| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
CrusherDK
   |
Posted - 2005.07.23 23:27:00 -
[1]
So as i think this act wasnt combat accomplishment from BoB?
IMO, the corp who did it, doesnt deserve any respect. 'Someone' attacked 2 FA POS and failed. Now SGHQ POS 'accidently' go down by spy.
No names. Put up facts and youll see some names.
Thats all. (c)
|
CrusherDK
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 00:27:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: TWD
hehe, reality check please.
*checked*
BoB didnt destroyed any of POS they attacked(small ones). So as we wont name anyone in particular. But your 'reality' is pretty real.
For you and others ill point it again:
- 'Someone' attacks FA POSes and fails.
- 'Accidently' Large SGHQ POS goes offline.
- 'Someone' pack it into indys and takes away.
Want another reality check?
So much of an 'alliance destroyers'. Now its not about just game, now its about to make people feel bad about any new member they will accept in future. Such thing can even destroy relationships in corporation.
Nothing but a un-respected and low-grade act here.
|
CrusherDK
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 00:39:00 -
[3]
Originally by: TWD
Edited by: TWD on 24/07/2005 00:34:07
We go and attack 2 small POS around d4ku.
We witnessed the rare occasion of an FA fleet being formed.
We got a fleet battle - Win.
We put the POS several times in reinforced mode.
We forced FA to take down both POS - Win.
Mission accomplished.
Oh, the only party failing here is FA 
uh oh, another reality check requred i see 
Well, i assume you know that small POSes were taken down and replaced with big ones.
p.s. just makes me laugh how that 'someone' tries to pretend nothing happened, lol
|
CrusherDK
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 10:33:00 -
[4]
I like seeing Bob trying to put dicussion away from the actual matter.
If you think that this is normal, then why dont SirMolle make a standalone thread where he will explain how BoB took down SGHQ POS, with all details.
|
CrusherDK
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 11:03:00 -
[5]
You still missing fact that before that you tryed to attack 2-3 FA POS and failed to take it down. Noone cares if it was in reinforce mode or not. You took it down? No.
So then just gone the most easy, but certainly low-grade way.
|
CrusherDK
|
Posted - 2005.07.24 12:59:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Rod Blaine
Edited by: Rod Blaine on 24/07/2005 12:02:24
What whops ?
You aren't stupid are you ?
Well, I wasn't counting on the reader of this thread being it, so I'm not evading issues here or pulling punches.
I actually don't know if we pay MC or someone else does. Nor do I care.
But whomever is paying them, I'm sure it's no coincidence. You lose faith in coincidences fast with Molle as your ceo.
And according to my sources war with MC was retracted?
|
CrusherDK
|
Posted - 2005.07.26 01:40:00 -
[7]
Edited by: CrusherDK on 26/07/2005 01:41:48
Originally by: Grimpak
my personal view of the loss of a POS by SG (and other ones):
..well it's a war, and do you prefer to spend hours spending ammo in a mindless "shoot the dead duck"? Or do you prefer going thru a less boring, more clever, less expensive way of sabbotage an enemy resource? (imho a valid tool)
I'll take door nŠ2.
..althou SG is right: the fact that the atribution of access to use any part of the POS also makes one available to offline the POS structure. That I must say it's rather bad.
but that's game mechanics, and I don't see any exploit there.
I want to see you saying it, if you get your corp POS offlined same way, and you loose all your stuff.
|
CrusherDK
|
Posted - 2005.07.26 14:13:00 -
[8]
Originally by: DB Preacher
Originally by: KOTH Fluf
Elite Academy and Ranger Corp left FA later not because of BOB, but because we had been contemplating it for along time, as we have wanted to pursue our own destiny.
I find it hilarious how many corps put that exact quote up when they leave an alliance that we are attacking with all our force.
dbp
reality check?
Maybe you guys like to think so, but corps leaving FA by main reason, because FA concuils/chairmens dont even care about Alliance itself.
People just dont wanna fight for alliance wich wont provide them anything that will help.
Now you can go and continue thinking that corps leaving because you beat them.
WTB your Ego Extender II.
|
CrusherDK
|
Posted - 2005.07.26 15:15:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: CrusherDK
People just dont wanna fight for alliance wich wont provide them anything that will help.
By that reasoning of course fighting has to be occuring in order to bring this flaw in the alliance's make up to the surface, ergo it is not merely a coincidence and there is some cause and effect.
By Alliance not willing to help i meant not only resources. People as well. People who dont care.
|
| |
|