Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jon Whayne
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 07:14:00 -
[91]
Originally by: ORLICZ change is very good . without nerf all dead space items could be worthless :P
imagine deade space best modulest worth only 10 mil isk wchich u can buy after 10 min rating in 0.0 or doing lvl4 misions :P
Man, you haven't understood the materia and will get a -10. We talking about f**** bug, not a nerf. Got it now?
|
ORLICZ
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 07:27:00 -
[92]
Originally by: Jon Whayne
Originally by: ORLICZ change is very good . without nerf all dead space items could be worthless :P
imagine deade space best modulest worth only 10 mil isk wchich u can buy after 10 min rating in 0.0 or doing lvl4 misions :P
Man, you haven't understood the materia and will get a -10. We talking about f**** bug, not a nerf. Got it now?
i hope that is nerf :P , spawn only once a day after dt and etc. ;)
|
Jon Whayne
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 07:41:00 -
[93]
Originally by: ORLICZ
Originally by: Jon Whayne
Originally by: ORLICZ change is very good . without nerf all dead space items could be worthless :P
imagine deade space best modulest worth only 10 mil isk wchich u can buy after 10 min rating in 0.0 or doing lvl4 misions :P
Man, you haven't understood the materia and will get a -10. We talking about f**** bug, not a nerf. Got it now?
i hope that is nerf :P , spawn only once a day after dt and etc. ;)
You Sir, you are a troll.
Wait! You are not only 'a troll ' - you are THE troll. Anyways, you art funny! ;)
|
HeliosGal
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 09:42:00 -
[94]
low sec sites are now nerfed to diddly o again to and they only sapwn after dt very sad
|
Jon Whayne
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 11:33:00 -
[95]
So, still no patchnotes.... *waits*
|
DeMichael Crimson
Minmatar Republic University
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 12:04:00 -
[96]
Originally by: Holdout
Originally by: Jireel Edited by: Jireel on 11/04/2011 20:57:04
Originally by: Holdout
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
For the record, my regular exploration routes usually will have up to half a dozen signatures per system with about the same amount of anomaly's, if not more. I also have 'special' exploration routes that usually have up to 2 dozen signatures with twice as many anomaly's per system.
This (and many of your other posts in this thread) renders all of your "data" worthless.
Where is this magic land that has 72 sites per system? LOL
My nullsec static opened 3 days ago in a system (AAA sov, didnt write down the sys) that had around 40 sites, and I was able to so them the whole evening without seeing anyone in local. Just sayin'.
I understand what you're just sayin'.
The fact that you found a single system with around 40 sites in sovereign nullsec really has no bearing on his claim of "special routes in hisec containing 70+ sites in each system".
Wow, you really do excel at twisting players statements around while trying to justify your failure at reading comprehension.
I never listed system security level nor did I give an exact amount of sites found within a specific system. It was a general estimation for maxium potential of what has been found there in the past. I also never said there was a 'string' of these systems all located within the same area.
You took it upon yourself to create false statements and assume it to be factual and then failed at trying to disprove what I had written. Jireel verified my statement but you still decided to troll and personally attack me through these forums in this and other threads.
Just because you haven't found any systems in isolated areas packed with multiple signatures doesn't mean they don't exist. Get up off your lazy duff and go check it out yourself before trolling someone. While you're at it, stop twisting statements around and adding false info as factual quotes.
|
Deezlar Ward
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 12:57:00 -
[97]
Im SO glad I found this topic as I thought I was either being a complete muppet, or my legendary bad luck in games was following me even to the outskirts of the universe!
I am a new player and really liked the idea of being a lone explorer, so feverently followed all the guides, watched the vids, trolled the blogs etc to get all the knowledge needed, then some awesome person gave me 20m to get started.
For 3 days I have scanned down sites in my Imicus and found a total of 3 radar sites.... MILLIONS (ok 30 or so) WH's though.
I even ventured into a WH to try and improve my luck, and there was another 3 WH inside it... NOTHING ELSE!!!
So now Im glad its looking like a bug/nerf, so I can adjust accordingly.
Would be nice to know which though as this early in my career it would be fairly painless to shift training focus to something else.
|
St Mio
Amarr Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 13:17:00 -
[98]
Nothing mentioned in the latest patch notes. Pity.
|
Montgomery Crabapple
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 13:28:00 -
[99]
Has anyone had ANY response? Either GM, Dev or anything at all? Some people have filed petitions, but I haven't heard of any kind of CCP acknowledgement of either a change or a bug here at all. It's all very strange.
|
Deezlar Ward
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 13:40:00 -
[100]
I asked anyone with a coloured name in noob chat if it was working as intended for 80+% of scans to be WH's, and they all said it was because of low skill and it was working as expected.
Load of cobbler's imo. Only found 1 or 2 scans that I couldnt nail down to at least 30% to see its group type.
So yeah, broken/bugged/nerfed whatever. Confirmation would be nice!
|
|
Montgomery Crabapple
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 13:45:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Deezlar Ward I asked anyone with a coloured name in noob chat if it was working as intended for 80+% of scans to be WH's, and they all said it was because of low skill and it was working as expected.
Load of cobbler's imo. Only found 1 or 2 scans that I couldnt nail down to at least 30% to see its group type.
So yeah, broken/bugged/nerfed whatever. Confirmation would be nice!
So I'm guessing the stealth nerf was to move a lot of exploration sites out of high sec into low sec/0.0? Because if it's working as intended, then it must have been a nerf, except nobody bothered to tell the player base, which kind-of makes me annoyed.
|
charlesv11
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 13:45:00 -
[102]
Ok I have been running sites for a long time now and could find a myriad of anomolies and cosmic signatures in almost every system. For the past few days i have found NO combat sites whatsoever and most systems have no signatures in them at all anymore and if there is one you can almost assume with certanty that its a wormhole. So Thanks CCP you have broken finding combat sites , Oh and thanks for breaking the fittings that can be saved aswell That was the Stupidest thing ever.
|
Ay Liz
Sacred Templars RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 13:46:00 -
[103]
Originally by: Deezlar Ward I asked anyone with a coloured name in noob chat if it was working as intended for 80+% of scans to be WH's, and they all said it was because of low skill and it was working as expected.
Load of cobbler's imo. Only found 1 or 2 scans that I couldnt nail down to at least 30% to see its group type.
So yeah, broken/bugged/nerfed whatever. Confirmation would be nice!
Those are just ISD guys most of the time. Volunteers that help new players in help chat and other stuffs. They probably have no idea about what is going on at CCP.
|
Jon Whayne
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 13:47:00 -
[104]
F**** hell!
Not even mentioned in the patch notes. Damn CCP, this is so frustrating. Common, at least give us a reply!
|
Angeliena
Caldari Eye of God United Front Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 13:55:00 -
[105]
I have filed a bug report on this; however, I do not expect to hear back from CCP )other then them reporting it as "working as intended" or as a "new feature" for a "new future".
I smell the hand of CCP's evil central banker/economist behind all this.
I think he now has all the main CCP devs in his pocket and his evil plan is to follow Japan's deflationary economic policies and to force the big alliances to undertake cost cutting measures like those begin forced across Europe.
The Great Depression of 2011 has started!
|
Kirana Mirelin
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 13:55:00 -
[106]
Edited by: Kirana Mirelin on 12/04/2011 13:55:30
Originally by: Ay Liz Edited by: Ay Liz on 12/04/2011 13:50:42
Originally by: Deezlar Ward I asked anyone with a coloured name in noob chat if it was working as intended for 80+% of scans to be WH's, and they all said it was because of low skill and it was working as expected.
Load of cobbler's imo. Only found 1 or 2 scans that I couldnt nail down to at least 30% to see its group type.
So yeah, broken/bugged/nerfed whatever. Confirmation would be nice!
Those are just ISD guys most of the time. Volunteers that help new players in help chat and other stuffs. They probably have no idea about what is going on at CCP.
I would add to this that anyone who is regularly in noob chat answering questions are probably expecting that whoever asked has racial frigate 3 and astrometrics 1 or 2, and that's about it. Not covops 4, astrometric supports to 3 or 4, and is running a rigged covops with sisters probes.
Even so, I remember when my scan skills were in the "noob" area, and I still found at least something.
|
Spooky69
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 15:01:00 -
[107]
Damn CCP, I'm in work at the minute, but have read the patch notes, still nothing about exploration, I wont get online for a few hours yet, so my question to the explorers of eve, has there been any change today after that small patch?
If they can stealth nerf exploration, I'm sure the can stealth buff it again:)
If someone from CCP could come and comment on forums, I think it will help, even to say its "working as intended" or whatever.
I really enjoyed finding combat sites that escalated into 0.0 and getting a nice a-type shield booster, but if all the sites have been run by time I finish work, what's the point playing/paying this game.
|
Deezlar Ward
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 15:06:00 -
[108]
Funnily enough, when the servers came back up there was a Dev in noob help (CCP Sisyphus) so I asked about the Exploration issues.
Took 3 tries to get an answer, and it was this...
"I dont deal with that sorry"
So there we are.
No fix, no explanation and STILL the same issues after server reset.
Im in deep 0.0 space, getting max 2 signatures per system, and an overbearing % of those are WH's.
|
Holdout
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 15:26:00 -
[109]
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
Wow, you really do excel at twisting players statements around while trying to justify your failure at reading comprehension.
I never listed system security level nor did I give an exact amount of sites found within a specific system. It was a general estimation for maxium potential of what has been found there in the past. I also never said there was a 'string' of these systems all located within the same area.
You took it upon yourself to create false statements and assume it to be factual and then failed at trying to disprove what I had written. Jireel verified my statement but you still decided to troll and personally attack me through these forums in this and other threads.
Just because you haven't found any systems in isolated areas packed with multiple signatures doesn't mean they don't exist. Get up off your lazy duff and go check it out yourself before trolling someone. While you're at it, stop twisting statements around and adding false info as factual quotes.
LOL
You are the one who claims to have these "special routes" with huge strings of systems that "usually contain up to 70+" sites". I'm not the one trolling here buddy.
You remind me of that guy who claims to make 400 million ISK per hour running L4 missions. Something that happened one time when you got really lucky is not the same as "usually".
At any rate, the initial claim that you made where "nothing is wrong, you people are just lazy" has been refuted. My job is done here.
|
Deezlar Ward
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 15:41:00 -
[110]
No update from the Dev or patch notes just killed what little grain of fun there was in Exploration, so just gave away all my cash and quit.
Shame... really thought there was something new and special in EvE this time around.
GL all.
|
|
Buster Gonads
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 15:52:00 -
[111]
I don't understand. If they nerfed it, why don't they tell us they nerfed it? If it's a bug, why doesn't anyone acknowledge it's a bug?
This is seriously weird behaviour on CCP's part.
|
Victor Byron
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 15:56:00 -
[112]
Thought for the longest I was the only one who noticed the massive drop in sites after the 1.4 patch. Well I'm throwing in my two cents as well. I have multiple runs I do on a daily basis and they always netted me combat sites and the occasional radar to do. I know it's an up and down thing, but yeah up as in woot woot I gotz alot of loot today, to down as in well I did alot of sites today but only one dropped something good smehhh. After the patch wham! nothingness. After a few days I was even glad to see WH just to have something to practice my scanning on instead of letting it rust away. Like night and day. Hope they fix this soon. I'm back to grinding mishes for now...thinking they won't nerf that would they?
|
MongerMan
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 16:35:00 -
[113]
This is by no means scientific of course. But even in lowsec we have seen a huge drop in anything to run. And when I say huge, I mean nothing, zip, zilch.
I hope its a string of bad luck. I really do. But we where always able to find something before, even if it was a "bad" site. Now, not even drone sites.
|
St Mio
Amarr Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 17:06:00 -
[114]
Originally by: CCP Soundwave
Originally by: Rexorol Could we please get some sort of official acknowledgement that explore site respawnings are being looked at? Or that everybody who is reporting a problem is crazy? Currently you can only do explore sites right after DT according to many, many topics and many hundreds of hours wasted searching:
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1494289 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1494085 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1493613 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1493983
Hey everyone!
The people reporting this aren't crazy (at least when it comes to exploration sites). There is currently a bug which effectively means that TQ "runs out" of exploration sites the longer time passes. They then re-spawn at downtime, and the process repeats itself. This should not affect all types of sites, so if you're running anomalies in upgraded systems, it should not be an issue.
We have a fix for this, which is still pending testing. Hopefully we'll have it ready to go Thursday, if not, then at the earliest possible opportunity next week.
Thanks for all the feedback and bug reports
Source
|
Mr LaForge
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 17:16:00 -
[115]
Soundwave is my hero.
|
Powie XIII
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 17:18:00 -
[116]
So much for your "Everything is fine."
I just love it when i'm right.
CCP Soundwave thanks!!!
|
Sul Glass
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 17:37:00 -
[117]
This is killing me, solo pilot, all I do is explore low sec. Sigh, at present eve is a sad and boring place for me.
Thursday please CCP.
Sul
|
Xu Da
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 18:48:00 -
[118]
Where is "Patient 2428190"? (and a couple of others).
their pie is getting cold...
|
Frenden Dax
Dax Acquisitions
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 19:05:00 -
[119]
Vindication!
I have to shake my head at the people who insisted that everything was fine, nothing had changed, etc. It makes me wonder if they found a single anomaly and decided that exploration was still working.
|
Brynhilda
Amarr Gun Metal Hit Sqaud
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 21:08:00 -
[120]
I've noticed a drop in anything worth visiting in low sec. I've been reduced to running Drone sites in low sec (amusingly, half of them escalated) and its just poor income.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |