Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Lambert Laycock
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 02:29:00 -
[31] - Quote
I think it's a great idea. Could change warfare in Sov space. A mobile base. Load that puppy up with more than enough for a long campaign, have Dust bunnies take a planet for anchorage, and bring her in. With capacity to bring Titans, a strong base defense, and he only way to stop an incursion into you're space would be to launch an all out assault to destory the Mothership before they take the whole system.
Hell, bring 2 or three to various points and you'll have the enemiy running crazy getting fleets around to all three points.
ISk sink? Hell, here's the ISK bathtub...and the big Sov alliances have ISk to burn to make em. |
Tul Breetai
Impromptu Asset Requisition Insurance Fraud.
219
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 02:30:00 -
[32] - Quote
fukier wrote:Forum Clone 77777 wrote:fukier wrote: 2. your assumption is that its stupid which is your opionion but not a correct one.
What makes this a, "not stupid", idea? I think it sounds very boring and it does not seem very practical. Why would anyone want it instead of a station? the use i could see from it is in a big fight you loose ships and need to refit and usually as a defender you have an advantage because you can reship rather easy and get back into the fight. what this would allow you to do is cyno in a mom at a safe spot and anchor it and then activate the clone bay and then when you die or get podded you wake up in your pod next to the mom and then access the sma and jump in a new ship and continue to fight.
I'd be shooting my fight all over the mom if she was in-system. Why wouldn't you? There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency. |
Torakenat
Noghri Strike Force
51
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 02:31:00 -
[33] - Quote
fukier wrote:Forum Clone 77777 wrote:fukier wrote: 2. your assumption is that its stupid which is your opionion but not a correct one.
What makes this a, "not stupid", idea? I think it sounds very boring and it does not seem very practical. Why would anyone want it instead of a station? the use i could see from it is in a big fight you loose ships and need to refit and usually as a defender you have an advantage because you can reship rather easy and get back into the fight. what this would allow you to do is cyno in a mom at a safe spot and anchor it and then activate the clone bay and then when you die or get podded you wake up in your pod next to the mom and then access the sma and jump in a new ship and continue to fight.
that's exactly the logistics i was thinking about.
titan can deploy a nice sizable amount of ships in a region...but a MOM would be really nice.
Also, to play hide and seek with your assets would be fun too. |
Arronicus
Brave Newbies Inc.
195
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 07:54:00 -
[34] - Quote
fukier wrote:
what is a Mothership and what does it do?
Ever watched Indepence Day?
The Mothership will be the following:
1: A giant buffing platform, that not only houses many other capital/super capital ships, but provides shield bonuses to the entire fleet, or has the ability to drop the shields of all said ships in its fleet.
Right, because they never stated that it had no weapons, jump drive restrictions, or ANCHOR =P |
Whitehound
850
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 08:42:00 -
[35] - Quote
fukier wrote:1. not drunk but bored at work
2. your assumption is that its stupid which is your opionion but not a correct one.
3. what happened to you dude you used to be cool. now you are just a bitter old dude.
4. there would be a hard cap on the sma so the amount of assests is limted.
5. there would not be 100 of thousands of people loosing it all... plus if you use it and loose it its a risk just like everything else in eve... cant afford to loose it then dont fly it.
6. i would love a flying castle... and space barbies are on the back burner...
7. are you the drunk one m8 cuss tyou are usually not this hostile. The first thing you should do when bored at work is not to go on the Internet and post useless ideas into the wrong forums, but to ask your boss to give you more work.
My assumption is pretty spot on, because for the very same reasons was the first version of the Doomsday device scrapped. It was a massively stupid and hard sucking feature when one could destroy the ships of hundreds and thousands of players by jumping in a Titan and pressing a button. It is then the same when you can blow up stations. These will contain everything the players own.
We also have sovereignty mechanics and the game play in 0.0 focuses around taking space and holding space. Having a "non-stationary" station here is a stupid, sad and boring idea.
This is my opinion and I am entitled to have one. You asked and you got your answer. What is wrong with you? Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
|
ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
432
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 08:55:00 -
[36] - Quote
Thread has been moved to Features & Ideas Discussion. ISD LackOfFaith Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Lokar Griman
Almost Invisible Industries
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 13:55:00 -
[37] - Quote
No actuly a mobil base would make 0.0 sov holding even harder for the enemy if you have the big number of coalitions backing it, but that means there has to be some restricts like you can fly and built it in null sec , cause if you apply that on wormhole you could basicly lock down and carv out corp or aliances on space pluss , and youd have to limit that how many can be built per alliance , lets say youd have to have 1000 activ members in the alliance 1 motherstation ber 1000 activ member alliance |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |