Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4058
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 20:43:00 -
[181] - Quote
My body isn't ready. Oh god... Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4571
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 22:50:00 -
[182] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:My body isn't ready. Oh god... i thought we were waiting on posting those perticular xenuria convos |
Xenuria
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
735
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 01:13:00 -
[183] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Xenuria wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:You know you're not getting out o this, so why not pony up the information? Stop pussyfooting around.
Behavior like this isn't going to get you elected. What information? The only people in this thread who are "pussyfooting" around are the ones making vague and non-specific accusations without anything remotely resembling evidence. Why did you lie multiple times while you were in Test Alliance?
Which time are we talking about? The first time when I said that I was in the "9gag army"? Or The second time when I said I planned on seeding some markets?
Seriously, I will humor you if you take the time to be specific. CSM 8 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
Styx Sertan
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 01:14:00 -
[184] - Quote
Xenuria wrote: After that I went back to join the gallente militia and spend time with people that actually appreciated my hyper-vigilance and attention to detail.
So you're saying that Gallente Militia is more tolerant to autism than TEST Alliance Haven for Autists?
I don't believe it. |
Mara Tessidar
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
758
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 06:37:00 -
[185] - Quote
Xenuria please don't leave your seed in my market :ohdear: Reading the EVEO forums is like huffing gas or sniffing glue. Sure it's funny and you get high, but you pay a terrible, terrible price in the long run. |
Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1338
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 13:58:00 -
[186] - Quote
Xenuria wrote: Seriously, I will humor you if you take the time to be specific.
If I post your post in this thread, CCP will lock your thread.
Do you want it posted here?
|
Xenuria
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
735
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 16:42:00 -
[187] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Xenuria wrote: Seriously, I will humor you if you take the time to be specific.
If I post your post in this thread, CCP will lock your thread. Do you want it posted here?
I said before that you are more than welcome to send me an evemail of it if you feel like posting it in this thread would be disruptive. CSM 8 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
|
ISD Cura Ursus
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
117
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 18:08:00 -
[188] - Quote
OK,
I cleaned up a couple of posts.
I want to remind everyone of a 5 things:
1. Keep it civil. 2. No personal attacks. 3. Try not to be uncivil. 4. No personal attacks. 5. Keep it civil.
Discussing the merits or pitfalls of a particular candidate is fine. Talking about their (apparent) disability, and using that as a way to make fun of them or others is not. Talking about harming another player, even indirectly is not.
Just a reminder in case you did not catch the rules above. Keep it civil. ISD Cura Ursus Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
592
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 19:31:00 -
[189] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Xenuria wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:You know you're not getting out o this, so why not pony up the information? Stop pussyfooting around.
Behavior like this isn't going to get you elected. What information? The only people in this thread who are "pussyfooting" around are the ones making vague and non-specific accusations without anything remotely resembling evidence. Why did you lie multiple times while you were in Test Alliance? Which time are we talking about? The first time when I said that I was in the "9gag army"? Or The second time when I said I planned on seeding some markets? Seriously, I will humor you if you take the time to be specific.
Lets just focus on the first time. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
592
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 19:32:00 -
[190] - Quote
ISD Cura Ursus wrote:OK,
I cleaned up a couple of posts.
I want to remind everyone of a 5 things:
1. Keep it civil. 2. No personal attacks. 3. Try not to be uncivil. 4. No personal attacks. 5. Keep it civil.
Discussing the merits or pitfalls of a particular candidate is fine. Talking about their (apparent) disability, and using that as a way to make fun of them or others is not. Talking about harming another player, even indirectly is not.
Just a reminder in case you did not catch the rules above. Keep it civil.
Also I'm agreeing with this. We can dismantle Xenuria's campaign without lowering ourselves to making fun of their disability or gender non-compliance. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |
|
Sidrat Flush
The Praxis Initiative Gentlemen's Agreement
126
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 19:36:00 -
[191] - Quote
You're evasive. You want specifics which seems rightly or wrongly to suggest that theres multiple thigs you dont really want to make public so you hope most gets stepped aside.
I wish CSM candidates could be pre screened before making public announcements about standing for CSM but then who would do that?
Be honest list everything enough of being specific - you're the vaguest in the thread.
I'm also glad to say I dont know what 9gag is because if even Test doesn't tolerate it it cant be that good and os perhaps even too and for Test themselves.
Being kicked from the same alliance twice is rarely a good sign for any one even high sec corps but the CSM yikes! The new home of the Eve Industrial Organiser is here. Enjoy the first in a series, EIO:Refinery now http://www.eve-files.com/media/corp/Sidrat/ Read about it http://eveindustrialorganiser.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0 |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
929
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 21:06:00 -
[192] - Quote
Sidrat Flush wrote:I'm also glad to say I dont know what 9gag is because if even Test doesn't tolerate it it cant be that good and os perhaps even too and for Test themselves. 9gag users are what redditors would call pubbies if they used that word. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Vote James 315 for CSM 8! |
Xenuria
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
735
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 01:48:00 -
[193] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Sidrat Flush wrote:I'm also glad to say I dont know what 9gag is because if even Test doesn't tolerate it it cant be that good and os perhaps even too and for Test themselves. 9gag users are what redditors would call pubbies if they used that word.
Yeah, the first time I was in test the whole point was to make people confused and unjustifiably upset. It was an elaborate troll. Hence the statement about working with chris hansen and being in the "9gag army", if the statement "9gag is legion" wasn't enough to cue you into the satirical nature of the encounter then nothing will. CSM 8 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1338
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 04:20:00 -
[194] - Quote
ISD Cura Ursus wrote:OK,
I cleaned up a couple of posts.
I want to remind everyone of a 5 things:
1. Keep it civil. 2. No personal attacks. 3. Try not to be uncivil. 4. No personal attacks. 5. Keep it civil.
Discussing the merits or pitfalls of a particular candidate is fine. Talking about their (apparent) disability, and using that as a way to make fun of them or others is not. Talking about harming another player, even indirectly is not.
Just a reminder in case you did not catch the rules above. Keep it civil.
So wait, is this you ISD saying that outing a self admitted pedophile who's running for public office isn't acceptable?
Where exactly do we file formal complaints against ISD members?
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1720
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 04:49:00 -
[195] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:ISD Cura Ursus wrote:OK,
I cleaned up a couple of posts.
I want to remind everyone of a 5 things:
1. Keep it civil. 2. No personal attacks. 3. Try not to be uncivil. 4. No personal attacks. 5. Keep it civil.
Discussing the merits or pitfalls of a particular candidate is fine. Talking about their (apparent) disability, and using that as a way to make fun of them or others is not. Talking about harming another player, even indirectly is not.
Just a reminder in case you did not catch the rules above. Keep it civil. So wait, is this you ISD saying that outing a self admitted pedophile who's running for public office isn't acceptable? Where exactly do we file formal complaints against ISD members? The head of the ISD. So yeah they police them selves. EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|
|
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1991
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 05:13:00 -
[196] - Quote
I have removed several off topic posts. If you wish to file a complaint against ISD, I direct you to use the petition system and it will be reviewed there by CCP. Thank you. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Endeavour Starfleet
842
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 07:11:00 -
[197] - Quote
Hello there!
I would like to name several situations that I feel are detrimental to the game. Give a solution and ask you for your stance on both. I do need answers to all the situations for my vote(s)
POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready?
Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard)
Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining?
The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts.
The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE.
Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi.
Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet.
Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4067
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 08:00:00 -
[198] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:My body isn't ready. Oh god... i thought we were waiting on posting those perticular xenuria convos You've never seen his "Xenuria Rising" video? Has nothing to do with the other... allegations. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |
|
CCP Eterne
C C P C C P Alliance
2207
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 15:27:00 -
[199] - Quote
I have deleted repeated trolling, personal attacks, and off topic posts from this thread. Do not do this. I will delete the posts and appropriate moderation action will be taken. New Eden Community Representative GÇ+ New Eden Illuminati GÇ+ Fiction Adept
@CCP_Eterne GÇ+ @EVE_LiveEvents |
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
4077
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 18:03:00 -
[200] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:I have deleted repeated trolling, personal attacks, and off topic posts from this thread. Do not do this. I will delete the posts and appropriate moderation action will be taken. I think you've ended up deleting things that are actually relevant to his candidacy for CSM. If there are allegations regarding certain actions he's taken in the past we have a right to know and discuss them here. Anything else would be patently dishonest. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |
|
Xenuria
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
735
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 19:28:00 -
[201] - Quote
POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready?
Here is the biggest problem I see with any measure of POD fixing. There is a difference between a conceptual idea of what would fix something and the actual "effort" and "work" that would need to go into making that happen, assuming it even CAN happen with the way the current foundation is at any point in time. More specifically, I am saying that I understand why CCP is hesitant to jump into what would be a very cold pool. If it were something really easy and point blank simple then they probably would have implemented it by now. I don't know what goes on behind the curtain so all I really can say is what I actually know to be true. In terms of a "near term" bandage, I think putting bandaids on problems often leads to overlooking the problem in the future ultimately resulting in it taking much longer for the root problem to be solved properly.
Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard)
I think I am going to have to disagree with you on this one but that does not mean I am not completely open to alternative arguments. Cloaking by design is supposed to make you invisible and to that end, very hard to find. I feel like people using this game-play mechanic to do Recon and even take things as far as streaming the locations of enemy fleets or gatherings is natural. I would argue that this level of sneaky, intelligence gathering is part of the meta game that makes EVE Online persist into other areas of our lives even after we have closed the game client for the day. The saturation of streams and other forms of observation of ingame content is only going to draw MORE attention to EVE Online. This is a positive not a negative.
Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining?
Honestly, I don't know a great deal about moon mining. I have seen people express discontent and frustration with the subject matter and if I were elected and nobody else on that CSM was paying attention too or focusing on moon mining, then at that point I would spend the time researching it inside and out so that I could cover the gap in representation.
The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts.
I think something with an effect as massive as altering the way local chat works is not to be played around with on a whim. CCP has access to a ridiculous amount of statistics and metrics with regards to how players interact with the game world. Without really knowing any of that right now, it's hard for me or ANYBODY to say with certainty what the long term effects of changing local would be.
The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE.
One of my primary focuses is Risk vs Reward and that no doubt extends to missions. There are many missions that are either out of date or configured in such a way that their difficulty is not proportional to their reward. Missions need attention for sure. I don't know about an incursion style but I do think a system should be implemented that rewards players based on more than what they are currently. Maybe, a mission has rats that don't need to be killed in order to finish it but killing said rats results in a slightly higher standing or lp or isk, etc. There are a multitude of ways in which missions could be made exponentially more diverse and unique even after doing the same one several times.
Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi.
I actually support the so called nerf to incursions. In my opinion there was a huge isk faucet. CCP didn't nerf incursions simply because they felt like people were making to much isk. They actually have alot of data on their end that tells them when something is unstable or wonky.
Continued on next post.
CSM 8 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
Xenuria
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
735
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 19:30:00 -
[202] - Quote
Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet.
I can't argue with you there. I could make the point that something like what you describe would be low priority compared to all the other stuff.
Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet.
I have to agree with you.
Note: I very much appreciate you asking these questions. It gives me an opportunity to articulate in a specific manner, my platform. CSM 8 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
Endeavour Starfleet
843
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 19:36:00 -
[203] - Quote
I thank you for your answers. However because you support incursion nerfs and because you do seem to not see AFK Cloaking streaming as clear evidence of how overpowered it is. I am afraid I can't support you in the upcoming election.
If you do happen to get in tho. I hope you will be very tough on CCP when it comes to POS and Moons. CCP continues to give half answers and other delaying actions when it comes to these badly needed changes in my opinion and I think part of that is due to how weak CSM 7 was. |
Xenuria
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
736
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 18:05:00 -
[204] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:I thank you for your answers. However because you support incursion nerfs and because you do seem to not see AFK Cloaking streaming as clear evidence of how overpowered it is. I am afraid I can't support you in the upcoming election.
If you do happen to get in tho. I hope you will be very tough on CCP when it comes to POS and Moons. CCP continues to give half answers and other delaying actions when it comes to these badly needed changes in my opinion and I think part of that is due to how weak CSM 7 was. I didn't say that I support all incursion nerfs across the board, now did I? I only made the point that for CCP to nerf something at that level they always have a reason.
Your perception of how "overpowered" Afk Cloak Streaming is, is subjective and isn't entirely relevant to CCP. If CCP starts altering gameplay based solely on things that happen OUTSIDE of the eve client then we are all going to have a really bad time.
Let me give you an example.
Example: The player base develops a means to calculate the best possible amount of time to spend mining in a dangerous location and when to leave. This results in a portion of the player base making good isk for much lower RISK than the players that don't use this formula. Then somebody like you comes along as says that Mining is OVER POWERED, BECAUSE "some" people have found a OUT OF GAME means of reducing their risk and in turn having less risk for the same isk as other players in the similar situation.
According to your logic, CCP should NERF mining or alter it in a way to compensate for the portion of players that have somehow calculated the best amount of time to spend mining before switching to a different system. Think about that... That's some Blizzard bs right there. That kind of reasoning is why so many people are unsubscribing from world of warcraft and coming over to eve online. Nerfing a mechanic for the singular reason that players have found a way to be better at it without breaking the rules is BAD/Blizzard-esk, and it's worse when the way they are better at it doesn't even happen inside the game client. In this hypothetical it's some spreadsheet that tells them when on average they should leave a system to statistically lower the amount of loses they experience over time. CSM 8 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
Endeavour Starfleet
846
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 20:56:00 -
[205] - Quote
The fact that you are comparing risk free streaming on enemy systems that affect entire battles or wars to mining when it comes to cloaking imbalance shows your position on things quite clearly to me personally and you will not have my vote. Sorry. Thank you again for answering my questions. |
Xenuria
Marcabian 5th Invasion Fleet
737
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 21:52:00 -
[206] - Quote
Nothing in eve is risk free. Your logic is broken. I refuted the central point of your argument and you countered by citing a falsehood. Personally, I don't want your vote. CSM 8 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
Xenuria
Eleutherian Guard Villore Accords
752
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 15:15:00 -
[207] - Quote
The man has shut me down folks.
It's been weeks without any response on official channels so I am just going to make this public itt.
I was "denied" CSM citing "Special reasons".
No specifics were given and I fear they never will be. CSM 8 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
BadAssMcKill
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
264
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:27:00 -
[208] - Quote
The man is trying to keep you down maaaaaaaan Starships were meant to fly~
http://i.imgur.com/6j6cIZE.gif |
Xenuria
Eleutherian Guard Villore Accords
752
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:58:00 -
[209] - Quote
I am going to refrain from making any further comments on the matter until certain people are given a fair opportunity to resolve this issue. CSM 8 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
Nariya Kentaya
Exclusion Cartel The Kadeshi
604
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:20:00 -
[210] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:The man has shut me down folks.
It's been weeks without any response on official channels so I am just going to make this public itt.
I was "denied" CSM citing "Special reasons".
No specifics were given and I fear they never will be. Not to be offensive, but its probably for the best.
You have made it clear in the past, both in opinions, attitude, and outright saying it, that you dont synergize well with people. you may have good ideas sometimes, but more often than not the way you present those ideas can come across as hostile, condescending, and rather forceful. From a realistic perspective, you would most likely have one of the lowest success chances on the CSM.
You're the kinda of person who works better either alone or with absolute dominion over decisions and authority, which would make you a counter-productive addition to the CSM lineup (not that the crrent linep is necessarily overflowing with competence). |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |