|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.14 22:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:
Question 1) Why does Empire need to be sent "into a panic" with "drought and pestilence everywhere"?
Question 2) As the CSM chair (with it's inherent Eve representation), you're OK that this potentially ruins the economic model for everyone?
Question 3) If the economic model is smashed by inflation, do you realize that CCP could simply become proactive on indy ganking and stop it all. Are you giving them cause?
Answer #1: The Mittanni himself admitted that he is sadistic. As someone else mentioned, goons joined EVE to destroy it. However, they discovered that EVE was the PERFECT game for their antics.
Answers #2 and #3: You fail to understand the robustness of EVE's economy. The only thing that this event has done is shift supply and demand around. So yeah, maybe fuel is more expensive. This has very little to do with T1 goods, as those can EASILY be manufactured without ever touching a POS, so long as you are willing to wait for your ME research.
The WORST CASE is that T2 returns to pre-invention prices, and everyone starts flying T1 again. Even if Goonswarm takes it a step farther and tries to prevent T1 industry from happening, then people will just go back to flying cruisers and rifters. Not even Goonswarm can stop people from mining in noobships. |
Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.14 23:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:The Apostle wrote:non judgement wrote:If/when they stop, wont you see heaps of people mining again and making isk from the inflated prices, and after awhile everything will slowly return to normal?
CCP might think it'd be interesting to see how well the Economy recovers from something like this. Yeah, valid point. I have mentioned myself that it really needs to be a very long and sustained campaign to have the effect Mittens claims he's after. It's why I'm asking because they can't do it but have convinced their members they can. every single moon reaction on a gallente tower (the best :effort: tower for anything but carbides) now loses money except fullerides and nanotransistors which are insanely profitable for some reason) because fueling a gallente pos costs 500m a month
Switch to Amarr towers then? You can still run reactions on those, and they still get a 50% bonus to silo capacity. |
Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.14 23:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:you use caldari instead, which makes up for their lack of silo bonus by having a shitload of cpu
No, don't tel..!
I mean, SUSH you, using Caldari Towers is a TERRIBLE idea. |
Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
105
|
Posted - 2011.10.15 15:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Taedrin wrote:Switch to Amarr towers then? You can still run reactions on those, and they still get a 50% bonus to silo capacity. pretty sure you can't because of their hideously low CPU but I could be wrong
You can just barely run a 4 input complex reaction (ferrogel) on an Amarr tower. You won't have any CPU left what-so-ever, however. But Amarr towers have enormous amounts of PG, so you'll be able to anchor craptons of guns.
If you do a 3 input reaction, then you still have enough CPU for several ewar mods. |
|
|
|