Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Kastsion Strax
Shadowfire Enterprises Rura-Penthe
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 00:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
Given EVEs player driven development and the way in which CCP actually pays attention to what we say, I felt that I should share my idea and see if it lights a fire under CCP.
I would like to propose a new aspect to WH life, the temporary stabilization of open WHs threw the use of anchored structures at either side of the WH opening. These purposed structures would utilize the same fuels as POS's, burning fuel in relation to mass as it maintains the open vortex. The WH would still have mass limitations as per existing WH mechanics but would allow for sustained incursions or exodus threw WH space. These structures would be linked and the destruction of either would destroy both as well as collapsing the current WH (this collapse being unnatural, should be violent leading to damage being delt to ships close to the event horizon). While being deployed the structure would be vulnerable (no shields) but once active would have EHP somewhere between a Cyno jammer and a customs office.
The possible implications of this would be very interesting, ie. multiple pockets linked threw WHs for extended periods, massive conflicts at event horizon of WHs, and general chaos and destruction.....all of which we in the EVE universe live for.
I believe this proposition fits well within current EVE universe and, as a WH dweller myself, would add some more intensity to WH life. I intend to light the fire on forums over next couple weeks with this idea and look forward to ANY response from you guys and the gentlemen at CCP.
Sincerely
-º Strax
|
Pink Marshmellow
Caucasian Culture Club Transmission Lost
51
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 01:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
No wormhole Stabilizers.
End of Discussion. |
kapolov
Hedion University Amarr Empire
18
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 01:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kastsion Strax wrote:Given EVEs player driven development and the way in which CCP actually pays attention to what we say, I felt that I should share my idea and see if it lights a fire under CCP.
I would like to propose a new aspect to WH life, the temporary stabilization of open WHs threw the use of anchored structures at either side of the WH opening. These purposed structures would utilize the same fuels as POS's, burning fuel in relation to mass as it maintains the open vortex. The WH would still have mass limitations as per existing WH mechanics but would allow for sustained incursions or exodus threw WH space. These structures would be linked and the destruction of either would destroy both as well as collapsing the current WH (this collapse being unnatural, should be violent leading to damage being delt to ships close to the event horizon). While being deployed the structure would be vulnerable (no shields) but once active would have EHP somewhere between a Cyno jammer and a customs office.
The possible implications of this would be very interesting, ie. multiple pockets linked threw WHs for extended periods, massive conflicts at event horizon of WHs, and general chaos and destruction.....all of which we in the EVE universe live for.
I believe this proposition fits well within current EVE universe and, as a WH dweller myself, would add some more intensity to WH life. I intend to light the fire on forums over next couple weeks with this idea and look forward to ANY response from you guys and the gentlemen at CCP.
Sincerely
-º Strax
You are a ****. |
SpaceSavage
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 01:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
we already have 60~80 men T3 blob, why need wh stabilizer?? |
|
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
251
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 02:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
This thread has already been discussed, and as I recall, pretty much no one wanted it. With the exception of say, 2, 3 people?
Learn to work with the mechanics. They were designed that way for a reason. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Lieutenant Community Communication Liasions (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Bully Hedro
Inner 5phere
19
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 02:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Makes WHs too much like Kspace. |
Rroff
The Xenodus Initiative. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
35
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 02:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
Obvious troll is obvious? |
Bane Nucleus
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
239
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 04:25:00 -
[8] - Quote
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:This thread has already been discussed, and as I recall, pretty much no one wanted it. With the exception of say, 2, 3 people?
Learn to work with the mechanics. They were designed that way for a reason.
Truth Alliance Diplomat, Recruiter |
Bane Nucleus
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
239
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 04:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Obvious troll is obvious?
I wish people would put more effort into their trolls. Alliance Diplomat, Recruiter |
Bane Nucleus
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
239
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 04:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
BTW, his home system is J111811. Feel free to shoot his tower for this silly idea Alliance Diplomat, Recruiter |
|
MadbaM
Hard Knocks Inc.
5
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 04:58:00 -
[11] - Quote
Someone has been watching to much Deep Space 9.
But i like your idea man its amazing, we could name these structure's "gates" and they could be visible on peoples overview so everyone could warp from system to system without having to probe.
I demand CCP take immediate action to resolve this problem immediately. |
Raiz Nhell
DEEP CORPS
162
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 05:00:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kastsion Strax wrote: see if it lights a fire under CCP.
I think the only thing that lights a fire under CCP is Eyjafjallaj+¦kull Which screwed everybody in Europe over, if I recall correctly There is no such thing as a fair fight...
If your fighting fair you have automatically put yourself at a disadvantage. |
Jack Miton
Bite Me inc Elysian Empire
521
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 07:15:00 -
[13] - Quote
G T F O |
Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
1104
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 07:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
SpaceSavage wrote:we already have 60~80 men T3 blob, why need wh stabilizer??
To counter the blob?
It was 68 last time, IIRC
Scanning for J111811. Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |
Bamsey Amraa
X Legion Exiled Ones
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 08:15:00 -
[15] - Quote
Man we dont need K-space **** in WH but i have another great idea for you. Maybe CCP just can remove local in K-space and after that you can go to Hi sec and play easy without this all WH mechanics? |
Caldari Citizen20090217
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2012.08.30 14:49:00 -
[16] - Quote
Awesome and new idea, the wormhole stabilizer.
Maybe we can add a pos module to give local chat to the defenders, moon goo to wh moons, and the ability to gain sov in wh systems. Allow cyno jumps, supercap building and we can have all that 0.0 has to offer.
Or we could leave it as it is, and revel in the unique environment that is wh space.
|
Ayeson
Hard Knocks Inc.
55
|
Posted - 2012.08.30 15:12:00 -
[17] - Quote
Caldari Citizen20090217 wrote: Maybe we can add a pos module to give local chat to the defenders, moon goo to wh moons, and the ability to gain sov in wh systems. Allow cyno jumps, supercap building and we can have all that 0.0 has to offer
This would be a glorious future for wormhole space Ask me about Rengas-dar, HRDKX's Most recent, groundbreaking, game-changing, wormhole-collapsing research endeavour. |
Tom Hagen
Twilight Empire Blazing Angels Alliance
87
|
Posted - 2012.08.30 15:12:00 -
[18] - Quote
Awesome ideas! I want Concord on standby in our system, can we make that a POS structure also? Also a POS structure to disable scanners and probes TYVM! |
Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo TEMNAVA
136
|
Posted - 2012.08.30 16:32:00 -
[19] - Quote
ISD, next time you make a pass through here, lets throw a nice lock on this bad boy... ~Boredom Breeds Direction~ |
Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo TEMNAVA
136
|
Posted - 2012.08.30 16:33:00 -
[20] - Quote
On that note, when are we getting a downvote option...? ~Boredom Breeds Direction~ |
|
QT McWhiskers
Hard Knocks Inc.
23
|
Posted - 2012.08.30 23:21:00 -
[21] - Quote
Kastsion Strax wrote: open WHs threw the use
What use are you throwing?
Kastsion Strax wrote: multiple pockets linked threw WHs for extended periods
Are you trying to throw wormholes? I dont even... |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
630
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 03:07:00 -
[22] - Quote
Crap idea
Nothing to see here move along. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Gumby Ambraelle
Broken Wheel Mercantile and Trading Company Illusion of Solitude
34
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 11:07:00 -
[23] - Quote
Why is it that people want to make W-space like every where else...
it is w-space for a reason...
not sure I understand the need to drive everything to be the same |
Dorn Val
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
49
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 11:12:00 -
[24] - Quote
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:This thread has already been discussed, and as I recall, pretty much no one wanted it. With the exception of say, 2, 3 people?
Learn to work with the mechanics. They were designed that way for a reason.
Have I told you lately how much I love you...
Just like there is no I in Team there is no Fair in Eve... |
Priodontes
Elsewhere. The Imperial Senate
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 15:23:00 -
[25] - Quote
I bet most will criticize and call me crazy.
But I would love to see new classes of WH. Especially higher (7,8,9,10 class?).
find that such stations with WH Sleepers? What they gain such power? How about having attacks (rematches) Sleepers with capital sleepers to regain station? Something like Sansha Incursion.
I see futudo the WH with sovereignty and blobs. It is the natural way. One can not fail to be the current version of WH.
|
Kalel Nimrott
Wishful Desires Inc. Armada Assail
43
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 15:37:00 -
[26] - Quote
There already are 7, 8 and 9. They are called by the special designation of k-space. Couse, you know, they are oK. |
Kalel Nimrott
Wishful Desires Inc. Armada Assail
43
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 15:40:00 -
[27] - Quote
There already are 7, 8 and 9. They are called by the special designation of k-space. Couse, you know, they are oK. |
Fradle
Bite Me inc Elysian Empire
8
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 16:09:00 -
[28] - Quote
Kalel Nimrott wrote:There already are 7, 8 and 9. They are called by the special designation of k-space. Couse, you know, they are oK. Typical troll answer that I give when someone mentions being able to have supers in higher class WHs. I respond there are already WHs like that... class 8 and 9 WHs lol. |
Priodontes
Elsewhere. The Imperial Senate
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 18:27:00 -
[29] - Quote
Fradle wrote:Kalel Nimrott wrote:There already are 7, 8 and 9. They are called by the special designation of k-space. Couse, you know, they are oK. Typical troll answer that I give when someone mentions being able to have supers in higher class WHs. I respond there are already WHs like that... class 8 and 9 WHs lol.
Typical response from whoever troll and do not know what to say.
There are two types of classes. The WH and the system Sleeper.
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/system/J110016
Security Class Class 4 Wormhole
Not existis Sleeper system of Security Class 7, 8, 9 or 10.
Just because the two terms have the same name does not mean they are the same thing. |
Princess Bride
Corripe Cervisiam Trade Consortium
415
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 19:10:00 -
[30] - Quote
Hey maybe we should have a forum for player ideas, and a protocol for submitting them. Oh wait...
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=267
http://eveprincessbride.wordpress.com/ |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |