|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7082
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 09:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
hisec incursion runners are upset over how things are done, refuse to do anything about it despite having hundreds of billions of isk to play with, opt to run more incursions instead ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7082
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 09:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote: You basically have to be sponsored by a large, well funded alliance to survive in nullsec these days. Or rent from one of them.
BoB politics/paradigm at its peak, no?
no, just the way the world works ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7082
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 10:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:While some say the World works in hyprocrisy i still think it fumbles over itself & ends up worse off for it... guess there is only 1 way to learn ( & yet still ignore the lesson )
several smaller alliances occupying some sov space can certainly form a defensive bloc that only sets standings when one of them faces a larger external threat, and such blocs exist
of course they'd probably get mopped away by a more organized bloc if it came to that but, again, that's just the law of the jungle ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7082
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 10:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Balthisus Filtch wrote:So here is the problem with moon goo.
New player base comes from 2 main places.
1 - random people pulled in by marketing, PR and advertising
2. - the 2 big nullsec blocks which feed players into the game from the IRL websites they are linked to
The majority of people want to play games casually (if you don't believe that then just look at the dumbing down of any major franchise). Unsurprisingly then a significant portion of new players that arrive in EVE also want to play casually. If developers don't cater to them then the game suffers significantly financially.
The random ppl joining in hi-sec get relative safety and a mission system/ship progression to suit their needs.
Those joining major power block get free ships and modules paid for by Moon goo. Their game consists of no hassle /hard work major fleet fights.
Turn off the moon goo and free stuff alliance programs and you might just turn off a significant route by which new players are attracted into and retained in the game. Clearly Moon Goo is totally game unbalancing and totally unfair..... BUT having implemented it, how do they get themselves out of it without damaging themselves financially.
IMO this is why the most obvious fix in the game hasn't appeared to gather any momentum to being fixed. CCP aren't stupid, they see the problem - but there is no win win solution right now.
Final killer - its the new players that pay for subscriptions - the older player base are in the main paying for plex - so financially new players are the lifeblood of the game. So that moon goo led gameplay driven by the IRL websites is really key to CCP, constant stream of new players joining and leaving is good for them.
yeah no that's not how it works ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7085
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 10:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Malcanis wrote:Azami Nevinyrall wrote:Yes we know Powerblocs are fat and happy with broken "ATMs" that CCP promised to fix..........2 years ago
If by "happy" you mean "have been begging, pleading, yelling and just plain asking for CCP to fix them" then sure I guess. butt Goons/CFC/HBC/PL/big bluwedoughnut doth protests toooooo much
lmao "blue donut"
you spend too much time reading en24 trash and then accepting it as truth without verifying things that are trivial to verify like, "are the CFC and HBC actually blue" ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7087
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 10:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Andski wrote:hisec incursion runners are upset over how things are done, refuse to do anything about it despite having hundreds of billions of isk to play with, opt to run more incursions instead Acrually I think Andski you are corrcet in that many HISEC incursioners are siting on billion of ISK but not next to the trillions of TECH ISK NULL sec coalitions are sittng on. That isprobably the biggest imbalance Eve is looking at at the moment
entire alliances having more assets and isk than individual players is an imbalance
pubbie logic, everyone ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7087
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 10:52:00 -
[7] - Quote
"this massive alliance that controls massive amounts of resources via the power it can project with hundreds of individual players at a time is more wealthy than I am, this is clearly unfair CCP" ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7087
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 10:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:this imbalance is making NULL to safe in many's eyes' watch out b4 logic pokes ya blind to reality
0.0 is only as safe as players can make it, whether it's us smashing the **** out of anyone who tries to take our stuff or others simply not feeling inclined to poke the lion
hisec is as safe as CCP makes it, because they can't stand the thought of wretched hisec pubbies complaining about having to do any work towards an end other than their wallets and cashout potential growing ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7088
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 10:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
"CCP please nerf wardecs and suicide ganking even further, I can't stand the thought of having to defend myself since that doesn't result in wallet++" ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7095
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 19:24:00 -
[10] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:How many incursion runners does it take to balance out one tech moon?
less than one ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7095
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 19:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
Goddamned American Capitalist wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Goddamned American Capitalist wrote:I know, they say they do want it fixed, but I don't see them packing up all of their moon harvesters and ceasing production, do you? Because like pre-nerf highsec incursions & FW mechanics or the current 150m isk/hour Forsaken Hubs, we'd be stupid to not take advantage of it while it's there. This doesn't mean we don't think it should be changed or don't want it changed I call bullshit. You don't want **** changed, if you did you'd do something about it like shooting monuments in Jita until CCP changed it. It is easy to say you want it changed on the forums; to actually do something about it, not so much. I bet if it were an attempt to nerf high-sec or anything that didn't remove the source of your wealth, we'd have whole regions of monuments being shot to ****. You say you want it changed, how about you actually put action to your words, otherwise you're just posturing on the forums and blowing smoke up our collective asses.
it's not like we've shown everyone how tech is broken, the scale at which it's broken, what we can do with our broken tech income and how CCP could actually balance moons instead of sitting around making useless crap like pants
no, we've been very subtle about our massive income and how other alliances make peanuts in contrast, even with renter empires, we definitely didn't spend a couple hundred billion ISK burning jita and proceeding to pay hisec to destroy itself ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7095
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 19:36:00 -
[12] - Quote
ever notice that whenever pubbies complain about technetium, they suddenly get very tight-lipped if not defensive when we bring up the zero-risk, zero-effort, zero-cost isk faucets that are incursions and l4s ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7095
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 19:39:00 -
[13] - Quote
Goddamned American Capitalist wrote:Well, all that is obviously not working so looks like it is time to start shooting monuments in the name of removing moon goo and unsubbing until moon goo is removed, remember, those two things light a fire under CCPs ass, everything else just seems to amuse them.
Why don't you do that? ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7096
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 19:47:00 -
[14] - Quote
Goddamned American Capitalist wrote:100% passive, once you set up the tower, it is all ISK printing from there.
Manufacturing and PI are both very passive as well. What about those? ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7100
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 07:32:00 -
[15] - Quote
Rhavin Kha'siere wrote:Nullbears love to rant about how hisec is all risk-averse. While that may be true, that doesn't mean those selfsame nullbears aren't risk averse either. Case in point, this idea of Cloud Ring (which is really just a player organized version of a PVP Arena, complete with rules and judges). If a Great War (which, it could be argued, previous incarnations created the massive coalitions that now dominate nullsec) is deemed to be something that would take too long, and be too destructive, and the only alternative is to fabricate fake fights for the sake of good fights (which are in truth only good because of the RISK and the surprise inherent in their emergent creation) while eliminating all potential vectors of risk...then you are risk-averse, and are just as terrible as the pubbies you love to hate. I'm sure your going to say something about how you earned the right to be top dog (which you did, because those who fought against BoB TOOK RISKS), and if someone else wants your space then they should come and take it; but that's like America, Russia and China telling Somalia to come at 'em. There is no potential threat to the blue doughnut, and there will never be a potential threat as long as all three coalitions are too damn scared to actually RISK something against each other.
If the only solution to the stagnation of Nullsec is to create a completely risk-averse PVP Arena, which somehow proves to CCP that null is borked (which, in and of itself is absurd, considering that is exactly what nullbears complain hisec is turning into); then your doing it wrong. If a Great War would be so costly, and take so long, that people who have played this awesome game for the past ten years would quit...you have your priorities backwards.
Yes, y'all fought your way to the top, and did such an excellent job of destroying any potential threat to your existence. Now, the very thought of having to risk said position as top dog would cause ten year vets to quit...that is the very definition of risk averse. I mean, those theoretical bittervets would quit because of the amount of risk inherent in a three-way Great War? Even discounting the idea of risk, YOU SPENT TEN YEARS PLAYING THIS GAME, AND A WAR THAT MAY LAST SIX MONTHS TO A YEAR IS TOO LONG? Are you serious?
And you claim us pubbies are risk-averse idiots who want all the things now, in perfect safety. Your hypocrisy is breathtaking.
let's not talk about people being hypocrites when you're slamming your ******* fist on the table demanding that CCP removes suicide ganking, wardecs and ninja salvaging after having successfully demanded that they remove ninja looting, can baiting and give worthless mining botters a gigantic buff to their ships which they never bothered trying to fit in a way that would counter the suicide gank attempt, because the entitled wretches could not fathom sacrificing yield
hiseccers are only useful for two things: giving revenue to CCP and being scourged. unfortunately, a good number of them are no longer even useful for the former, since their bot-like behavior and the near-perfect safety of hisec (which is still not enough for you) means they have absolutely not issue funding their gametime with PLEX. thanks to these wretched botters and quasi-botters, the price of a GTC is close to a billion ISK.
hisec is the part of the game that goes against its original conception in every goddamned way. the difference is that we've crafted the political landscape of 0.0 while the hiseccers have demanded that CCP do all the work for them through their lil tantrums and threats of unsubbing.
and you wretches always talk about how you're playing the game the way you want it to
well, as it turns out, we're playing the game the way we want, get 0wned ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7100
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 07:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:baltec1 wrote: Not only do we have no need for even more space but we don't have the manpower to secure it if we do capture it.
You all sure do have a lot of excuses to avoid just random fun combat. So keep making them and pretend people are fleeing null for reasons other then boring and risk averse leadership that won't do anything unless it has overwhelming odds. Pure geniuses, the whole lot of you.
hey look sentamon's being wrong as always
we've been engaging in random fun combat with the HBC for months, i'm sorry that you choose to read riverini's rag where he claims that we have blue standings or something ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7103
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 07:37:00 -
[17] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Rhavin Kha'siere wrote: Nullbears love to rant about how hisec is all risk-averse. (snip) And you claim us pubbies are risk-averse idiots who want all the things now, in perfect safety. Your hypocrisy is breathtaking.
^^ Damn I wish I had written you posts first & last sentences above in my OP. +1
you are risk-averse, though
you should look at your own posting history, where you demand things like outlaws being unable to enter hisec, the removal of ninja looting, ninja salvaging and wardecs, and more nerfs to suicide ganking, because they affect your own quasi-botting gameplay and coming up with ways to counter those things is too much work, so CCP must hold your hand because thinking is hard :(
you have no idea what you're talking about, since you have never left hisec and you most likely never will ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7106
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 07:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
the other fact is that in these months, rather than banding together and making a war against one of the "two coalitions that controls all of 0.0" the wretches choose to complain
of course, they use "we don't have tech moons" as an excuse, despite the fact that many alliances like pizza and black legion fight to great effect without substantial alliance-level income, even reimbursing some ships. the fact of the matter is that they don't wish to play our game, yet the worthless wretches complain that we don't play how they envision us playing, and rather than doing anything about it in-game, they'll just whine endlessly to no effect ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7122
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 16:10:00 -
[19] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:So in order to prove to me there is no big blue doughnut you post a kill in HI SEC? Looks like NULL has run out of targets because they're all blue & has to resort totraveling to HI by your account
because naturally GSF members suicide ganking a jumpfreighter in hisec is not indicative of the fact that we're not blue to the HBC
can you explain this bit of logic ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7124
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:40:00 -
[20] - Quote
i love it when wretches compare wargames to RvB
as if nobody can interfere in them and as if we have ridiculous rules like "don't pod" or "don't primary hostile FCs" or "don't use ECM it's DISHONOURABLE" and "don't interfere in honourable 1v1s" ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7183
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:35:00 -
[21] - Quote
sniggwaffe has tons and tons of tech moons and space I hear ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7183
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 21:56:00 -
[22] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Varius Xeral wrote: "ISK wins wars" ISK for ship replacement programs wins wars FIXED
i'm sorry that we're successful
would you like us to be less successful so that others might actually have a chance at winning ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7183
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 22:02:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:Ice miner in null will make more than an ice miner in hs. That's a comparison.
yes mining blue ice in 0.0 is more lucrative than mining blue ice in an 0.7 tell us another one ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7183
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 22:05:00 -
[24] - Quote
also the best part is where you compared ice mining to moons
see when you lose your mackinaw you don't have to form a fleet to take it back, you just buy another one and continue quasi-botting away, while losing a moon means you have to either scan another moon and tower it or take that moon back
but those are just trivial differences you'll set aside because they don't fit within your narrative right? ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7184
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 03:55:00 -
[25] - Quote
wow time to bust out those macks and mine dark glitter in 0.0 for a jaw-dropping 20m/hour ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7186
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 16:29:00 -
[26] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:Of course I'm conveniently forgetting ignoring it. Just like you're conveniently pulling 250 man hours out of your butt. In order to consider how much real effort goes into a moon goo pos you'll need to consider a tad bit more data like all income streams possible by the sov-null alliance and it's players as well as all defensive actions and how many moon goo pos's were attacked, all this over a given period of time before you can even begin to make meaningful comparisons. See, those fleets just aren't sitting around defending moon goo. They're doing other things so there is multiplicity of use you have to consider. Because of that, not just moon goo needs to be considered, since these same fleets will also be generating income from mining, ratting, pewing, defending other infrastructure etc, etc, etc. It would be a rather complex analysis to accurately compare it to a simple activity such as ice mining in HS which is why it is not comparable, imo.
So until someone has that data, I don't, my 83.33mil/min to 166k/min comparison of moon and ice mining, respectively, is at least more valid than your 250 man hours since noone knows where this 250hrs comes from.
But I think I've already stated this, just in another manner so I would gather you're not really following the thread.
Actually, Ruby is wrong. 250 man hours assumes that a POS defense op will wrap up within an hour - it's usually more like 2-3 hours, so it'd be 500-750 man hours for a defense op.
Also, when ice mining only requires you to park a mackinaw in an ice belt, turn ice harvesters on, go AFK, come back in 30-40 minutes, drop the ice into an Orca, and return to your movie, the effort required to scoop silos completely eclipses that. Ice mining is effectively passive income. ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7186
|
Posted - 2013.03.24 23:27:00 -
[27] - Quote
let's make 0.0 combat more battlecruiser-centric while battlecruisers get nerfed into the ground
great plan ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7186
|
Posted - 2013.03.25 03:12:00 -
[28] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Primary This Rifter wrote:No, the ice miner just has to press F1 and occasionally empty his ore hold into an Orca. That's it. Stop pretending there's more effort involved than that. Well when you can gank a moon mining operation with 2-3 catlysts then we'll start seriously comparing ice mining & Moons goo extraction
when you can go to jita and immediately replace a moon then i'll take any comparison of ice mining and moon mining seriously ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7251
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 07:50:00 -
[29] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Are you a Goon director? I heard they all live in Gallente Pleasure Dome/Villas in POS's in DELVE The Goon dregs which I suspect you are live in poverty but at least you get free ships thnx to well TECH funded SRP's providing infinite Drakes
us directors are mostly rich as hell because we scam people like you, pocketing alliance isk isn't really that lucrative in comparison ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7251
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 07:59:00 -
[30] - Quote
imagine that, not needing to hoard a ton of isk and assets simply because anytime you need isk, there are plenty of chumps lined up to hand it to you with glee
well it owns ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7258
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 02:43:00 -
[31] - Quote
yes nobody ran large fleets until 2008
yep, nobody ever sieged towers, which dictated sovereignty, with large fleets, they used 20-man gangs to siege them for 10 hours at a time ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7258
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 02:45:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:It doesn't matter what it looks like at the moment, you know what I meant. You also know that it's PvE in a area designed for PvP (and exists due to resources only). It makes a mockery to a game about 24/7 PvP, just as blobs about "skills matter" (if they don't, just do away with the skills system, it's hypocrisy otherwise).
I think we can safely disregard the rest of your post if you subscribe to this idea that gameplay is segregated in such a way when it is not and has never been ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7258
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 02:52:00 -
[33] - Quote
beyond that ablooblooblooooo goons hellcamp people into their stations when they start sieging their moons, why don't they let others simply take moons from them
gotta say, this thread is p. hilarious ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7258
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 03:35:00 -
[34] - Quote
if we were the first ones to come up with tactics like "stay docked" and "outnumber the enemy" well damn that says a lot about the eve community ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7259
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 05:11:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Who are you to dictate what another says/believes/reads, dear?
Now in your corp you may choose to brainwash all you like, but outside the game you're but anyone else with a butthole.
i'm stating facts, such as "no, there are no separate PvP areas" because well the whole game is "the PvP area" ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7273
|
Posted - 2013.04.02 23:36:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:It's conditional PvP in a game suppose to be ABOUT 24/7 PvP.
Seems you misunderstood "hyper-competitive PvP environment" as "a fragfest like Darkfall" ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
|
|
|