EVE Search - Dev Blog: Fast Forward

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Dev Blog: Fast Forward

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 22 post(s)
Inquisitor Kitchner Galaxy Punks Executive Outcomes 238	Posted - 2012.10.23 11:32:00 - [301] - Quote I approve of this product and/or service.
Sky Marshal Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.10.23 11:35:00 - [302] - Quote I knew it... Each time I want to do something, CCP nerf it few days after. Falcons was nerfed one month after I trained it, heavy missiles is going to be nerfed, etc. And I just resub and planned to do FW... I wonder how they know what I think. Oh well, I will stay in the station from now on. No, wait... They will nerf stations if I do.
Veshta Yoshida PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 331	Posted - 2012.10.23 11:41:00 - [303] - Quote Andski wrote: It's better for them to take the hatchet to the massive LP faucet and then address any imbalances in future iterations than to delay fixing the massive LP faucet because of imbalances that a fix is likely to create. ~hth~ It would have been better if they hadn't launched the abject failure in the first place, over-incentivization leads to one thing and one thing only .. always has and always will. Not even possible for them to call "20/20 Hindsight" because we bloody TOLD them what the result was going to be immediately after their FF presentation which as you recall was what launched with only a minute adjustment. Now they want to move the farm from offensive to defensive. LP over time will drop but that is about it and in the process they will more than likely create a 2 militia system where no one in their right mind (ie. such as me as a RP'er) would ever join the downtrodden. Let me give you a snapshot of how metro (doesn't get more backwater than that) will look 3 months hence: Dominant militia will perma-farm all systems using alts in enemy militia to offensive plex (getting LP) while main/alt defensive plex same system after the fact (getting LP). Can be done in near perfect safety as travel time for legitimate enemies is insane 'out there', biggest threat will be from other farmers/wanna-be pew'ers who accidentally shoot the farming alts. Had thought and even expected that the threads went up early so that they could get gauge the weather and get ideas to flesh out a solid system, but apparently all they were for was to say that there was dialogue .. ******* tricksy politician's scheme if ever I saw one.
War Kitten Panda McLegion 1388	Posted - 2012.10.23 11:47:00 - [304] - Quote Bad Messenger wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Quick clarification: With the patch tomorrow we will be reducing the over-vulnerability of many systems so that they cannot be defensively farmed for extensive periods of time after the deployment, and that with concerted effort each side can influence the vulnerability of systems in their warzone without being forced to use alts in the opposing side. Merritoff wrote: CCP is working via a variety of methods to bring the price of PLEX down, and FW has been identified as an area that can help the process along. Can you elaborate on this comment in the blog? I am sure I am not only one with a ... limited period of vested interest. The only method I'll be discussing at this time if FW changes, but rest assured that the price of PLEX is something that the Eve Central Bank is keeping a close eye on. You really are stupid, no one is going to defend systems for isk because LP is pretty much worthless, but you really favor minmatar and gallente on this change by making sure that they manage to defend several systems from vulnerable to contested. Maximize the fuckup ! Well done, CCP should really kick some devs who 1st made horrible isk farm and then they fix it by favoring some sides that happend to be represented by current CSM members. Pro Posting tip for the day: Be just like this guy! 1. Calling CCP devs stupid - always gets good results. 2. Emo ranting and raving without any logical reasoning - usually sways everyone's opinions. 3. Waving your tinfoil hat around in the air - Alerts fellow conspiracy club members of your credentials. These three steps are tried and true methods of generating positive results and getting CCP devs to pay special attention to your opinions. Facts, logic and articulately presented arguments are totally overrated. I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
Gunship Forced Penetration 1	Posted - 2012.10.23 11:47:00 - [305] - Quote Are CCP going to do anything about the map? A good suggestion is here http://i.imgur.com/aM9Ir.jpg
SwissChris1 Stimulus Rote Kapelle 10	Posted - 2012.10.23 11:48:00 - [306] - Quote Seriously, **** you. Moon goo has been broken for ages, but lets screw the little guy first
Recruitment Specialist State War Academy Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.10.23 11:55:00 - [307] - Quote SwissChris1 wrote: Seriously, **** you. Moon goo has been broken for ages, but lets screw the little guy first Ah but by screwing with FW they only upset farmers .... cant be upsetting the nullsec crowd can we?
Bad Messenger Nasranite Watch Liandri Covenant 269	Posted - 2012.10.23 12:01:00 - [308] - Quote War Kitten wrote: Bad Messenger wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Quick clarification: With the patch tomorrow we will be reducing the over-vulnerability of many systems so that they cannot be defensively farmed for extensive periods of time after the deployment, and that with concerted effort each side can influence the vulnerability of systems in their warzone without being forced to use alts in the opposing side. Merritoff wrote: CCP is working via a variety of methods to bring the price of PLEX down, and FW has been identified as an area that can help the process along. Can you elaborate on this comment in the blog? I am sure I am not only one with a ... limited period of vested interest. The only method I'll be discussing at this time if FW changes, but rest assured that the price of PLEX is something that the Eve Central Bank is keeping a close eye on. You really are stupid, no one is going to defend systems for isk because LP is pretty much worthless, but you really favor minmatar and gallente on this change by making sure that they manage to defend several systems from vulnerable to contested. Maximize the fuckup ! Well done, CCP should really kick some devs who 1st made horrible isk farm and then they fix it by favoring some sides that happend to be represented by current CSM members. Pro Posting tip for the day: Be just like this guy! 1. Calling CCP devs stupid - always gets good results. 2. Emo ranting and raving without any logical reasoning - usually sways everyone's opinions. 3. Waving your tinfoil hat around in the air - Alerts fellow conspiracy club members of your credentials. These three steps are tried and true methods of generating positive results and getting CCP devs to pay special attention to your opinions. Facts, logic and articulately presented arguments are totally overrated. who cares about my opinions anyway, CCP already applied patch.
Siobhan MacLeary BRG Corp Ocularis Inferno 21	Posted - 2012.10.23 12:01:00 - [309] - Quote Recruitment Specialist wrote: SwissChris1 wrote: Seriously, **** you. Moon goo has been broken for ages, but lets screw the little guy first Ah but by screwing with FW they only upset farmers .... cant be upsetting the nullsec crowd can we? Your tinfoil is showing.
Bad Messenger Nasranite Watch Liandri Covenant 269	Posted - 2012.10.23 12:04:00 - [310] - Quote Recruitment Specialist wrote: SwissChris1 wrote: Seriously, ** you. Moon goo has been broken for ages, but lets screw the little guy first Ah but by screwing with FW they only upset farmers .... cant be upsetting the nullsec crowd can we? Actually farmers are not upset at all, they already made hundreds of billions isk, CCP **** over those players who stay and play FW after nerf and are not interested about isk at all.

Axl Borlara T.R.I.A.D Ushra'Khan 52	Posted - 2012.10.23 12:05:00 - [311] - Quote Poetic Stanziel wrote: Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: IMHO, there should be only one type of plex period, with NPC's spawning either way. OMFG?!? Are you seriously championing Susan Black's idea that plexes should have NO ship restrictions whatsoever? Do you just blindly agree with every dumb idea she puts forward? I've still got 10 pages to read through, so may well have missed stuff. Plexs should absolutely be kept with different ship restrictions. (although things like pirate/faction frigs maybe shouldn't be allowed in minor plexs, etc). One of the great things about having to kill npc's in a plex is that it will probably encourage larger ships to be flown - ie battleships - in order to cap major plexs. There will be more/some reason to fly ships other than t1 frigs and destroyers. Great sounding patch so far.
Rommiee Mercury Inc. 489	Posted - 2012.10.23 12:37:00 - [312] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Poetic Stanziel wrote: Hmm. Seems the only posting the CSM does now is to cheerlead devblogs. At least we know the CSM is doing their job marketing the game. My devblogs bring all the capsuleers to the yard. In all seriousness, it's one of the side effects of showing dev blogs to the CSM ahead of time and often incorporating some of their feedback before release. CSM........ LOLOL
The Prowling Tiger Artaxes Ventures Inc. 1	Posted - 2012.10.23 12:45:00 - [313] - Quote Bad Messenger wrote: who cares about my opinions anyway, CCP already applied patch. Good show, my farming friend. Good show. You've fought the good fight, but it's over now. You can finally rest, and eye the 'Cancel Subscription' button with a tear in your eye.
SwissChris1 Stimulus Rote Kapelle 10	Posted - 2012.10.23 12:50:00 - [314] - Quote The Prowling Tiger wrote: Bad Messenger wrote: who cares about my opinions anyway, CCP already applied patch. Good show, my farming friend. Good show. You've fought the good fight, but it's over now. You can finally rest, and eye the 'Cancel Subscription' button with a tear in your eye. Aw how cute, you posted on an alt
DJ P0N-3 Table Flippendeavors 48	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:07:00 - [315] - Quote SwissChris1 wrote: The Prowling Tiger wrote: Bad Messenger wrote: who cares about my opinions anyway, CCP already applied patch. Good show, my farming friend. Good show. You've fought the good fight, but it's over now. You can finally rest, and eye the 'Cancel Subscription' button with a tear in your eye. Aw how cute, you posted on an alt Shpfff, who trains Forum Warrior V on their main?
Recruitment Specialist State War Academy Caldari State 2	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:07:00 - [316] - Quote Siobhan MacLeary wrote: Recruitment Specialist wrote: SwissChris1 wrote: Seriously, **** you. Moon goo has been broken for ages, but lets screw the little guy first Ah but by screwing with FW they only upset farmers .... cant be upsetting the nullsec crowd can we? Your tinfoil is showing. Biggest ISK reward for minimum effort ... Tech moons Biggest driver of inflation and Tech 2 costs .... Tech Single biggest bottleneck in T2 production ... Tech 95% of all Tech in nullsec or controlled by nullsec entities Universal tech moon income PER HOUR is approx 5 billion isk So tell me CCP, how exactly is nerfbatting the little guy going to bring PLEX prices down? Grow a pair and deal with the North
SwissChris1 Stimulus Rote Kapelle 10	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:10:00 - [317] - Quote Recruitment Specialist wrote: Siobhan MacLeary wrote: Recruitment Specialist wrote: SwissChris1 wrote: Seriously, **** you. Moon goo has been broken for ages, but lets screw the little guy first Ah but by screwing with FW they only upset farmers .... cant be upsetting the nullsec crowd can we? Your tinfoil is showing. Biggest ISK reward for minimum effort ... Tech moons Biggest driver of inflation and Tech 2 costs .... Tech Single biggest bottleneck in T2 production ... Tech 95% of all Tech in nullsec or controlled by nullsec entities Universal tech moon income PER HOUR is approx 5 billion isk So tell me CCP, how exactly is nerfbatting the little guy going to bring PLEX prices down? Grow a pair and deal with the North QFT...CCP only cares if a few are super rich because spreading the wealth is bad for business. You are worse than America :D
War Kitten Panda McLegion 1388	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:16:00 - [318] - Quote Recruitment Specialist wrote: Biggest ISK reward for minimum effort ... Tech moons Really? Cool, Ima go get me a tech moon! Think a small corp or one-man operation can pull that off? Minimum effort - only after you've built up a strong fleet, taken the moon away from someone else, built your own defensive mining POS, and then held the space or at least been able to defend the POS long term. Some of that takes effort on a scale slightly above "minimal". I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative. 4955	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:16:00 - [319] - Quote Recruitment Specialist wrote: Siobhan MacLeary wrote: Recruitment Specialist wrote: SwissChris1 wrote: Seriously, **** you. Moon goo has been broken for ages, but lets screw the little guy first Ah but by screwing with FW they only upset farmers .... cant be upsetting the nullsec crowd can we? Your tinfoil is showing. Biggest ISK reward for minimum effort ... Tech moons Biggest driver of inflation and Tech 2 costs .... Tech Single biggest bottleneck in T2 production ... Tech 95% of all Tech in nullsec or controlled by nullsec entities Universal tech moon income PER HOUR is approx 5 billion isk So tell me CCP, how exactly is nerfbatting the little guy going to bring PLEX prices down? Grow a pair and deal with the North If tech moons are such low effort wealth fountains, why don't you go snag yourself half a dozen or so? MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button."
Iris Bravemount Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth 90	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:18:00 - [320] - Quote War Kitten wrote: Recruitment Specialist wrote: Biggest ISK reward for minimum effort ... Tech moons Really? Cool, Ima go get me a tech moon! Think a small corp or one-man operation can pull that off? Minimum effort - only after you've built up a strong fleet, taken the moon away from someone else, built your own defensive mining POS, and then held the space or at least been able to defend the POS long term. Some of that takes effort on a scale slightly above "minimal". You forgot fuelling the deathstar. I accidentally... the bookmark. How much is it worth?

SwissChris1 Stimulus Rote Kapelle 10	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:22:00 - [321] - Quote War Kitten wrote: Recruitment Specialist wrote: Biggest ISK reward for minimum effort ... Tech moons Really? Cool, Ima go get me a tech moon! Think a small corp or one-man operation can pull that off? Minimum effort - only after you've built up a strong fleet, taken the moon away from someone else, built your own defensive mining POS, and then held the space or at least been able to defend the POS long term. Some of that takes effort on a scale slightly above "minimal". Clearly you don't know how OPEC works and what a non aggression act stands for.
Iris Bravemount Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth 91	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:24:00 - [322] - Quote SwissChris1 wrote: War Kitten wrote: Recruitment Specialist wrote: Biggest ISK reward for minimum effort ... Tech moons Really? Cool, Ima go get me a tech moon! Think a small corp or one-man operation can pull that off? Minimum effort - only after you've built up a strong fleet, taken the moon away from someone else, built your own defensive mining POS, and then held the space or at least been able to defend the POS long term. Some of that takes effort on a scale slightly above "minimal". Clearly you don't know how OPEC works and what a non aggression act stands for. Guys, this is about FW. Please leave the tech debate out of this. I accidentally... the bookmark. How much is it worth?
Garan Nardieu Moira. Villore Accords 1	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:28:00 - [323] - Quote Bad Messenger wrote: who cares about my opinions anyway, CCP already applied patch. Indeed. All hail CCP Chatgris!
War Kitten Panda McLegion 1389	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:40:00 - [324] - Quote SwissChris1 wrote: War Kitten wrote: Recruitment Specialist wrote: Biggest ISK reward for minimum effort ... Tech moons Really? Cool, Ima go get me a tech moon! Think a small corp or one-man operation can pull that off? Minimum effort - only after you've built up a strong fleet, taken the moon away from someone else, built your own defensive mining POS, and then held the space or at least been able to defend the POS long term. Some of that takes effort on a scale slightly above "minimal". Clearly you don't know how OPEC works and what a non aggression act stands for. Clearly there was no effort involved in establishing that either. Hey gais! Ima join OPEC too. Icanhas tech moon now? I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.

CCP Fozzie C C P C C P Alliance 1990	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:44:00 - [325] - Quote Quick note for those who are defensive plexing across the warzones right now. As part of the patch today we took every system that had more than 4000 VPs worth of vulnerability (>133%) and set them to 4000 VPs. We are planning to implement a cap on the number of VPs past vulnerable a system can collect, but that was not ready to deploy quite yet. Game Designer \| Team Game of Drones https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie

Shepard Book Underground Stargate 84	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:51:00 - [326] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Quick note for those who are defensive plexing across the warzones right now. As part of the patch today we took every system that had more than 4000 VPs worth of vulnerability (>133%) and set them to 4000 VPs. We are planning to implement a cap on the number of VPs past vulnerable a system can collect, but that was not ready to deploy quite yet. What does that mean? Are some systems still over 200% vulnerable? Please expand.
Zheketri Caldari Provisions Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:57:00 - [327] - Quote Shepard Book wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Quick note for those who are defensive plexing across the warzones right now. As part of the patch today we took every system that had more than 4000 VPs worth of vulnerability (>133%) and set them to 4000 VPs. We are planning to implement a cap on the number of VPs past vulnerable a system can collect, but that was not ready to deploy quite yet. What does that mean? Are some systems still over 200% vulnerable? Please expand. Seems to mean that systems have a cap of 133% of vulnerable.

CCP Fozzie C C P C C P Alliance 1990	Posted - 2012.10.23 13:58:00 - [328] - Quote As of the server starting, we ensured that no system was over 133% vulnerable. There's no cap at this time, but if you offensive plex one of those systems past 133% you won't get any reward for doing so. Game Designer \| Team Game of Drones https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie

Shepard Book Underground Stargate 84	Posted - 2012.10.23 14:00:00 - [329] - Quote TY
The Prowling Tiger Artaxes Ventures Inc. 1	Posted - 2012.10.23 14:13:00 - [330] - Quote DJ P0N-3 wrote: SwissChris1 wrote: The Prowling Tiger wrote: Bad Messenger wrote: who cares about my opinions anyway, CCP already applied patch. Good show, my farming friend. Good show. You've fought the good fight, but it's over now. You can finally rest, and eye the 'Cancel Subscription' button with a tear in your eye. Aw how cute, you posted on an alt Shpfff, who trains Forum Warrior V on their main? This is actually my main. Ran out of plex on the other account, so he's in limbo now, LOL.



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page