EVE Search - New Dev Blog: 0.0 Tweaks

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

New Dev Blog: 0.0 Tweaks

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 75 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 31 post(s)
Jack Abramof	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:11:00 - [1681] Edited by: Jack Abramof on 11/05/2011 20:13:24 this is a good start, next should be delayed or no local at all in 0.0 there was a time where you had no freaking jump bridge, you had to move your stuff in 0.0 on your own or build it at your loc with the right infrastucture behind, that how it should be
Bagehi Association of Commonwealth Enterprises R.A.G.E	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:18:00 - [1682] Originally by: Jack Abramof this is a good start, next should be delayed or no local at all in 0.0 there was a time where you had no freaking jump bridge, you had to move your stuff in 0.0 on your own or build it at your loc with the right infrastucture behind, that how it should be And stuff didn't die as much because you would travel 40 jumps without seeing anyone. When a dreadnought died, it made the news feed. That was the Eve of back then. If you want that back, I guess I disagree with your view of the future of Eve. P.S. Nice name. This signature is useless, but it is red.
Purrp Ledone Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:22:00 - [1683] Originally by: Elizabeth Cho If you've ever played Sim City you'll know how you spend all your time building and tweaking things..but eventually it gets too much and you wonder what it would be like to let Godzilla loose on your creation.. I think the devs have got to that position with Eve. This is the best explanation of the changes I've read so far.
BIZZAROSTORMY	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:22:00 - [1684] Originally by: Elizabeth Cho If you've ever played Sim City you'll know how you spend all your time building and tweaking things..but eventually it gets too much and you wonder what it would be like to let Godzilla loose on your creation.. I think the devs have got to that position with Eve. I think you might be on to something. Lets SQUISH all the people!
Miso Hawnee	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:27:00 - [1685] So clearly CCP are the biggest greifers. Why do you pay $14.99 a month to be terrorized? Devs have stated before that they want you to feel stress an misery when logging into eve. Why pay for something I can get for free everyday in rush hour traffic? Entertainment failure at the highest level. Battlefield 3 this fall. Epic fights without lag, dev corruption or ham fisted game design. It might not have a pretty barbie creator but it should have balanced game play. Also, your money won't be going to cosplay vampire ***s. That fact alone is enough to stop feeding C C P. How many of you are still in null-sec because of the game play? How many of you are still around because you don't want to abandon you E-buddies to this hopeless creation called Eve? Get an out of game forum and take you e-buddies to a pasture that doesn't lower your sperm count. Crowd Control Productions. Don't be their cattle.
ReddSky	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:30:00 - [1686] Great job CCP JB travel in 0.0 is way too safe, and force projection half way across EvE is way too easy with current JB mechanics. Please ignore the tears in this thread and follow through with this change. This is a positive change that enhances 0.0 game play. I would also suggest for 0.0 systems a timed delay (session time) before anyone shows up in local. 0.0 should have risks. CCP, stick to your guns, ignore the QQ
Komen Gallente The Night Crew	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:31:00 - [1687] Originally by: Miso Hawnee So clearly CCP are the biggest greifers. Why do you pay $14.99 a month to be terrorized? Devs have stated before that they want you to feel stress an misery when logging into eve. Why pay for something I can get for free everyday in rush hour traffic? Entertainment failure at the highest level. Battlefield 3 this fall. Epic fights without lag, dev corruption or ham fisted game design. It might not have a pretty barbie creator but it should have balanced game play. Also, your money won't be going to cosplay vampire ***s. That fact alone is enough to stop feeding C C P. How many of you are still in null-sec because of the game play? How many of you are still around because you don't want to abandon you E-buddies to this hopeless creation called Eve? Get an out of game forum and take you e-buddies to a pasture that doesn't lower your sperm count. Crowd Control Productions. Don't be their cattle. You first.
Iece Quaan Caldari Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:35:00 - [1688] Originally by: ReddSky Great job CCP JB travel in 0.0 is way too safe, and force projection half way across EvE is way too easy with current JB mechanics. Please ignore the tears in this thread and follow through with this change. This is a positive change that enhances 0.0 game play. I would also suggest for 0.0 systems a timed delay (session time) before anyone shows up in local. 0.0 should have risks. CCP, stick to your guns, ignore the QQ Sure, except for the part where it doesn't do anything to force projection issues because no changes are being made to jump drives, jump clones, or pod jumping. Hint: if you have subcaps at your destination, you don't need to move them there.
Baron Munchousen	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:35:00 - [1689] Pure genius, well done, this action looks to penalise existing long term customers. I believe you could consider an opposite action. Perhaps players can build and control Jump-Bridges, anchored at planets, as stations are. A good system may contain many Jumb-Bridges, but no defence POS in range. This would create many logistical Hot-Spots, and encourage strategic domination of systems in nul-sec. And the gates would have to be defended by gangs, with no gun support
Taipion	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:41:00 - [1690] Building up things that provide convenience IS nice, JBs were that way! Besides its not realistic... oh wait, in a game were you can go 10.000 times the speed of light, but only slightly faster than a good car when not in warp, and where space is considered a fluid-drag-medium... Anyway, the glorious end justifies the means, still this "fix" says "we dont care enuff to really do something good, take this instead". CCP, you are disassembling things that were good, instead of changing/tweaking them, this could, but most importantly should have been done BETTER!
Feyleaf	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:46:00 - [1691] I already cancelled an alt i was training up for fun =) 1 cancelled alt account = 1 vote. Its not because of the jumpbridge changes as such, but the 7day(lol) warning of this major 0.0 change, that its in the middle of a large conflict and basically helps one side and screws the other.. thats not sandbox. my problem is ccp now making sudden changes with basically no warning (tho its a safe bet that some ppl know in advance) to "rock the boat" or "keep it fresh" .. no more long term projects in 0.0 anymore.. not worth it.. ccp will just ** it up in a patch if you are too succesfull.. Still havent got any usefull ansfer from Soundwave to most of questions asked here, just bull** and vague hints of... whatever. Im not gonna blabber much about ccp being biased coz you destroyed their cheaty pet alliance BoB/IT, taking bribes from rmt's.. I think ppl who have played eve for a bit knows that ccp is not beyond stuff like this.. last time they only really cared about damage control, and hurting the whistleblowers.
Vaju Katru	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:49:00 - [1692] Originally by: Miso Hawnee So clearly CCP are the biggest greifers. Why do you pay $14.99 a month to be terrorized? Devs have stated before that they want you to feel stress an misery when logging into eve. Why pay for something I can get for free everyday in rush hour traffic? Entertainment failure at the highest level. Battlefield 3 this fall. Epic fights without lag, dev corruption or ham fisted game design. It might not have a pretty barbie creator but it should have balanced game play. Also, your money won't be going to cosplay vampire *s. That fact alone is enough to stop feeding C C P. How many of you are still in null-sec because of the game play? How many of you are still around because you don't want to abandon you E-buddies to this hopeless creation called Eve? Get an out of game forum and take you e-buddies to a pasture that doesn't lower your sperm count. Crowd Control Productions. Don't be their cattle. EvE Online is not the game for you, what you don't enjoy in this game, is what everone else loves. Go play a solo game, or some ***fied carebear heaven MMO like WoW.
Feyleaf	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:53:00 - [1693] Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 20:55:44 Originally by: Vaju Katru Originally by: Miso Hawnee So clearly CCP are the biggest greifers. Why do you pay $14.99 a month to be terrorized? Devs have stated before that they want you to feel stress an misery when logging into eve. Why pay for something I can get for free everyday in rush hour traffic? Entertainment failure at the highest level. Battlefield 3 this fall. Epic fights without lag, dev corruption or ham fisted game design. It might not have a pretty barbie creator but it should have balanced game play. Also, your money won't be going to cosplay vampire ***s. That fact alone is enough to stop feeding C C P. How many of you are still in null-sec because of the game play? How many of you are still around because you don't want to abandon you E-buddies to this hopeless creation called Eve? Get an out of game forum and take you e-buddies to a pasture that doesn't lower your sperm count. Crowd Control Productions. Don't be their cattle. EvE Online is not the game for casual allround players, what you don't enjoy in this game, is what I enjoy, and thats all this is ever about. fixed? ¿^ we dont really need all these miners and pve players in our deathmatch arena?
Miso Hawnee	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:55:00 - [1694] Originally by: Vaju Katru Originally by: Miso Hawnee So clearly CCP are the biggest greifers. Why do you pay $14.99 a month to be terrorized? Devs have stated before that they want you to feel stress an misery when logging into eve. Why pay for something I can get for free everyday in rush hour traffic? Entertainment failure at the highest level. Battlefield 3 this fall. Epic fights without lag, dev corruption or ham fisted game design. It might not have a pretty barbie creator but it should have balanced game play. Also, your money won't be going to cosplay vampire *s. That fact alone is enough to stop feeding C C P. How many of you are still in null-sec because of the game play? How many of you are still around because you don't want to abandon you E-buddies to this hopeless creation called Eve? Get an out of game forum and take you e-buddies to a pasture that doesn't lower your sperm count. Crowd Control Productions. Don't be their cattle. EvE Online is not the game for you, what you don't enjoy in this game, is what everone else loves. Go play a solo game, or some *fied carebear heaven MMO like WoW. I guess I forget that some people enjoy pulling the legs off a spider. and ** WoW. Eve was the first time I tried a subscription based game, at it was because there was no other space game out there. It has only confirmed my previous opinion of the general stock of MMO populations. Misery loves company, no? Digital Heroism is a pretty lol concept. I'll go play ice hockey with actual people in the flesh. You can have your pussified digital delusions of grandeur and relevance.
Major Stallion The Dark Horses.	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:55:00 - [1695] Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow Originally by: CCP Soundwave The CSM have gotten the first peek at a highlevel direction for 0.0, and they seemed pleased. To clarify, CSM has been presented with some high-level "principles, rules and guidelines" that any nullsec iteration should adhere to, and they seem reasonable -- in fact, I would encourage CCP to publish them in a devblog ASAP for discussion. However, this presentation does not include any details -- even on the most global level -- on how these guidelines will actually be achieved. We look forward to seeing those, because as we all know, the is in the details. reposting this for the people who are crying that CCP didnt run this by CSM :D
Feyleaf	Posted - 2011.05.11 20:59:00 - [1696] Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 20:59:44 Originally by: Major Stallion Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow Originally by: CCP Soundwave The CSM have gotten the first peek at a highlevel direction for 0.0, and they seemed pleased. To clarify, CSM has been presented with some high-level "principles, rules and guidelines" that any nullsec iteration should adhere to, and they seem reasonable -- in fact, I would encourage CCP to publish them in a devblog ASAP for discussion. However, this presentation does not include any details -- even on the most global level -- on how these guidelines will actually be achieved. We look forward to seeing those, because as we all know, the is in the details. reposting this for the people who are crying that CCP didnt run this by CSM :D CSM was a publicity stunt.. always was always will be.. nothing more.
Lt banaan Trojan Trolls Controlled Chaos	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:00:00 - [1697] Its funny that in every topic about 0.0 its all NC haters vs DRF mabo jambo. 0.0 sucks and its just getting whorse and whorse with all the ccp tweaking. People posting of the nc and dc hating this might think again when the roles are reversed and when you are under siege and seeing 0.0 get nerfed more and more.
Bagehi Association of Commonwealth Enterprises R.A.G.E	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:01:00 - [1698] Originally by: Major Stallion Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow Originally by: CCP Soundwave The CSM have gotten the first peek at a highlevel direction for 0.0, and they seemed pleased. To clarify, CSM has been presented with some high-level "principles, rules and guidelines" that any nullsec iteration should adhere to, and they seem reasonable -- in fact, I would encourage CCP to publish them in a devblog ASAP for discussion. However, this presentation does not include any details -- even on the most global level -- on how these guidelines will actually be achieved. We look forward to seeing those, because as we all know, the is in the details. reposting this for the people who are crying that CCP didnt run this by CSM :D 1. This was the previous CSM, with only one member of a sov holding alliance. 2. Trebor clearly says that all they saw was goals, not any information about how CCP was planning to achieve those goals. This signature is useless, but it is red.
Justice Starcatcher Strategic Syndicate	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:03:00 - [1699] Originally by: Baron Munchousen I believe you could consider an opposite action. Perhaps players can build and control Jump-Bridges, anchored at planets, as stations are. A good system may contain many Jumb-Bridges, but no defence POS in range. This would create many logistical Hot-Spots, and encourage strategic domination of systems in nul-sec. And the gates would have to be defended by gangs, with no gun support Some infomration in the noise! Call them ôun-authorized gates,ö give them the same restrictions as gates, make them vulnerable to attack or capture-able. I would add that they are not able to link regions. But, it seems like a nice compromise creates interaction and lets us control our environment. What the...
Feyleaf	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:06:00 - [1700] Originally by: Lt banaan Its funny that in every topic about 0.0 its all NC haters vs DRF mabo jambo. 0.0 sucks and its just getting whorse and whorse with all the ccp tweaking. People posting of the nc and dc hating this might think again when the roles are reversed and when you are under siege and seeing 0.0 get nerfed more and more. Luckily cluster** entities dont mind moving to a new place when ccp screws the current place we live over. many of us are doing lvl4 pirate missions again.. until ccp finds out that we do them and nerf that too. Seems we are just to friendly to each other to be allowed in 0.0? after all you cant be friends in eve.. its against the entire idea of eve? you have to atleast ** you friends over for profit if not for lolz sometimes. This being friends just becoz we are friends seem to be destroying ccp's vision for eve?
Neni The Wyld Hunt Cascade Imminent	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:08:00 - [1701] *heads back to empire
Bryan Havoc The Safe House	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:13:00 - [1702] Edited by: Bryan Havoc on 11/05/2011 21:13:04 Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:09:46 Luckily cluster** entities dont mind moving to a new place when ccp screws the current place we live over. many of us are doing lvl4 pirate missions again.. until ccp finds out that we do them and nerf that too. Seems we are just to friendly to each other to be allowed in 0.0? after all you cant be friends in eve.. its against the entire idea of eve? you have to atleast ** you friends over for profit if not for lolz sometimes. This being friends just becoz we are friends seem to be destroying ccp's vision for eve? I do enjoy all the whine from the crowd with too short attention span's for sov logistics.. and thus dont reap the rewards. =) I feel sad that 0.0 is gonna be as empty as it used to be soon. Whines like this are why I play eve.
Miso Hawnee	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:15:00 - [1703] Originally by: Bryan Havoc Edited by: Bryan Havoc on 11/05/2011 21:13:04 Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:09:46 Luckily cluster** entities dont mind moving to a new place when ccp screws the current place we live over. many of us are doing lvl4 pirate missions again.. until ccp finds out that we do them and nerf that too. Seems we are just to friendly to each other to be allowed in 0.0? after all you cant be friends in eve.. its against the entire idea of eve? you have to atleast ** you friends over for profit if not for lolz sometimes. This being friends just becoz we are friends seem to be destroying ccp's vision for eve? I do enjoy all the whine from the crowd with too short attention span's for sov logistics.. and thus dont reap the rewards. =) I feel sad that 0.0 is gonna be as empty as it used to be soon. Whines like this are why I play eve. Is you real life so miserable and desolate that you have to feed on others misfortune to feel complete? You sir are a sad little man.
Feyleaf	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:19:00 - [1704] Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:20:14 Originally by: Miso Hawnee Originally by: Bryan Havoc Edited by: Bryan Havoc on 11/05/2011 21:13:04 Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:09:46 Luckily cluster** entities dont mind moving to a new place when ccp screws the current place we live over. many of us are doing lvl4 pirate missions again.. until ccp finds out that we do them and nerf that too. Seems we are just to friendly to each other to be allowed in 0.0? after all you cant be friends in eve.. its against the entire idea of eve? you have to atleast ** you friends over for profit if not for lolz sometimes. This being friends just becoz we are friends seem to be destroying ccp's vision for eve? I do enjoy all the whine from the crowd with too short attention span's for sov logistics.. and thus dont reap the rewards. =) I feel sad that 0.0 is gonna be as empty as it used to be soon. Whines like this are why I play eve. Is you real life so miserable and desolate that you have to feed on others misfortune to feel complete? You sir are a sad little man. my thoughts exactly, i dont usually bother with "simple" trolls but my thoughts exactly
cyclone71	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:25:00 - [1705] i think the limiting of Jump briges is goin to far. the larger fuel bay is fine but limiting to keeps caps out is no good that is how capatals get in to staion systems. cause staoin systems should be cyno jamed to keep enemy caps out but i would also like ccp to repeel the new way ratting systems are ut to gether the -0.9 systems are uslay in the open and some regions hve none of them at all that is just goin to force more people back to high sec. i want it to go back to the way it was when ur miltary lvlis wat desided wat kind of anoms u got
lett erika	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:33:00 - [1706] Is 0.0 industry currently geared to support the population living there? No most indy guys need at least 15 to 50 PvP guys guarding them at all times. Is the relationship between 0.0 and empire balanced well enough? No jita is the olny place with a good market now days. Does the current sovereignty system meet our goals? Yeah if you fix the bugs with the lag and the Ihubs not accepting upgrades and that is not to menchon the Ihubs that accept the upgrade then it still dose not work. Are there enough incentives for conflict/pvp outside sov? When is the last time some one saw SOV as a reason to stay out of that system? Are we happy with movement/player interaction? Hellllll no! As there are players that still exzist just to kill others just for an easy kill. and others that take on defencless targets like the frieghters and rorqualls.
Carcusian Global Criminal Countdown	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:35:00 - [1707] Originally by: Bagehi It only looks instant to people who are horrible at Eve and don't have spies. fleet formation =/= fleet travel time to dest also spies are a metagame; jumbridges are not I think your fail logic is what's horrible, here.
Feyleaf	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:40:00 - [1708] Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:44:49 Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:43:36 Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:42:34 Originally by: Kalissa All these tears do indeed make my day, all the crying about having to take risks and how smaller alliances will be hit when actually since smaller alliances own less space and have less JB's they will be hit less. Life out in 0.0 is supposed to be risky, for too long people have had it too easy. Yes there will be gatecamps, so bloody well deal with it thats what PVP is about and in the end PVP is what makes EVE tick without that everything falls apart for everyone. I personally will be hit by this moving around won't be as convenient or risk free as it is now but as I've said in a previous post this idea is well overdue, good on you CCP! (And looking back at previous posts it does seem like most of the bleating is coming from the NC doesn't it? That gives me a nice warm feeling inside ) I can understand that you are happy.. with ccp's help you might actually have a slightly better chance in the ungoing conflict =) how many rubles does a dev cost? Sad to see one of my favorite games get perverted like this.. but it is just a game and its summer outside That gives me a warm feeling inside <3
Alexander Knott ElitistOps Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:47:00 - [1709] Originally by: lett erika Hellllll no! As there are players that still exzist just to kill others just for an easy kill. and others that take on defencless targets like the frieghters and rorqualls. Linkage
Feyleaf	Posted - 2011.05.11 21:49:00 - [1710] Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:49:46 Originally by: Alexander Knott Originally by: lett erika Hellllll no! As there are players that still exzist just to kill others just for an easy kill. and others that take on defencless targets like the frieghters and rorqualls. Linkage Im all for ganking soft targets.. i might even come to like the jb changes.. I dont like ccp make sudden shuffles to 0.0 landscape just to "shake things up" or whatever. Takes the control of 0.0 out of player hands, thats bad.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 75 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.