Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sarmatiko
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 22:44:00 -
[1]
Made this small video with comparison between docking/undocking on good ol' Tranquility and new mysterious Incarna which will tear your computer apart. There is huge difference and it's total fail for some people. Just see the truth and 10 minutes loading times: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giCIctbYXJw
|
Astroka
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 22:52:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Astroka on 28/05/2011 22:53:32 Two things: First of all, your computer could barely run the TQ build.
Second, the CQ build is not finished and hasn't been optimized. But I do strongly support making it optional.
Edit: Posted before I finished watching, herp derp. Kept so you can make fun of me.
Originally by: Ioci Welcome to the bustedness of EVE.
1 guy can disband a 2000 man alliance and wipe out trillions, that's cool. Give back a noob 10 mill? No, that's game breaking.
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 22:55:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Astroka Edited by: Astroka on 28/05/2011 22:53:32 Two things: First of all, your computer could barely run the TQ build.
Second, the CQ build is not finished and hasn't been optimized. But I do strongly support making it optional.
Edit: Posted before I finished watching, herp derp. Kept so you can make fun of me.
haha herp derp!
|
Deviana Sevidon
Gallente Panta-Rhei Butterfly Effect Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 22:58:00 -
[4]
I noticed no practical difference in the undocking time between the incarna build and TQ.
Besides even your TQ undocking is terribly slow.
Quote: Disclaimer: All mentioned above contains my opinion and is therefore an absolute truth (for me anyway, my universe, muhahaha.....ok, done
|
Astroka
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:03:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Deviana Sevidon I noticed no practical difference in the undocking time between the incarna build and TQ.
Besides even your TQ undocking is terribly slow.
Watch the video, you did the same thing I did, I think.
Originally by: Ioci Welcome to the bustedness of EVE.
1 guy can disband a 2000 man alliance and wipe out trillions, that's cool. Give back a noob 10 mill? No, that's game breaking.
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:05:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Deviana Sevidon I noticed no practical difference in the undocking time between the incarna build and TQ.
Besides even your TQ undocking is terribly slow.
lol why would you act like you watched it?
FAILLLLLLL
this thread perfectly wraps up why the community is going to **** xD
|
Rolare
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:05:00 -
[7]
Your TQ docking is slower than mine... how in God's name can your docking time be slower than mine? O.o
|
Simply Human
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:08:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Deviana Sevidon I noticed no practical difference in the undocking time between the incarna build and TQ.
Besides even your TQ undocking is terribly slow.
That's caused by the 30 second session timer. |
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar The Python Cartel. The Defenders of Pen Island
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:12:00 -
[9]
I win, I just skipped right to the end of the video. It was taking too long, much like your computer
Originally by: Xenuria
I don't need a LICENSE to take a photoshooped image and lay it on top of the game client and make pretend my character is naked.
|
ivar R'dhak
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:21:00 -
[10]
Nice, the smartass is strong with these ones. Quelle surprise.
Now try it with two clients simultaneously... And use an actual minimum spec sys like a P4/2gig/GForce 6000+.
Suddenly not so smartassy anymore, eh? What about all the laptop users?
..
Morans... ______________ Mal-¦Appears we got here just in a nick of time. What does that make us?¦ Zoe-`Big damn heroes, sir.` Mal-¦Aint we just.¦ |
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:24:00 -
[11]
Originally by: ivar R'dhak Nice, the smartass is strong with these ones. Quelle surprise.
Now try it with two clients simultaneously... And use an actual minimum spec sys like a P4/2gig/GForce 6000+.
Suddenly not so smartassy anymore, eh? What about all the laptop users?
..
Morans...
my 3 year laptop has a 8800 GTS...
|
ivar R'dhak
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:25:00 -
[12]
Originally by: MotherMoon
Originally by: ivar R'dhak What about all the laptop users?
my 3 year laptop has a 8800 GTS...
That¦s nice. But I¦m not buying at the door. ______________ Mal-¦Appears we got here just in a nick of time. What does that make us?¦ Zoe-`Big damn heroes, sir.` Mal-¦Aint we just.¦ |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:34:00 -
[13]
So basically, you're saying that Incarna docking/relaunching takes 50% longer than it should? ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
ivar R'dhak
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:43:00 -
[14]
From what my Pal told me Incarna docking is barely useable on his minimum spec sys with only one account. Effectively unbearable.
While another friend who had an even lower spec sys has all but given up on EVE now.
Maybe I can get more info out of them tomorrow, when they¦re less ****ed off. ______________ Mal-¦Appears we got here just in a nick of time. What does that make us?¦ Zoe-`Big damn heroes, sir.` Mal-¦Aint we just.¦ |
Kieron VonDeux
|
Posted - 2011.05.28 23:59:00 -
[15]
I guess it's time to up the min spec again.
|
Lt Chonchu
International Anarchy
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 00:05:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Sarmatiko Made this small video with comparison between docking/undocking on good ol' Tranquility and new mysterious Incarna which will tear your computer apart. There is huge difference and it's total fail for some people. Just see the truth and 10 minutes loading times: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giCIctbYXJw
only 10 minutes? Too bad you didn't have two exotic dancers in your quarters when you did this test... á á á -----------------á "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe"
A.E |
Cathy Drall
Amarr Royal Amarr Institute
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 00:11:00 -
[17]
Edited by: Cathy Drall on 29/05/2011 00:11:21
Originally by: Sarmatiko Made this small video with comparison between docking/undocking on good ol' Tranquility and new mysterious Incarna which will tear your computer apart. There is huge difference and it's total fail for some people. Just see the truth and 10 minutes loading times: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giCIctbYXJw
My docking times on duality aren¦t that different but when I enter the `wardrobe` my PC crashes all the time .. annoying!
"Im not nearly as paranoid as people think I am" |
Aeronwen Carys
Empire of Dust
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 00:12:00 -
[18]
Originally by: ivar R'dhak From what my Pal told me Incarna docking is barely useable on his minimum spec sys with only one account. Effectively unbearable.
While another friend who had an even lower spec sys has all but given up on EVE now.
Maybe I can get more info out of them tomorrow, when they¦re less ****ed off.
Are you actually saying that your friend is so challenged mentally, that he is complaining about his LOWER THAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENT system being unable to run EVE? Holy crap stop the presses, we have found the worlds stupidest person.
|
ivar R'dhak
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 00:14:00 -
[19]
Edited by: ivar R''dhak on 29/05/2011 00:16:47
Originally by: Kieron VonDeux I guess it's time to up the min spec again.
Yes, because making a niche game even more exclusive by raising system specs is the way to make it more profitable...
While the reason for the raised performance requirements adds practically no gameplay value.
Perfect.
Originally by: Aeronwen Carys Holy crap stop the presses, we have found the worlds stupidest person.
When you point at someone, 4 fingers are pointing right back at ya. Thnx for the ozom proof of that saying. ______________ Mal-¦Appears we got here just in a nick of time. What does that make us?¦ Zoe-`Big damn heroes, sir.` Mal-¦Aint we just.¦ |
Sadayiel
Caldari Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 00:22:00 -
[20]
Edited by: Sadayiel on 29/05/2011 00:23:20
Originally by: Sarmatiko Made this small video with comparison between docking/undocking on good ol' Tranquility and new mysterious Incarna which will tear your computer apart. There is huge difference and it's total fail for some people. Just see the truth and 10 minutes loading times: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giCIctbYXJw
Sarmatiko dear just log back into duality and asap you get the Loading Screen for the station check how the ships/hangar mods and all the other buttons are just fully functional even if the CQ didn't loaded yet.
Tbh i just fired up duality and check a straight load game, undock then redock for swap ship/fittings and it takes almost same time as TQ
P.S: also on a side note i noticed a looong station load this time, specially when first entering the game but that's all and with everything at max.
|
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 00:26:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Sadayiel Sarmatiko dear just log back into duality and asap you get the Loading Screen for the station check how the ships/hangar mods and all the other buttons are just fully functional even if the CQ didn't loaded yet.
Actually, it takes them a while to be fully functional, and the functions they provide are (unsurprisingly) slowed down by the loading process. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:00:00 -
[22]
Has anyone tried to run 2 clients and see how fast the alt tabbing is and how much memory 2 clients + operating system (xp) allocate.
------------------------------------------------- Play with the best - die like the rest starwreck.com - support the cause :) |
Zoroa Aulx-Gao
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:05:00 -
[23]
All that whining for that. Holy ****.
|
Baralosus
Caldari Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:08:00 -
[24]
Guess we'll just have to wait till release. :D
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:12:00 -
[25]
Edited by: MotherMoon on 29/05/2011 02:15:54 Edited by: MotherMoon on 29/05/2011 02:13:32 I"M SORRY BUT WHY IS NO ONE WATCHING THE F***NG YOUTUBE VIDEO.
It's suppose to be funny, his video shows there there is NO DIFFERENCE IN LOADING TIMES.
edit: if you even read the 1st reply you wouldn't look so dense xD
Originally by: ivar R'dhak Edited by: ivar R''dhak on 29/05/2011 00:18:32
Originally by: Kieron VonDeux I guess it's time to up the min spec again.
Yes, because making a niche game even more exclusive by raising system specs is the way to make it more profitable...
While the reason for the raised performance requirements adds practically no gameplay value.
Perfect.
good point, we all know that's been helping every other mmo that refused to change it's graphics. I mean Everquest is soooo popular at 30,000 subs right now. and if they had upped the graphics there is no way that would in anyways have saved thier customer base.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:14:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Zoroa Aulx-Gao All that whining for that.
Not really, no. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
voiddragon
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:20:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Grey Stormshadow Has anyone tried to run 2 clients and see how fast the alt tabbing is and how much memory 2 clients + operating system (xp) allocate.
You should switch instantly if you're alt tabbing using fixed window mode instead of full screen... I can't see any noticable difference between TQ and CQ, I would reduce the settings if you're experiencing problems...
But honestly, people should think about upgrading if you're on a 4+ year old XP machine anyway. It's only a matter of time before XP is unable to run any new releases of games as it is an obsolete OS which can only run DirectX 9 and that won't change as MS has abandoned it.
|
Nova Fox
Gallente Novafox Shipyards
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:23:00 -
[28]
Well when the first started to test CQ the FPS and load and undock times where unbearably long at a minute or two between transitions and fps of 10, current build is smooth as butter and barely unnoticable and they said they still havent started optimizing? Pre-order your Sisters of ≡v≡ Exploration ship today, Updated 3APR11
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:29:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Nova Fox current build is smooth as butter and barely unnoticable and they said they still havent started optimizing?
"Barely unnoticable" as in "very noticable" or as in "barely noticable"?
And anyway, no, they've started optimising. They'll certainly optimise some more, as it is still very much needed, but they have indeed already started. However, no optimisation in the world will ever beat the very simple matter of not loading the assets at all (which you can force the client to do the naught way, with absolutely zero ill effects)à ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.05.29 02:33:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Nova Fox current build is smooth as butter and barely unnoticable and they said they still havent started optimizing?
"Barely unnoticable" as in "very noticable" or as in "barely noticable"?
And anyway, no, they've started optimising. They'll certainly optimise some more, as it is still very much needed, but they have indeed already started. However, no optimisation in the world will ever beat the very simple matter of not loading the assets at all (which you can force the client to do the naught way, with absolutely zero ill effects)à
funny part is they already have the loading screen before the assets load. They could have an option ot never let it get past that part. More or less forgetting getting out of pod, you don't even have to really fully dock just to buy mods and get ammo. Like drive through fast food, but in space.
point is there is no excuse why if you wanted *I wouldn't* you could just let it sit on the loading screen forever as per option in the settings.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |