|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
850
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 05:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
I got caught up in the earlier discussion over the timing to nerf compression or if it would disappear magically.
I always thought one of the main reasons to nerf it was to nerf titan and super construction makeing them a lot harder to build. Bring this up since people want industry in null and want that first before compression nerf.
I am curios to see what level of industry players want in null really. (Like how much they want miners to mine and builders to go through.)
As in miners might be able to supply BS or below with a compression nerf, but would players want miners to support titans and supers easily in null.
With timing, you can nerf compression earlier and hurt supers being built. Or if you do want industry to support their production, then you have to wait longer for compression to be nerfed.
I might have missed though, the conversation of what players actually wanted to be built in null to support a war or so, or how big a war they wanted supported. I'm not shitposting. |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
850
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 11:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
Thanks, but I don't really agree with corestwo's opinoins though.
I do see it as a viable nerf to supers and stuff, if compression was nerfed. If players found a way around it, it would be by doing a ton of work, which really isn't a way around things at all.
Also don't really care about the rate of super deaths or how many there are I suppose, just annoying that it is too easy to get one. But that is a wierder point though.
I mostly made my post off of corestwo's post though, about how the miners and industry peeps would have to carry the null sec residents if compression was nerfed. Suppose, with some of his opinions he wouldn't allow anyone to carry him though. Personally I don't think I could ever support super production really, but BS sized hulls would be worth debating over. I'm not shitposting. |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
853
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 04:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Is it just me, or is it kinda hilarious that the CSM reps who are weighing in most heavily on nullsec issues are not particularly knowledgeable about nullsec? Hans. Issler. And to a lesser extent, Aleks.
(Aleks is probably the closest we have here to a CSM representative who understands anything about nullsec.)
Hell, Kelduum should start weighing in now.
(Aren't there some actual nullsec representatives?)
Null sec residents are all dicks. Their representatives are just continuing that tradition for taking the icelandic trip then doing nothing. Just to be a ****, just to be a null sec resident representative.
Who cares about null sec anyhow? They don't care, why should we? I'm not shitposting. |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
854
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 07:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
^ So we need each other?
You do know, the goons denounce and try to burn freeports right? As well as other groups probably would as well.
Perhaps, the idea of improving things is a bit wishy washy with how many players support burning stations and totally **** ******* other people in null. I'm not shitposting. |
|
|
|