Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 75 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 31 post(s) |
Ranger 1
Amarr Paragon Fury Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 21:50:00 -
[1711]
Edited by: Ranger 1 on 11/05/2011 21:51:16
Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:20:14
Originally by: Miso Hawnee
Originally by: Bryan Havoc Edited by: Bryan Havoc on 11/05/2011 21:13:04
Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:09:46
Luckily cluster**** entities dont mind moving to a new place when ccp screws the current place we live over. many of us are doing lvl4 pirate missions again.. until ccp finds out that we do them and nerf that too. Seems we are just to friendly to each other to be allowed in 0.0? after all you cant be friends in eve.. its against the entire idea of eve? you have to atleast **** you friends over for profit if not for lolz sometimes. This being friends just becoz we are friends seem to be destroying ccp's vision for eve?
I do enjoy all the whine from the crowd with too short attention span's for sov logistics.. and thus dont reap the rewards. =) I feel sad that 0.0 is gonna be as empty as it used to be soon.
Whines like this are why I play eve.
Is you real life so miserable and desolate that you have to feed on others misfortune to feel complete? You sir are a sad little man.
my thoughts exactly, i dont usually bother with "simple" trolls but my thoughts exactly
Interesting. So by your definition the person that is enjoying the game in a light hearted and jovial manner is "miserable, desolate, and sad".
However the people that are reacting to a minor nerf in the current ease of transportation in null sec with hysteria, exhortations for people to rage quit, and over-the-top condescension towards anyone that suggests you calm down (alternated with the occasional "It won't affect me much anyway" attention diverter) are the mature, well balanced members of our gaming community.
Lets just leave this with the thought that your comments are being received with all the respect they deserve by your fellow gamers. ===== The world will not end in 2012, however there will be a serious nerf to Planetary Interaction. |
Barry Niven
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 21:58:00 -
[1712]
Page 57 seems far too late to come to this and get a response, but I'd be curious some answers from CCP on the following topics:
How do you want the losec experience to differ from the nullsec experience? SOV claiming and holding is a lot of work and a lot of expense, what types of benefits should SOV holders have? Given those goals, what metrics have you put in place to judge whether or not the changes you are making are in line with your goals?
Thanks in advance for any insight here.
|
Feyleaf
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 21:58:00 -
[1713]
Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 22:03:03 Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:59:13 A single line comment like that is fine but not worthy of respect, go enjoy your griefing persona in-game its fun fun. but its basically the standard troll for any such discussion in here atleast come up with something new?.. Unless hes roleplaying his persona on the forum i have no doubt who has the healthier outlook on life.:D
|
Ranger 1
Amarr Paragon Fury Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:02:00 -
[1714]
Edited by: Ranger 1 on 11/05/2011 22:04:12
Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:59:13 A single line comment like that is fine but not worthy of respect, go enjoy your griefing persona in-game its fun fun. but its basically the standard troll for any such discussion in here atleast come up with something new?..
Just to be perfectly clear, I wasn't simply refering to that last comment, but rather the entire series of rants the two of you have made throughout the course of this thread... regardless of the sincerity or eloquence of the opposing point of view.
===== The world will not end in 2012, however there will be a serious nerf to Planetary Interaction. |
Sidus Sarmiang
GoonWaffe
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:04:00 -
[1715]
Edited by: Sidus Sarmiang on 11/05/2011 22:05:03 One of the biggest issues I see is that it's very easy for "elite PvP" types to attack sov-holders, but there's no mechanism for sov holders to hit them back in a meaningful way beyond trying to kill their supercaps (which are a major balance issue in and of themselves). If anything, that needs a look and some serious fixing.
|
Feyleaf
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:05:00 -
[1716]
Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 22:14:59 Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 22:09:06 Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 22:08:40
Originally by: Ranger 1
Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:59:13 A single line comment like that is fine but not worthy of respect, go enjoy your griefing persona in-game its fun fun. but its basically the standard troll for any such discussion in here atleast come up with something new?..
Just to be perfectly clear, I wasn't simply refering to that last comment, but rather the entire series of rants the two of you have made throughout the course of this thread.
yep.. you should comment on the rants that conflict with your own view... I dont use too much energy on agreeing with people.. unless I do. and im still waiting for ansfer for the questions asked by all kinds of different ppl in here.. sofar some beating around the bush and then some silence is what we got Most important question is.. why the rush. cant say im against these actual changes.. except for it baing part of a bad trend lately.
|
Steel Dragon
Caldari Skyforger Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:07:00 -
[1717]
This just shows how ******ed the team looking into 0.0 space really is. A few questions for the fools that obviously have never truly lived in 0.0: 1. How do capital ships get into friendly station systems that are cyno jammed if we can't use a jb? 2. Why do you think having a JB highway is wrong? We took a lot of time and effort to build them so yes they should be slightly safer and tbh I have lost more ships from JB's then stargates. 3. WTF are you smoking and can I have some.
Anyway good job at losing yet another subscriber (and my 4 other accounts ) You have (or are) totally destroying the only aspect of this game I truly enjoyed and I have been here from the start. Thanks CCP for being total douche bags.
Was words: If it isn't broken don't fix it Please resize your signature to the maximum allowed resolution of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24000 bytes. -Weatherman
|
Ranger 1
Amarr Paragon Fury Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:09:00 -
[1718]
Originally by: Sidus Sarmiang Edited by: Sidus Sarmiang on 11/05/2011 22:05:03 One of the biggest issues I see is that it's very easy for "elite PvP" types to attack sov-holders, but there's no mechanism for sov holders to hit them back in a meaningful way beyond trying to kill their supercaps (which are a major balance issue in and of themselves). If anything, that needs a look and some serious fixing.
I agree with this. It would add depth to the game if industrial giants that lacked PVP experience (rather than sheer numbers) could flex their economic muscles a bit more directly to bring pressure to bear on PVP centric entities.
Who knows, perhaps this will spark the return of the large Merc outfits that could be hired to do that very thing. ===== The world will not end in 2012, however there will be a serious nerf to Planetary Interaction. |
Smurf Dog
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:11:00 -
[1719]
I think CCP should spend less time nerfing stuff, and more time adding useful features or fixing the many remaining bugs.
There it is: STOP NERFING!!! Use a bit of imagination, would it kill you.
|
Lofe sXe
Caldari North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:13:00 -
[1720]
I haven't read the devblog ... but by the amount of carebear tears I must think that finally CCP have a good idea ?
|
|
Ranger 1
Amarr Paragon Fury Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:14:00 -
[1721]
Edited by: Ranger 1 on 11/05/2011 22:15:36
Originally by: Steel Dragon This just shows how ******ed the team looking into 0.0 space really is. A few questions for the fools that obviously have never truly lived in 0.0: 1. How do capital ships get into friendly station systems that are cyno jammed if we can't use a jb? 2. Why do you think having a JB highway is wrong? We took a lot of time and effort to build them so yes they should be slightly safer and tbh I have lost more ships from JB's then stargates. 3. WTF are you smoking and can I have some.
Anyway good job at losing yet another subscriber (and my 4 other accounts ) You have (or are) totally destroying the only aspect of this game I truly enjoyed and I have been here from the start. Thanks CCP for being total douche bags.
Was words: If it isn't broken don't fix it
1: Cyno jammers can be turned on and off. 2: There is nothing wrong with having a JB highway, they will still be significantly safer than gate to gate travel to your destination. The element of risk has been increased slightly as the whole route can't be JB to JB now. You might have to jump through a single gate somewhere in your trip as opposed to 10 without the JB's. 3: None of your business, and NO!
See you next time around, sorry your primary pleasure in game was traveling by jump bridge.
===== The world will not end in 2012, however there will be a serious nerf to Planetary Interaction. |
Vaju Katru
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:17:00 -
[1722]
Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:59:13 A single line comment like that is fine but not worthy of respect, go enjoy your griefing persona in-game its fun fun. but its basically the standard troll for any such discussion in here atleast come up with something new?..
You shouldn't post in this forums then. You are the standard carebear troll, always trolling when something changes ingame that messes with "carebearinness". You bring nothing new to the discussion, you are selfish and you don't see the big picture of the EvE Universe.
Basically you are just providing tears and treats of quitting EvE, just quit already or stop posting BS.
|
Rumpelstilski
Caldari Blood Covenant Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:18:00 -
[1723]
Edited by: Rumpelstilski on 11/05/2011 22:18:26
Originally by: Ranger 1 I agree with this. It would add depth to the game if industrial giants that lacked PVP experience (rather than sheer numbers) could flex their economic muscles a bit more directly to bring pressure to bear on PVP centric entities.
Who knows, perhaps this will spark the return of the large Merc outfits that could be hired to do that very thing.
Contact Shamis Orzoz regarding future contracts, tia
Originally by: Steel Dragon This just shows how ******ed the team looking into 0.0 space really is. A few questions for the fools that obviously have never truly lived in 0.0: 1. How do capital ships get into friendly station systems that are cyno jammed if we can't use a jb? 2. Why do you think having a JB highway is wrong? We took a lot of time and effort to build them so yes they should be slightly safer and tbh I have lost more ships from JB's then stargates. 3. WTF are you smoking and can I have some.
1. contact your in-alliance comrad and cycle jammer, form convoys to protect against drops, make a team effort and be better for it 2. having a jb highway is awesome, that is why you get to keep it according to the devblog so you can be slightly safer 3. sorry
EDIT: ****, beaten
|
Feyleaf
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:20:00 -
[1724]
Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 22:23:14 Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 22:20:37
Originally by: Vaju Katru
Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:59:13 A single line comment like that is fine but not worthy of respect, go enjoy your griefing persona in-game its fun fun. but its basically the standard troll for any such discussion in here atleast come up with something new?..
You shouldn't post in this forums then. You are the standard carebear troll, always trolling when something changes ingame that messes with "carebearinness". You bring nothing new to the discussion, you are selfish and you don't see the big picture of the EvE Universe.
Basically you are just providing tears and treats of quitting EvE, just quit already or stop posting BS.
And you are basically a standard anti-"carebear"(whatever) troll.. whats ur point. you do know your game would suck if all the 0.0 "carebears" left right?
Nah not gonna cancel all my eve accounts yet.. im an optimist at heart.
|
TradingTooth
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:21:00 -
[1725]
Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 22:20:37
Originally by: Vaju Katru
Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:59:13 A single line comment like that is fine but not worthy of respect, go enjoy your griefing persona in-game its fun fun. but its basically the standard troll for any such discussion in here atleast come up with something new?..
You shouldn't post in this forums then. You are the standard carebear troll, always trolling when something changes ingame that messes with "carebearinness". You bring nothing new to the discussion, you are selfish and you don't see the big picture of the EvE Universe.
Basically you are just providing tears and treats of quitting EvE, just quit already or stop posting BS.
And you are basically a standard anti-"carebear"(whatever) troll.. whats ur point.
You're both trolls trolling about trolling?
|
Feyleaf
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:24:00 -
[1726]
Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 22:25:51
Originally by: TradingTooth
Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 22:20:37
Originally by: Vaju Katru
Originally by: Feyleaf Edited by: Feyleaf on 11/05/2011 21:59:13 A single line comment like that is fine but not worthy of respect, go enjoy your griefing persona in-game its fun fun. but its basically the standard troll for any such discussion in here atleast come up with something new?..
You shouldn't post in this forums then. You are the standard carebear troll, always trolling when something changes ingame that messes with "carebearinness". You bring nothing new to the discussion, you are selfish and you don't see the big picture of the EvE Universe.
Basically you are just providing tears and treats of quitting EvE, just quit already or stop posting BS.
And you are basically a standard anti-"carebear"(whatever) troll.. whats ur point.
You're both trolls trolling about trolling?
lol maybe its something to do while being blueballed by ruskies+pets
|
ChaoticDemon
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:28:00 -
[1727]
So will capital ships be able to use gates in 0.0 since can no longer use jb's to get into jammed systems? Or at least gates where you have sov?
|
Nalle Bear
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:32:00 -
[1728]
Nicely done ccp you change the rules for the worse for us who live in not the nice 0.0 space. May consider taking a summer break from eve and hope that more people do it so your money runs dry .. and you hire an employee in the sense ccp
|
Miso Hawnee
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:34:00 -
[1729]
Originally by: Ranger 1
Originally by: Sidus Sarmiang Edited by: Sidus Sarmiang on 11/05/2011 22:05:03 One of the biggest issues I see is that it's very easy for "elite PvP" types to attack sov-holders, but there's no mechanism for sov holders to hit them back in a meaningful way beyond trying to kill their supercaps (which are a major balance issue in and of themselves). If anything, that needs a look and some serious fixing.
I agree with this. It would add depth to the game if industrial giants that lacked PVP experience (rather than sheer numbers) could flex their economic muscles a bit more directly to bring pressure to bear on PVP centric entities.
Who knows, perhaps this will spark the return of the large Merc outfits that could be hired to do that very thing.
PVP entities typically have no persistent infrastructure in game. Pandemic Legion for example has no presence once they log off, yet they have the second largest Capital Fleet in the game. All of which exists with absolutely nothing to defend. How epic is warfare when entire super fleets can disappear in 15 minutes. How are you supposed to combat entities that are 100% offense and by the graces of bad game design are not required to even set up the most basic of forward operating bases.
What we have is the ability to wield the power of super fleets without the requirement to have a port. Seems a bit off balanced doesn't it?
|
Tommy Blue
Executive Intervention Controlled Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:41:00 -
[1730]
Why not just move them to Planets and give them a few gate guns (upgradeable perhaps, based on sov/station in sys/whatever?) and call it a day?
|
|
mindblow
Rionnag Alba
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:41:00 -
[1731]
Edited by: mindblow on 11/05/2011 22:43:04 THIS.. IS.. SPARTA!!!..erm WIN!!
I totally agree of this. This is the 1st time I totally agree with CCP's way of thinking. +1, keep up the awesome work! Sig removed, lacks EVE related content. And it scared the bejesus out of me - Mitnal
|
Alaren Planeswalker
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:41:00 -
[1732]
Empire sucked, I moved out to null-sec. Don't make me move back CCP. I thought I loved your game, with its brutal learning curve and huge amount of player influence on the world. You're not keeping up the romance with these changes.
Post anom nerf, DRF now controls all the best tru-sec regions. Wanted your slice of the RMT money pie huh CCP?
It'll be interesting which groups benefit from these new changes.
Stop nerfing null-sec, and add some new features. All you're doing is forcing people back into empire. You're not blizzard. You don't have 10 million player + base where you can afford to **** off a few.
|
Messy Beaver
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:43:00 -
[1733]
Originally by: Steel Dragon This just shows how ******ed the team looking into 0.0 space really is. A few questions for the fools that obviously have never truly lived in 0.0: 1. How do capital ships get into friendly station systems that are cyno jammed if we can't use a jb? 2. Why do you think having a JB highway is wrong? We took a lot of time and effort to build them so yes they should be slightly safer and tbh I have lost more ships from JB's then stargates. 3. WTF are you smoking and can I have some.
Anyway good job at losing yet another subscriber (and my 4 other accounts ) You have (or are) totally destroying the only aspect of this game I truly enjoyed and I have been here from the start. Thanks CCP for being total douche bags.
Was words: If it isn't broken don't fix it
1) If you can't defend against what comes through when you offline that cyno jammer to let in your caps i'm afraid that jammer is only delaying the inevitable. 2)The reason you die less on gates and more at JB's is because your JB highway allows you to bypass most of those gates. Now imagine how many times you would have died at gates without them.
Why should you have the advantage of having situational control over any roaming gangs that enter your space without skill or tactical prowess getting you that advantage. You already have the advantage of reshipping, free repair, having intel channels warning of the fleet entering your space, etc etc.
3) I have some pills that give soothing and relaxing effect, I'd be happy to pass you some because boy do you need them.
Good ruidance tbh, when the changes brought to the game were to the detriment of the small roaming gang, the NC and friends said HTFU adapt or GTFO. We adapted now it's your turn, except the changes proposed to your way of playing arent all that severe.
I'll add you to my contact list because I suspect you'll still be here come the day that CCP really does **** this game up beyond repair. |
Megy Feel
V.L.A.S.T. V.L.A.S.T
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:43:00 -
[1734]
I was slightly worried when i started playing Eve in the late 2007 and checked the forums for the 1st time. People claiming they are quiting Eve with thier 10s of accounts and i was like "WHY THE **** DID I START PLAYING THIS GAME"... but then couple of months passed and Eve was still running, and then couple of years passed and Eve's subscribes tripled.
So my point is:
You are not unsubing fast enough
|
Tommy Blue
Executive Intervention Controlled Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:46:00 -
[1735]
Originally by: Miso Hawnee What we have is the ability to wield the power of super fleets without the requirement to have a port. Seems a bit off balance doesn't it?
Its called a staging pos. Kill all of their staging posses, and they will go away.
|
Miso Hawnee
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:52:00 -
[1736]
Edited by: Miso Hawnee on 11/05/2011 22:54:39
Originally by: Tommy Blue
Originally by: Miso Hawnee What we have is the ability to wield the power of super fleets without the requirement to have a port. Seems a bit off balance doesn't it?
Its called a staging pos. Kill all of their staging posses, and they will go away.
So the Titans and Nyx that did drive bys in P-2 for over a month had a staging pos? No they had a cloaking device and then logged off. Supers don't need a POS to stage in, they simply need their own account and they can use the log on / log off mechanics as a form of invulnerability. There is no counter offensive to this. The aggressor gets to dictate all the terms, and the defensive potentials in this game have become increasingly impotent over the cycles of design.
|
Megy Feel
V.L.A.S.T. V.L.A.S.T
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 22:58:00 -
[1737]
Quote: So the Titans and Nyx that did drive bys in P-2 for over a month had a staging pos? No they had a cloaking device and then logged off. Supers don't need a POS to stage in, they simply need their own account and they can use the log on / log off mechanics as a form of invulnerability. There is no counter offensive to this. The aggressor gets to dictate all the terms, and the defensive potentials in this game have become increasingly impotent over the cycles of design.
Titan drive bys and cloaking device doesn't mix very well mate...
|
Miso Hawnee
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 23:04:00 -
[1738]
Originally by: Megy Feel
Quote: So the Titans and Nyx that did drive bys in P-2 for over a month had a staging pos? No they had a cloaking device and then logged off. Supers don't need a POS to stage in, they simply need their own account and they can use the log on / log off mechanics as a form of invulnerability. There is no counter offensive to this. The aggressor gets to dictate all the terms, and the defensive potentials in this game have become increasingly impotent over the cycles of design.
Titan drive bys and cloaking device doesn't mix very well mate...
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7148623
O'rlly
|
David Carel
Caldari Random Selection. Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 23:04:00 -
[1739]
Originally by: Steel Dragon This just shows how ******ed the team looking into 0.0 space really is. A few questions for the fools that obviously have never truly lived in 0.0: 1. How do capital ships get into friendly station systems that are cyno jammed if we can't use a jb? 2. Why do you think having a JB highway is wrong? We took a lot of time and effort to build them so yes they should be slightly safer and tbh I have lost more ships from JB's then stargates. 3. WTF are you smoking and can I have some.
Anyway good job at losing yet another subscriber (and my 4 other accounts ) You have (or are) totally destroying the only aspect of this game I truly enjoyed and I have been here from the start. Thanks CCP for being total douche bags.
Was words: If it isn't broken don't fix it
u mad bro?
|
Metlec
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 23:05:00 -
[1740]
OMG u are making 0.0 harder to live in like the old days. This is an outrage!!!11
Man up.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 75 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |