Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Roc Wieler
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
200
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 19:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
TL;DR
Why Roc? Discipline, consistency, passion, dedication, community, no alliance agenda. My voice is your voice.
CSM 8 - THE VOICES IN MY HEAD
PLAYER
I've been a part of New Eden for nearly seven years now. It's hard to believe when I say that out loud to myself. Like many veterans, I've watched our universe reinvent itself time and again, sometimes for the worse, but overall for the betterment and continued longevity of our beloved game. I am passionate about our universe in all aspects, even those that may not appeal to the vast majority. I believe that every facet of EVE Online is what makes it wonderful, not just the current topic of the moment.
While there are glaring issues and hot topics like nullsec POSes, lowsec engagement, future direction of ship rebalancing, graphics upgrades, etc, etc, there are also continuing issues such as Incarna, API, UI, exploits, botting, and more.
I do not have an agenda for any one item, or even a group of items. The views of every player are valid to me. Every voice deserves to be heard at the table. You may ask me what my platform is and my response will be "What's important to you?"
As a member of the CSM, I would be your representative. To push my own ideas would be flawed, though I will always welcome discussion on how to improve all of our ideas.
I do my best to keep abreast of everything that can potentially affect my enjoyment of our game, lurking in forums, engaging in community blogs, digesting what third parties say about CCP's efforts, but I am just one man - one man with one voice.
PROBLEM SOLVER
In game I have only experienced some of what our game has to offer directly, and probably some things that others haven't experienced. My time in New Eden has been unique to me as yours has been unique to you. I have been in large alliances. I have been part of the factional war. I continue to fund myself through market trading, scams, and killing pirates, which I suppose is a form of piracy on its own. I have been industrious. I have hung around my Captain's Quarters. I have developed third party applications use the API.
In a gesture of transparency, I have never mined. I have never been a Director in an Alliance, though I have been a Director within a corporation. Does this negate my value in those two arenas? Hardly, because you have been part of those mechanics, and through you I am made better.
All of these have been learning experiences, and I am always growing. There are many complex underlying systems involved in EVE Online, and I've been fortunate to have a peek at some, to speak intimately with those that have built them and continue to work on them, to have an appreciation for what CCP does and how we can identify how it can be done even better.
Out of game I have spent the better part of my life focusing my career on being that trusted individual people turn to when they need the right answer, when they need a well thought out plan of execution that not only meets the need, but exceeds it. I am a lateral thinker, naturally able to see multiple paths and quickly select the appropriate direction. I am a developer. I am a QA specialist. I am an Information Architect. I am a digital Project Manager. I am a Technical Director.
My job has always been to deliver the best. I've never done it alone. I am just one man - one man with a voice.
MY VOICE
I have mentioned that I am one man with a voice. I am. It's a strong voice, a consistent voice, a voice that I have always used to advocate our community both in and out of game. My humble blog has retained a consistent following over the years as I've explored various aspects of Roc's immortal life, and through Roc, my own life.
I am the voice of reason amidst the storms. I am the storm amidst the tides of complacency. I am a solid Roc upon which you can rely. I do not waver from any commitment. I do not falter from any challenge. I can be depended upon to give my all to any task set before me.
I believe in people. I believe we are all of value. I believe that when voices unite, change is inevitable. I believe in you. I believe in me. I believe that together our voices are made stronger. I believe we can make a difference in our universe.
I hope you believe the same. Roc the Vote.
rocwieler.com/csm8 for more comments. Never start a fight you can win.
|
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
795
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 20:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
Hi there,
I used to read your blog, and I think you're a pretty decent guy. However, I'm a bit worried that you're running for the CSM without a platform of any kind - is it enough to say "I will represent ALL of you" when it is a well-known fact that no two players in EVE Online have the same views?
With that in mind, here are some questions;
Which blog post do you most agree with? This one or this one? Why?
What are your views on the 100-page thread of people asking for revamped POSes? What do you think of CCP Seagull's response here? What would you do in Two Step's position?
What are your opinions on the recent tension between the HBC and the CFC that ultimately cooled down due solely (apparently) to the fact that the awful sov mechanics disincentivise sov warfare? How do you think that more war in nullsec could be encouraged? What do you think of the battle in Asakai - good result of the HBC/CFC conflict, or a lucky (unlucky for DBRB) one-off?
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Roc Wieler
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
201
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 20:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
First of all, thanks for commenting. I think one of the issues I've run into years past when running for CSM is the concept of "no platform".
I actually have a platform. I have ideas. I have opinions. On all aspects of the game.
What I don't have is the illusion that is so often made to other players by CSM candidates saying "If I get elected I promise that nullsec will be fixed!"
The truth is that the CSM does not drive CCP's development direction. That was never the nature of the beast. The CSM is a sounding board, and when used correctly can indeed help mitigate bad decisions but has never been in a position of authority and honestly shouldn't be.
I need to communicate that better. I admit.
As to your direct questions:
GANKING IS PVP
I have carebear moments where I really don't want to be shot at. The easy answer there is to not undock. I can't get shot if I don't undock. Might be time to get some market orders up to date anyway.
The truth is, as has been put forward by others, that open PVP is instrumental to learning how to prosper in EVE Online. When I think back to my own career, and the stories that have been shared amongst real life friends, 99% of my deaths were caused by own stupidity. Period. I should've known better to do what I did that resulted in my death.
The idea of making EVE "safe" to appeal to a broader player base is not something I agree with when it comes to PVP. Do I agree with docking games? No. Do I agree with other abuses of the system that would be the equivalent of "lvl 80 on a lvl 1"? No. Undocking, as an example, is a fundamental game mechanic that everyone needs to do. Dying as soon as I do shouldn't be seen as right.
I can also make a counter-argument. If I'm in lowsec of nullsec and undock then I have every right to be shot at. It was my own dumb fault for docking up where I did. It's part of the harsh beauty that is New Eden.
I respect Jester. We've agreed and disagreed in the past on things. This could be one of them.
Last year I wrote about my own ideas for 'themeparking' EVE with a method that would produce everychanging content taking the pressure off of devs. You can read about that HERE if you want.
--- POSes. Need of help. Yes. I know CCP Seagull and I can believe that what was in the CSM Minutes didn't reflect the truer story. I also believe that any longterm solution for such a critical component of the game should be taken slowly with lots of discussion with the players and CSM to ensure a system that we're all happy with going forward. Do I know what that system is? No. As you mentioned, there is a 100 threadnaught with many ideas and trolling already that give a wealth of insight into the issue.
---
Next point. SOV Mechanics. Broken. Yes. Obvious. Yes.
---
What you've done here, perhaps on purpose, is reinforce my platform of "The voice of the people." SOV mechanics and POSes might not be important to a lot of people. I still care enough to be informed and have an opinion. Highsec carebears may not matter to the other end of that spectrum. I still care care enough to be informed and have an opinion.
Again, I must reiterate, any CSM candidate that stands on singular platforms doesn't deserve the position. The CSM represents ALL PLAYERS not just the ones that agree with their ideas. Never start a fight you can win.
|
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
796
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 21:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
Thanks for your responses.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Roc Wieler
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
201
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 21:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Thanks for your responses.
No problem at all. Thanks for the questions.
Never start a fight you can win.
|
Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics CODE.
98
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 21:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
Roc Wieler wrote:Again, I must reiterate, any CSM candidate that stands on singular platforms doesn't deserve the position. The CSM represents ALL PLAYERS not just the ones that agree with their ideas.
What is you plan to represent the part of the playerbase who demand the removal of all aggression in highsec? |
Tom JBrokaw
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 21:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
a cursory examination of your blog shows you spend most of your time talking about yourself. do you expect people to believe you are up to putting in the work to better the game, or is this really just a vanity run. or a shameless attempt to cash in on your percieved fame?
Singular Snowflake wrote:Roc Wieler wrote:Again, I must reiterate, any CSM candidate that stands on singular platforms doesn't deserve the position. The CSM represents ALL PLAYERS not just the ones that agree with their ideas. What is you plan to represent the part of the playerbase who demand the removal of all aggression in highsec?
id also like to echo this question. the tone of your responses say that you have an attitude of "htfu" to some portion of players, that their positions are not in fact worth considering. in light of that, how can anyone really take your claim that you represent "all players" at face value? |
Roc Wieler
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
201
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 22:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
My blog is about me, yes. Roc's Ramblings. It's my personal experiences in EVE Online. There is occasionally some non-roc-related EVE fiction as well as out of character posts.
That has no bearing on my involvement or love for this community. In fact, if you've read or followed my blog you would know I've ran many contests over the years as well as other community oriented initiatives. Right now, for example, is the Fandom contest, where the winner will be the featured vocalist on a self-produced album with all proceeds from all my album sales going to Child's Play charity.
I also don't have a HTFU attitude at all. I have my own opinion. Being able to state one's opinion with strength of conviction and the hopes of intelligent and productive debate should be a demerit.
Anyway, that doesn't answer the questions asked.
Here's my approach to all things in life: - what is position 1? - what is position 2? - can the two co-exist? If so, how? - if not, what is the best course of action for my demographic
That last point is often the scariest in any project regardless of medium as you are undoubtedly going to make some people unhappy.
In the case of a "safe" high sec, here is but one idea: - flag modules as aggressive
In a nutshell it essentially means you can't have any "aggressive" or "combat" oriented modules fit when you undock. If you do, you can be attacked, as per normal gameplay. If you don't have any of the aggressive or combat modules fit in high sec, then you have safe passage through highsec systems.
This caters to the carebears but also allows for mistakes to be made, and thusly, maintains EVE's harsh learning curve.
Another idea could be "diplomatic immunity" where a pilot can literally purchase a pass they store in their cargo hold. The more systems in high sec they want to pass through, the higher the cost of the pass. Of course, the second the pilot leaves highsec, the pass is revoked.
This creates an ISK sink as well as the chance for mistakes to be made, and thusly, maintains EVE's harsh learning curve.
What I've done here is called brainstorming. Already I can see problems with my own ideas. As a member of the CSM it would be my job to honestly critique ideas, tear them apart, poke holes in them until the best solution for a particular issue is identified.
It's all part of the process.
Stay calm and vote Roc. Never start a fight you can win.
|
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
3251
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 12:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
Do you feel that you can work with people like CCP Punkturis and CCP Dolan after writing blog posts like this one? Will you be writing creepy posts about other CCP staff as well? CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
|
ry ry
Snuff Box
177
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 12:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
Roc. dude.
Your relentless self-promotion should be a means to an end - not an election platform. |
|
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
1034
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 12:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
Quote:Do you feel that you can work with people like CCP Punkturis and CCP Dolan after writing blog posts like this one? Will you be writing creepy posts about other CCP staff as well?
^ Isn't that what the massing drinking is for? At least now, I think I would drink as much as you guys do now. Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
3251
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 12:54:00 -
[12] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Quote:Do you feel that you can work with people like CCP Punkturis and CCP Dolan after writing blog posts like this one? Will you be writing creepy posts about other CCP staff as well?
^ Isn't that what the massing drinking is for? At least now, I think I would drink as much as you guys do now.
The devs go out drinking with the CSM because they aren't afraid we will roofie them and drag them back to our hotel room. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7464
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 13:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
Roc Wieler wrote: Here's my approach to all things in life: - what is position 1? - what is position 2? - can the two co-exist? If so, how? - if not, what is the best course of action for my demographic
That last point is often the scariest in any project regardless of medium as you are undoubtedly going to make some people unhappy.
In the case of a "safe" high sec, here is but one idea: - flag modules as aggressive
In a nutshell it essentially means you can't have any "aggressive" or "combat" oriented modules fit when you undock. If you do, you can be attacked, as per normal gameplay. If you don't have any of the aggressive or combat modules fit in high sec, then you have safe passage through highsec systems.
This caters to the carebears but also allows for mistakes to be made, and thusly, maintains EVE's harsh learning curve...
So open-season on mission runners? Or on miners with combat drones in their drone bay?
Interestingly, I made almost exactly this suggestion a few years ago, as a reducto ad absurdum proposal during one of the many, many suicide ganking threads as an illustration of what some of the more extreme "anti ganker" proposals would lead to.
Sadly, no one was enthusiastic. Apparently CCP should be able to code the game to know who's undocking with weapons with criminal intent and who merely intends to murder NPCs. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
1034
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 13:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
Ah that is a good point, forgot about the trust issue with drinking. I shall have to visit a frat or so more often, before I go to fanfest, so I get the ethics down.
"In my room I got naked, and wanting to respect the traditions surrounding me, headed downstairs." - roc (blog)
How is he not Punkturis or Bolton anyhow. I think the main complaint right now, is if another Bolton is needed in Iceland or not. Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
1034
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 13:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Roc Wieler wrote: Here's my approach to all things in life: - what is position 1? - what is position 2? - can the two co-exist? If so, how? - if not, what is the best course of action for my demographic
That last point is often the scariest in any project regardless of medium as you are undoubtedly going to make some people unhappy.
In the case of a "safe" high sec, here is but one idea: - flag modules as aggressive
In a nutshell it essentially means you can't have any "aggressive" or "combat" oriented modules fit when you undock. If you do, you can be attacked, as per normal gameplay. If you don't have any of the aggressive or combat modules fit in high sec, then you have safe passage through highsec systems.
This caters to the carebears but also allows for mistakes to be made, and thusly, maintains EVE's harsh learning curve...
So open-season on mission runners? Or on miners with combat drones in their drone bay? Interestingly, I made almost exactly this suggestion a few years ago, as a reducto ad absurdum proposal during one of the many, many suicide ganking threads as an illustration of what some of the more extreme "anti ganker" proposals would lead to. Sadly, no one was enthusiastic. Apparently CCP should be able to code the game to know who's undocking with weapons with criminal intent and who merely intends to murder NPCs.
Well if they undock with active tanks be easy to tell if they are murdering NPCs. Could code it so you are like 80% or more if lucky accurate based on that. The bad calls could be excused to RNG, and if it happens repeatedly, just tell them RNG doesn't like them, and everything happening to them is normal and acceptable.
Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7465
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 13:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
So death to regen tanked drakes, buffer-tanked Macks and speed tanking AFs? Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
1034
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 13:31:00 -
[17] - Quote
^ Yes to buffer-tanked Macks.
The other deaths would be blamed on RNG. Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
796
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 14:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
Wait. Are you advocating an RNG-based system to determine whether or not players are allowed to be attacked in highsec or not?
...
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7471
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 15:05:00 -
[19] - Quote
It's exciting and innovative ideas like that that will bring a new level of excitement to hi-sec. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2419
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 15:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Two step wrote:rodyas wrote:Quote:Do you feel that you can work with people like CCP Punkturis and CCP Dolan after writing blog posts like this one? Will you be writing creepy posts about other CCP staff as well?
^ Isn't that what the massing drinking is for? At least now, I think I would drink as much as you guys do now. The devs go out drinking with the CSM because they aren't afraid we will roofie them and drag them back to our hotel room.
Goddamn.
Roc is a cool guy. He's never taken advantage of me, even when he could have... CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
|
Roc Wieler
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
201
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 16:28:00 -
[21] - Quote
Two step wrote:Do you feel that you can work with people like CCP Punkturis and CCP Dolan after writing blog posts like this one? Will you be writing creepy posts about other CCP staff as well?
Absolutely to both questions! Here's the secret to the character of Roc Wieler. Those of us that are "in" on the gag realize it's all in good fun. It's when we start taking ourselves too seriously that real issues arise.
Never start a fight you can win.
|
Roc Wieler
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
201
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 16:30:00 -
[22] - Quote
ry ry wrote:Roc. dude.
Your relentless self-promotion should be a means to an end - not an election platform.
Thank you for posting.
I will politely disagree. My self-promotion is actually my platform. I'm not making any empty campaign promises to players. I'm not trying to mislead players.
I'm selling me, my value, my virtues, my voice. Regardless of any situation I would run into as a CSM member it is because of confidence in me that players should know the issue would be dealt with fairly, with deep analysis, and no shenanigans.
Never start a fight you can win.
|
Roc Wieler
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
201
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 16:32:00 -
[23] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Roc Wieler wrote: Here's my approach to all things in life: - what is position 1? - what is position 2? - can the two co-exist? If so, how? - if not, what is the best course of action for my demographic
That last point is often the scariest in any project regardless of medium as you are undoubtedly going to make some people unhappy.
In the case of a "safe" high sec, here is but one idea: - flag modules as aggressive
In a nutshell it essentially means you can't have any "aggressive" or "combat" oriented modules fit when you undock. If you do, you can be attacked, as per normal gameplay. If you don't have any of the aggressive or combat modules fit in high sec, then you have safe passage through highsec systems.
This caters to the carebears but also allows for mistakes to be made, and thusly, maintains EVE's harsh learning curve...
So open-season on mission runners? Or on miners with combat drones in their drone bay? Interestingly, I made almost exactly this suggestion a few years ago, as a reducto ad absurdum proposal during one of the many, many suicide ganking threads as an illustration of what some of the more extreme "anti ganker" proposals would lead to. Sadly, no one was enthusiastic. Apparently CCP should be able to code the game to know who's undocking with weapons with criminal intent and who merely intends to murder NPCs.
I also think that highsec players would find it unfair that they are penalized for safety in the sense that they would have to buy the diplomatic immunity tokens, etc, etc.
This is why I welcome open discussion at the table. Throw ideas against the wall. See what sticks. Develop it into something presentable then see what CCP does with it.
Good luck to you in the election.
Never start a fight you can win.
|
Roc Wieler
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
201
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 16:35:00 -
[24] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Two step wrote:rodyas wrote:Quote:Do you feel that you can work with people like CCP Punkturis and CCP Dolan after writing blog posts like this one? Will you be writing creepy posts about other CCP staff as well?
^ Isn't that what the massing drinking is for? At least now, I think I would drink as much as you guys do now. The devs go out drinking with the CSM because they aren't afraid we will roofie them and drag them back to our hotel room. Goddamn. Roc is a cool guy. He's never taken advantage of me, even when he could have...
At least not that you remember...
Seriously though, Seleene understands, as do most of the existing CSM and CCP teams. There's playing a character and there's been an asshat in real life.
To compare me to Bolton III is downright insulting. I can hold my liquor, thank you very much.
Never start a fight you can win.
|
Kelduum Revaan
EVE University Ivy League
1999
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 16:43:00 -
[25] - Quote
Roc Wieler wrote:Here's the secret to the character of Roc Wieler. Those of us that are "in" on the gag realize it's all in good fun. It's when we start taking ourselves too seriously that real issues arise.
I entirely agree...
http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/26/health/bodybuilder-gamer-avatar-inspiration/index.html
CNN wrote:Iqbal says she keeps her husband from crossing the line between fantasy and reality. She's not a big fan of Roc -- she prefers her men balanced, with a feminine side. When Dickinson slips into Roc's deep voice with a "Hello, darling..." greeting after work, "I'm like 'Oh, shut the hell up,'" she says.
"I have to remind him that it is a character." Kelduum Revaan CEO, EVE University |
Roc Wieler
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
201
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 16:57:00 -
[26] - Quote
Kelduum Revaan wrote:Roc Wieler wrote:Here's the secret to the character of Roc Wieler. Those of us that are "in" on the gag realize it's all in good fun. It's when we start taking ourselves too seriously that real issues arise.
I entirely agree... http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/26/health/bodybuilder-gamer-avatar-inspiration/index.htmlCNN wrote:"We were all just a bunch of pathetic losers," Dickinson remembers. "We paid good money to fly all the way to Iceland and instead of enjoying Iceland, most of us spent all our time sitting around playing the video game we already played back home."
...
Iqbal says she keeps her husband from crossing the line between fantasy and reality. She's not a big fan of Roc -- she prefers her men balanced, with a feminine side. When Dickinson slips into Roc's deep voice with a "Hello, darling..." greeting after work, "I'm like 'Oh, shut the hell up,'" she says.
"I have to remind him that it is a character."
Thank you for bringing this up, as I knew it would come up sooner or later, so it gives me a chance to deal with it early.
"We're all a bunch of pathetic losers." I stand by this comment 100% even if the meaning didn't translate well. You see, our characters are immortal gods, piloting massive spaceships with the power of their brains! By comparison, we fall short, badly. Most of us, if we're honest, don't have ideal self-image, myself included.
It was my first visit to Iceland and I was in awe of how gorgeous it was, and instead of seeing that same passion shared around me, all of us, including me, sat around talking about EVE Online.
This statement was about my own hypocrisy and the irony that we would all fly so far to completely ignore the beauty around us instead to focus on our other passion, New Eden. Sadly, it was a sweeping statement. I don't know how many times other people had been. Maybe they were bored of Iceland. Maybe it was my own insecurity coming out.
That is what was meant by this statement. It was never intended as a slight towards anyone, but not much I can do about it once it's out there, right?
As for my wife reminding me not to be Roc, that's meant more about the fact that I use the idea of Roc Wieler as my own motivation at the gym. WWRD? He would push a little harder on that rep, he wouldn't rest as long between sets, he would give it everything he has.
I live my life that way now.
So no, I don't take myself too seriously. There's no need to as there are enough people out there already that do. Never start a fight you can win.
|
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir. Black Legion.
1031
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 17:23:00 -
[27] - Quote
Where did you find time to actually play EVE during Fanfest? #BallTilliFall "Alekseyev Karrde: mercenary of my heart."-á -Arydanika, Voices from the Void
Hero of the CSM Noir./Noir. Academy Recruiting: www.noirmercs.com |
Roc Wieler
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
201
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 17:29:00 -
[28] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:Where did you find time to actually play EVE during Fanfest? #BallTilliFall
LOL not so much "play" EVE as talk about it incessantly. Good times.
Never start a fight you can win.
|
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1516
|
Posted - 2013.01.30 20:49:00 -
[29] - Quote
You know that should you be a successful candidate, one of your responsibilities may involve flying to Iceland to sit around and talk about Eve incessantly, right? Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
1034
|
Posted - 2013.01.31 05:16:00 -
[30] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Wait. Are you advocating an RNG-based system to determine whether or not players are allowed to be attacked in highsec or not?
...
......... and a 5, sorry you lost the RNG roll, so no answer for you. Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |