Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6554
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:54:00 -
[151] - Quote
Hecate Shaw wrote:Does it seem likely to anyone else that the OP bought his character? As several people have pointed out, the odds of a 4-5 year vet not knowing about high-sec ganking and yet still working up to owning a Golem worth 3b are very slim. I sometimes wonder if the the character bizarre isn't hurting more than it helps.
Some people are so insular that they take no notice of what is going on around them, there's plenty of highsec dwellers who've been "playing" for a couple of years or more that are shocked and horrified to find that people can shoot at them in highsec without killrights or a wardec. Time spent in game does not equal a knowledge of game mechanics, especially if people choose to play Eve as a single player game and ignore everything beyond their particular play style.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |
Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:54:00 -
[152] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain.
Lolwut?
I move comparable amounts between hubs on a routine basis without ever getting ganked.
How can this be? |
Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
504
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:55:00 -
[153] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
So you dont understand the difference between carrying around a bunch of loot or fitting your ship?
Fitting or carrying high value items makes you a target, don't like it? then don't do it. Quote:Smart has nothing to do with it. This person could be running a mission and get ganked. And your point is? Quote:Again it is a problem for the people getting ganked. They worked hard to make thier big nice shiny ships and they shouldnt be vunerable to a few low cost high dps fit ships. The only problem I see is that the OP expected to be immune from the actions of other players in an open ended PvP multiplayer game. BTW 5x fitted tier 3 battle cruisers comes out at the best part of 3/4 billion Isk if not more, so not exactly cheap either. Quote:You guys scream risk vs reward non stop on these forum. This should be no different. Gankers should not be able to use little effort and destroy high value targets. Coordinating a 5 player gank takes a considerable amount of effort, not a little. I can pretty much guarantee that the gank operation took a fair amount of prior planning, which involved ship scanning potential targets, making sure that all the required pilots were in the right place, with the right equipment, at the right time to carry the operation off without a hitch, all of which are effort. Even after all the effort put into the planning and execution the loot fairy can still crap on gankers from a great height, in this case they took the risk and got little or no reward for their efforts, are they whining about risk vs reward? The answer is no, because next time the loot fairy may well smile upon them with lots and lots of shiny stuff.
ISBoxer makes all that coordination unnecessary... The single biggest danger to EVE is the proliferation of ALTS! Kill an alt today!
Petition for a Minimum bounty of 10 mil. Prevent useless bounties!
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:57:00 -
[154] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Alternatively, maybe it's mechanics are not well understood by the masses. IOW, not easy. Also, not profitable since being profitable would mean that all the people doing it in the past (who do understand the mechanics) would flock to itGǪ but instead, it's very very rare.
Quote:Your conclusion that it is dull and unprofitable is not only a forgone conclusion, it does not fit the facts presented in this thread via killmail. It fits the facts just fine, since the KM in this thread is a unique case of stupidity that provides a one-time bonanza. Show me the KMs where people are getting those hits, one after another, in quick succession to generate any kind of decent ISK/h.
By the way, notice the singular here. Also notice that the other KM posted was a massive loss GÇö not just GÇ£unprofitable compared to miningGÇ¥, but a complete waste of time and money. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
baltec1
Bat Country
5607
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:58:00 -
[155] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain.
That is not stupidity. That is a game "feature". Make a ship that can hall all that stuff at once to save time and generate wealth, and then if you do do it, you are "stupid".
Just because you can do it doesn't mean you should. Its like transporting 10 billion in gold in the back of a truck with an open sided trailer through the heart of Bagdad with no armed guards.
Its that stupid. |
Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:03:00 -
[156] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Alternatively, maybe it's mechanics are not well understood by the masses. IOW, not easy. Also, not profitable since that would mean that all the people doing it in the past (who do understand the mechanics) would flock to itGǪ but instead, it's very very rare.
That does not mean that it is not easy, it could just as easily mean that people are simply having trouble understanding Concord mechanics. You used to be better at this Tippia
|
Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:04:00 -
[157] - Quote
Namdor wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain. Lolwut? I move comparable amounts between hubs on a routine basis without ever getting ganked. How can this be?
Not in a freighter loaded to the brim and starting in Jita I imagine.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:04:00 -
[158] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:That does not mean that it is not easy, it could just as easily mean that people are simply having trouble understanding Concord mechanics. GǪwhich means it's not easy.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6554
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:05:00 -
[159] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: Just because you can do it doesn't mean you should. Its like transporting 10 billion in gold in the back of a truck with an open sided trailer through the heart of Bagdad with no armed guards.
Its that stupid.
Or sailing off the coast of Somalia in a Yacht made of money, it's that stupid too.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |
Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:06:00 -
[160] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:
It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain.
That is not stupidity. That is a game "feature". Make a ship that can hall all that stuff at once to save time and generate wealth, and then if you do do it, you are "stupid".
Just because you can do it doesn't mean you should. Its like transporting 10 billion in gold in the back of a truck with an open sided trailer through the heart of Bagdad with no armed guards. Its that stupid.
No it is more like Arabs scanning your truck to see how much cash you have in your wallet. Ramming you with a bulldozer at a stoplight and mugging you. That is a somewhat more accurate analogy.
|
|
Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:07:00 -
[161] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Namdor wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain. Lolwut? I move comparable amounts between hubs on a routine basis without ever getting ganked. How can this be? Not in a freighter loaded to the brim and starting in Jita I imagine.
The linked kill was a noobship, not a freighter. |
baltec1
Bat Country
5607
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:08:00 -
[162] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
No it is more like Arabs scanning your truck to see how much cash you have in your wallet. Ramming you with a bulldozer at a stoplight and mugging you. That is a somewhat more accurate analogy.
Because they are going to do that to a waggon full of carrots.
It doesnt matter how you try to word it, stuffing 10 billion into the hold of a rookie ship is a stupid thing to do. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:08:00 -
[163] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:No it is more like Arabs scanning your truck to see how much cash you have in your wallet. Ramming you with a bulldozer at a stoplight and mugging you. That is a somewhat more accurate analogy. GǪwhich means it's stupid to carry around tons of cash in known mugging spots.
The basic concept remains the same: you're doing something you shouldn't be doing. You're being stupid. You end up paying the price for your stupidity, as you should. It was all easily avoidable had you been a bit smarter about it.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:08:00 -
[164] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:That does not mean that it is not easy, it could just as easily mean that people are simply having trouble understanding Concord mechanics. GǪwhich means it's not easy.
Actually no. Not being sure of how exactly concord works, has nothing to do with how easy/hard the act of ganking and profiting from that ganking is. It just means the idea of concord is ballyhoo functioning as a deterrent, without actually being one in physicality.
|
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1084
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:10:00 -
[165] - Quote
This thread started with a troll by the OP.
It has now degenerated into the usual ganking is too easy/too hard.
Blame the miners etc... This is not a signature. |
Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:11:00 -
[166] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:
No it is more like Arabs scanning your truck to see how much cash you have in your wallet. Ramming you with a bulldozer at a stoplight and mugging you. That is a somewhat more accurate analogy.
Because they are going to do that to a waggon full of carrots. It doesnt matter how you try to word it, stuffing 10 billion into the hold of a rookie ship is a stupid thing to do.
No one seems to be talking about 10b in the hold of a rookie ship here, unless I missed something.
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6554
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:12:00 -
[167] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote: Actually no. Not being sure of how exactly concord works, has nothing to do with how easy/hard the act of ganking and profiting from that ganking is. It is just ballyhoo functioning as a deterrent.
I'm pretty sure the gankers know how Concord works, if they didn't they wouldn't be able to manipulate Concord spawns, or to drag Concord clear across a solar system to give them the window of opportunity required to carry out their nefarious plans. The information on Concord mechanics isn't exactly hard to find, Goonswarm have it down to a fine art, as do the New Order guys.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:13:00 -
[168] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Actually no. No? So it's not a case of GÇ£people are simply having troubleGÇ¥ with the mechanics (i.e. not that easy after all)? Then why is it so rare?
Quote:Not being sure of how exactly concord works, has nothing to do with how easy/hard the act of ganking and profiting from that ganking is GǪaside from the rather important fact that CONCORD is what determines how easy or hard something is to gank and how much profit you'll make from it, and not knowing how that mechanic works means a complete stab in the dark even before we add in the RNG GÇö a difficult task indeed.
Quote:No one seems to be talking about 10b in the hold of a rookie ship here, unless I missed something. You missed a lot. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:15:00 -
[169] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:baltec1 wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:
No it is more like Arabs scanning your truck to see how much cash you have in your wallet. Ramming you with a bulldozer at a stoplight and mugging you. That is a somewhat more accurate analogy.
Because they are going to do that to a waggon full of carrots. It doesnt matter how you try to word it, stuffing 10 billion into the hold of a rookie ship is a stupid thing to do. No one seems to be talking about 10b in the hold of a rookie ship here, unless I missed something.
You did. |
baltec1
Bat Country
5607
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:15:00 -
[170] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
No one seems to be talking about 10b in the hold of a rookie ship here, unless I missed something.
You did. |
|
Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:17:00 -
[171] - Quote
You can't read then, I seem to have typed freighter.
|
Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
359
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:19:00 -
[172] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:evedawn wrote:Secondly because its never happened to me before & I've never heard it could happen! Hang on a second... logical disconnect here. So, you WORKED your way into a Golem (not cheap, not easy skill-wise), but you don't know anything about suicide ganking?!?! Really? 0/10 for too-obvious of a troll.
If you don't read the forums and have a wee bit of luck, you could go for years without being suicide ganked. |
Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:19:00 -
[173] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Actually no. No? So it's not a case of GÇ£people are simply having troubleGÇ¥ with the mechanics (i.e. not that easy after all)? Then why is it so rare?.
You carefully expunged a word, which I am sure you did by accident. Right? People are simply having trouble understanding the mechanics of concord.
See, when you put that word back in it changes the entire meaning of the sentence. Very important lesson there.
|
Namdor
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:23:00 -
[174] - Quote
Here, let me help.
See, we started here:
This is a kill of a rookie ship with 10 billion in melted nanoribbons in its hold.
To which YOU directly responded:
Quote:It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain.
Implying one or more of the following:
1. You believe the function of a rookie ship is to transport 10 billion in nanoribbons. 2. You're incapable of discerning a rookie ship from a ship more suited to transporting 10 billion in nanoribbons. 3. You responded with a non sequitur, hoping everyone else would fail to notice that it was a rookie ship. |
Georgina Parmala
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:25:00 -
[175] - Quote
dexington wrote:evedawn wrote:Yesterday I got Insta popped in a Golem undocking from Osmon Station. and the nullbears keep whining about hi-sec being to safe...
It took him almost 5 YEARS of playing EvE in high sec and the loss of a shiny MARAUDER to realize he is not completely and absolutely safe in high sec.
The "null bears" are right. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:25:00 -
[176] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:You can't read then, I seem to have typed freighter. You can't read then. You are talking about the 10bn rookie ship.
Quote:You carefully expunged-ácut before a word GǪwhich made no difference. With or without it, you're saying it's not easy. That would explain why it's so rare, but would contradict your previous claim that it easy after all. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7124
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:25:00 -
[177] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:I understand where the op is coming from. I dont feel hi-sec should be completely safe and people should still have the ability to gank somone out of revenge or spite, but I dont feel it should be profitable.
I say if you want to gank people thats fine but it should cost you and anyone involved. This seemed to worked well for the miners. Macks seem still be on the profit list but rifter ganks have fallen off substantially. WHY? No profit in it.
People shouldnt be afraid to undock thier big shiny ships to play the game. Something needs to be in place to remove the profit margin for using high dps ships with no effort put in to them to kill ships people have worked hard to obtain.
Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem.
Years of work can vanish in a moment when you mess up. That's life and that's EVE, son. ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Eternum Praetorian
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
926
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:28:00 -
[178] - Quote
Namdor wrote:Here, let me help. See, we started here: This is a kill of a rookie ship with 10 billion in melted nanoribbons in its hold. To which YOU directly responded: Quote:It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thing. Now, you literally will not survive your trip if you take loads like that between market hubs. Your death is next to certain. Implying one or more of the following: 1. You believe the function of a rookie ship is to transport 10 billion in nanoribbons. 2. You're incapable of discerning a rookie ship from a ship more suited to transporting 10 billion in nanoribbons. 3. You responded with a non sequitur, hoping everyone else would fail to notice that it was a rookie ship.
I didn't click on it. The op is about Golem and I am referring to ships that have a specific function and role in the game. I am not discussing rookie ships.
But after looking at that KM, I'd say he was trying to outsmart the system by flying a ship that no one would suspect. Problem with that is... people have already figured out that trick.
|
Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
359
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:31:00 -
[179] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:That does not mean that it is not easy, it could just as easily mean that people are simply having trouble understanding Concord mechanics. GǪwhich means it's not easy. Actually no. Not being sure of how exactly concord works, has nothing to do with how easy/hard the act of ganking and profiting from that ganking is. It just means the idea of concord is ballyhoo functioning as a deterrent, without actually being one in physicality.
Of course it acts as a deterrent. Otherwise pirates would just shoot ALL the miners and missioners they could lock. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13284
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:32:00 -
[180] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I didn't click on it. So you were talking out of your ass when you said that GÇ£It is the function of that particular ship to do such a thingGÇ¥. You had absolutely no idea what you were talking about. Good on you.
Quote:The op is about Golem and I am referring to ships that have a specific function and role in the game. I am not discussing rookie ships. GǪexcept that by saying to Gǣthat particular shipGǥ (i.e. referring to the rookie ship you were commenting on), you did exactly that. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |