Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1136
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 22:07:00 -
[151] - Quote
FW low sec is the most active pvp region in all of Eve right now. |
Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
846
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 22:12:00 -
[152] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:You claim you know where everyone is plexing but you still haven't told me where the top five have plexed. I think we know why.
edit: Or are you saying that one of the top five is Chatgris's alt? At some point you'll understand the difference between knowing where a group of players are and where specific players are. But in any case I was saying chatgris' alt is in Nisuwa and Notoras. You should rejoin FW and go hunt it down. Practice what you preach and all that. I don't need to join to chase alts. Tell me, what plexes are being taken within 5 jumps of your character right now? what? and save you the 5 minutes required to answer that yourself?
Yeah right. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
519
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 22:14:00 -
[153] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:
what? and save you the 5 minutes required to answer that yourself?
Yeah right.
I think im seeing the issue here.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Directional_Scanner_guide
Problem solved, you are welcome. |
X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1136
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 22:16:00 -
[154] - Quote
Cearain wrote:I don't need to join to chase alts. Then go chase his alt while you aren't in FW. Practice what you preach. Location: Nisuwa and Notoras. Put chatgris on your watch list so you know when he logs on. Have at it.
|
Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
846
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 22:16:00 -
[155] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:FW low sec is the most active pvp region in all of Eve right now.
Perhaps that is true. Eve is a notoriously slow game to find pvp. Where did you get that data anyway?
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1136
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 22:25:00 -
[156] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Perhaps that is true. Eve is a notoriously slow game to find pvp. Where did you get that data anyway?
Just compare the Caldari vs Gallente map with any other region in the game (except the Minmatar vs Amarr one, it's a bit busier).
|
Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
846
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 22:26:00 -
[157] - Quote
I already know how to use dscan.
I don't recall for sure but I thought I might have seen you in nisuwa. Just using that as an example, there are about 25 systems within 5 jumps of that system. You cant identify who is running plexes in all those systems, in 5 minutes.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
846
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 22:42:00 -
[158] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote:ALUCARD 1208 wrote:i think you missed out the important bit about using alts to flip there own systems there mate
and ofc flip flopping was caused by the cash out system it wasnt happening before was it? No I didn't. It rarely happened and when it did it proved to be foolish to do that. People do stupid things all the time in eve that doesn't mean we need to change the mechanics so they don't continue to do them. At this moment i have more state pro LP than fedef LP from flipping gallente systems to caldari in a shell corp. Also, it worked out perfectly well, enabling us to start stacking up vuln caldari systems for a tier push well before they would otherwise have been available. Does it take effort to be wrong on nearly every topic or is it a talent? You would know. We weren't even talking about plexing to bring a system vulnerable. We were talking about flipping systems that were already vulnerable. Doh! What? The state LP i have IS from bunker busting hubs in a small cap fleet. Perhaps if you slowed down you posting the quality would improve? It worked out well. Things were set to do this on a much larger scale to get a good start moving forwards but the ninja patch removed any need for this. Also, one look at both of your toons killboard shows that you have always been terrible at finding pvp. One look at your forum posts show you probably always will be.
You are right I misread your post. How many bunkers did you bust and who did you bust them with?
And really there is no point in bringing up killboards again. Yes I can ***** killmails by gate camping in sensor boosted ships like you do, but that is not my bag. You don't think my killboard is impressive either - I agree. So what? No one really cares. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
846
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 22:55:00 -
[159] - Quote
chatgris wrote:Cearain wrote:http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Caldari_VS_Gallente#kills
Vast majority are white systems showing zero or only 1 kill. Just a few systems that seem hot. Well, I don't really have any experience outside of the US TZ except for a few weekend all nighters - though the 24 hr kills show quite a bit of activity. http://evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Caldari_VS_Gallente#kills24
Yes I agree with you and xg that is a fair amount of kills even outside the systems with a high sec gate. Gate camping a high sec gate is not really fw related.
I would put the average at about 1 kill per hour per system. Thats not really what I consider good but it definitely seems a large improvement from the pre-inferno days. Preinferno I would occassionally roam for 2 hours and not get a fight.
Perhaps I just had some bad luck and I admit I am not as familiar with the caldari gallente front, as I am with the amarr minmatar front. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
416
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 23:33:00 -
[160] - Quote
Cearain wrote: I would put the average at about 1 kill per hour per system.
This is an issue with your analysis - right now, there's not enough people in FW to really populate all the systems. So activity is centered around a few systems, and no-one but farmers really care about the other systems.
The people who want pvp hang around one of the hot spots and they get a lot of it. They don't go to the unpopulated areas.
Since you said you didn't know the gal/cal zone much, off the top of my head some hotspots are:
Tama Nisuwa + 1 jump Nenna + 1 jump except for Immuri Vlillier + 1 jump Eha Okagaiken in the German TZ, dead otherwise Heyd
|
|
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
519
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 00:32:00 -
[161] - Quote
Cearain wrote: You are right I misread your post. How many bunkers did you bust and who did you bust them with?
And really there is no point in bringing up killboards again. Yes I can ***** killmails by gate camping in sensor boosted ships like you do, but that is not my bag. You don't think my killboard is impressive either - I agree. So what? No one really cares.
We busted 6- 8 hubs. These systems were near our home system and were never busted by caldari as part of any of their tier 5 pushes as they had enough systems to hit tier 5 without them. We just denied their farmers the land to farm in these perma-vuln systems while stacking the systems ready for our push and denying them the option to just ninja flip them if needed - since the caldari were very active in trying to deny gallente cashouts.
As for remosebo camping, sure ive been lazy. But im not the one complaining now am i? Aside from the last month and a half you will find little or no gate camping on my killboard. On the other hand, i have killed many dozens of farmers while on the gate so you should really be appreciating the work done :)
On the topic of killboards, the quality/efficiency of your board is not what im talking about. Just the fact that if you spend as much time looking for kills as you did trolling these threads with your ill informed drivel then the quantity of kills and losses should be a great deal higher. It just smacks to me you would rather just moan on forums than play the game. As usual, this is an issue with the player, not the game. |
Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
846
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 01:39:00 -
[162] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Cearain wrote: You are right I misread your post. How many bunkers did you bust and who did you bust them with?
And really there is no point in bringing up killboards again. Yes I can ***** killmails by gate camping in sensor boosted ships like you do, but that is not my bag. You don't think my killboard is impressive either - I agree. So what? No one really cares.
We busted 6- 8 hubs. These systems were near our home system and were never busted by caldari as part of any of their tier 5 pushes as they had enough systems to hit tier 5 without them. We just denied their farmers the land to farm in these perma-vuln systems while stacking the systems ready for our push and denying them the option to just ninja flip them if needed - since the caldari were very active in trying to deny gallente cashouts. As for remosebo camping, sure ive been lazy. But im not the one complaining now am i? Aside from the last month and a half you will find little or no gate camping on my killboard. On the other hand, i have killed many dozens of farmers while on the gate so you should really be appreciating the work done :) On the topic of killboards, the quality/efficiency of your board is not what im talking about. Just the fact that if you spend as much time looking for kills as you did trolling these threads with your ill informed drivel then the quantity of kills and losses should be a great deal higher. It just smacks to me you would rather just moan on forums than play the game. As usual, this is an issue with the player, not the game.
Thats a very small number of systems flipped by alts. Given that no one seems to care about occupancy now under the current forever grind system its hard to say its preferable. No real goals other than getting a large enough blob to take over a base system.
I'm actually not happy that the pvp is switching to gate camping for farmers.
As far as my playing time - well the game is ok and I like playing it. But spending hours for a few good fights isn't something I want to spend allot more time at. But that is really none of your business, and beside the point that the best occupancy plexers don't pvp at all. If your happy that the system is such that the best occupancy warriors are carebears, that's fine. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I am just pointing out that under the current mechanics the best occupancy plexers are in fact carebears.. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1137
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 01:41:00 -
[163] - Quote
Cearain wrote: Given that no one seems to care about occupancy now under the current forever grind system its hard to say its preferable. No real goals other than getting a large enough blob to take over a base system.
Says you. Others in our militia that have flipped about 10 systems over the past week disagree with you. The Caldari who have flipped about 60+ systems since being run out of the warzone would probably disagree as well.
|
Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
846
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 02:05:00 -
[164] - Quote
chatgris wrote:Cearain wrote: I would put the average at about 1 kill per hour per system.
This is an issue with your analysis - right now, there's not enough people in FW to really populate all the systems. So activity is centered around a few systems, and no-one but farmers really care about the other systems. The people who want pvp hang around one of the hot spots and they get a lot of it. They don't go to the unpopulated areas. Since you said you didn't know the gal/cal zone much, off the top of my head some hotspots are: Tama Nisuwa + 1 jump Nenna + 1 jump except for Immuri Vlillier + 1 jump Eha Okagaiken in the German TZ, dead otherwise Heyd
Thanks for the info.
I guess no one wants to leave their booster alts. I think what you say is true. We see allot more pvp in the hot systems and not so much of an increase in the back waters.(although even in the back water systems its better than pre-inferno) That the war would become more about who can outblob the other in a few systems was accurately predicted with the station lockout changes.
One of the great things about the faction war plex system is that it could force both sides to leave the blob and spread out The current system is not really doing that. Would you agree?
I go into the systems you mention and can expect to wait around for a fight and then when it finally comes I can expect 5xs my number (probably all boosted since its their home system) to jump in after me. Its better than nothing, and I realize allot of the players may be new so they have to all stick together. (I did too when I was new) But its not really all that great either. Its certainly not the vision of small gang fights happening constantly throughout the warzone.
Even before inferno I knew where to go if I wanted to get blobbed e.g., Hang out on the kourm huola gate.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
846
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 02:11:00 -
[165] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: Given that no one seems to care about occupancy now under the current forever grind system its hard to say its preferable. No real goals other than getting a large enough blob to take over a base system.
Says you. Others in our militia that have flipped about 10 systems over the past week disagree with you. The Caldari who have flipped about 60+ systems since being run out of the warzone would probably disagree as well.
Well this thread is full of people saying they don't care about anything but a handfull of systems - this includes you. Only cynthia nezmor cares and she is running multiple alts. Her and about 3 others the only ones who care about occupancy in the other 90% of systems.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
416
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 02:32:00 -
[166] - Quote
Cearain wrote:One of the great things about the faction war plex system is that it could force both sides to leave the blob and spread out The current system is not really doing that. Would you agree?
I don't agree, but close. The previous system didn't force both sides to leave the blob, just like the current system doesn't. However, the current system punishes those that branch out on their own because they can't maintain around the clock control of their system so they can dock. |
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
519
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 03:02:00 -
[167] - Quote
Cearain wrote: Thats a very small number of systems flipped by alts. Given that no one seems to care about occupancy now under the current forever grind system its hard to say its preferable. No real goals other than getting a large enough blob to take over a base system.
I'm actually not happy that the pvp is switching to gate camping for farmers.
It was exactly the number we needed to flip. It was one of the actions that assured gallentes single tier 5 cashout.
You dont think we could have swung the whole war zone? Im sceptical too. But there is no denying that as a militia we could probably get half a dozen squads of 4/6 dreadnought alts / people willing to drop their mains into cal mil, each squad capable of swinging a system in one siege cycle.
Its no different to what we did anyway. Its not hard to change into a shell corp thats already in cal mil.
Finally, no one cares if you are happy with gatecamping or anything else. Just that your reasons for being unhappy are that people are gaming the system. Most people are happy with the current status quo and accept it as a happy medium since the pvp in the game has never been so abundant and paying for it is viable without going out of your way too much. No one has suggested anything close to a fix that removes the negatives while maintaining the positives of the current system. You solution is pathetic and would not fix the real reason you are unhappy with you eve experience - the obvious fact that you are pretty lazy. |
Lin Suizei
113
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 04:13:00 -
[168] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Most people are happy with the current status quo and accept it as a happy medium since the pvp in the game has never been so abundant and paying for it is viable without going out of your way too much.
Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that people are happier with the current status quo, but aren't satisfied with it - I don't know a single pvp'ing person, outside of a few vocal forum warriors, who would accept that the current system is at all healthy. Yes, it's better than pre-nerf, but the job is not yet done (especially considering FW is farmed just as hard, if not harder, than pre-nerf).
Also, confirming Cearain's laziness is the problem which is causing the rampant plex farming and broken system design which heavily incentivizes avoiding PvP. If he wasn't so lazy, there would be no plex farming. Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |
X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1137
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 04:44:00 -
[169] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Well this thread is full of people saying they don't care about anything but a handfull of systems - this includes you. Only cynthia nezmor cares and she is running multiple alts. Her and about 3 others the only ones who care about occupancy in the other 90% of systems. I think this thread is full of people who say they know their influence (and attention span, patience for waiting out rabbits, etc...) is limited, and adjust accordingly. Even you can't be bothered to chase farmers while you are online.
|
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
520
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 04:46:00 -
[170] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:Crosi Wesdo wrote:Most people are happy with the current status quo and accept it as a happy medium since the pvp in the game has never been so abundant and paying for it is viable without going out of your way too much. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that people are happier with the current status quo, but aren't satisfied with it - I don't know a single pvp'ing person, outside of a few vocal forum warriors, who would accept that the current system is at all healthy. Yes, it's better than pre-nerf, but the job is not yet done (especially considering FW is farmed just as hard, if not harder, than pre-nerf). Also, confirming Cearain's laziness is the problem which is causing the rampant plex farming and broken system design which heavily incentivizes avoiding PvP. If he wasn't so lazy, there would be no plex farming.
Confirming that 20-30k vp per day per faction in ships with guns is farming on the same scale or greater than the gunless ships farming well over 100k per day in already vuln systems for the upswing factions pre nerf.
Personally id still like to see timers running backwards on abandoned plexes, however, saying that you are unhappy with the game mechanics is ridiculous. Current FW is better than it has ever been by any measure, except for perhaps bc and above brawls.
The only legitimate complaint imo would be that the players are broken since there is always a demographic that will game any reward system in eve, any other game and irl. Removing rewards is the only way to fix the farmers that are utterly ruining yours and the cearains game. In light of this im pretty sure that most other people who arnt pathologically transfixed by farmers and the occupancy of some remote system could be described as more satisfied than ever before. You know, the guys that are out there shooting stuff, making isk and creating content. Thats my experience.
Its not that im against things improving, just that all suggestions beyond timers rolling back have been worthless. |
|
ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
147
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 04:56:00 -
[171] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
BTW I like the way ALUCARD 1208 says flipping vulnerable systems only happened after cashouts. He appearantly doesn't realize that there was actually no financial or other reason to flip a system before inferno.
can you read i didnt say that at all i said the flipping by alts or people didnt flop flop militias before inferno geesh i know ur blind to facts but cmon man u do play this game right? GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |
Yuri Intaki
Nasranite Watch The Bloody Ronin Syndicate
127
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 07:15:00 -
[172] - Quote
It seems CCP Fozzie is busy making another nerf to boost their pet goats in gallente and minmatar militia. With this i'm of course referring to upcoming nerf to Hookbill and massive boosts to (already overpowered comet) and firetail.
I cannot think of any other reason why they make Comet even more OP than it is. Probably because they want to make sure hookbills can no longer hope to triumph over comets due to massive inbalance in speed and hitpoints. Hookbill and Condor were the only caldari boats left which were not totally surpassed by their gallente counterparts. |
ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
147
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 09:00:00 -
[173] - Quote
youve had enough after 2 weeks of posting and decided you should be banned again drama? GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |
Dread Operative
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
165
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 10:45:00 -
[174] - Quote
Yuri Intaki wrote:It seems CCP Fozzie is busy making another nerf to boost their pet goats in gallente and minmatar militia. With this i'm of course referring to upcoming nerf to Hookbill and massive boosts to (already overpowered comet) and firetail.
I cannot think of any other reason why they make Comet even more OP than it is. Probably because they want to make sure hookbills can no longer hope to triumph over comets due to massive inbalance in speed and hitpoints. Hookbill and Condor were the only caldari boats left which were not totally surpassed by their gallente counterparts.
So better tank at the expense of some speed and agility out of the most OP navy faction frig is a bad thing? Have you ever even flown a firetail? That thing deserved the love.
Apparently your prescription ran out and the delusions are returning. |
Yuri Intaki
Nasranite Watch The Bloody Ronin Syndicate
127
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 11:20:00 -
[175] - Quote
Dread Operative wrote:So better tank at the expense of some speed and agility out of the most OP navy faction frig is a bad thing? Have you ever even flown a firetail? That thing deserved the love.
Apparently your prescription ran out and the delusions are returning.
Never said firetail was op, I clearly state I was talking about comet. And yes, making hookbill slower will make it almost certainly redundant compared to comet which will now be superior brawler and superior kiter due to massive speed/tank inbalance (since comet will be able to fit a DC, hookbill wont if it wants to actually be in position to break an armor tanker).
But as said, it was only a matter of time before CCP invented another nerf aimed at hurting caldari militia. |
Dread Operative
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
165
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 11:33:00 -
[176] - Quote
Yuri Intaki wrote:Dread Operative wrote:So better tank at the expense of some speed and agility out of the most OP navy faction frig is a bad thing? Have you ever even flown a firetail? That thing deserved the love.
Apparently your prescription ran out and the delusions are returning. Never said firetail was op, I clearly state I was talking about comet. And yes, making hookbill slower will make it almost certainly redundant compared to comet which will now be superior brawler and superior kiter due to massive speed/tank inbalance (since comet will be able to fit a DC, hookbill wont if it wants to actually be in position to break an armor tanker). But as said, it was only a matter of time before CCP invented another nerf aimed at hurting caldari militia.
You saw the slicer got buffed to right? And how in gods name will the comet a superior brawler? Web, TD, Keep at 8k. Shoot drones. Then shoot ship. Easy win. Against the kiter. TD range. Shoot drones. Load Jav. Shoot ship. Win or chase away. Stop grasping at straws. |
Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor
2220
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 11:50:00 -
[177] - Quote
Dread, I would caution against wasting too much time reasoning with people who genuinely believe there is a CCP conspiracy against a militia. It's not a productive use of your time. Mane 614
|
X Gallentius
Justified Chaos
1138
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 12:49:00 -
[178] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote: Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that people are happier with the current status quo, but aren't satisfied with it - I don't know a single pvp'ing person, outside of a few vocal forum warriors, who would accept that the current system is at all healthy. Yes, it's better than pre-nerf, but the job is not yet done (especially considering FW is farmed just as hard, if not harder, than pre-nerf).
The farmers cause volatility in the FW map, and they affect your isk/lp ratio when selling stuff. That's about it. You can argue all you want about how much volatility there should be, or how much you think you are entitled to earn for having fun 23/7. Fair enough.
The best objective figure of merit on how FW Occupany is working out is whether or not the FW map reflects the actual balance of power on the ground. The answer for the most part is 'yes" in the Gallente and Caldari theater- especially if you look at the amount of time a system is held by each side over a period of time (to account for the effects of volatility in unpopulated regions).
What affects the long term stability of a system? The number and quality of pvp'ers on both sides who dedicate themselves to that system.
Cearain, however, is whining that volatility caused by farmers is "winning" or "losing" FW which is clearly not the case. They are just causing systems to flip back and forth relatively quickly in unpopulated areas. So, his whine, and yours are misplaced. You both should really be saying "I want a more stable FW map", and "I am jealous that farmers are making isk at my expense" |
Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch The Bloody Ronin Syndicate
387
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 13:12:00 -
[179] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Lin Suizei wrote: Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that people are happier with the current status quo, but aren't satisfied with it - I don't know a single pvp'ing person, outside of a few vocal forum warriors, who would accept that the current system is at all healthy. Yes, it's better than pre-nerf, but the job is not yet done (especially considering FW is farmed just as hard, if not harder, than pre-nerf).
The farmers cause volatility in the FW map, and they affect your isk/lp ratio when selling stuff. That's about it. You can argue all you want about how much volatility there should be, or how much you think you are entitled to earn for having fun 23/7. Fair enough. The best objective figure of merit on how FW Occupany is working out is whether or not the FW map reflects the actual balance of power on the ground. The answer for the most part is 'yes" in the Gallente and Caldari theater- especially if you look at the amount of time a system is held by each side over a period of time (to account for the effects of volatility in unpopulated regions). What affects the long term stability of a system? The number and quality of pvp'ers on both sides who dedicate themselves to that system. Cearain, however, is whining that volatility caused by farmers is "winning" or "losing" FW which is clearly not the case. They are just causing systems to flip back and forth relatively quickly in unpopulated areas. So, his whine, and yours are misplaced. You both should really be saying "I want a more stable FW map", and "I am jealous that farmers are making isk at my expense"
As long as people prefer stabbed farmer alts grinding lp better choice than pvp char fw will never be good. |
|
ISD Suvetar
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1883
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 15:14:00 -
[180] - Quote
Hi,
Please note that under rule 31 of the forums, rumor mongering is not allowed. This includes claiming that CCP are biased against specific Factions of Factional warfare.
Forum rules wrote: Rumor mongering is prohibited.
Rumor threads and posts which are based off no actual solid information and are designed to either troll or annoy other users will be locked and removed. These kinds of threads and posts are detrimental to the wellbeing and spirit of the EVE Online Community, and can create undue panic among forum users, as well as adding to the workload of our moderators.
If you disagree with the proposed changes, you can use the Feedback thread in Features and Ideas here to make your arguments, constructively.
Thanks. ISD Suvetar Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |