Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 41 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Raz Xym
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 20:10:00 -
[931]
Originally by: Jannx Edited by: Jannx on 23/06/2011 19:39:58 Could CCP tell us why they're deleting posts that, rightly, point out that their latest dev blog completely ignores the issues that the subscribing community are concerned with?
Edit: I've pointed out, in the comments section of their latest dev blog, that it completely ignores the current concerns of the community... four times! Each time it was deleted. I used no foul language or images, and I was not the only one by any means. I'm guessing at least half the posts on there have been deleted by CCP Fallout.
That's biting the hand that feeds you, CCP.
I also have been heavily moderated in that thread. All posts are deleted that do not 100% support CCP in their views of what a good job they have done. Just more signs what they really think of their customers.
|
Fogwlker
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 20:19:00 -
[932]
1.) In anticipation of this expansion I have been stockpiling all my usual hangouts with Booz, Cigarettes, Janitors, Slaves and Exotic Dancers as well as snack items. Yet when I look in my quarters there are no cigarettes, no liquor, noone picking up my dirty laundry and certainly no half naked dancers. Get on it. I don't need nudity but perhaps some bikini clad women would make my investments worth it. And cigarettes my character neeeds smoke like a fat kid needs cake.
2.) Vanity store needs way more items. If I'm going to spend the isk to look awesome I certainly dont wanna look like everyone else out there. Perhaps some of the items/slaves/strippers I mentioned above would be available for purchase.
3.) This is prolly in the works but Ill mention it anyways, having a real avatar that I can play dress up with is useless unless I can walk around with other avatars and make rude gestures at them.
|
Zorash Xanten
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 20:21:00 -
[933]
As a 2006 player I am deeply concerned about the direction CCP is taking my beloved EVE, 2 days ago I would have said to anyone that I would play EVE until the day the servers shut down, now I doubt I will be playing EVE at the end of the year, probably sooner if CCP don't seriously rethink their strategy.
Oh a feedback for Incarna: Full of c r a p that the playerbase did not want.
|
DHuncan
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 20:29:00 -
[934]
Originally by: Draco Omega In a word: Terrible update.
Walking around a pointless room is lame. Waste of computer resources if you ask me. All that time for this? Ugh... lame.
Why not spend more time upgrading content (more interesting / new quests, more epic arc missions, etc) instead of wasting time on something like the Captain's Quarters.
And to top it all off, the problems with the Mac client since the launch (which still has not been corrected) is terrible. Why not fully bug test things before release?
They dont aim for intelligent players, but for the big mass, that will give more money by larger numbers. This patch improved theyr servers performances not your end. So from now on the politics are: Sims like girlie game and nonsense noobkill asistance. Get over it, is all about mulla, isn't it?
|
Jenny Starlight
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 20:39:00 -
[935]
Edited by: Jenny Starlight on 23/06/2011 20:41:07 Running two clients with the captains quarter turned on lags like a 500v500 battle even on my newly upgraded PC with I7 2600K, x2 6970 2GB, 16GB of RAM, 128GB intel 510 SSD.
Three clients, well then its worse than Uemon was at max graphics. And it laggs the entire PC not just the clients. And yes its wrong with the game itself not my PC.
Yeah, that clash in Uemon was less laggy than the captains quarter with multiple clients..
|
Posiedan
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 20:59:00 -
[936]
I like the Captains Quarters, except it lags with the settings I have. I know I can turn it off, and I do, but I wish it would revert back to the old way when I did.
|
Horaccio
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:16:00 -
[937]
Originally by: Jenny Starlight Edited by: Jenny Starlight on 23/06/2011 20:41:07 Running two clients with the captains quarter turned on lags like a 500v500 battle even on my newly upgraded PC with I7 2600K, x2 6970 2GB, 16GB of RAM, 128GB intel 510 SSD.
Three clients, well then its worse than Uemon was at max graphics. And it laggs the entire PC not just the clients. And yes its wrong with the game itself not my PC.
Yeah, that clash in Uemon was less laggy than the captains quarter with multiple clients..
Running a Pentium D processor with 3 Gigs of RAM under vista 32-bit on an old spinning HD with 8800GT 1GB card and it's fine. 2 clients on one screen (alt+tab) drives this baby to the the edge but still works just fine even with maxed out graphics. Either stop buying computers in malls or stop selling bull.
BTW One (maybe few) general remark: - This Incarna patch is a first step into social gaming. Just a way of checking how much flaming it would get from those "hardcore" long-time players who normally don't have any issue with exploiting game mechanics but in this case are acting as "guradians of tradition" - Of course this patch is also an end of PLEX - one can not pay bills in ISK, even in Iceland. You see vanity items, PLEX conversion into aurum etc. But the point is to get those plexes our of players pockets and make them paying real money for playing. - Of course with Dust 514 ccp is trying to dramatically increase and rejuvenate player base with those evil console gamers. These people will very likely try to see what eve is about and if it's not like S*MS they won't bother.
Huge generalisation but as usual it's our choice to play or not and remember that ccp is not a non-profit organistaion. Stop whining and enjoy :). Or in an act of protest you can just give me all your plexes and cancel subscription.
|
Eddie Saunders
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:21:00 -
[938]
Edited by: Eddie Saunders on 23/06/2011 21:24:32 Edited by: Eddie Saunders on 23/06/2011 21:22:38 Personally I really like incarna, and there is alot of potential. However as mentioned, please reduce NEX prices, this will actually make you ,ccp, more money as if basic clothes were a hundred or few hundred aurum: more ppl buy and remember every aurum will have come from breaking up a PLEX, also ull boost the isk to aurum trade so people will risk breaking up a plex to sell the aurum individually for more isk overall than the plex cost them (4 ppl who only want 100 aur for those new boots and dnt wana WASTE a whole PLEX ) so then u'll get more plex's used again. Also make it easier to do stuff as again already said, i don't want to have to learn shortcuts , I have to open ship hangar then cargo hold to open ships cargo if I'm not near the holograms ... Just think when therest of the station is open and were 3 mins from our cq and need to suddenly move some items from our hangar to our ships cargo and undock .... Please get a team to fix up all of these minor mistakes ! Thanks , eddie
|
Felis Arkaral
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:22:00 -
[939]
- The new turret design is awesome. I had been looking forward to it and was not disappointed. Some of the turrets fit kind of oddly on some of the frigates though, but that's more a function of ship size than turret design.
- The new Maller ship family design is also awesome, especially the Khanid variant. Makes me want to go buy one even though I really don't have the need to fly it.
- Ambulation is cool, and is pretty much as had been promised and expected, not a big surprise there. I'd love to have a body reshape for my character though, her proportions didn't quite appear the way I expected when i made her. I had hoped there would be more (free) options introduced for attire, but hopefully that is down the road somewhere.
- CQ is amusing and also appears as expected. However, the lighting seems off in some places, and I'd love to be able to customize whats on those monitors. Also, I think reintroducing the hanger layer between open space and standing in the station would be convenient. Sometimes I'd just like to dock quickly, load stuff and take off without disembarking.
- I'm not sure how to articulate my objection to NEX. If people want to cash-in PLEX in NEX for in game bling and what not, I could care less, to each their own. That being said, I feel that MT models have a bad kinda vibe to them. Kind of a buffet vs. a la carte sort of deal. I would strongly prefer to stay on a strictly subscription game, MT can have a stingy kinda feel to if not executed very carefully. Lol @ $70 monocle.
All in all, get a few bugs patched up and work out some of the CQ/ambulation kinks, expand past the CQ novelty material into something that holds the attention a bit more and i think we might have something cool. Doesn't the idea of a completely integrated universe between planets, stations, ships and people sound fun?
|
Mera Lehbo
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:25:00 -
[940]
Feedback: Incarna is essentially a tech demo that doesn't add to or fix the gameplay in any meaningful way. I'll be cancelling all my subscriptions.
|
|
zoni Ishikela
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:27:00 -
[941]
Edited by: zoni Ishikela on 23/06/2011 21:35:43 Edited by: zoni Ishikela on 23/06/2011 21:34:41 Edited by: zoni Ishikela on 23/06/2011 21:33:55 Edited by: zoni Ishikela on 23/06/2011 21:32:20 - I like CQ as a user interface, and glad you also kept the old UI. - I'm not sure why CQ is such a hit on the GPU - even when the UI is doing nothing my GPU fan spins up and it's working hard. In fact, enabling AA in CQ really hits the FPS. In fact, if my GPU can handle Crysis at a decent 30FPS, it should easily handle CQ, and that's not the case (slide show with AA enabled on an Nvidia 420M, no issues with ATI 5870). Seems that there's some optimization yet to be had there. - Please fix HDR on ATI cards - that's a bummer. - With regards to which ship is selected, would be nice to see that easily through the ship window. Can see it in the holographic image and/or the deck. - Turrets are nice, love that. - Haven't tried Aurum, didn't see the need at my level (I don't need style to get podded :) ) - Seems to take a lot less time to load my items window - If only I didn't need a magnifying glass to see my text in 13 points at native screen resolution - my eyes are old, and I fail to see the point in using 800x600 resolution just to be able to read my text with my reading glasses... - Hope they have a way to turn off the TV in Incarna 1.1...
Overall, I think it's a positive step and good evolution, keep it up. Do keep the 2D though as 3D is not for all users, and even mid-range graphic cards have a super hard time with CQ right now, and the existing ability to turn that off is welcome.
Z.
|
G'Shad
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:28:00 -
[942]
òFactional Warfare NPCs now care about defending against their allies enemies. (copy/pasted from http://www.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp?patchlogID=230 )
Could we get some expansion on what this means, because it clearly is not Empire Navy NPCs attacking PCs of cross enemy faction like it sounds like it should be. Example: player members of the Gallente Federation's militia with high Amarr Empire standing can still sit around a gate in Amarr Empire highsec and not be noticed by the Amarr Empire NPCs. They can even get into an extensive battleship on battleship brawl against members of the Amarr Empire Militia right next to said NPCs with out ever drawing navy attention. This greatly implies that nothing has changed.
|
Miharu Kuzak
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:35:00 -
[943]
I'm a 2007 player and I love this update! The new turret animation are awsome and I really like the CQ. But I would like to control the lighting, it's a bit to dark. Also it would be great to change the style of the CQ so that it looks more like caldari or amaar.
Really great job CCP!
|
Vanessa Vansen
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:37:00 -
[944]
Hi there,
just wanted to let you know. I really do like the new turrets... looking forward to see the missile launcher in the future too. A little thing to add on your list is who turrets interact with cloaking, since that is looking a bit strange.
Captain Quarters ... sorry, I don't care about and have turned it off but I do miss station spinning a bit. Noble exchange ... sorry again, but I'm into ships and no, they don't need some special painting or whatever.
It would be nice to hear if there is any new ship that you would have in mind ... maybe T3 frigates/destroyer/battlecruiser/battleships ... or even T3 mining barges ... I would have some ideas for the later one, in case you're interested (yes, I'm serious).
Cheers, Van
|
andymark
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:40:00 -
[945]
C'mon CCP admit it this has no merit at all to gameplay. This is self indulgence taken to grandiose proportions. Has top management any idea at all what eve is about any more? I personally walked into the CQ and switched the f&cker off! What mad marketing tosser dreamt this all up and how did it sail past the drawing board?
|
Fluffy Pillowbiter
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 21:57:00 -
[946]
Congratulations CCP! You have now made the game much less enjoyable for me. I for one am not going to pay 1 more red cent to beta test your product.Thats what we pay YOU for. Nor do i wish to shorten the life of my computer if i want to play more than 2 clients with CQ OFF let alone on!
Your DUST OR BUST approach is wrecking EVE as we know and love it. Good Luck with transitioning eve from internet space ship pew pew to FPS planet pew pew, oh and u better do it b4 the cash cow runs outta milk or ya gonna be F*****D. 6 accts unsubbed = more pillows i can buy.
And NO!,u cannot haz mah jhew gold =) |
Illadelph Justice
SniggWaffe FREE KARTTOON NOW
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 22:21:00 -
[947]
this is my feedback read
---
|
Tek Gold
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 22:30:00 -
[948]
After playing the game with the new content I have to add some things to my previous feedback:
-Aurum/NeX: The idea is acceptable, the prices are certainly not. While most MMO's feature a item-store nowadays, the prices are -to say it politely- exaggerated. The eye-implant costs 12000 aurum, that's almost 4 plexes. After all this is a decorational digital item, paying that much(around 70Ç or 1560,000,000 ISK(fast check))...certainly not. I don't see forward to the complete walking-in-stations-experience if it turns out like this. If only people who are well enough compensated for such investments in a game will be able to expand their outfits, the players will turn out to look all the same. While EVE is certainly the best scifi-MMO or even simulator I've encountered, it's still a game. 5Ç for a shirt, that's a price I could accept. It would be reasonable enough to just go shopping sometimes, but it would sum up for a large variety of outfits. Leave the high prices to things large corporations or alliances could use: Expensive costumizable skysc****rs in a station for example.
-Captains Quarters: I like graphical interfaces like this. Further expansions of it would be great...but I miss the old hangar too. For one of the first demonstrations of the incarna-features the captains-cabin was chosen from a menu in the normal hangar-interface. This would be the ideal solution.
-Turrets: Well, I stick with it: Please make them retractable by pressing a button.
|
Atreus Venom
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 22:41:00 -
[949]
Edited by: Atreus Venom on 23/06/2011 22:42:23 how awesome would it be to dock at a station and have the old hanger view there like before but then have the option to unboard the ship.. and you see your pod leave the ship and lock onto the platform and open and you pop out some **** like that would be cool or you can choose to just stay in the ship...
BTW PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE explain NEX there is nothing noble about it
º--Atreus--º
|
Neeke Oh'Lamarick
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 22:44:00 -
[950]
Originally by: Thermoss Devlin I only hope that CCP really listens to this player feedback becuase if they don't i don't sincerely know if i will keep my accountsactive.
I only have a few things to say: * Don't release updates that are not fully tested.
This made me laugh :)
|
|
Prester Tom
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 22:54:00 -
[951]
CCP, please, please, can we get some response from you about all this?
|
Dan Estrellas Amigo
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 23:17:00 -
[952]
"But what if they don't want to use CQ?"
"Well then just show them the door."
|
Vauss Dutan
Caldari Rock and Stone
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 23:19:00 -
[953]
Your Aurum prices are waaay too high. They are so high that wearing these items will get you ridiculed. You will not be elite or special, you will be a fool to be mocked. This is a game where being a fool and being mocked is waaaaay bad. As someone stated in another thread, the eve base of players are not they type of players your market analysts learned about in business school. This is a niche group of hardcore players and they are laughing your macro transaction rollout into the ground. You should now have some data to analyze the rejection of this. Analyze it and make some changes.
And, change your "golden goose" perspective and just make a damn good game. The subscribers will then come and you'll have enough money to fund your twilight game and whatever else youre making.
|
Heinrich Dekkard
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 23:36:00 -
[954]
I normaly dont post a lot on this Forums because quite frankly i dont like them that much but here it comes:
I came to the conclusion that instead of pushing out all this Aurum and Microtransactions nonsense i would have been much more happy with an increase in Subs by lets say 5 Euros a month.
I am 100% Serious here.
I mean everyone understands this: There are those Greedy shareholders who want to just grab the money and run, creating a counterproductive environment for the CCP Employes to develop anything innovative (cause beeing innovative means taking a risk Position in the Market these days and they cant have that in there greedy little world).
So why not raise the Subscription by a fiver and save us all the whole Aurum hussle and the related nonsense. Sooner or later Game relevant Stuff will pop out in that fancy Store anyways and people will be even more anoyed by all this (One can allread smell that Nuclear +15% Bomb for only 19,95 Aurum per use,.. and dont pretend otherwise ;)). Development time for this stuff could be used for much more benefit in other departments of the game etc. etc. you get the Point .....
Cheers
|
JT Black
Amarr ALPHA REACTION
|
Posted - 2011.06.23 23:38:00 -
[955]
The one at the helm is responsible for not putting a stop to what members of CCP staff are doing.
Mr Hilmar , can you read the forums and understand how displeased your subscribers are ?
Yet again you trust your "inovative" members of staff to do a good job ?
Say , was I the Boss I would simply replace whoever keeps trying to interfere with teh game content with people who understand that EvE needs to stabilize and give way to their constant changes and sugestions.
Take time to reflect on the course your/our beloved game is taking, maybe you will say i am right. Its time to stop releasing expansions and better what already needed addressing.
|
Soden Rah
Gallente EVE University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 00:00:00 -
[956]
I suppose my feedback to this patch, and subsequent revelations, is this....
Originally by: Account management - cancel account
I will re-sub in September IF:
You scrap ALL MT for EVE (if my subscription is not enough then your business model is flawed).
You restore the old Hanger view and make CQ optional on docking.
If you give us separate graphics settings for Incarna and Space.
If you start responding regularly to feedback from players helping you out by testing stuff on SiSi.
If you start caring about RP and Immersion over hard profit.
If you take the time to actually remove defects from patches that are discovered on the first day of testing rather than allowing patches to hit TQ with them still in. ( I appreciate you can't find all the bugs/issues before launch, But your not fixing the ones we do find)
If you start communicating with us in the early development process and ask us for feedback when there is still time to change things, and lots of dev time and resources have not already been deployed.
If you do these things... I will re-sub in September... If you don't... I will vanish and never return...
Your choice.
I await your response to these issues on the forums, and in the dev blogs.
EVE Online Subscription Cancelled
You have cancelled your EVE Online subscription.
Your account will be suspended at the end of the current subscription period, expiring on 12 September 2011.
Your characters will be stored safely and be ready for you to enjoy again should you decide to return.
If you feel that this cancellation has been made in error, you can quickly and easily reopen your account by clicking below.
You have till September as I resubscribed for 3 months just before the patch.
I was not expecting to, and have never before, threatened to leave EVE over any other patch.
I am not threatening to leave now.
I am already gone. --------
By Grfmsv÷tn, Eyjafjallaj÷kull, Vatnaj÷kull, and Hekla itself... THIS is my sig.
Support Optional CQ
|
Chidori kun
Minmatar Starship Operating BastardZ
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 00:07:00 -
[957]
Hi all,
Of and on I been playing EvE since 2005, I have fought up north and south. So yeah I can say I am a PVP'r.
Peeps talking barbie space dolls and other stuff fine if that is your opinion that fine with me I respect that.
But when in 2006 rumors came about walking in stations I was like yes more immersion that's great. But it never came and it turned in a echo in the background noise.
Not long ago I returned to EvE been away on SL, WoW and so on. Anyways I saw the new CC en was like yes finally that looks more like it, not that fake cartoon like character picture we had before. When I was catching up on my EvE reading I learned about Incarna and was even more happy, fluffy well ya know ;)
I knew it would the first step to walking in stations but hey not everything can be done at once.
Even looked at SiSi helped with the last masstest cause I was there anyways to look how the CQ would look with my own eyes. Saw the shop played barbie doll in front of the mirror and basically liked what I saw. Although not all the clothing was well... top notch, I have designed and seen better in SL but it was a good enough start.
So the 21th of june came stayed up late waiting to go online creditcard ready to buy a plex to convert it to AURUM (yeah I am dutch) After patching my client plop online headed to the shop and.... well I had to rub my eyes a few time because of the prices and the lack of goods compared to SiSi. Basically I put back my CC in my RL wallet half laughing half crying only thinking they must have gone mad in Iceland sniffing to much volcanic ashes. Or some idiot made a misstake...
The prices are well insane and... I am lost for words.. Now I am concerned about the future when we finally can get out of our CQ's meet up or walk up behind a person pointing a blaster to his/her head Saying "Hey remember me"
There is no future for immersion with clothing and trinkets with those prices.. If it stays like that then we can better clone Jango Fett again and play clone wars in EvE... well that is really boring.
Chid hops back in the her hulk
|
RnDr Brain
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 00:11:00 -
[958]
Originally by: G'Shad òFactional Warfare NPCs now care about defending against their allies enemies. (copy/pasted from http://www.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp?patchlogID=230 )
Could we get some expansion on what this means, because it clearly is not Empire Navy NPCs attacking PCs of cross enemy faction like it sounds like it should be. Example: player members of the Gallente Federation's militia with high Amarr Empire standing can still sit around a gate in Amarr Empire highsec and not be noticed by the Amarr Empire NPCs. They can even get into an extensive battleship on battleship brawl against members of the Amarr Empire Militia right next to said NPCs with out ever drawing navy attention. This greatly implies that nothing has changed.
dude we were tanking amarr navy... It doesnt do anything with Incarna...
|
RnDr Brain
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 00:38:00 -
[959]
turret icons dont need to say more
|
Laurentus
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[960]
Originally by: RnDr Brain turret icons dont need to say more
Completely agree. While the turret models are OK, the icons are terrible (too dark at least).
Generally about the Incarna: big disappointment. There are really much more important issues to improve than introducing CQ which eat my computer resources, and I see no sense in it at this time at least. Why the CCP resources are not diverted to the areas which really need improvement like low-sec, diplomacy, more interesting missions, arc & epics, new ships, etc...
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 41 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |