Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 .. 449 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Miilla
Minmatar Hulkageddon Orphanage
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:32:00 -
[5491]
Edited by: Miilla on 24/06/2011 19:32:20
All GO TO RENS SYSTEM!
PROTEST STAGING IN RENS.
|
moola
Band Of Frogs
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:32:00 -
[5492]
Edited by: moola on 24/06/2011 19:33:49 Hahaha the guy running jita protest on Justin Tv is using that ship info hack thing, ever time he mouses over a ship info pops up in green txt
http://www.justin.tv/deamosseraph#/w/1380742320
Edit - the green UI is just an XML change, so the streamer says.
|
Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:33:00 -
[5493]
Originally by: Cailais
Originally by: Crye MultiCam
Originally by: Da Gooch
Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?
!!
According to the latest rumour Ive just heard its worse. Much worse.
This suckers going down.
C.
oh so everyone is going to see solid proof of the rest of the story? That will be GOLD!
His name was John Turbefield! Truth. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4YHvtEJgBc Best brief on the details. FREE HELICITY |
Kindora Adoulin
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:34:00 -
[5494]
CCP, I have one request that will at least (in my opinion) show a step in the right direction.
If you are actually planning to bring your transparency as a company back to where it once was, then it would be in your best interest to post the Greed is Good document to your news feed. Many of us have already seen the document, however there are still many who have not, and if you are serious about bringing about more transparency then stand behind that and put the document out for everyone to see.
You have lost a lot of the trust of your player base and you need to take this first step to true transparency NOW. Responding in this thread is not helping matters.
You need to take action on this ASAP and post the document out in the open (on your news feed for everyone to see), apologize to the community, and issue an official statement from Soundwave and the rest of the management group that micro-transactions will remain purely cosmetic and that you will pursue a more transparent company policy in the future. And most importantly, you must follow through on that statement. If you don't then far less people will forgive you a second time.
You will lose subscriptions over this incident, however you will lose far more if you do not take action and SHOW your community that you are taking a step in the right direction rather than just telling us here.
|
Gabriel Arxangel
Amarr Hidden Agenda Deep Space Engineering
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:34:00 -
[5495]
Edited by: Gabriel Arxangel on 24/06/2011 19:37:25 I have been here a while, I remember t20. I remember the reason for starting the CSM. There is no doubt that selling valuable items through MT has the potential for making significant money for CCP, and I understand how a company would desire to pursue that. Ironically enough I'm one of those in position to take advantage of the MT market. Real money for unbeatable ships or t3 ammo or even extra skill points certainly wouldn't break me. But I know it's wrong. It destroys the "sandbox" concept that eve has valued for so long. It cheapens the game.
It is very disturbing that anyone who works on this game could even contemplate such a game destroying feature. It does not 'cross the line' it leaps over it. Eve is based on you taking what you want and fighting to keep it, everyone starts the same and goes from there. Giving players the option of buying what they want devalues the cornerstone of the game. That's why it is so wrong for eve. I always thought the biggest fans of eve were the devs who loved and cared about this game, I see now that isn't the case, at least for some.
A blog won't fix this, neither will any grandiose promises. PR won't stop this, perhaps even Helmar can't stop this. I am not upset about the system demands of CQ, and believe in the vision of increasing player immersion. When CCP shared their vision of a total sifi MMO, I cheered. Could CQ have been implemented better, sure. Could some the players ideas be included to improve the expansion, sure. Do I believe that CQ is a bold leap forward, yes and I applaud the effort.
But allowing out of game advantages to spill over into the game is 180 out from the sandbox concept eve has prided itself on. It is so wrong on every level, and the fact that anyone involved in the development of this game fails to see that is truly frightening. I am not ready to rage quit, I am not threatening. MT for in game advantages is NOT in place yet, and hopefully never will be. If/when it becomes a reality, I will have some hard choices to make. I truly hope CCP never asks me to make that decision.
Edit - spelling
|
YarrMama
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:34:00 -
[5496]
Originally by: Lord Wiggin Rumor has it they are in talks with Ex-congressman Weiner. They think he can put a better spin on things.....
- 3 accounts, not waiting for the spin to hit...
They will be texting a picture response soon.
|
Magicblue
Amarr Hunters of capsuleers
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:35:00 -
[5497]
Ok, me an my friends/acquintences have all agreed not to complain about eve. Unless MT starts affecting the game, if that happens we all agreed that thats the end. Thats around a hundred less subscribers. If you wish, jack up the prices monthly. Whatever, just don't introduce MT where you can get an advantage that isk cannot give you by itself Custom paintjobs, custom clothes. Bring it on, we are all for that part. However, micro transaction that affects the game in more then a visual way is a turnoff. If you read ccp thanks:) Hf fun spiralling this game into the next stage
|
Ze DarkMaster
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:35:00 -
[5498]
no to MT etc. fix things like this instead.
|
Miss Panky
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:36:00 -
[5499]
Half a million views. Hope we get a dev blog before we hit a million
|
Koba Kyogen
The Concordiat Concordiat Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:36:00 -
[5500]
No to any microtransaction that is not purely vanity related.
The second you turn a beautiful sandbox into a pay-to-win browser game - I'm effin out of here.
Been here since March of 2006, and love it. Don't commit suicide like this CCP.
Koba
Originally by: CCP Sharkbait we are screwed. delaying startup again.
|
|
Nitsu
Gallente Gladiators of Rage Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:36:00 -
[5501]
Born: 27.10.2006 Joined long standing corp: 27.08.2007 Leaving game due to CCP choosing the mighty dollar over its loyal sub base: 25.6.2011 (Waiting for CCP's response) All supplemental alt accounts also being shredded:4 It is clear that mining to make money in this game will no longer be possible once CCP is selling non-player generated items that are coveted over what my fellow miners and manufacutres are making now. With a heavy heart me accounts are now circling the drain. I think i will go play a game where its possible to honestly play by the rules and win by playing it best. I am thinking WoW, Maybe.
P.S. CCP you have 24 hours.
|
Adunh Slavy
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:36:00 -
[5502]
Originally by: Magenta Rae
There is no "cancel subscription" under "account" on any of my subs. I cannot find any way to cancel anywhere on the management section.
Game time, white bar?
My faith in CCP will return SoonÖ |
Azran Zala
Fleet of the Damned Legion of The Damned.
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:36:00 -
[5503]
Edited by: Azran Zala on 24/06/2011 19:37:07 My favourite piece ever:
"Kristoffer is a driving force in CCP's Game Design department. The vast majority of his free time is spent buying dresses for his characters in Leage of Lengends and ready authentic japanses mange comic books"
Kris sounds like a cross dressing homo with a lolita complex... just saying :P
|
Mechatronicus Anihilus
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:37:00 -
[5504]
Originally by: Rer Eirikr I don't even know what to say anymore.
Cool Pic. But I think the poster should read, "I find your lack of win disturbing. The Fail is strong in you."
It most certainly is strong in CCP recently. |
Kary Tamona
Crom Demons
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:37:00 -
[5505]
Police brutality!!! They have destroyed my ship while I was peacefully protesting in 4-4!!! I demand an investigation!!!
__________________________________ My faith in CCP will return SoonÖ |
Daesis Wrack
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:37:00 -
[5506]
Getting in, while I still can, to the first 5% of this thread.
|
Reed Tiburon
Caldari Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:37:00 -
[5507]
Originally by: Magicblue Ok, me an my friends/acquintences have all agreed not to complain about eve. Unless MT starts affecting the game, if that happens we all agreed that thats the end. Thats around a hundred less subscribers. If you wish, jack up the prices monthly. Whatever, just don't introduce MT where you can get an advantage that isk cannot give you by itself Custom paintjobs, custom clothes. Bring it on, we are all for that part. However, micro transaction that affects the game in more then a visual way is a turnoff. If you read ccp thanks:) Hf fun spiralling this game into the next stage
Should you stay or should you go...
Everyone has their limit. ---
R.I.P.
EVE ONLINE [img]ht |
Tea Ester Elliot
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:37:00 -
[5508]
Originally by: Constantinus Maximus
Originally by: Cailais
Originally by: Crye MultiCam
Originally by: Da Gooch
Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?
!!
According to the latest rumour Ive just heard its worse. Much worse.
This suckers going down.
C.
oh so everyone is going to see solid proof of the rest of the story? That will be GOLD!
Oh god the drama, i'm so hungry for more now.
|
Kewso
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:38:00 -
[5509]
Please move beyond Vanity Aur Items! Add ships/modules/gambling for Aur!! |
Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:38:00 -
[5510]
Edited by: Bloodpetal on 24/06/2011 19:38:16
Originally by: Ranger 1 I guess you missed the part where they said the answers to the meatier questions would come tomorrow in official statements.
-----> . Tomorrow is almost over.
|
|
Constantinus Maximus
Paxian Expeditionary Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:38:00 -
[5511]
Originally by: Gabriel Arxangel I have been here a while, I remember t20. I remember the reason for starting the CSM. There is no doubt that selling valuable items through MT has the potential for making significant money for CCP, and I understand how a company would desire to pursue that. Ironically enough I'm one of those in position to take advantage of the MT market. Real money for unbeatable ships or t3 ammo or even extra skill points certainly wouldn't break me. But I know it's wrong. It destroys the "sandbox" concept that eve has valued for so long. It cheapens the game.
It is very disturbing that anyone who works on this game could even contemplate such a game destroying feature. It does not 'cross the line' it leaps over it. Eve is based on you taking what you want and fighting to keep it, everyone starts the same and goes from there. Giving players the option of buying what they want devalues the cornerstone of the game. That's why it is so wrong for eve. I always thought the biggest fans of eve were the devs who loved and cared about this game, I see now that isn't the case, at least for some.
I blog won't fix this, neither will any grandiose promises. PR won't stop this, perhaps even Helmar can't stop this. I am not upset about the system demands of CQ, and believe in the vision of increasing player immersion. When CCP shared their vision of a total sifi MMO, I cheered. Could CQ have been implemented better, sure. Could some the players ideas be included to improve the expansion, sure. Do I believe that CQ is a bold leap forward, yes and I applaud the effort.
But allowing out of game advantages to spill over into the game is 180 out from the sandbox concept eve has prided itself on. It is so wrong on every level, and the fact that anyone involved in the development of this game fails to see that is truly frightening. I am not ready to rage quit, I am not threatening. MT for in game advantages is NOT in place yet, and hopefully never will be. If/when it becomes a reality, I will have some hard choices to make. I truly hope CCP never asks me to make that decision.
Well said.
but to quote another thread..
Originally by: Mater Dolorosa
"We need to milk them 9 more months to get enough cash to finish Dust & WoD. Be brave guys, in 2013 Eve will be a f2p and we'll get rid of them..."
They can and did contemplate it.
This is why CCP is in fact over regardless of any action they take save sacking the whole team.
His name was John Turbefield! Truth. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4YHvtEJgBc Best brief on the details. FREE HELICITY |
Placid09
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:39:00 -
[5512]
Originally by: Milkmy Sausage Edited by: Milkmy Sausage on 24/06/2011 19:26:08
Originally by: Brokers Clone To all Corp Officers - Do CCP a favor, Tell ass of your corp mates... If you see them undock in a ship, or appear on the Forums, wearing a monacle(or anything else identifiable as a novelty item), they will be ejected from the corp.
CCP MIGHT get the message if no one who really PLAYS the game is buying any of this stuff
I still maintian novelty items are fine, it's AUR for items affecting gameplay I have an issue with. The way I see it novelty items will help gain CCP more money... I have no issue with that if 1)people are stupid enough to buy them 2)it means more resource for CCP to spend on eve
Although I would like the vanity items to appear in pod wrecks when people die (and they lose them obviously)
They are not spending the money on EVE though. If you had read the leak you would see that EVE is just a cashcow to fund WoD.
|
Hegg Master
Amarr Nephite Rangers
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:39:00 -
[5513]
I disagree with Micro-transactions. Despite it being for vanity items at the moment, who knows what it will lead on to; ships, modules etc. Players shouldn't be given an advantage over other players by spending real money on in-game items. [url=http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=Hegg%20Master][ |
Hiram Alexander
Caldari The Night Crew
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:39:00 -
[5514]
Edited by: Hiram Alexander on 24/06/2011 19:39:38
Originally by: Adunh Slavy
Originally by: Magenta Rae
There is no "cancel subscription" under "account" on any of my subs. I cannot find any way to cancel anywhere on the management section.
Game time, white bar?
It's in the second dropdown menu -- but only if you're on a recurring payment method, if you're not, then you can't "cancel" as such - all you can do is let your money run out....
|
Crymrea
Minmatar The Red Circle Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:39:00 -
[5515]
Edited by: Crymrea on 24/06/2011 19:41:19 Honestly, I am baffled that the response thus far has been silence.
I also appreciate the timing of Pann's post - well played to you madame . . . ultimately not going to earn many brownie points with the rabble, however (and I do increasingly find myself siding with the rabble here).
|
Krispy Dingo
Minmatar The Night Crew
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:39:00 -
[5516]
Originally by: Ayandra
Originally by: Krispy Dingo
There is so much I want to say, but in the end, I'm not raging, I'm not ****ed. I was a little amazed when I first learned the Greed is Good Newsletter was an actually company circulated document, then I sat down and actually read it and saw it for what it is, which is exactly what Mittens said above me.
Shameless requoting, but that's the whole point, it isn't just the innocent "for the sake of argument" pro-con discussion. Read the whole newsletter thoroughly, it's pretty obvious where they want to go with this. They even say it literally, allow me to quote p.11; "On the opposite end of the scale to vanity items are performance based items such as weapons. They are consumed through gameplay,..." "Selling them though, is highly controversial. We are planning on doing so." Can it be more clear?
Not only does it go against what was said/promised before, the predominant view in there is that they want to take these M(i/a)cro-transactions to a whole new level, one which inevitably (no matter how it'll be implemented) contradicts what Eve is all about.
Why are you comparing parts from the section about Dust514 with EVE?
They stated at E3 that Dust will be fully controlled by MTs.
See, I did read it thoroughly. _____________________________ http://twitter.com/krispydingo http://krispydingo.com |
RU Sirius
Brutor Tribe
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:39:00 -
[5517]
I've not played in a while, a long while. I decided to update the client today and try out Incarna, what a ****ing disaster. Slower and less functional than the old hanger, but more eye candy.
Then I saw this thread. Hah! and I though Incarna would get me playing again, it may well break the game for everyone. I can only post here because I've reactivated my main account for 4 hours. Wonder if we'll get a response before midnight, I hear someone is writing a dev blog. To be honest, it will have to come from Hilmar to make a difference at this stage.
Vive la revolution.
The Star Fraction Communications Portal |
Raimo
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:39:00 -
[5518]
+1
Also, retracting my personal AT9 apology from Soundwave, sorry m8 I want 50+ fitting slots free of extra charge... Like it used to be? Please re-size your signature to the maximum allowed of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Zymurgist |
Chogon Toil
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:40:00 -
[5519]
Good thing there's another space game coming out. You know...
Star Wars.
I bet BioWare is ROLLING right now at this catastrophe. I'll bet many of us SciFi fans that mocked Star Wars: TOR just a week ago are now going, "well... huh, can't be worse than this, right?"
Good one, CCP. You dun goofed, big time.
|
Telkanes Serkant
Caldari Von Braun Inc
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 19:40:00 -
[5520]
I dont think Micro Transactions will help EVE.
I think CCP has underestimated the intelligence of thier player base, this is not Blizzards WOW, this game has always been fundamentaly more intelligent, more risky and more complex.
Suggest CCP look to respond correctly to this thread, or the golden goose may just fly away.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 .. 449 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |