|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2011.05.26 13:30:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Tres Farmer
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: CCP Atropos Or I could just add it to the manifest so that it's validated at startup...
Not funny.
In fact, a rather appalling display of either ignorance or callous disregard for the wishes of your clients.
Someone just found a solution to a problem you people apparently couldn't (or wouldn't) solve, but which has been asked for by quite a few people over the last year, and you joke about it and implicitly threaten people who would want to make use of this improvement. What's next? Are you going to make the removal of cached files and logs an offence?
How about you guys just take the hint and start giving people the options they want for how they want to play the gameā?
Why is that not funny?
As for the last part.. did the CSM raise the issue when they were in Iceland last week? What came out of this? I mean, if 'quite a few people' want this so badly, there for sure had been a proposal in the Assembly Hall with 'quite a few' supporters so that the CSM brought up this topic, no?
If all of this didn't happen.. sry. Try better next time.
You must be an idiot. CCP-started feedback threads for CQ on duality are full of these kind of requests. There's been other numerous threads dedicated to this issue. Etc. The problem and the solution are both visible and obvious to anyone interested, and CCP should be interested, rabid fanboyz notwithstanding. ...
|
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2011.05.26 18:17:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Tres Farmer
Also, I can't see what so bad about having your head in the hangar-picture in the future and seeing your ship from a diff angle?
For me personally it is being forced to do something that is pretty stupid (in-game) every single time I dock in a station. There is also the feeling that this is being done purely for usage metrics' sake, with no regard to customer relations.
For many others it is either a hardware performance issue, which most likely will not be alleviated by code optimization, or a general EVE gameplay philosophy.
In all of these cases a very simple fix is required.
What's weird is the almost religious stubbornness with which many on this forum are expressing their opposition to a simple option to toggle the new feature. ...
|
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2011.05.27 14:55:00 -
[3]
Originally by: white kight The amount of tears in this thread is amazing, all i hear is "You: waaaaaaaaaaaa ccp won't give us walking in stations" "CCP: Here you go, heres the starting point for it" "You:Don't want it any more :sulk:"
If you hate eve as much as you say you do, do us all a favour and quit. CCP Atropos came to this thread with a joke (yes ccp IS allowed to do that) and you go all emo on him. I don't care its mandatory, in fact I'm looking forward to it.
Why do you hate reason and logic so much? Why do you prefer to stay ignorant? Are you mentally challenged? ...
|
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2011.05.27 15:18:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Deviana Sevidon
Originally by: Razin Why do you hate reason and logic so much? Why do you prefer to stay ignorant? Are you mentally challenged?
Afraid your ISK farm will collapse if you can't run 8 clients at the same time?
I see you decided this was also applicable to yourself.
I own one EVE account. Have since beta. Though I read on these forums that the incarna content runs just fine in multiple windows, if your computer is up to running it at all. And mine is. My one contention in this debate is that the dock->avatar transition without the ship/hangar view stage is immersion breaking. ...
|
|
|
|