|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.05 16:05:00 -
[1]
No. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|
Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.05 16:34:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Sir Ibex a friend who spends most of his day in EVE every day, told me ice will be removed soon, according to what he heard on IRC and forums. I googled this and found several supporting posts. So I decided to come in and check if any of it is true.
It's not.
What it is is people suffering from highsec persecution complex who dream up nerfs that are supposed to happen to them based on a failure to read very simple language.
The fact is this: as part of their 5-year nullsec development plan, CCP are discussing an idea that nullsec should be the sole source of at least some of the types of ice in the game. So it is not ôvery soonö and it is not ôall iceö anyway. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|
Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.05 17:47:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Tippia on 05/09/2011 17:50:21
Originally by: Sullen Skoung Looks like CCP is suffering from it too
Quote: Sole source of ice and high-end minerals For further discussion. Nullsec should be the only place we're injecting ices, zydrine, megacyte and morphite into the game.
Nice edit there. It's this kind of wilful self-deception and nigh on paranoid altering of facts I refer to as the highsec persecution complex.
Anyway, no, they're not. Let's look at the actual quote, shall we? Quote: For further discussion. Nullsec should be the only place we're injecting (at least some of the) ices, zydrine, megacyte and morphite into the game.
So, yes, the notion that all ice will be removed from highsec is something highsec dwellers have dreamed up because they can't read, not something CCP has ever mentioned, much like the supposed removal of L4s that also was never mentioned.
It might be the case that as part of a 5-year plan, they will make sure some types of ice are only available in nullsec. Some ù might ù in upwards of 5 years. There is no mention whatsoever about removing all highsec ice, and the any reshuffling of other ice that might happen will not happen very soon. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|
Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.05 18:21:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Tippia on 05/09/2011 18:24:40
Originally by: Prince Kobol Tippa, as much as I like your posting in the past, your condesening attitude is starting to get old.
I have grown to old and weary to have patience with self-imposed ignorance, even more so when it's so blatantly obvious that people are inventing **** just to be able to get all worked up about the nonsense they've just invented.
Quote: The topic about moving ice to null started why back during the Alliance Tourny when it was discussed live.
àand what was said back then isn't particularly relevant when that was just 5-second soundbites compared to the actual design pointers that were then presented.
Quote: At the moment you can not help people being very skeptical about anything CCP say.
No, but I can be sceptical (and, yes, condescending) towards people who blatantly alter and falsify statements and then claim that it's CCP who said it.
Originally by: Ghoest To be honest Tippia is arguing just to argue.
Not really. I'm correcting people to provide them with correct information. If they have invented their own information, then yes, I also like to smack them over the head a bit. Neither really counts as arguing.
Quote: CCP(even in this very thread) has said that they are considering major changes to ice in the future. Looking at CCPs recent track record its reasonable for people worry about the worst case serio for any change.
àand no-one is arguing that. What I'm saying that the whole ôomgz, highsec nerfö is just the product of wilful ignorance or an outright inability to read. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|
Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.06 09:57:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Mara Rinn Is all of the ice the same as (at least some of) the ice?
No. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|
Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.06 10:42:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Mara Rinn Now is all a subset of the conditions satisfying at least some?
Doesn't make the two the same ù ôat least someö does not satisfy the condition of ôallö, which is what we're talking about here.
More importantly, if it was ôallö they wanted to say, then there's a perfect word for describing that: ôallö. They instead chose ôat least someö, which signals that it's not all, but ratherà some. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|
|
|
|