Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Revolution Rising
Navy of Xoc Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2011.03.20 04:50:00 -
[1]
I'm really just after a candidate to push for change in the invention/t2 production realm.
The current UI and system is not very nice for those who make their cash from invention.
Here's a good example post regarding the issue.
I'm not after someone who suddenly decides to see god, I'd like to read a thread written by them regarding this issue somewhere in the past.
Rev.
|
Trebor Daehdoow
Gallente Sane Industries Inc. Initiative Mercenaries
|
Posted - 2011.03.20 08:46:00 -
[2]
Improvements to the UI (not just in invention) have long been a focus of mine. It was one of the core planks of my platform in the CSM 5 elections, and I raised the "Low Hanging Fruit" UI proposal last year and ran the associated prioritization effort.
While it is impossible for any CSM to promise that a particular area of the game will get attention, CCP is clearly focusing more resources on the UI, and the whole Science&Industry interface is in obvious need of some love.
CLICK HERE NOW TO VOTE TO RE-ELECT TREBOR!
|
Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
|
Posted - 2011.03.20 08:49:00 -
[3]
Being inventer myself (I do up to 250 inventions a day, when I do modules), I made several requests to help on that front.
Doing multiple inventions with one click has been requested already, it didn't get prioritized yet however. I'll keep pushing Likewise, I requested POS improvements on that front (try manufacturing using equipment assembly arrays, a nightmare).
We got last year a more responsive UI on the invention front, if you remember 2 years ago one had to wait a long time between job runs because of the unresponsiveness of the UI. We still have way too many clicks (and for ****'s sake, remember my "range" settings), but you can trust that I'll push for improvements on that front. ----- Member of CSM 2, 3, 4, 5. Running for CSM 6 http://www.rooksandkings.com/meissa/ Click here to vote for me! |
Jonathon Silence
Thorny Rose Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.03.20 18:59:00 -
[4]
Both of the above choices are good, but I would also put my name forward.
I do a lot of Research and manufacturing and understand the 'click' issues. I will be pushing (no promises form CCP) for a revamp of the Science and Industry interfaces as well as the Corporation Management Interface.
Jonathon Silence
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1472967 Vote for Me |
Issler Dainze
Minmatar Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
|
Posted - 2011.03.20 20:33:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Revolution Rising I'm really just after a candidate to push for change in the invention/t2 production realm.
The current UI and system is not very nice for those who make their cash from invention.
Here's a good example post regarding the issue.
I'm not after someone who suddenly decides to see god, I'd like to read a thread written by them regarding this issue somewhere in the past.
Rev.
Invention is a primary way we fund our corporation. Trying to improve invention and POS lab access is a big piece of what I will focus on in the CSM if elected.
Issler Dainze
|
Imigo Montoya
Hysterically Unforgiving Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2011.03.20 21:51:00 -
[6]
Clickfests are one of my pet peeves with EVE. In my CSM campaign I've highlighted Planetary Interaction as something that I just don't do because of the insane amount of clicking to implement anything, and that it's just not fun.
Invention is something I do on a small scale, so it's kind of bareable. Still, I'm firmly opposed to any and all clickfests - this is a game (well, persistent world if we want to be pedantic... which we do...) and it should be fun and engaging rather than repetitive work (with sporadic moments of fun/excitement).
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |