|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 10:15:00 -
[1]
Let me make one thing clear to all you would be 0.0 players... This game is not here for everyone to have fun and run around laughing and circle jerking eachother in sanctums. And it sure as hell doesnt revolve around every system and every player being equal. If it were we would all get full L5 toons and only fight other fleets with the same amount of players in logi and supercaps... Im not so sure that CCP remembers that this game was designed to favor the bold and the most aggressive players who can take the fight to another level twice as fast as the other chump. Same with all the systems... Why the hell should each system have the same number of everything? Nah, F that noise. Grow up, grow a pair or get left behind in the -0.01 system.
Im sure CCP had a dilemma when they fixed the nano ***gotry... Why should anyone be able to stop them from nuking 75% of 0.0? I call favoritism to the carebear.
CCP, i urge you to remember that you arent here to hold peoples hands. So quit groping people and let them fend for themselves. =)
GG and Good Fight. ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 10:27:00 -
[2]
Originally by: P3po
This change just make few regions (like Providence) completly useless. No valuable moon, no valuable ores (not like mining is profitable anyway), no valuable rats ..... how can alliance survive ISK wise in that place?
that would be the problem of the players in the alliance who inhabit it. CVA did it before and were quite successful. i suggest something like that. i dont think alot of you remember pre-anomaly... 0.0 was still a good place to make money from rats. ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 10:39:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Lisa Valenheim
Anything that makes you grind more to be competitive = bad. That's why WoW is so full of fail, let's not go down that road.
B4 "Fly cheaper ships" : Yes, because that's what the people who own the good systems who you are trying to invade will be flying. Sure they will. Also known as "rich get richer, poor . . ."
to your first sentence... not true. wow is full of fail because any time the players whine about something the devs fix it until they stop getting bugged about it. another reason is because its a very casual game in comparison... you dont respawn on the other side of the map with all your **** intact in eve.
to your second sentence, you fly what you can afford to lose based on how much you can spend, how much your corp or alliance can reimburse you and how much you trust that FC not to ram your ship into a wreck. its up to your leadership to secure a way to make your ships affordable as well as your own, not CCP's. if your alliance is not prepared to take on bigger and better equipped alliances and coalitions in 0.0 then back to hi-sec. if you dont like it, leave them.
______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 10:45:00 -
[4]
Originally by: CCP Greyscale Morning all,
I think there was another point but I've forgotten what it was; I'll come back later if I remember.
Possibly not giving in to the dark side and letting the carebears dictate how patches are released? <3 ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 11:03:00 -
[5]
Originally by: El'Niaga
Introduce new 0.0 systems, shouldn't be to hard. Another 10 regions.
Please no. we need to fill the 0.0 systems we have as it is. most of the damn game goes uninhabited. the whole idea of this change is so that the bigger alliances will hold certain systems/constellations/regions while smaller alliances fill in the blanks and get roamed. great fun for everyone. i can bet to you there is some group of hi-sec corps that want to move into 0.0 but cant for whatever reason. this will give them an opportunity to do just that.
IF 0.0 becomes bloated then yes, by all means, make CCP a storyline as to why the ingame elements completely missed the '10' regions that happened to have all manner of NPC rats in them =)
only thing im saying here, is people need to stop thinking about themselves and start thinking about whats going to happen from a neutral view. and quit the water works, we have enough of that already in here. ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 11:09:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Geralden Edited by: Geralden on 26/03/2011 11:07:23
who will pay for some anom's that cant even pay the rent for holding sov?
moons? just a thought. ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 11:34:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Frodo Teabaggins on 26/03/2011 11:35:38
Originally by: Beowulff Schaefer
this is just silly.
obviously it isnt because this thread is already 17-18 pages long. BFF my ass pretty soon.
Originally by: Zilero After reading a lot of the replies its obvious they fall into one of three categories:
1) We don't give a **** because we get our main income from moon goo which so far won't be affected, but hey making everyone else weaker sounds really cool, let me support this.
2) We give a **** because we actually use sanctums and havens for income in our crap space. Nerfing our income will decrease our amount of isk, making it impossible for us to contest better space. We are the ones the guys from above would like to see get even less isk!
or the best ones:
3) I live in hisec and have no clue whatsoever, but all those 0.0 dwellers make WAY too much isk, NERF THEM!
Worst part is CCP has once again shown that they apparently have nobody playing in 0.0 and/or the guys they have playing have access to unlimited isk either through CCP and/or moon goo and/or they just sit and spin ships in station.
or
4) people who care how the game is changed and want it based on survival of the fittest. ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 11:46:00 -
[8]
Originally by: AngusThermo Most 0.0 corps dont survive that. Many leave the game.
2. Rich pilots get safer, since only a few systems are worth making isk in, it's simpler to boubble/protect those systems. Less conflict will arise.
correction. some 0.0 corps loose where they put their manhood, players that cant hack it and were going to quit anyway (and rightfully should, good riddance) quit. all the rest (corps and players) shuffle into other corps which float their boat and its like those unfit entities never existed except on some corp histories.
as well as... roamers try and go gank those supers... omnom capital kills. ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 11:57:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Frodo Teabaggins on 26/03/2011 11:58:52
Originally by: AngusThermo
I've been at war for the last 3 years. There has not been 1 week of "peace" so i would suggest you leave your worthless jita corp, and go find conflict. There's plenty around.
i think you should check who you are talking to before you assume they are in a 'jita corp'.
hes referring to the amount of major conflicts.. i dont know if you've noticed but there are 2 major sides of eve. DC/NC against DRF and Stain train. CCP is trying to open up the doors for more sides of the fight, not 2 gigantic cluster****s.
oh and quit posting from some random toon... no battleclinic record ftl. trolled much? ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 12:09:00 -
[10]
Originally by: JeanLuc Blindtard If you want to ad more conflict move the isk making index up instead of down.
So keep everything as it is but add up more "large sum" isk making options in some regions of space.
Dont just take peoples isk making everywhere, to make them fight for w/e is left. I cant go pvp for new space just so I can get a piece of space to rat to make isk for 30d plex now cant I?
Isk is not just for pvp we pay sov/renter bills, (on my corp been like 3 bill atm) we also buy those 30 day PLEX to keep us alive...
Most isk comes from ratters that are already talking about moving back to empire if our system going to loose the main isk making anoms.
Overall turn out for my corp after changes: Most probably 6 or 10 people will go to empire back to lvl4's and salvaging. Some 3 or 4 will focus fully on pi in npc 0.0 space. Rest up to 40 members drop corp look for a 0.0 alliance arround the isk making pokets or a high/low sec war decking pvp corp/alliance... Current Corp closed.
Overall turnout for me: 1 out of 3 accounts closed. remaining 2 account moved to empire for lvl4 mission runing and salvaging/looting.
For more conflict (as if it was needed) I propose you make some kind of global event that will massively push isk into pokets of the dudes that run it but it wouldn't need a giant fleet to complete it. This event will be moving from region to region like 1 move a month or so, but it would be a giant magnet for people.
Basically you can make it like a wormhole to a happy happy place where isk flows...
A comet or something traveling through space and that holds massive amounts of t2 materials or some SHuT.
Donno Sleeper mother ship that drops T3 modules and module bpc's travels arround eve been seen here an there drawing people to it...
Theres more than 1 way to get people to fight each other why go for the r e t a r d e d way that wont work???
No. EVE is meant to be harsh while still being playable. this means adapting. the nano***s did it. Sov warfare has done it countless times and will do it countless times more. and im sure that gallente pilots are hard at work theorycrafting to do it too =). at any rate, if CCP starts conforming to tears than this game will not be the same as it was. (although gallente does need reworking...) ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
|
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 12:49:00 -
[11]
Originally by: JeanLuc Blindtard
Originally by: Slaman Snikovski Edited by: Slaman Snikovski on 26/03/2011 12:28:33 Edited by: Slaman Snikovski on 26/03/2011 12:26:20 If you will get less money from a ****ty syste, HTFU and attack the neighbor who has better systems. Team up with others and take down larger entities who have better systems or moons. Need is a perfect way to generate conflict. I hope CCP will not give in to whiners who forgot that this game should be difficult and full of conflict, not people doing anomalies in 0.0 unchallenged.
You're not verry smart are you?
his error was a mis-communication. yours was being an idiot... your post had absolutely no worth at all. comets... hmm i seemed to remember a troll about that recently. ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 13:07:00 -
[12]
Originally by: JeanLuc Blindtard
Originally by: Frodo Teabaggins
Originally by: JeanLuc Blindtard
Originally by: Slaman Snikovski Edited by: Slaman Snikovski on 26/03/2011 12:28:33 Edited by: Slaman Snikovski on 26/03/2011 12:26:20 If you will get less money from a ****ty syste, HTFU and attack the neighbor who has better systems. Team up with others and take down larger entities who have better systems or moons. Need is a perfect way to generate conflict. I hope CCP will not give in to whiners who forgot that this game should be difficult and full of conflict, not people doing anomalies in 0.0 unchallenged.
You're not verry smart are you?
his error was a mis-communication. yours was being an idiot... your post had absolutely no worth at all. comets... hmm i seemed to remember a troll about that recently.
I was just pointing out there other ways to make people beat each other than taking the isk away. I dont really care what that might be.
true but the intention was not to make every system equal in the first place. why do we have truesec if it isnt making any difference, since nobody is belt ratting? thats the issue here. people have gotten too happy and comfortable with every 0.0 system being able to produce 4 high level ratting sites per hour. i say no. ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 13:20:00 -
[13]
Originally by: DanMck Edited by: DanMck on 26/03/2011 13:14:41
Originally by: Scapogo Only thing you will achieve by this is that we will have many empty useless crap systems nobody will want. Not even some new alliance because they can make more isk in WH or Incursions.
I hope you will think about this one more time and instead of nerf you will make better sec systems better without nerfing others.
Ppl in crap systems will need rat longer and will have less time and isk for pvp. So result is oposite to your expectations.
Thanks god there are other games.
tbh this guy sums it up pretty well. why would some new alliance or corp risk moving or living in 0.0 for poor income when they can farm empire missions with little risk. also from a small 0.0 roaming perspective we are now back to whole constellations/regions of empty space.
i would think because it will give smaller alliances a place to get themselves a name and possibly better space when their friends have a new constellation or two free. the whole idea is not to make things easy for people getting into 0.0. just to give them an entry level type of space to start in. if the game were about making money the NC would be capitalizing on their tech moo..... nvm the whole game is carebear. gg u win. ______________________________
Is Frodo gonna have to choke a bltch?? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 13:41:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Woodiex3 eve 2014 update...
ccp ship price update
Titan $700.95 supercap $400.95 Carrier $100.95 Battleship pack of 5 $125.95
50% DPS increase for 2 hours $10.95 50% HP increase for 2huors $10.95 100% drop rate for 2 hours $20.95
This is where its heading; blogs like this are the start.
fixed again for accuracy ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 13:54:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Tommy Blue I'm going to say this again.
The worst nullsec system in eve should still make you more money than the best level four missions.
not every system is meant to rat in... what happens when its a system with 3 belts and -0.01?... the mentality that all 0.0 is good is quite unrealistic... it may have moons but as for ratting... lol. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 14:44:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Aquintus Minerale good job ccp....
at first you make crappy region's like providence or else less crappy that some smaller alliances could gain some isk in there and then, sometime later, you punch them in the face while you reduce such region's to what they were... ****ty regions with an iskincome that sucks at all while alliances like morsus mihi or razor have at least as much isk income like before because they hold good regions....
so good job ccp... punish smaller alliances for beeing small and throw cookie's to all the big alliances holding the good space were a smaller alliance would never ever gain any sov :-/
so again, good job ccp!
why should CCP favor a region over another? there are other regions just as ****ty as prov. in fact some are being held by NC alliances. not everyone wins. it just means that the alliances who have crap systems will get all ****y when the pilots are broke. ofc the corps and alliances are rolling in ISK from moon goo though, all going for supers and whatnot. stop crying because you live in **** space... i lived in provi too. yea, it sucks but if "you pro bro" you will find everything you need in this game. if not, **** happens. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 15:11:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Ignatius Gnarl
The crappiest nullsec needs to be better than the best hisec. Even now, there is pretty much zero economic incentive in terms of the average player to get out to nullsec or fight. Alliances fight over high end moons, and mostly people fight for the love of fighting. Proposed changes remove what weak economic incentives there are, whilst kicking away the means that allow people to fight for love.
Utterly insane. What frightens me most is how can CCP think like this? It's almost like they made EVE by accident. They seem to have no idea how it works. Why doesn't Greyscale take a year out, roll a fresh character, and try to build a corp and get into nullsec. This is a serious proposal. I reckon if he did that, then next year we'd have much better thought through proposals.
first paragraph... incorrect. ive said this before... just because it has a lower security status does not make it a better place to rat. it could have 3 belts...
second paragraph... if CCP frightens you pick another game or go back to hi-sec. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 21:35:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Hakaru Ishiwara
Originally by: xanavi
Originally by: Matt Fairbanks This is a great idea. I am very pleased with the direction that CCP is taking with this new change to null sec. As a null sec resident for the majority of my time playing Eve, I fully support this shift and hope that CCP continues with the direction it is taking.
What he said.
Ok, will you stop crying now Failbanks?
Hehe. Of course you guys are for this change. You have Sov in some of the lowest security space in EVE.
we would have the same outlook regardless. we arent carebear whiners who dont know how to survive when we get nerfed, thats why we own that space, scrub. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 22:10:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Frodo Teabaggins on 26/03/2011 22:11:54
Originally by: Kreshin CCP,
If its working don't screw with it. The current system IS working.
i beg to differ. the current system may not have bugs or glitches... but it is not working as intended.
Quote:
You have problems needing immediate attention in Eve. Completely changing the 0.0 game mechanic and SOV is not a valid idea and in fact is game destroying.
yes, because they didnt do that before quite a few times... CCP giveth and taketh the **** away for a reason.
Quote:
Don't use a sledgehammer when a pair of tweezers is needed. Implement small changes over time to measure the results.
they arent trying to pick out your nose hair, hammers usually do the trick when putting carebears in line
Quote:
Stop the insanity.
WhY sO SerIOUS? =3
in all fairness, i think people need to stop crying about drastic game changes and try to adapt. all you are doing is making yourselves look like helpless tweens... im not trying to troll but tbh, when did begging and pleading get you anywhere in this game. man up and take charge or be content. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 22:28:00 -
[20]
Stu, i believe you are focusing on what keeps you from signing in, however you leave out what keeps you playing and that is that CCP makes a good game, it will be no different when this update goes live. players will still play because they adapt or die. thats the way it is and has always been. people quit over the nano-nerf. EVE is still here and yet was drastically changed. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
|
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 22:35:00 -
[21]
Originally by: The Offerer
Right now, I've got the skills, I've got my agents, Incursions, LPs, Datacores,...
how can I expect to survive living in 0.0 space if my income is worse than now? There will be a point when I would get bored of highsec and finally make my move, but if the move is against my interest or makes me unable to get enough ISK to survive, then guess I'll stay where I am until the game becomes too boring to be playable.
Shame... I really liked this game.
first paragraph... if you have all that you have a good base of ISK then and shouldnt have to worry about your wallet for awhile...
second paragraph... ISK will still be easily attained in 0.0 as it was done before... alot of players made good isk ratting in belts well before the anomalies gained weight. in a good system (even .3 or .4) you can make 40ish mil an hour with bounties alone.
______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 22:48:00 -
[22]
Originally by: StuRyan Edited by: StuRyan on 26/03/2011 22:42:20 Edited by: StuRyan on 26/03/2011 22:38:04
Originally by: Frodo Teabaggins Stu, i believe you are focusing on what keeps you from signing in, however you leave out what keeps you playing and that is that CCP makes a good game, it will be no different when this update goes live. players will still play because they adapt or die. thats the way it is and has always been. people quit over the nano-nerf. EVE is still here and yet was drastically changed.
Yeah you are right - it is good to keep the game evolving but where as the nano nerf was to level the playing field - this null sec nurf is going to do nothing but create an endless pit of grinding. One in which i can see MANY MANY people going **** that. You can not even compare the nano nerf to this, if anything this nerf will further increase and welcome macro-ers and RMT-ing.
I know what i would choose if it was to add more space so that more people had a chance of getting their own turf or this i would much rather see new space being developed. with new riches and new things to go at.... that would be an interesting and incredibly viable story line.
adding space will only make the alliances that are well established bigger. if you think that new alliances will even have a shot at it you are high.
this WILL level the playing field, believe it or not. it will make systems that have lower truesec more desireable instead of everyone being equal. this game is revolved around fluctuation and value... what is the value of a -1.0 system when i can do the same in a -0.0? its not meant to be even. its meant so that players will strive to work toward gaining good systems instead of having them handed to them.
______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 22:52:00 -
[23]
Edited by: Frodo Teabaggins on 26/03/2011 22:53:15
Originally by: Renan Ruivo
Originally by: Frodo Teabaggins
Originally by: The Offerer
Right now, I've got the skills, I've got my agents, Incursions, LPs, Datacores,...
how can I expect to survive living in 0.0 space if my income is worse than now? There will be a point when I would get bored of highsec and finally make my move, but if the move is against my interest or makes me unable to get enough ISK to survive, then guess I'll stay where I am until the game becomes too boring to be playable.
Shame... I really liked this game.
first paragraph... if you have all that you have a good base of ISK then and shouldnt have to worry about your wallet for awhile...
second paragraph... ISK will still be easily attained in 0.0 as it was done before... alot of players made good isk ratting in belts well before the anomalies gained weight. in a good system (even .3 or .4) you can make 40ish mil an hour with bounties alone.
Then either remove them completely, or don't touch them. I find it VERY convenient that a ****load of people who are favorable to these changes already live in good truesec, so you people are hardly qualified to judge these changes.
The proposed change will make the poor poorer and the rich richier. Either remove it all, or don't touch it. Don't just take it from the small guys and leave it in the hands of the big dogs.
we earned that space, we are still fighting and supporting our allies to prove that we deserve it, and lets not forget that most of nulli lived in providence or some other crap region some time along the line, and there is no reason you cannot make do with higher truesec status space. there should be more NRDS coalitions, it would make the game more diverse. walk in CVA's footsteps and open up the space for everyones enjoyment and charge the hell out of them for station services. all im saying is take the bad with the good and deal, it will make you a better player for it.
edit: whining that eve is too hard will not. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 23:23:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Sebastian Hoch
Originally by: Frodo Teabaggins
Originally by: StuRyan Edited by: StuRyan on 26/03/2011 22:42:20 Edited by: StuRyan on 26/03/2011 22:38:04
Originally by: Frodo Teabaggins Stu, adding space will only make the alliances that are well established bigger. if you think that new alliances will even have a shot at it you are high.
Not if the new space is not contiguous with current Null sec and is thus apart from the existing power blocks and is out of Cyno range from current lowsec and Nullsec. Think about it.
Seb
... why the **** even bother then? that makes you isolated and useless... out of cyno range.... win. GG. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.26 23:37:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Bung1 Well reading the posts I guess its unanimous.
you guessed wrong. and CCP is right on this one. if anyone thinks otherwise they have been coddled too long. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.27 00:02:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Sem Nan
Originally by: Frodo Teabaggins
Originally by: Bung1 Well reading the posts I guess its unanimous.
you guessed wrong. and CCP is right on this one. if anyone thinks otherwise they have been coddled too long.
Yes he guessed wrong, but not too wrong. It might be not unanimous, but 20 pages of 10:1 against the change naturally gives that impression.
Before you call us whiners, learn to read all the arguments that were raised and try to counter them .
ironically, my success ratio on battleclinic for all time is 10:1. <- fun fact (although its actually been higher since ive made my return a couple months back).
i would like to see these people who are posting with one of their 2 alt toons to show who they really are and really play.
and before you think im not reading all the arguments. i am. im just tired of shooting each one down over and over. there is more than one way of making ISK in 0.0, it doesnt revolve 100% around sanctums... be intuitive because i know plenty of people who make more isk than doing sanctums and dont need a high true-sec status to do it. As for botters and RMT, its against the rules. if CCP did or didnt do something based on the fact that it would have an increase of those activities then the RMTers win and we cannot have that. (that was to address the people trying to use that as an angle)
if there is anything else i missed ill gladly clarify my stance on it when i wake up. til then cheers (and safe sanctuming while you still have them). ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.28 05:35:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Antihrist Pripravnik Edited by: Antihrist Pripravnik on 28/03/2011 05:25:22
Originally by: Lord Zorana instead of removing something in order to make ppl fight, y not instead add something? as i remember the old fixed 10/10's used to cause a lot of intrest in certain sections of space so why not bring them back.
Because static stuff have a nasty habit of getting monopolised.
The right question is: Instead of nerfing income of a nullsec grunts in order to make them fight (if you see any logic in that), why not boost it instead so they can actually have something to fight with? Or even better... leave it alone and let the players deal with it.
kinda like tech moons right?
no, what needs to happen is CCP needs to not listen to players' bias and make the damn game harder. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.29 20:42:00 -
[28]
To CCP: good. im glad you stuck with the plan.
To... everyone else: tee hee.
otherwise, a good change. its good to see EVE becoming just a bit harder. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.29 23:17:00 -
[29]
Originally by: mkmin Edited by: mkmin on 29/03/2011 22:30:59
Originally by: Xel Ra
CCP, why does the solution have to be a Phyrric victory? Surely there is something better than throwing out the baby with the bathwater?
Because they are bored and want to **** stuff up, and are too drunk, stoned, or stupid to realize that it's going to cost every one of them their jobs.
edit: But I guess the actual decision makers hold ownership in the company and are probably cashing in as we speak. Who cares about the players? Who cares about the coders?
... are you just ******ed? they are simply turning back the tables to when the game was an actual challenge... eve will be here long after you quit... i bet you quit smoking too. i see a pattern here... ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 00:20:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Amber Villaneous
Originally by: Marconus Orion LOL @ ALL THE HARD CORE NULL PLAYERS THREATENING TO QUIT THE GAME OR GO BACK TO HIGH SEC BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FARM SANCTUMS ALL DAY!
You are an idiot, a troll, or both. I am gonna go with both.
you must be a bad.
his trolling was spot on, and very accurate. people have gotten soft since the anoms came out and every region was equal... its no different from anything else, not everything can be equal. some regions are simply designed to be utter ****. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
|
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 00:44:00 -
[31]
Edited by: Frodo Teabaggins on 30/03/2011 00:45:26 Just let CCP do their thing, if the update doesnt work as planned they will make a change... however i can assure you that money can be made on rats in belts with little problem. it is not the same as a sanctum or a haven but the idea that every system is equal is ludicrous. you seem to think you are entitled to these imbalances. that doesnt mean you should have a way to make ISK. chaining belts in a system can net plenty of isk to support a player. ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
Frodo Teabaggins
Minmatar 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.03.30 00:47:00 -
[32]
hey maybe with all these emos the lag wont be so bad =) ______________________________
Do you feel lucky? well, do you, Punk? |
|
|
|