| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Commissar Veldt
Progressive State State Section 9
34
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 06:56:00 -
[61] - Quote
Grayson Cole wrote:Are there any actual dedicated FW players? Seriously.
It seems FW is mostly made up of farmers, null alts, and players just looking for a place to pad killboards.
I know loads in Caldari and Gallente, plenty out there, plenty of us p*ssed off with current FW mechanic which has killed our baby and turned it into farmville. Once you start getting stuck into PVP/plexing out in Black Rise you will get to know the local corps on both sides, who fights, who runs, who is the farmers etc...
Think timer rollbacks is a good idea but lets say I find a farmer, warp into plex and he cloaks or warps off. , as soon as I leave because I cant get a fight hes straight back on the button, timer rollback of about 1 minute (because im not patient enough to try camp/chase farmers anymore). Best Idea I have heard recently is a few more spawns of NPC's, not many, but make it so one new NPC spawns every few minutes or so, causing farmers to have to do more than kill one NPC then sit on button. Everyone used to b*tch and whine about FW being PVE and NPC's but if you had NPC spawns even at half of what they used to be I think it would reduce LP farming) |

Colt Blackhawk
Nasranite Watch The Bloody Ronin Syndicate
93
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 11:02:00 -
[62] - Quote
http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=1527982 That is fw actually^^ This guy prolly conquered several systems alone^^ |

Takseen
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
410
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 11:14:00 -
[63] - Quote
Colt Blackhawk wrote:http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=1527982 That is fw actually^^ This guy prolly conquered several systems alone^^
Ah yes. The vital Gallente staging system of Immuri. I live right next door, it gets farmed fairly regularly by both sides. Gives me something to do while waiting for a fleet to join.
Edit : Also note that this guy fits neither cloaks nor warp core stabs. So removing both is only a partial fix to the perceived problem. |

Lin Suizei
127
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 11:17:00 -
[64] - Quote
Colt Blackhawk wrote:http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=1527982 That is fw actually^^ This guy prolly conquered several systems alone^^
These guys should get medals for truly winning at faction war. Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

Colt Blackhawk
Nasranite Watch The Bloody Ronin Syndicate
94
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 11:30:00 -
[65] - Quote
Quote:Ah yes. The vital Gallente staging system of Immuri. I live right next door, it gets farmed fairly regularly by both sides. Gives me something to do while waiting for a fleet to join.
Edit : Also note that this guy fits neither cloaks nor warp core stabs. So removing both is only a partial fix to the perceived problem.
Okay you are right. But actually I would be even happy with a partial fix. |

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1228
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 12:56:00 -
[66] - Quote
Colt Blackhawk wrote:http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=1527982 That is fw actually^^ This guy prolly conquered several systems alone^^
He's doing something. How many of you are just sitting in high sec spinning? "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
855
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 20:42:00 -
[67] - Quote
chatgris wrote:This isn't a Minmatar only issue - especially around T3, there were never ending waves of stabbed Caldari plexers coming down from Tama into the Nisuwa area. And it doesn't end at stabs either - stabs, cloaks, ecm all in one.
Farmers gonna farm :(
I don't mind pve in general. I don't mind people runnning level 4 missions, cosmos missions, epic arcs, or belt ratting, or sleeper sites, or fw missions, or incursions etc.
I just think its too bad they had to make fw sov yet another pve mechanic. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
334
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 21:08:00 -
[68] - Quote
Cearain wrote:chatgris wrote:This isn't a Minmatar only issue - especially around T3, there were never ending waves of stabbed Caldari plexers coming down from Tama into the Nisuwa area. And it doesn't end at stabs either - stabs, cloaks, ecm all in one.
Farmers gonna farm :( I don't mind pve in general. I don't mind people runnning level 4 missions, cosmos missions, epic arcs, or belt ratting, or sleeper sites, or fw missions, or incursions etc. I just think its too bad they had to make fw sov yet another pve mechanic.
I too would love to see FW sov a pvp mechanic.
However I can't see it ever being so without either a: massive structure bashing grinds or b: hugely exploitable by alt farming.
In reality EVE doesn't really have the playerbase to make any form of sov a completely pvp mechanic without some form of timer watching, structure bashing mechanic. If eve had 10x the number spread out across all TZ then I'd say there would be enough players to actually make a completly pvp mechanic at least viable. But then it would probably be exploitable by alt farming of some kind.
TBH I'd like to see the Teired WZ gone and have standard LP values for plex's regard less of how much of the WZ you control.
Keep the lockout mechanic and system upgrades so you can upgrade your home etc. This way it is still valuable to capture space.
This would stop the farm horde from militia hopping to whatever militia is at highest teir for bonussed LP but still allow the actual FW players to make enough LP to support their playstyle.
Do this and you pretty much remove the biggest farm factor for most farmers - bonussed LP. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Grayson Cole
R.A.V.E.N.
10
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 21:17:00 -
[69] - Quote
Best fix IMHO is that you can only have 1 character in FW at any time. In addition, it has to be your main, the character with the most skill points. There should also be a fairly long lockout if you decide to drop from FW, perhaps a week.
This wouldn't eliminate 2nd (and 3rd, 4th, etc) accounts from being involved, but would be a serious blow to alts and LP farmers. Caldari Militia Gÿ£G£½GÿP |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
334
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 21:37:00 -
[70] - Quote
Grayson Cole wrote:Best fix IMHO is that you can only have 1 character in FW at any time. In addition, it has to be your main, the character with the most skill points. There should also be a fairly long lockout if you decide to drop from FW, perhaps a week.
This wouldn't eliminate 2nd (and 3rd, 4th, etc) accounts from being involved, but would be a serious blow to alts and LP farmers.
Not really a workable fix IMO this would be an account wide restriction which kinda goes against the sandbox feel of eve. In doing this you might as well just say that from now on each account can only have 1 toon. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Grayson Cole
R.A.V.E.N.
10
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 22:02:00 -
[71] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Not really a workable fix IMO this would be an account wide restriction which kinda goes against the sandbox feel of eve.
In doing this you might as well just say that from now on each account can only have 1 toon.
There's never going to be a workable fix that fits within the sandbox element. Players will always find a way around it. The only way to truly get rid of this kind of stuff is to nerf it at the account level. Caldari Militia Gÿ£G£½GÿP |

Taoist Dragon
Bastion of Mad Behaviour Caldari State Capturing
334
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 22:12:00 -
[72] - Quote
Grayson Cole wrote:
There's never going to be a workable fix that fits within the sandbox element. Players will always find a way around it. The only way to truly get rid of this kind of stuff is to nerf it at the account level.
Anything requiring an account nerf is very bad for eve. got nothing to do the sandbox element now that I think about it.
Mucking about with mechanics is one thing but mucking about with account is a whole other can of worms.
One toon in FW - pretty easy from a coding pov but how would you determine 'mains'? not practicable..... That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything. |

Major Killz
163
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 22:21:00 -
[73] - Quote
Why does factional warfare seem to break after every patch?
- killz |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
856
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 22:44:00 -
[74] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Cearain wrote:chatgris wrote:This isn't a Minmatar only issue - especially around T3, there were never ending waves of stabbed Caldari plexers coming down from Tama into the Nisuwa area. And it doesn't end at stabs either - stabs, cloaks, ecm all in one.
Farmers gonna farm :( I don't mind pve in general. I don't mind people runnning level 4 missions, cosmos missions, epic arcs, or belt ratting, or sleeper sites, or fw missions, or incursions etc. I just think its too bad they had to make fw sov yet another pve mechanic. I too would love to see FW sov a pvp mechanic. However I can't see it ever being so without either a: massive structure bashing grinds or b: hugely exploitable by alt farming. In reality EVE doesn't really have the playerbase to make any form of sov a completely pvp mechanic without some form of timer watching, structure bashing mechanic. If eve had 10x the number spread out across all TZ then I'd say there would be enough players to actually make a completly pvp mechanic at least viable. But then it would probably be exploitable by alt farming of some kind..
You are right that if there were a huge increase in numbers the current system might work. That is why ccp needs to implement mechanics such that each pvp has a much bigger impact on the warzone than the pve-ers.
If they implement a form or timer rollback, and notifications it would be a pvp mechanic. These changes have been proposed by players for years.
CCP focused on lockouts and lp rewards instead.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
856
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 22:44:00 -
[75] - Quote
Major Killz wrote:Why does factional warfare seem to break after every patch?
- killz
CCP never fixes it. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Grendel Sickswitch
31
|
Posted - 2013.03.30 23:35:00 -
[76] - Quote
it's one of the best ways of making isk atm and rightly so given the amount of ships you lose.
how many ships do mission runners lose? miners?
|

Lin Suizei
127
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 01:33:00 -
[77] - Quote
Taoist Dragon wrote:Do this and you pretty much remove the biggest farm factor for most farmers - bonussed LP.
Someone on these forums got it right a few weeks ago - ultimately, as long as undocking a non-combat ship is preferrable to undocking a PvP ship, faction war will never be good. Even if LP rewards are reduced, farmers will still farm, because it's so easy, safe, and requires next to zero investment.
With regards to all the suggestions of timer countdowns if people warp out our people cloak, don't forget there also needs to be some kind of measure to deal with people (i.e. Walter Islands) in nano condors who keep range, simply waiting for pirates and wartargets to leave before they finish the plex - otherwise, farmers just do that instead. Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

ALUCARD 1208
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
159
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 03:13:00 -
[78] - Quote
Cearain wrote: and notifications it would be a pvp mechanic. These changes have been proposed by players for years.
only you on that one matey wondered how many posts it would take you to get that in there GÖÑ HIGH FIVES GÖÑ-á |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
1623
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 04:53:00 -
[79] - Quote
implementing a timer reset is probably 30min effort for somebody who never looked at the code before (not counting testing effort). Something tells me CCP deliberately doesn't want to change that for some reason otherwise we would have it already since retribution.
Would farmers adapt? Possibly. The thing is that every feature needs maintenance in a dynamic world like we have it in eve. The first few weeks after inferno where awesome, something similar happened after retribution. Maybe we can repeat that just by adding timer resets. But as i said for some reason ccp doesn't want to do it. The situation right now is much better as we had it with the cashout strategies after inferno but I really believe it could be even better with minor tweaks to the mechanics.
why i think CCP does not want to change it? Since there was not a single dev comment on a FW topic since retribution. This makes me a bit sad since FW could be so much more as it is now just by continuing to adjust a few things here and there from time to time. a eve-style bounty system (done)-á dust boarding parties You fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Takseen
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
416
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 10:33:00 -
[80] - Quote
Grayson Cole wrote:Best fix IMHO is that you can only have 1 character in FW at any time. In addition, it has to be your main, the character with the most skill points. There should also be a fairly long lockout if you decide to drop from FW, perhaps a week.
This wouldn't eliminate 2nd (and 3rd, 4th, etc) accounts from being involved, but would be a serious blow to alts and LP farmers.
This is a terrible idea on multiple levels. -former carebears can't test the waters with a FW alt -if your highest SP character isn't a combat character, its even worse |

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate Villore Accords
75
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 17:50:00 -
[81] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:Estella Osoka wrote:Maybe CCP needs to create an infinite point mod for interceptors. That way farmers would be limited to only operating in the novices. Not really - when farmers are already sitting in unfit executioners not even bothering to react to losses, I doubt this will change much. Also, cloaking - can't infnipoint what's not lockable.
If they are cloaked then they aren't running the site. Stay in there and complete it. Will **** them off, especially if they can't warp while cloaked; then they will either have to risk uncloaking and getting caught. |

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
553
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 19:01:00 -
[82] - Quote
Cloaked inside plexes are solved by *NEW* mechanic: - Interact with beacon like one does with iHubs and deposit 2000LP for a decloaking field with a 30km radius to be deployed and remain in place until plex closes.
There sorted. Can we get on to the heavy stuff?  |

Colt Blackhawk
Nasranite Watch The Bloody Ronin Syndicate
98
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 20:01:00 -
[83] - Quote
Quote:Cloaked inside plexes are solved by *NEW* mechanic: - Interact with beacon like one does with iHubs and deposit 2000LP for a decloaking field with a 30km radius to be deployed and remain in place until plex closes.
There sorted. Can we get on to the heavy stuff?
Would like to. But you forget the following: CCP gives a f... about how they broke fw and won-¦t change anything. |

