not from personal experience) |
Jokerface666
Ever Flow Northern Coalition.
15
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jita 4-4.... not kidding... i hate it! Corporation / Alliance permissions are a pain in the ass POS management is a pain in the ASS
------------------------------w00t w00t rapetrain------------------------------ |
PointlessWitch
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
keep em coming, i'm loving the collaboration of words here.
I know 3 things for sure so far. * No one likes how corporations work * No one likes how POS structures work, and; * No one likes how CCP is working on eve right now.
|
Ladie Scarlet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
206
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:48:00 -
[9] - Quote
Too many pubbies. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |
Kunming
T.H.U.G L.I.F.E Xenon-Empire
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
1) Super capitals - Do I even need to explain this, they killed any fun that you could have in 0.0 and to some extend low sec 2) RMT - Legal or illegal it is destroying the purpose of conflict, hence destroying the game 3) BOTs - This is a big problem, and not one that can be solved easily since CCPs revenue stream is connected to it 4) POS - Scrapyard in space, CCP could have done a single structures with modular attachments that enhance functionality 5) Moon Goo - Passive income is fine, passive income so high that you can practically finance super capital fleets with it is game breaking, this connects to #1&2 as well
These first 5 are game breaking and could have been in any order really, the other are just annoyances.
6) Overview bugs - Im sick of overview bugs, CCP do it pls its been many years 7) Jita - Yulai was dismissed because it was clear a central market hub was not what we wanted, Jita is even worse than Yulai 8) Gallente - I miss the good old "melt-your-face-with-plasma" style combat of blasters 9) Bad interfaces - Corp interface (I dont know about the alliance one, probably just as bad), and many other interfaces need to be redone IMO 10) The community - Well nothing you can do about this, but the community used to be more mature, and we used to have discussions with real arguements rather than just flame/troll wars like now
|
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
214
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 21:01:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ten? PhewGǪ
The UI. Yes, all of it, but in particular anything that has to do with corp and S&I management. The general lack of settings and options (or, really, CCP's phobia of including options). The far too high security of high security space. The many abandoned ships with poorly or non-defined roles (including the tier system and other early-era artefacts).
GǪI suppose the unrealistic and occasionally bone-headed optimism of CCP when it comes to implementing new features. GǪand their almost pathological and institutionalised inability to communicate.
Oh, and the lack of a Roden Myrmidon.
Also, while I most certainly understand the game-breaking properties of RMT and bots and supers that others list, they don't get up my nose enough in my current situation to really qualify as a GÇ£top dislikeGÇ¥ GÇö more as a GÇ£grumble, grumble, annoyanceGÇ¥. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |
Wolfcan
EVE University Ivy League
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 21:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
Painfully, painfully boring missions. Rince and repeat. If you are going to offer missions, at least make them compelling. A few more wouldn't help. Much more mission arcs required. The mission grind is much, much worse than WoW. |
Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
41
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 22:05:00 -
[13] - Quote
The fact that the op's post is not top on the list of things to do. In a game were we supposedly have representatives... why are we not having these issues addressed? |
Froz3nEcho Sarain
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
91
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 22:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
Community being a bunch of whiners that only complain instead of praising the few things that CCP does right. Like giving ship spinning back to a bunch of whiners.
And for the sake of this thread.
They should fix the gap of stuff to do between low skilled characters and med skilled characters. ~ When everything fades away, an echo is the only sound that will remain ~ -á-á~ Chaos is a name for any order that produces confusion in our minds ~ |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
44
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 22:16:00 -
[15] - Quote
Trolls Griefers Hate
CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. |
Ladie Scarlet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
208
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 23:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Trolls Griefers Hate
You must be thinking of a different game. There are no trolls here.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |
Maxpie
Metaphysical Utopian Society Explorations
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 00:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
Lack of follow through really. Bugs still around since I started some 6 years ago. Unfinished ideas. Abandoned ideas. As many have said, rather than add new stuff, fix the stuff that's here first. Then take the time, listen to the feedback from the test server, and release polished content.
Also, I hate the idea of the CQ. Send me a beta invite and I'll playtest your new game, no charge. Don't stick it into a game I pay for.
Nex store. For obvious reason. |
Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
110
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 00:34:00 -
[18] - Quote
- Drones: all of them, randomly targeting and attacking targets not designated by the pilot, as well as stopping randomly. Affects all drones (lights, mediums, heavies, sentries, fighters, FBs
- POSs: the science and industry button and selection for construction etc needs a complete overhaul, IMO each module needs one tab for every corp member, or have the option for the CEO to create a tab for a corp member in all modules.
Bookmarks: Needs a 'Copy' and 'Add to bookmarks' function.
Nothing too big or reinvention of the wheel, just tweaks. [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |
Ayuren Aakiwa
The Multinational Company. Somnium Romanum
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 00:54:00 -
[19] - Quote
-Terribly boring PvE -No real meaningful small gang pvp -The whole botting and RMT thing -That 'incarna' thing -Null sec being dominated by huge power blocs -CCPs attitude post incarna -and all of the unfinished aspects of the game, why implement something that's not even complete? |
Karn Dulake
Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 02:44:00 -
[20] - Quote
only a few things
1. no content for the solo player
2. The constant whinging and bitching from the peanut gallery
|
|
Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
40
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 03:01:00 -
[21] - Quote
Failure to go back and work on old stuff (e.g. Faction Warfare) Failure to keep promises (e.g. we are looking into what we can do with FW). Failure to communicate (e.g. we are looking at XYZ issues with FW and know about ABC, DEF ones as well).
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |
Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
53
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 03:32:00 -
[22] - Quote
The length of time it takes to find a decent pvp fight.
Come on ccp fix fw plexing. Let the mayhem commence. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |