| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Ignitious Hellfury
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 23:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
I guess I'm a bit of an old schooler (re: bitter vet) but I'd like to say the steady phasing out of split weapons for minmatar is kind of disheartening. Yes they were usually putzy and inferior to single weapon type ships, and that IS a problem that needed to be fixed. I however am a bigger fan of improving the performance of split weapons instead of it's extinction.
My reason is that it's becoming homogenizing, imo anyways. Also it might have the reverse effect of simplifying the sp requirements of minmatar. I think a lot of people realize/agree that minmatar has for a long time, if not forever, been the hardest race to train for - they have ships that feel very restricted to armor, some to shield, some both. They are all very quick, which means good navigation to capitalize on. They usually have ample drone bays to accompany what used to be split weapons which meant drones, projectiles, and missile skills. They basically had to do everything. This does create a barrier for entry... but at the same time, you could be quite functional with some ships if you dedicated yourself to one end of the spectrum (hurricane with just guns, neuts and armor and you can do well in a rupture, tempest, rifter, etc) or you could be fine with guns and shield (stabber, cyclone, mael... ofc cyclone used to be a bit weak, but it's a victim of weapon layout - which could've been handled with some improved weapon bonuses). This may not make my case about being easier to train just yet, but I'm getting there.
Now what we have are some ships that are being redesigned as dedicated missile boats and largely removing any split weapons. It feels like to me that that just means focusing on one weapon type means you simply won't be flying the missile ships like the cyclone, and soon the claymore or typhoon (I might be forgetting others as well). However they haven't shied away from having highly flexible/variable tanking options. This is good though, I'd love to see it stay this way. You do occasionally see shield buffer or ASB amarr (eek) or gallente (meh) but they certainly don't compare to the variety minmatar has. This creates some variety in our little spaceship land. Neat.
So what I would hope to see instead of making dedicated missile boats/turrets it would be much more fun to see the weak 5%/7.5% split bonuses changed to something like 7.5%/10% or 10%/10% or what have you until it's dps is competitive with other ships of it's role and class. It creates some fun variation and flexibility. Some of you think it's disgusting - I'd like you to consider this: HAM/AC - you will have some very interesting damage application curves, within 20km you will be in deep falloff of your AC's but still have hams so you will have reliable damage, but not a lot. Within 10km you will hit quite comfortably with both and be able to tackle. Beyond 20km (ok I guess you could use javs to which are fine, but w/e) barrage will still allow you to poke at frigs as you try and run away. If your AC's aren't tracking a webbed drone for whatever reason your HAMs will do at least some damage and you can keep AC pressure on your target. Sure your ship will not be as particularly good at anyone thing, but it will however be far more versatile and give you a wider engagement envelope for fights. Furthermore what I was saying before, you will have more substantial weapon bonuses to a fewer guns which means if your skills are lacking in one weapon system you could forgo the latter and use those highs for utility like neuts/nos/smartbombs. This would make those ships less effective to some pilots, but at least still an option.
I think that's most of my case for now, I'm more than happy and willing to discuss the topic so please share you opinions guys!
|

Tsukino Stareine
EVE University Ivy League
35
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 00:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
projection issue as well as the damage issue |

Zarnak Wulf
In Exile. Imperial Outlaws.
1076
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 00:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
I liked my Phoon with four plates and over 1k DPS from three different sources. I took pride when I could finally fly it-- but in the end, when was the last time I actually flew the thing?!?
Minmatar is still there in it's variety. Armor and shield. Missiles and projectiles. Utility high slots. A ship's role will be more obvious is all. |

Ignitious Hellfury
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 00:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Quote:projection issue as well as the damage issue
I feel the engagement range of a non range bonused HAM/AC is actually quite similar. And I agree that damage was a problem, which is why I'd like to see increased bonuses to the ships as opposed to simplifying the ship and then readjusting. One thing there is to consider is that you get to bypass stacking penalties from damage mods with split weapons. While it didn't quite work out that way, it could have if the ship bonuses had been readjusted.
Quote:I liked my Phoon with four plates and over 1k DPS from three different sources. I took pride when I could finally fly the thing-- but in the end, when was the last time I actually flew the thing?!?
Minmatar is still there in it's variety. Armor and shield. Missiles and projectiles. Utility high slots. A ship's role will be more obvious is all.
I don't feel role is being really changed, they are more changing from DPS with funky weapons to DPS with ordinary lays outs. It kind of takes a way from the freedom of fitting. But I am aware of gank phoons, they are bad ass =D If I had to guess at what you use them for it's for RR bs gangs, however those seem to be a dying breed - that however is not a split weapon issue, more of a metagame issue. |

Katy Karkinoff
Psycho Chicks
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 05:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
I would like to see the preservation of split weapons too, it might make me want to fly minmatar again, in the mean time Gallente all day  |

Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
1484
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 06:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
You're on your own on this one mate. Cant wait for a useable naglfar. |

Paikis
Vapour Holdings
694
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 07:01:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:You're on your own on this one mate. Cant wait for a useable naglfar.
Nag actually looks a bit too good after this change. I know they're going to be doing a second pass... but DAYUM! |

Meditril
T.R.I.A.D
248
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 11:13:00 -
[8] - Quote
I know how you feel. I also love the split weapon ships, because they are so inpretictable and unexpected. I am still waiting for the split weapon frigate. But as it looks it will never come :-( |

Markius TheShed
Murientor Tribe Defiant Legacy
142
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 11:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
The old tristan used to be a decent split frig blasters and rockets.
As a mostly Minmatar and gallente pilot for roleplay reasons i hate using caldari weapons on my ships get rid of them please Minmatar should just be dirty oily projectiles. **Murientor Tribe** a capsuleer organization composed of radical Minmatar. Since YC107 http://www.defiant-legacy.com/ |

Ignitious Hellfury
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 19:07:00 -
[10] - Quote
Markius TheShed wrote:The old tristan used to be a decent split frig blasters and rockets.
As a mostly Minmatar and gallente pilot for roleplay reasons i hate using caldari weapons on my ships get rid of them please Minmatar should just be dirty oily projectiles.
How are missiles a "caldari" weapon? They use them on a lot of their ships, but they also get dronebays and hybrid weapons. Gallente also have T2 ships that have missile bonuses, as do amarr (the gallente ones need a buff though... and its actually only the lachesis left with the terrible bonus, it needs to be increased).
So far the only arguments for getting rid of split weapons is it's an old ideology... Do some of you just not like versatile but viable ships vs focused niche ships? Lately the theme has been to give a ship 1 job and 1 way of doing it. Sure you can choose between active and buffer and maybe more vs less range, but otherwise there is very little variation and opportunity for improvisation in set ups. Split weapon ships offered some really dynamic fits that could be really fun, interesting, and unexpected. That allowed you to surprise your opponent and try to catch people off guard.
Idk, it looks like I'm just old fashioned... Kinda sad though. |

Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
676
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 19:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
Quote:Split weapon ships offered some really dynamic fits that could be really fun, interesting, and unexpected. That allowed you to surprise your opponent and try to catch people off guard.
I'd love to hear this.
Explain to me how split weapons made the Phoon, Tristan, or Bellicose more dynamic and interesting to fight against. What kind of interesting and unexpected things could you put on these ships? |

Ignitious Hellfury
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 19:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kahega Amielden wrote:Quote:Split weapon ships offered some really dynamic fits that could be really fun, interesting, and unexpected. That allowed you to surprise your opponent and try to catch people off guard.
Wait, what? Split weapon ships only have one option. The most versatility is the Phoon which can choose between 5 torps 3 autos, 4/4, or 3/5. In what way is this going to catch anyone off guard?
The neut phoon is/was a very popular fit. You can choose between a full gank fit and fill your highs with guns/launchers, or a more utility type setup with some neut/smartbombs, or focus on one weapon type and fit RR and cap transfer.
If you haven't encountered a neut phoon, you should count yourself lucky. |

Yabba Addict
Red Shift Enterprises
58
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 20:07:00 -
[13] - Quote
Ignitious Hellfury wrote: How are missiles a "caldari" weapon? They use them on a lot of their ships, but they also get dronebays and hybrid weapons. Gallente also have T2 ships that have missile bonuses, as do amarr (the gallente ones need a buff though... and its actually only the lachesis left with the terrible bonus, it needs to be increased).
Because missiles ARE a caldari weapon system. This is the the way it works...
Caldari weapon systems are comprised of 2 different elements, missiles and hybrid rails, focused more on missiles. The gallente have drones and blaster hybrids, pretty evenly balanced use of the 2 Ammar have lasers, drones and rockets, with much more focus on lasers than the other 2 Aaaand then you have the minnies, whose weapons are based on projectiles, running away and being pansies
|

Ignitious Hellfury
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 20:22:00 -
[14] - Quote
Yabba Addict wrote:Ignitious Hellfury wrote: How are missiles a "caldari" weapon? They use them on a lot of their ships, but they also get dronebays and hybrid weapons. Gallente also have T2 ships that have missile bonuses, as do amarr (the gallente ones need a buff though... and its actually only the lachesis left with the terrible bonus, it needs to be increased).
Because missiles ARE a caldari weapon system. This is the the way it works... Caldari weapon systems are comprised of 2 different elements, missiles and hybrid rails, focused more on missiles. The gallente have drones and blaster hybrids, pretty evenly balanced use of the 2 Ammar have lasers, drones and rockets, with much more focus on lasers than the other 2 Aaaand then you have the minnies, whose weapons are based on projectiles, running away and being pansies
Using that argument then missiles are also a for minmatar because they now have dedicated missile boats. Also, lots of caldari ships use blasters as well, the optimal bonus makes it easier to use high damage ammo effectively. This is still not a real argument to back the removal of split weapons as a part of minmatar ship philosophy.
Can someone please explain to me why they hate split weapons ASIDE from the fact they sucked (I know they sucked, but that's because their bonuses sucked, not because the idea of split weapons suck).
|

Tsukino Stareine
EVE University Ivy League
40
|
Posted - 2013.03.12 21:02:00 -
[15] - Quote
there's no way to make split bonuses NOT suck because if they increased anything you would just get a AC phoon with 3 large neuts doing competitive damage with other full turret battleships.
A gank phoon is just that, loads of guns and decent damage. |

Ersahi Kir
Freelance Mining Company
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 18:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
Ignitious Hellfury wrote:Can someone please explain to me why they hate split weapons ASIDE from the fact they sucked (I know they sucked, but that's because their bonuses sucked, not because the idea of split weapons suck).
The idea of split weapons blazing away on a target is neat, but the reality is that it's just terrible in this game because weapon mods/rigs are weapon type specific. You end up with a ship that does comparatively bad dps with similar fits, and they're relegated to niche rolls by completely ignoring the ability to fit split weapons.
I tried to design a Loki that used the hardpoint efficiency module, but even with the ability to mount 7 weapon systems it could barely get in the same ballpark as other strategic cruisers with 6 weapon mounts but had to be in facecheck range to apply it. The idea of assault missiles and autocannons blasting away was neat though. |

Ignitious Hellfury
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 20:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ersahi Kir wrote:Ignitious Hellfury wrote:Can someone please explain to me why they hate split weapons ASIDE from the fact they sucked (I know they sucked, but that's because their bonuses sucked, not because the idea of split weapons suck).
The idea of split weapons blazing away on a target is neat, but the reality is that it's just terrible in this game because weapon mods/rigs are weapon type specific. You end up with a ship that does comparatively bad dps with similar fits, and they're relegated to niche rolls by completely ignoring the ability to fit split weapons. I tried to design a Loki that used the hardpoint efficiency module, but even with the ability to mount 7 weapon systems it could barely get in the same ballpark as other strategic cruisers with 6 weapon mounts but had to be in facecheck range to apply it. The idea of assault missiles and autocannons blasting away was neat though.
It is difficult to get the damage quite right, that's certainly true. Overtune the damage bonuses and it becomes overpowered, or we get what we have now: crap. One thing thats worth noting though, if you fit 1x gyro and 1x bcu you don't get any stacking penalties. However torps do so much more damage than projectiles that 2xbcu's gives you more damage on the phoon heh.
But your post is the reason I wanted to have this discussion. I think there are people out there that enjoy the idea of split weapons and would like to use them in properly balanced boats. CCP COULD do it, but it would be a chore to get it quite right. I don't like the excuse of "We're too lazy to check some numbers" to not maintaining the dynamic fitting strategy of EVE. AFAIK the only reason the nag is getting changed is because they are TOO LAZY TO FIX THE MODEL FOR 3 TURRETS. That's kinda really disappointing. |

Kasutra
Tailor Company Hashashin Cartel
157
|
Posted - 2013.03.13 20:35:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ersahi Kir wrote:The idea of split weapons blazing away on a target is neat, but the reality is that it's just terrible in this game because weapon mods/rigs are weapon type specific. You end up with a ship that does comparatively bad dps with similar fits, and they're relegated to niche rolls by completely ignoring the ability to fit split weapons. This.
The issue isn't that CCP has some kind of a collective boner for homogenization, the issue is that is split weapon systems do not fit into the current hardpoint/damage module/module slot model and the "you don't make up for your own weaknesses, your gang mates do" metagame.
So yeah. It's cool, but we can't have it. |

Markku Laaksonen
EVE University Ivy League
96
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 14:23:00 -
[19] - Quote
From a purely lore and role play perspective, missiles ARE the Caldari weapon system for reasons including, but not limited to the following;
"Of the meticulous craftsmanship the Caldari are renowned for, the Drake was born. It was found beneath such a ship to rely on anything other than the time-honored combat tradition of missile fire..."
The meticulous craftsmanship and time-honored traditions of the Caldari point towards missiles. I hear in a time long ago that missiles did full damage to all targets (no explosion radius or velocity stat) and that Ravens vaporized everything.
Then again, you have things like the outdated Evelopedia with entries on the "Piranha Light Missile," now called the Nova Light Missile, with the following description; "The Piranha is a tiny nuclear missile based on a classic Minmatar design that has been in use since the early days of the Minmatar Resistance."
Game mechanics don't necessarily agree with game lore however, and many none Caldari ships are bonused for missiles. It's completely reasonable to call missiles the Caldari weapon system, though. |

Jarod Kyle
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 14:52:00 -
[20] - Quote
Markku Laaksonen wrote:From a purely lore and role play perspective, missiles ARE the Caldari weapon system for reasons including, but not limited to the following;
"Of the meticulous craftsmanship the Caldari are renowned for, the Drake was born. It was found beneath such a ship to rely on anything other than the time-honored combat tradition of missile fire..."
The meticulous craftsmanship and time-honored traditions of the Caldari point towards missiles. I hear in a time long ago that missiles did full damage to all targets (no explosion radius or velocity stat) and that Ravens vaporized everything.
Then again, you have things like the outdated Evelopedia with entries on the "Piranha Light Missile," now called the Nova Light Missile, with the following description; "The Piranha is a tiny nuclear missile based on a classic Minmatar design that has been in use since the early days of the Minmatar Resistance."
Game mechanics don't necessarily agree with game lore however, and many none Caldari ships are bonused for missiles. It's completely reasonable to call missiles the Caldari weapon system, though.
The (first) quoted sentance states that Caldari have a long tradition of using missiles and that is often the weapon of choice in Caldari ship design. It does not imply that Caldari is the only race/nation with such traditions or preferences.
"In addition to robust electronics systems, the Khanid Kingdom's ships possess advanced armor alloys capable of withstanding a great deal of punishment. Generally eschewing the use of turrets, they tend to gear their vessels more towards close-range missile combat." - Damnation description
The Khanid Kingdom also has a tradition, or at least preference, to gear for missiles.
Of all the four weapon types, missiles is the most universal one, which makes sense considering it's the one that stands out.
/JK |

Markku Laaksonen
EVE University Ivy League
96
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:30:00 -
[21] - Quote
Jarod Kyle wrote:The (first) quoted sentance states that Caldari have a long tradition of using missiles and that is often the weapon of choice in Caldari ship design. It does not imply that Caldari is the only race/nation with such traditions or preferences.
"In addition to robust electronics systems, the Khanid Kingdom's ships possess advanced armor alloys capable of withstanding a great deal of punishment. Generally eschewing the use of turrets, they tend to gear their vessels more towards close-range missile combat." - Damnation description
The Khanid Kingdom also has a tradition, or at least preference, to gear for missiles.
Of all the four weapon types, missiles is the most universal one, which makes sense considering it's the one that stands out.
/JK
I never said it implied anything. I said it's a reasonable expectation, at the very least from a lore perspective, to associate missiles with Caldari. You said 'it does not imply...' (which is sort of an implication anyway.) If anything, it implies the opposite, that missiles are the only weapons used by the Caldari, considering the Caldari view hybrids as 'beneath' their finest ships.
Again, this is from a lore perspective. Our posts don't contradict each other. |

Drake Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
75
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 20:24:00 -
[22] - Quote
Beneath their finest ships? Merlin and naga are my only replies |

Jarod Kyle
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 07:49:00 -
[23] - Quote
Markku Laaksonen wrote:Jarod Kyle wrote:The (first) quoted sentance states that Caldari have a long tradition of using missiles and that is often the weapon of choice in Caldari ship design. It does not imply that Caldari is the only race/nation with such traditions or preferences.
"In addition to robust electronics systems, the Khanid Kingdom's ships possess advanced armor alloys capable of withstanding a great deal of punishment. Generally eschewing the use of turrets, they tend to gear their vessels more towards close-range missile combat." - Damnation description
The Khanid Kingdom also has a tradition, or at least preference, to gear for missiles.
Of all the four weapon types, missiles is the most universal one, which makes sense considering it's the one that stands out.
/JK I never said it implied anything. I said it's a reasonable expectation, at the very least from a lore perspective, to associate missiles with Caldari. You said 'it does not imply...' (which is sort of an implication anyway.) If anything, it implies the opposite, that missiles are the only weapons used by the Caldari, considering the Caldari view hybrids as 'beneath' their finest ships. Again, this is from a lore perspective. Our posts don't contradict each other.
We probably agree on this.
My interpratation (of lore) is that a) Caldari favor missiles over other weapon systems, regarding others as inferior and b) Missiles are the weapon system of choice for several groups in Eve.
That being said, here's another piece of lore: "State-of-the-art armor alloys, along with missile systems developed from the most advanced Caldari designs, mean the Sacrilege may be well on its way to becoming the Royal Khanid Navy's flagship cruiser." - Sacrilege description
Khanid Innovations use Caldari designs for their missiles systems, presumably (though not stated) because Caldari missile systems are superior, at least within the Amarr/Caldari realm.
/JK |

Hulasikaly Wada
G.P.S. Global Private Security Agency
18
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 09:27:00 -
[24] - Quote
IMO split weapon systems was conceptually working before the introduction of tier3 BSs but as someone already said weapon upgrades do no work for all systems ( support turrets / drone / missiles ) Splits had to be the only way to have 8 turrets/launchers fitted with DPS bonus ( only non-faction pre-tier3 with 8 turret hard points was the Apocalipse but have a different way ) Ships like Raven , Tempest and the the old Hurricane all had the ability, almost never used , to fit a second source of dps and those have somehow a way to have 1 more utility slot ( losing it from primary damage slot ) Ship like the Typhon IMO had to have more bonus to make stupid to NOT fit weapons and less option, like forcing it to be 4/4 preventing it to e 5 slot weapons plus 3 utility slots
Hula |

Minimal Charisma
Padded Sell
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 11:32:00 -
[25] - Quote
Cookie cutters are bad m'kay! The occasional "SURPRISE!" is well worth the (on average) loss of efficiency. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8159
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 11:35:00 -
[26] - Quote
Back when Hybrids were terrible for 4 years, it was reasonable for Caldari pilots not to bother training them.
Now it's dumb. All hybrids except medium rails are good now. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

gaijiin pok
Nox Noctis Industrius Novus Dominatum
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 13:01:00 -
[27] - Quote
Markius TheShed wrote:The old tristan used to be a decent split frig blasters and rockets.
I loved the old tristan, sure it wasnt optimized in any way, but it was sorely underrated and a ton of fun to fly even if I did die a horrible death most of the time
I did manage to surprise a few peeps who while scratching their heads asked "how the f*#k did I lose to a tristan!" |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
254
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 15:27:00 -
[28] - Quote
Drake Doe wrote:Beneath their finest ships? Merlin and naga are my only replies You forgot the Rokh. |

Ignitious Hellfury
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 09:18:00 -
[29] - Quote
Minimal Charisma wrote:Cookie cutters are bad m'kay! The occasional "SURPRISE!" is well worth the (on average) loss of efficiency.
I'm glad to hear another advocate for dynamic ship load outs. We are however, apparently, outnumbered. I had made a couple posts prior to this, but the forumds ate them and cba to type out 6000 characters again quite yet. |

Drake Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
76
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 09:35:00 -
[30] - Quote
In essence aren't most drone boats since most get a bonus to multiple weapon systems? |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |