| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 57 post(s) |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
4871
   |
Posted - 2012.10.11 09:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:More than that, I am an immortal capsuleer capable of taking and discarding planets, flesh and souls as a child would toys, and I do not expect having to tolerate wearing boots of the non-magneto variety
Obviously we need Magneto Boots. But we Caldari, having surpassed the decadent Gallente technology, will get Grav boots. Amarr Laser Boots will of course remain viable.
(Everyone try not to laugh at Disco Stu in his Minmatar Radio Boots.)
MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
4871
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 09:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP t0rfifrans wrote:Hey guys, thanks for the positive reaction. Like stated above, our vision is to make the EVE Universe the ultimate science fiction simulator. Saying that EVE is just about spaceships, is a bit like saying that phones should only be about making voice phone calls one on one with other people. Indeed they did start out like that, but as technology evolved, they become something much bigger. We hope you guys stay with us long enough for that dream to materialize.
Oh and to someone that asked if it can be safe. Sorry, nope. The EVA gameplay is not safe, it's as safe as going into a wormhole. That's also what makes it interesting.
Please please please GÖÑ
MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
4872
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 09:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote: CCP t0rfifrans wrote:Oh and to someone that asked if it can be safe. Sorry, nope. The EVA gameplay is not safe, it's as safe as going into a wormhole. That's also what makes it interesting. Is there any discussion of using station environments as a "open beta" for the multi-character environments before shoving us into combat environments with no training in the UI? 
What? Those combat environments are the training 
MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
4944
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 08:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Soulpirate wrote:By the time this hits live servers(as if it ever really will) Dust514 will be a distant memory.
yes, Dust will die even quicker than EVE did 
http://www.eve-search.com/search/eve%20is%20dying
MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
11114
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 15:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
Deborah Bat-Zeev wrote:Aidan Brooder wrote:
In any case, when the CSM election happened there was not a single CSM candidate - at least as far as I remember - who was for anything WiS. So it comes at no great surprise that they did not pick anything WiS.
Actually, Malcanis stated on his candidate platform that he wants CCP to at least talk again about their future plans for WiS. The other people in current CSM are either indifferent about or explicitly against WiS, though.
I have already given my advice to CCP as a CSM that they should make a "State of the nation" communication on the WiS project.
That part of my campaign pledge has been fulfilled as far as I am able to do so at this time. I haven't forgotten the issue or changed my mind on it, but at this point the ball is in CCP's court.
1 Kings 12:11
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
11114
|
Posted - 2013.08.05 15:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
In a very literal way, EVE is not going anywhere because there is noone at the wheel
In a very literal way, this is absolutely untrue.
1 Kings 12:11
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
11182
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 06:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:Malcanis wrote:Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
In a very literal way, EVE is not going anywhere because there is noone at the wheel
In a very literal way, this is absolutely untrue. So there is actually a Plan but, let me guess: it's NDA'ed! So I must trust you.
Yes, precisely. Until CCP chose to make that communication I am absolutely forbidden to reveal anything about what they said to us on the subject. I did what I was able to which was to raise the issue and get an official answer.
Nevertheless there is a very competent person "in charge of EVE" at the moment. CCP have a plan for EVE, I have seen it, I think they can deliver it.
1 Kings 12:11
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
11237
|
Posted - 2013.08.14 17:25:00 -
[8] - Quote
Stitcher wrote:A separate chat would effectively make it an instance, really. I think we're all against that, right?
No that's not what an instance is. Jita isn't an instance because it has a seperate local from Perimiter.
1 Kings 12:11
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
11238
|
Posted - 2013.08.14 19:14:00 -
[9] - Quote
Indeed I did. People misusing "instance" is one of my push buttons.
1 Kings 12:11
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
12697
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 21:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Sadly, we've seen this too often where a new game play style might be developed at the cost of developing more toys for major alliances. Then a bunch of alliances spread BS on the forums, round up an mob with pitchforks and torches, and go burn parts of Jita down.
We will never see WiS. We will never see COSMOS taken anywhere, we will never see an actual POS overhaul, or any number of things that the players have been demanding almost since day 1 in some cases. Instead we've had a long train of things that are only to the benefit of major alliances. This latest expansion has been a massive circle jerk for the nullsec alliances and CCP, and this announcement of building one's own stargates to newspace being effectively a nullsec allliance only toy? **** that.
This was nothing to do with "alliances".
1 Kings 12:11
|
| |
|