Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Major Mikes
The First Kiss
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 19:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
hi all o/ (sry for my english)
It is very nice rifter is not a best T1 frig yet. CCP balanced/boost frigs, AF, destroyers and cruiser, but not a dictors. Dictors was ultimate anti-frig ships, but now? It is even really hard win against AF, dictors are killable by T1 frigs, etc
What is a PROBLEM: Dictors are worst then their t1 conuterpart
signature radius: T1 thrasher 56 T2 sabre 75 It is 33%+... None of the T2 ships in EVE has 1/3 signature boost (stabber 105 X vaga 115 = 10%+) SHAME
HP: just compare - T1>T2 lol
dmg rezistence somebody forget dictors are T2 ships, because they have only little "T2" rezists yeah vargur has maybe only 50% of T2 rezists but others T2 ships has full T2 rezistence (jaguar, wolf, etc)
SOLUTION 1.reduce signature 2.add T2 rezistence 3. rebalance few of them
REBALNCE X sabre is good
X heretic needs full rack of missile slot (7) and fiting CPU/PG for this or laser dmg bonus and full turret slots (7)
X eris - eris is good, but I see only good fitting without bubble launcher --> so maybe need some PG/CPU, dont know exactly
X flycatcher - is good like a support dictors - dual prob, dual point, my favorite cloaky dictor
PS:update your wiki everytime you change ships
Thank you CCP , this game is amazing
|
Seranova Farreach
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Exhale.
16
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 20:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
im sure once they are done with tech 1 ship rebalanceing the wave will pass over tech 2 ships. but yeah t2 ships in general need some love. especially nighthawk. |
Romvex
The Scope Gallente Federation
94
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 11:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Yes pretty much all non-frigate T2 ships need rebalancing. especially HACs Warning: Hyper-Elitist Egomaniacal Space God. |
Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
350
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 11:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Dictors bubble things better than destroyers
Seriously though a dictor should not be better at pew pew than afs/faction frigs (well except cov ops and maybe eafs) and not necessarilly better than t1 destroyers. Sabre for example is pretty much great as is.
You seem to be confused about resists too. Ships designed for pure combat have great resists, ships designed for tackling do not (see interceptors). It is a gripe of mine that the force recons have the same resists as combat recons.
They do need the sig radius fixed, but that is just an oversight on ccps part since they reduced destroyer sig. And the stupid weapon set ups for eris etc do need sorted.
And obviously ccp need to make a t2 combat destoyer, maybe they will now they have another hull. That would not be an interdictor and would have assault resists. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |