EVE Search - New Dev Blog: Those anomaly changes in full

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

New Dev Blog: Those anomaly changes in full

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
BinaryData Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.01 17:38:00 - [1] Originally by: Lady Carton Originally by: Simvastatin Montelukast I tried to read through all 72 pages of this topic. Did I miss the CSM's input? seriously? when did we ever see anything from CSM? this nerf is the most disgusting piece of crap I see from CCP since I began playing/paying EVE - not hearing from its customers is so pleasant, CCP. Agreed. I may quit EVE period. The only thing this will achieve is pushing alliances from nullsec to lowsec. I hate low-sec. For a company who doesn't listen to player input, is a company that is doomed.
BinaryData Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.01 18:24:00 - [2] Originally by: Skaarl just remember according to CCP this thread is split 50/50 for and against this change... thats bull**** but it lets ya know where CCP's head is on this. Lol. So true.
BinaryData Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.01 18:31:00 - [3] Originally by: Nipps McChesty Originally by: Liability Insurance CCP Greyscale's model of the sandbox is the model of someone who has never actually played the game. That right there. Eve is touted as the ultimate sandbox where everything is unscripted and player driven. This change kind of blows that model out of the water. Particularly when the big decisions are made by someone in CCP who's just an outside observer seeing very little of what actually happens in game. Eve is far too big and complex of a world for anyone that isn't experiencing the actual gameplay (as a player) to be able to really understand the 'big picture'. I don't care if these guys are the hands-on programmers that built the thing. Until they've "lived" in it, they're just noobs. I agree. But define "lived" in. 2 weeks, a month, 6 months, 2 years? I've been here for about 5 weeks in total, and I love it the way it is. If they implement this "New Feature" it'll ruin everything a lot of people have worked for. Isn't there a saying; If it's not broken, don't **** with it? Just a thought for CCP to contemplate..
BinaryData Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.02 03:56:00 - [4] Originally by: Mac Omon Oh well, back to World of Warcraft. you must be desperate. I'll just quit gaming. I'll keep my cash. The 45$ a month I spend will go to beer, and other stuff. CCP Greyscale, can I have your address so I can kick you in the testicals for being a self-indulgent wiener? kthxbai!
BinaryData Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.02 05:07:00 - [5] Originally by: mkmin Edited by: mkmin on 02/04/2011 04:47:55 Originally by: Liang Nuren Originally by: Nipps McChesty I love how high sec griefers and low sec pirates seem to have all the answers about how things should be handled in 0.0. I love how the 0.0 populace is able to take an objective look at Eve and realize that the game is out of balance. -Liang I love how trolls fail to notice that Greyscale said this change isn't meant to change the high/low/0.0 income balance, just shift the exciting 0.0 income further into the hands of the rich. Unless trolls don't have a dictionary and are unaware of what the word 'balance' means. Originally by: A90EDA27 Greyscale is fick. People living in 0.0 to 0.2 will just go back to levels 4 - no one is interested (at a player level) in these. No one will want to live there and they will become wastelands like lo-sec is now. Moon goos will continue to be harvested by big alliances (again like lo-sec) People living in 0.6 to 1.0 will repel invaders with pimped out supercaps. So, basicaly, CCP want to solve the lag by driving players back to empire. What motivation is there left for a player to progress to 0.0? Was this change asked for by the players or CSM? Was there any consultation with the players or CSM? What is the **ing point of CSM? tbh this change makes me feel like saying you CCP, what's the **ing point if the goalposts keep changing? Yeah, there's a 3rd party piracy/griefer forum that CCP takes more seriously than it's own forums. That's who they are catering to. That's where they got the idea from. You put CCP and the word "balance" in the same comment. You should be ashamed of yourself. There is NOTHING balanced about this game. Take mom's for instance, overpowered to high fcking hell.
BinaryData Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.03 07:43:00 - [6] Edited by: BinaryData on 03/04/2011 07:46:06 Originally by: Tubolard I assume this idea came around to reduce lag. After all when no one can afford to pvp because you took away their income there will be less 0.0 fighting. CCP actually cares more about high-sec than they do nullsec. Why do you think they beefed up the servers that host High-Sec places? If you really wanna ** CCP off. I will be hosting a Disco Dance. What to bring Dominix or another battleship similar. Massive amounts of cap boosters SmartBombs Resists to combat SmartBomb damage Goal: Crash EVE servers by spamming the Fck outta Jita with Concord. Message me for Questions :) Oh yeah, and for the person who said nullsec lags when you have lots of ships.. Go smack yourself in the face with the stupid paddle. OF COURSE ITS GOING TO LAG WHEN YOU HAVE 900 ING PEOPLE IN THE SYSTEM. And it's not CLIENT lag you imbeciles, it's CCP's TY servers. <sarcasm>My god, my eMachine could host this game 100x better.</sarcasm> CCP, Sincerely off and die you **ed ing **s. kthxbai Your Lost Customer
BinaryData Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.03 07:55:00 - [7] Originally by: Lost'In'Space Originally by: BinaryData OF COURSE ITS GOING TO LAG WHEN YOU HAVE 900 **ING PEOPLE IN THE SYSTEM. And it's not CLIENT lag you imbeciles, it's CCP's TY servers. 1000 v 1000 lag is fixed, you'll see 2000 v 2000, and then it'll still be laggy. OFF TO COAD TO ***! The real problem is the napfest, maybe they should look into not have half the 0.0 sov napped. Eh, I dunno about the 1000 vs 1000. Last NC vs DRF fight I was at, it was terrible. Not sure if it was client lag or server lag but when you jump 50AU's, somethings up. Sov Nap? Wtf you smokin'? You mean inactive systems that no one uses? You should have to keep a specific level to keep systems. There's soo many other things they can do. I will be affected by this change a lot. I just moved to nullsec, and started ratting. It's a stupid change. Everything they've "Predicted" won't happen. New Alliances will be shafted because they have no places to "conquer" and set their own sov. The larger alliances will just control the good systems, and you'll be screwed. CCP Stupidity +1 Player Intelligence -1 Stupid CCP..
BinaryData Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.03 08:03:00 - [8] Originally by: Antigue "'Ello 'ello 'ello, wot's goin' on 'ere then?" Well said. I couldn't agree more. P.S. Disco Domi idea good or bad? Could I get banned from it?
BinaryData Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.06 09:00:00 - [9] Originally by: Blackbrock Originally by: nano bobcat go for better space then if your income is farming sanctums. That easy. Uh.... I'll finish your sentence.. Uhh.. Dude your stupid. CCP also did this to combat the botters from NC, Red Alliance, White Noise, etc...
BinaryData Gallente Segmentum Solar Intergalactic Exports Group	Posted - 2011.04.06 17:13:00 - [10] Originally by: Apollo A Originally by: lpttpnalt i dunno about everyone else. but i see nothing in the new patch notes upon the download of the patch that say anything about any anomalies change.its not there hes right, its not in the patch notes That's because, it's happening later this week. =)

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.