|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
BLACK-STAR
113
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
why cant we get a few hundred or unlimited fittings just as default/free....? paying AUR for something that we had more before and taken away is dumb. [img]http://www.imgbox.de/users/S7AR/star.png[/img] |
BLACK-STAR
142
|
Posted - 2011.10.14 00:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
No.... will not bend over for additional slots for AUR. that's ridiculous.
Unlimited because we can store unlimited browser bookmarks locally to our hdd. A Few hundred server-side fittings would be nice, because this isn't a _space_ issue, their tiny files stored like our notes, like origin bookmarks.
would be very lame if ccp forced us to pay AUR for something so basic. [img]http://www.imgbox.de/users/S7AR/star.png[/img] |
BLACK-STAR
153
|
Posted - 2011.10.14 23:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Tuxford, the description field is semi useless because it erases itself all the time. I do use it for listing some ammo links or alt mods links, on occasion for special note.
KEEP descriptions for local storage as they don't even show up anyways to other people (if you can make them not erase themselves every edit on some part of the fitting would be nice)
OMIT descriptions for server side storage.
Please put a search bar in the fitting window sometime when possible, after you got our unlimited fittings back. ppl like myself use abbreviations on shipnames for different purposes, so recalling an assorted list of ships under that name would be nice than expanding and collapsing categories.
Thank you Tuxford. [img]http://www.imgbox.de/users/S7AR/star.png[/img] |
BLACK-STAR
155
|
Posted - 2011.10.15 23:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:I'd say 100 Fittings is probably reasonable for the average Bitter Vet that you see in here. I can fly probably 60% of the ships in the game - and have multiple fittings for each. 100 At least rounds out nicely. Do 100, if we keep complaining, then you can see about appeasing our insane desires further. 0/10
- massive sighs -
People don't read or understand, read, or obviously don't use the fitting system.... _100_ fittings enough for vets? Obviously you are far from VET.
_1000_ / unlimited. Nobody is interested in threadnaughts over fittings and everyone doesn't want to fight CCP for basic functions back and forth on the forums.
It certainly doesn't help when randoms post "lols if ccp makes it 51 fittings i will be happy" or "lols ccp I'll pay you money for more" Stop encouraging CCP to make poor decisions.
[img]http://www.imgbox.de/users/S7AR/star.png[/img] |
BLACK-STAR
179
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 08:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
I noticed that on the winter expansion page there is nothing mentioned about optimal local and server side fittings.
Just crossing my fingers is all.
Also my statements still stand on the front about ISK/AUR over +fittings. CCP wouldn't make it any harder on themselves to program that transaction mess. Nobody would be happy about an internal fee or tax on basics, honestly.
[img]http://www.imgbox.de/users/S7AR/star.png[/img] |
BLACK-STAR
196
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 22:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
so reporting back from sisi it appears CCP increased fittings to one hundred.
That's really generous and all...
but please CCP, be out going and just grant us a full featured unrestricted utility. I guess, whoever is making these fitting restrictions is a sole person. Or a unanimous conscious decision from everyone at CCP (I think that's probably not the case).
You might aswell put a calculator tool restriction and decrease the number of numerals that appear calculated. It might break something down the road.
[img]http://www.imgbox.de/users/S7AR/star.png[/img] |
BLACK-STAR
203
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 01:50:00 -
[7] - Quote
Buzzmong wrote: If you want unlimited fittings, it'll be client side and local to your machine only.
EXACTLY. Local it, I don't care. CCP can fix by "pushing the envelope". I already explained how it's easy to accomplish and two ways it can be done.
I don't care either about NET difficulties, that can be achieved with CCP as they're committed. it's a fitting tool for convenience recalling smaller info than a full size note.
I respect time and time again they dish an excuse. Out of the blue, CCP NERFing the tool in the first place for no given reason, I guess you invite feedback from community when you play with fire.
Such an honest simple task to accomplish for any developer gaming company.
I seriously just want my fittings, not argue moan and cry about it. It couldn't be blatantly more obvious that vet players of the game need well over 100+ fits.
This I think is so far out overlooked and shouldn't be this way, this thread shouldn't exist. that bad decision shouldn't have been made. and Tuxford already forgotten about it.
[img]http://www.imgbox.de/users/S7AR/star.png[/img] |
|
|
|