Zircon Dasher
181
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 21:13:00 -
[84] - Quote
Colt Blackhawk wrote: Would like to. But you forget the following: CCP gives a f... about how they broke fw and won-¦t change anything.
You mean like how they made it profitable? Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'. |

Colt Blackhawk
Nasranite Watch The Bloody Ronin Syndicate
98
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 21:21:00 -
[85] - Quote
Quote:You mean like how they made it profitable?
I mean how they made it farmville |

Zircon Dasher
181
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 21:41:00 -
[86] - Quote
Colt Blackhawk wrote:Quote:You mean like how they made it profitable? I mean how they made it farmville
You say potato, I say multi-billion dollar snack industry.
Same referent different vocalization. vOv
Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'. |

Takseen
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
417
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 22:02:00 -
[87] - Quote
Colt Blackhawk wrote:Quote:You mean like how they made it profitable? I mean how they made it farmville
If you got 236 kills in March in farmville, I'd hate to see how many you'd get if they fixed it. |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
1623
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 23:35:00 -
[88] - Quote
Takseen wrote:Colt Blackhawk wrote:Quote:You mean like how they made it profitable? I mean how they made it farmville If you got 236 kills in March in farmville, I'd hate to see how many you'd get if they fixed it.
like the pure number of kills would matter. Nobody wants to fight pve ships, pve ships don't want to fight too, still they influence where you can dock and where not. Thats a conflict of interests. I would trade all those pve ships against a few pvp ships any time.
but CCP probably looked at the statistics and said, hey FW is growing on popularity, and hey even the number of kills grows. But they don't look at the value of the killed ships or what the situation was as the fight happened. like a farmer who did not alt-tab to the right window fast enough.
whats even more funny but a bit off topic: they did the same mistake again. The orbital bombardment destroyers are all pve ships with meta 1 guns + cloak. No mods or skills influence OB. So people simply use 0 risk ships with trial alts for that. Wait till they add some form of rewards and we are in the same situation. a eve-style bounty system (done)-á dust boarding parties You fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Cearain
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
856
|
Posted - 2013.03.31 23:47:00 -
[89] - Quote
ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Cearain wrote: and notifications it would be a pvp mechanic. These changes have been proposed by players for years.
only you on that one matey wondered how many posts it would take you to get that in there
It wasn't even my idea.
And yes I will keep proposing the same solution since its the same problem that is ignored and needs to be fixed.
I am well aware that there are allot of gallente who have recently been coming on these forums that hate that idea that pvpers would know where their alts are hiding and running pelxes. But that doesn't change the fact that this idea was proposed by pvpers for years, and in combination with a timer rollback would make fw sov a pvp game.
Just becasue many of the pvpers have long since abandoned fw and no longer post here doesn't mean their ideas won't work.
Bottom line: we will forever get threads like this one where people realize fw sov is a carebear race - untill ccp actually does what they need to do to fix it. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
545
|
Posted - 2013.04.01 00:01:00 -
[90] - Quote
Cearain wrote:ALUCARD 1208 wrote:Cearain wrote: and notifications it would be a pvp mechanic. These changes have been proposed by players for years.
only you on that one matey wondered how many posts it would take you to get that in there It wasn't even my idea. And yes I will keep proposing the same solution since its the same problem that is ignored and needs to be fixed. I am well aware that there are allot of gallente who have recently been coming on these forums that hate that idea that pvpers would know where their alts are hiding and running pelxes. But that doesn't change the fact that this idea was proposed by pvpers for years, and in combination with a timer rollback would make fw sov a pvp game. Just becasue many of the pvpers have long since abandoned fw and no longer post here doesn't mean their ideas won't work. Bottom line: we will forever get threads like this one where people realize fw sov is a carebear race - untill ccp actually does what they need to do to fix it.
PvP'ers are not looking for stabbed cloaky evasion farmers. So your proposed 'fix' is a complete waste of time and forum space. PvP'ers have no problem finding PvP. They also have no problem finding stabbed cloaky evasion farmers either for that matter.
I just think you lack the faculties to comprehend what people want, though as always feel free to post your inane ideas. Theres no IQ restrictions here. I for one have the patience to keep explaining to you why its a complete waste of time. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |