Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 .. 449 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Sirinda
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[661]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Has soundwave been fired yet?
Will all future editions of 'Fearless' be released publicly?
Is there anything else you've lied to the playerbase about (MT for vanity ONLY) that we might like to know about?
Soundwave will NOT be fired nor should he. I personally would not like to see one of the driving forces behind the Alliance Tournament and the spiritual leader of Team BFF take a fall for agreeing to present one opposing side of the microtransaction debate in an internal newsletter.
Are you saying Soundwave represented the side of an argument he otherwise wouldn't necessarily have in an exercise of brainstorming? You'll have to do better than that.
|
OMGWTFResearch
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[662]
Edited by: OMGWTFResearch on 24/06/2011 01:53:18
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: AkJon Ferguson Has soundwave been fired yet?
Will all future editions of 'Fearless' be released publicly?
Is there anything else you've lied to the playerbase about (MT for vanity ONLY) that we might like to know about?
Soundwave will NOT be fired nor should he. I personally would not like to see one of the driving forces behind the Alliance Tournament and the spiritual leader of Team BFF take a fall for agreeing to present one opposing side of the microtransaction debate in an internal newsletter.
Employment Termination is STRICTLY a CCP manner. And personally I don't think you ought to say either way because frankly it is NONE of our business what happens to soundwave or any other member of CCP. I personally think SOME people at CCP may need to be considered for termination of employment but again it is an opinion and directly calling for a named employee to be fired is defamation from members of the community.
BTW you mentioned earlier that there had been threats of violence. I would encourage CCP to turn in IPs of those making violent threats to the relevant law enforcement agencies of their countries. Threats on a forum are not funny.
The newspaper needs to be addressed mainly by saying Microtransactions will NEVER be used to give a player advantage ONLY vanity!
|
Dogo Duma
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[663]
Originally by: Mumu Mueller Hey Pann,
im just interested: have you ever played the game we are talking about?
Once upon a time long ago she did. But it has been ages (comparatively).
|
Jorhan Brimve Stahl
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[664]
Posting in a thread of unwarranted sense of self-importance using an alt in NPC-corp and a lot of "we" words. Insert statements of rage, threats of unsubscription with multiple accounts, bargaining on behalf of community which doesn't give a **** about me. Add demands for human sacrifices, rollback to 2003 build and bans for anyone wearing "precision" boots. Follow up with some more rage and a lot of "we's", denounce capitalism and greed (no, I won't share my isk, THEY'RE ALL MINE!), bargain for lower prices on monocles.
Also HUGE LETTERS.
Having CQ all the time indeed sucks though. I'd vote with all my accounts and bunch of trial alts to have an option to switch between it and old hangar view back and forth.
|
Ayuma Sukaki
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[665]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: Evelgrivion Edited by: Evelgrivion on 24/06/2011 00:36:49 Here's my big question that I demand an answer to.
Are you going to **** the EVE Online sandbox over for Monetary Transactions or not? If not, all is forgiven. If MTs are going to impact the sandbox, start printing your resumes and god help you all.
The designs we will implement in game will not **** over the sandbox.
Thanks for the reply Manifest, I suppose it's left to interpretation, But for Eve's future let's hope your right.
|
Vin Hellsing
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[666]
Originally by: Kujira
Originally by: Jade Constantine Sure when you have been playing Eve as long as we have you learn to take the rough with the smooth but you do so with the general feeling that CCP developers understand and ôgetö what makes Eve great û and thatÆs the problem now. This internal newsletter (if real) shows that one of the leading developers does not ôget eveö does not care about eve, and simply sees eve as a cash cow to be milked ferociously to fund other projects. This is about keeping the golden goose of eve subscriptions (on a drip feed if necessary) while chasing and grubbing every little loose cent he can from the player base.
Let me give you a couple of examples of how this can and does (and has already) impacted our enjoyment of this game:
1. The Captains Quarters û itÆs not gameplay its a display cabinet for vanity items. And the price of this display cabinet for you and I is that multi-client performance in stations is now terrible û if you have a bad graphic card itÆs a jerk fest û if you have a decent graphics card itÆs heat-fest. I can run 3-4 clients with CQÆs turned on û I can run it smoothly û but do I want to? Hell no because my Gtx 580 sounds like its melting my motherboard now! So I need to turn off the CQÆs on multiple accounts and as a result have more limited functionality on those accounts and an ugly wallpaper. No more station environment, no more clicking on my ship to open cargo hold, no more dragging ship to the hanger to board it. The delivery of the CQ vanity item display case has impacted my gameplay.
CCP could have made it optional and given us the option of keeping the old hanger view and added a ôdisembark shipö option to the UI but ôoh noö to do that would have meant we werenÆt being forced to look the vanity display case that marketing insisted must be front and centre if weÆre to even think about buying these ridiculously overpriced items from the Noble store.
2. If you read the newsletter youÆll see reference to saved fitting slots û and I donÆt know about you Verone but in JF weÆve run out of saved corp ship fittings. We want CCP to up the limit but is that really going to happen while the ôbiz-devsö talk honeyed words about how to squeeze extra income from players for such ôminor upgrades.ö? How long till we pay aurum for extra corp standing slots? For wardec options? For a usable corp management screen?
3. And who develops these vanity items? Yes thats right its Eve artists and developers whose salary we pay with our subscriptions. Given the choice wouldnÆt you rather have engine trails and flashy cyno effect for all players rather than a bunch of overpriced tat in the Aur store for a fleeced few?
Because that is precisely the compromise being made here -> CCP using our subs money to pay for vanity item production they want to sell back to us for greedy prices and it is something you SHOULD get mad about.
So hereÆs the thing.
The time to fight for the game we love is not in six months time when these concepts have bedded down and CCP is feeling bold enough to start selling Noble Faction ammo and +9 implants. The time to fight is now. Because this newsletter embodies everything that many of us feared but didnÆt want to believe CCP were becoming capable of. It is a massive betrayal of the compact we shared as players and developers of this game and indicates that CCP is preparing to leap down a very dark and deep path of self-immolation in the months to come.
I donÆt want to see Eve Online die Verone. That sounds dramatic I know, but gameworlds die when the dreams and visions are extinguished and that can happen through a succession of bad ideas foisted on a community by people who really donÆt have much of a clue in business.
This cannot be quoted too many times, it strikes at the heart of what is going on here.
Requoted. Seriously, CCP. Read it. Get a goddamn clue.
|
Herschel Yamamoto
Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[667]
I don't envy you your position behind the riot shield, but I'm glad to see some CCP response.
I haven't been playing much the last couple months, but I do still care about this game, and I do still want to see it go in a good direction. I think our biggest concern, as an angry mob, is the fact that CCP's idea of a good direction and ours seem to be diverging pretty hard lately. I've always thought of CCP as being sort of a big stupid dog. Yeah, he might crap on your carpet sometimes, but it's only because he loves you and was trying to give you a present. You haven't been acting much like lovable goofs lately, though, and I'm starting to think that the turds I'm seeing are there because you want them to be there.
I mean, really, what are we supposed to make of Incarna? This is the most insulting set of microtransactions I've ever seen this side of my cable company, and literally less than 24 hours later I get to hear about how one of your senior folks has a great vision for the game where the whole thing is turned into an accountant's playground of player screwjobs. Doesn't matter that the only way you managed to stop the last tsunami of rage was by promising that this would never happen and that you had no plans of ever even thinking about it, now we get to read about how you're plotting to ram it down our throats because it's what we really want deep down. And all this less than a week after you have the brilliant idea to take the people who pour their own time and effort into making your game better have to cough up money for the privilege of trying to offset their bandwidth costs with advertising.
Every single news story I've seen about Eve in the last week has been about a ham-handed attempt to extract more money out of players. Doesn't matter if it's a useful sum or not, doesn't matter if it'll destroy some of the tools that make the game playable or not, just cash the **** in. Yeah, we're pissed off. You're acting like either you think that we're all a bunch of sheep who will keep feeding you cash as quickly as you ask for it - and the subscription numbers haven't followed that trend since Trinity - or you think that the game/company is dying and you need to get the most cash you can as fast as you can, and the long run be damned. Neither of these is a good thing, to put it lightly. And until we actually get some sign that this is a monstrous aberration and not the wave of the future, you're going to keep getting a whole lot of perfectly justified rage, and(while I obviously don't have access to the numbers), I'd wager a whole lot of cancellations.
You charge a pretty good subscription fee, which makes the people who pay it entitled to some things. Most notably, a level playing field. I don't care if someone gets to put on a sparkly pink thong in the character creation screen, but when we're undocked and fighting, I want my ship to be the same as the other guy's, whether he bought it with missions, GTC sales, or aurum. I want it to happen in a way that keeps the game's economy stable, since the economy is probably the single biggest thing that makes me like Eve. And I want to feel like you actually have a vision for the game that isn't just drunken talk of "Awesome" or a single number on a bank statement. If you can make us believe that, then I'm sure we will, by and large, shut up. If you can't...
|
Reed Tiburon
Caldari Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[668]
Originally by: HoboWithAShip Edited by: HoboWithAShip on 24/06/2011 01:50:18
Originally by: Miilla Edited by: Miilla on 24/06/2011 01:47:27
Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?
This. This needs an answer NOW.
Broken promises hurt, CCP. We'd like an answer. --- Which is the best DOOR picture??? Bartholomeus Crane speaks out! [img]ht |
Black Dranzer
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[669]
Originally by: Brooks Puuntai For all those calling for CCP Soundwave to be fired.. Don't
He voiced his opinion on a internal document. While it was a pretty bad opinion when it comes to Eve it is still just his opinion. I would be more concerned about the state of CCP if they actually did fire someone over a opinion.
Even still NeX and MTs have no place in Eve.. Vanity or not. You already have 2 MT based games coming out theres no reason to degrade Eve with them.
I'm not worried because he has an opinion.
I'm not worried because he voiced his opinion.
I'm worried because he has a very controversial opinion and he's in a position of power.
|
XIRUSPHERE
Gallente The 8th Order Mean Coalition
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[670]
Originally by: Major Stallion
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: Evelgrivion Edited by: Evelgrivion on 24/06/2011 00:36:49 Here's my big question that I demand an answer to.
Are you going to **** the EVE Online sandbox over for Monetary Transactions or not? If not, all is forgiven. If MTs are going to impact the sandbox, start printing your resumes and god help you all.
The designs we will implement in game will not **** over the sandbox.
http://hosted.corelicorp.net/micro.jpg
you were saying?
Quit the MT or quit your jobs before having CCP on your resume black list you.
* Image turned to URL as it broke the forum layout - Fallout
|
|
Scubato
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:52:00 -
[671]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: Evelgrivion Edited by: Evelgrivion on 24/06/2011 00:36:49 Here's my big question that I demand an answer to.
Are you going to **** the EVE Online sandbox over for Monetary Transactions or not? If not, all is forgiven. If MTs are going to impact the sandbox, start printing your resumes and god help you all.
The designs we will implement in game will not **** over the sandbox.
I hope you don't misunderstand and take this as me picking apart your every word, I do appreciate CCP comments on this issue and hope more are to come. What a lot of people want to hear is that this promise not to effect the space game includes not adding any module items or implant items to the store. I really think a simple yes or no will go a long way to resolving some of the concerns. Maybe you know this already and perhaps your unable to do so at this moment I just wanted to put emphasis on that key aspect.
|
Kallynda Nai
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:53:00 -
[672]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: Evelgrivion Edited by: Evelgrivion on 24/06/2011 00:36:49 Here's my big question that I demand an answer to.
Are you going to **** the EVE Online sandbox over for Monetary Transactions or not? If not, all is forgiven. If MTs are going to impact the sandbox, start printing your resumes and god help you all.
The designs we will implement in game will not **** over the sandbox.
The content in the newsletter calls you a liar.
|
TK420
Caldari Navy of Xoc Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:53:00 -
[673]
This thread has a new page every minute.
|
Si'Andregal Grungolash
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:53:00 -
[674]
Actions speak louder than words, CCP. And we already know know your words are full of ****, your promises empty, and your apologies meaningless. We don't pay you ccp for this crap, so pull your head out of your collective asses or you will losses will be even greater.
|
Big Bad Guy
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:53:00 -
[675]
Originally by: Blade Gunner Edited by: Blade Gunner on 24/06/2011 01:24:07 A very interesting PR strategy CCP. You create a second thread, not acknowledging the points raised in the first and ask for confirmation on the problems that you have selected to discuss. By getting a raging fire to turn and burn spent fuel you reduce its power and extinguish the seat of the fire allowing you to firefight the small spot fires (I will delete what I don't want to talk about!)
The heart of the matter is the deception, the manner in which it has taken place and its implications to a game that subscribers have invested huge amounts of time, money and effort to provide the content that draws the playerbase. If you honestly believe that a smoke and mirrors fiasco will fool us all and satiate the angry pitch forked mob, you really do need a reality check. The mob do not need to storm the castle of CCP at all. We do not require the scapegoat of a sacrificial lamb who will be recycled and introduced in another guise at a later date. We have the option of collecting our shackles and moving to lands new with promise and potential.
This is not the first incident of CCP deception (The Sabre BPO fiasco for example). The first time, shame on you, to fall for it again, shame on us. And when a significant number of old guard multiple account holders have unsubscribed, How would you attract them back? Who would lead the alliances, corps and combat that currently shape EvE and it's content?
Will your greed be satisfed by Commander Fat Wallet who attempts to but ingame status rather than earn it. Or will your greed increase as subscriptions fall with increasing momentum because you assumed we had no options and would tolerate this abuse.
EvE success relies on the partnership of CCP and its playerbase, break that trust and who do you work for? because one thing I can assure you Dust514 will attract the single purchase market, not the loyal subscription paying hoards that you now enjoy.
So perhaps you should leave castle CCP, walk to the village and live as us peasants (With the guidance of the CSM). I say this because the view from your ivory towers is misguided, beyond reality and out of touch with the folk you tax to exist in your land.
Regards
Blade Gunner
Brilliant post. Also, most MT'ing games fail horribly, even if the start was good. CCP, you're playing with fire. EVE is in many ways shaped by it's community, unlike many other games where players can be sort of "filler". Don't you see what's going on already? And it's not like EVE has millions of subscribers like that other game - that other game also has subscription fees and MT market, but if you look closer - it offers only some non-combat companions, transportation mounts with unique design and that's it. Even with their huge community base that other game never even though about preying on addon creators, even if they ask for donations. Etc. EVE is it's players, despite all lore and stuff, it's all people in pods. Please listen to them. You could start by giving us back the old version of hangar so that CQ and whole "walking in stations" part is an option as it was promised. |
Carmine Lady
Amarr Viziam
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:53:00 -
[676]
Originally by: Riflin' Betty
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Aurum is here to stay. The cycle here isn't changing soon.
That is too bad, because it's going to cost you your job.
Quote:
That was not on purpose and I sincerely apologize for that. We've asked you guys to digest a lot of very quick changes and did a suboptimal job at walking beside you during the past month. Dev blogs and test servers and AT interviews and such didn't quite cut it for everything. There is NO contempt against our players.I've witnessed some extreme amounts of exhibited patience for the nastiest of the nasties who have threatened lives, engaged in character assassination and such--and that's because we as developers realize there are a lot of hurt/angry people out there.
It has nothing to do with walking besides us. And it has nothing to do with us not understanding.
It has everything to do with a cold, calculated scheme to turn "awesome spaceships" into "sustain our expensive drug habits at any cost"
Yes, I phrased that offensively, and yes I did that on purpose. Don't spin this Ned, it's not going to work. You (CCP) are on a path to just try to extract the absolute maximum amount of cash from us at any cost, with no regard for us, our feelings or your own ****ing original mission statement (read it on your corporate page)
Quote:
I won't make excuses for those features we know are much wanted or the ones people want us to go back and "fix". Heck, I want some of them. Soundwave and Eyjo and Dropbear and TonyG and Fallout want them too. BUT, making and designing and creating a game isn't pick and choose, especially when it comes to introducing something like Incarna or devoting significant dev time to rewriting old code backbone so we can grow again in the future. We know the other stuff is wanted. We know Incarna is also wanted and are working towards what many of you have wanted out of it. It just takes time.
I call bull**** on this Eyjo and Soundwave only want money, they are part of team :awesome: and :graphs: that just live a self-masturbatory fantasy where they are rockstar gamedesigners.
They are just little failed John Romeros, and we know how that ended up.
I truly believe there is a lot of lovely people at CCP, dedicated and with vision. But you need to cut out the cancer before it kills you. And as you can probably tell, this week will determine if you have homes next summer.
Plan your next move very carefully, and divest yourself of corrupting elements.
Quote:
I don't think that it's too late to save this special little den of internet spaceships and internet spaceship captains; however, this trend cannot go on forever and it has all the signs of fail cascade written all over it. Word.
CCP, your players really do care about you and about your game. It would just be nice if the feelings were returned. I could profess my love for each of you and really really mean it. Yes even you back there! But we all know its going to be more about showing you and not just saying it.
This is. your last chance.
Heads must roll. They should have rolled already when you released the abortions that are EVEgate and the new Forums. They should have rolled the moment you broke your "no MT ever promise" They should have rolled yesterday when you were celebrating your "amazing and above expectations launch" You are deluding yourselves, you buy your own publicity, but we no longer do.
I know you won't answer me, since I'm you big "troublemaker" but there you go.
Signed,
Helicity -****ing- Boson's Alt.
Quoting the Helicity again to make sure that a veritable voice of the community is heard.
Helicity has inspired so many.
so Plus One More. FREE HELICITY |
Words Words Words
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:53:00 -
[677]
hey ccp getting a bigger playerbase doesnt seem to be working, so it's time to try and fleece your current playerbase for as much money as possible?
am I right?
|
Poetic Stanziel
Gallente EVE University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:53:00 -
[678]
Originally by: Seleene CCP, I'd just like to say one quick thing: since there's now two big threads, don't take take the number of pages and unique character posts and add them all up as metric of success that the matter is under control.
Also, this dude continues to state the obvious but he's got big yellow text so imma quote him!
Originally by: Tipsy 3.Talk to the CSM. That's what it's there for. Its members could have told you how the community would respond to the third party licensing blog, Noble Exchange pricing and to the removal of the old hangar. If CCP had taken the quick, no-cost step of simply asking the CSM it could have avoided causing almost all of the irritation and negative media coverage it has generated in the past few weeks.
In this case ... I'd prefer they talk to the community, rather than the 8 or so of you. This is much bigger than some CSM issue. Stop being butthurt that you're all out of the loop on this one.
|
Ivbeen Cloned
Caldari Formidable Ops
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:53:00 -
[679]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: Majuan Shuo Edited by: Majuan Shuo on 24/06/2011 01:18:12
Originally by: CCP Pann
Hi, everyone
As I see it, the chief complaint is regarding the high cost of goods in the Nobel Market.
Then you are blind, go get us someone else.
You have to admit that some people are vexed about the high cost of the monocle... but not because they would buy one at 3/4 the cost.
I think Pann might have mistyped (as she did with Nobel/Noble) and put that instead of NeX/Microtransaction. That's the chief concern atm, and of course there are the other more immediate ones and of course the longer tail concerns that many of you have mentioned here.
Congrats you've managed to convince me that you're and idiot with zero reading comprehension skills by making a single post. Thats something to be proud of.
People are "vexed" because the majority of CCP are a gropup of money grubbing, lying, out of touch individuals. After reading the leaked newletter I now think worse of CCP than I do my ex-wife.
|
Sephoron
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:53:00 -
[680]
I'm honestly very disappointed in CCP's blunt attempt at a (not so) Micro Market. You might of been able to pull it off if you didn't just aim for the high bidder. How about some reasonable, newbie friendly goods? C'mon guys you should know better. The technical issues are something to be resolved on the go, debug is at it's best things are put to the test ;)
|
|
Vid Eeomeet
Smoke 'n' Mirrors Knights Of Freedoms
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:54:00 -
[681]
CCP,
Vanity microtransactions do not bother me. Eve becoming a RL WvW (Wallet Vs Wallet) game does. It bothers me enough to post something I've never considered much less posted before...
Add me to the list of subscriptions that get cancelled the moment MT items become impactful on stats and performence, ie; ships, mods, ammunition, etc.
-Very Concerned Capsuleer, Vid
|
Jerry Pepridge
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:54:00 -
[682]
Make a customer satisfaction survey on the splash page.
Must be completed before entering game. (thus 100% of opinions are drawn)
Ask questions regarding incarna
Take the results into consideration when patch days comes _________________________________________________
Misty McGinnity Doesn't have an iPhone. |
dpidcoe
Gallente Cash and Cargo Liberators Incorporated
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:54:00 -
[683]
Originally by: Major Stallion http://hosted.corelicorp.net/micro.jpg
Just quoting this again as a non-image for anyone who has images disabled or can't log in to the forums.
CCP: This is why we don't trust you. Just come out and admit that you plan on selling SP for cash.
|
Captain Futur3
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:54:00 -
[684]
Edited by: Captain Futur3 on 24/06/2011 01:54:33 Why are microtransactions needed in a game where i have to pay 15 Euro per account? So far, only free to play games have microtransactions (with very very very few exceptions) and it feels like a pure ripoff! The sense behind microtransactions is to pay the developerss for their work, but we are already paying for THREE developer teams working on 2 other games than eve. And all of them are bigger than the Eve Developer team. So isnt it time to give us something back in terms of some HUGE addon? Just for an example, you did 2 new ship models in 3 expansions, this clearly shows ME that you just dont care about eve anymore. I bet 10 billion ISK that in the same time, you created about 100 new (at least as complex as the maller) models for the other games.
Please answer this question. I will bump and repeat it until some dev says something about this.
|
Rei Nakasone
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:54:00 -
[685]
SLOW DOWN WITH ALL THE **** POSTING Or nothing is going to be solved!
|
Garreth Vlox
Minmatar Blackened Skies
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:55:00 -
[686]
once upon a time i actually spoke positively about this game, this was a time before your CEO told us the quality we pay for didn't matter to him cause he didn't make any money off it, this was before you added crippling lag and made supers unstoppable by anything other than another blob of supers, and to be honest even with all this just mentioned bull**** i still liked the game. then you added PI and told us it was a feature and not a sadly pathetic attempt at making money off the farmville craze. then you gave us walking in stations after having a large part of the population tell you they would rather have the old broken **** fixed, (LAG, those features from all the other patches that didn't work that you promised to fix and then swept under the rug), you proceeded to ignore us once again and do your own thing, which wouldn't bother me so much if it wasn't for the fact that you were doing your own thing with my ****ing money. and then your release incarna, and eve responds with glitches in every single game interface, and the best you can do is to raise your hand 2 days after your latest **** up and say my bad?
and before you ask, yes i mad, i mad because you have successfully managed to nickle and dime the **** out of my former favorite online game.
and then there is this little gem:
Originally by: CCP Pann
ItÆs clear that many of you are <understatement alert> angry </alert>.
just out of curiosity, how long did that take you guys to figure that out?
|
Nedak Pather
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:55:00 -
[687]
Originally by: Vid Eeomeet CCP,
Vanity microtransactions do not bother me. Eve becoming a RL WvW (Wallet Vs Wallet) game does. It bothers me enough to post something I've never considered much less posted before...
Add me to the list of subscriptions that get cancelled the moment MT items become impactful on stats and performence, ie; ships, mods, ammunition, etc.
-Very Concerned Capsuleer, Vid
Quoted for ****ing truth.
|
Panda Name
Amarr Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:55:00 -
[688]
i know this probably won't be read, but what the hell: again ccp shows its total disconnect from both reality and its own player base. in this fluff of an apology, you completely failed to grasp the true source of what you call "rage". anybody who has any actual learning skills attained in real life isn't "raging" about a damn monocle, or the current resource intensive client. they are "raging" at the implications of your internal memo. the fact that you missed this says enough for me. the best thing is that after a few weeks or months, you'll release some self-affirming "metrics" (cherry picked data) that shows how successful this "iteration" is. given that i actually pvp and thus know how stupid most people who play this game actually are, i'd wager that this tactic will most likely work. well done, ccp.
i also would like to ask how it feels to be thrown under a bus by your own employer? if i were you, i would grab as many monocles as i could and run.
|
Nimbat
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:55:00 -
[689]
Originally by: Rei Nakasone SLOW DOWN WITH ALL THE **** POSTING Or nothing is going to be solved!
You are posting aswell. Be quiet.
|
Lirael Dyrim
Gallente In Bacon We Trust
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 01:55:00 -
[690]
Originally by: HoboWithAShip Edited by: HoboWithAShip on 24/06/2011 01:50:18
Originally by: Miilla Edited by: Miilla on 24/06/2011 01:47:27
Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?
This. This needs an answer NOW.
^
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 .. 449 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |