Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Omegon Aleutinus
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 10:06:00 -
[31] - Quote
Yeah go multi-vote! |
Slaveofjita
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 22:16:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ccp already changing poses why do we need them in csm? |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
899
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 22:39:00 -
[33] - Quote
Slaveofjita wrote:Ccp already changing poses why do we need them in csm?
I think you answered your own question. They're gonna need someone there to guide them through the changes and the bugs that will inevitably come up.
Also, the current changes are nice, but they're definitely nowhere near all that needs to be done. It's obvious you've never had to live out of one. Nathan Jameson for CSM 8! My CSM 8 Blog My Twitter |
Glasgow Dunlop
Gigaverse The Imperial Senate
53
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 22:56:00 -
[34] - Quote
me vote's been cast There are no worms in wormholes |
Chitsa Jason
Infinity Explorers Exhale.
470
|
Posted - 2013.04.07 00:50:00 -
[35] - Quote
In the end what matters is that all wspace residents do vote for wspace candidates. It will be a shame if noone gets elected. Chitsa Jason for CSM 8 Twitter:-á@ChitsaJason Skype: Casparas
|
Nurza Tzestu
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.07 01:28:00 -
[36] - Quote
. |
Nurza Tzestu
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.07 01:31:00 -
[37] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:In the end what matters is that all wspace residents do vote for wspace candidates. It will be a shame if noone gets elected.
qft. chitsa for csm |
Frying Doom
2202
|
Posted - 2013.04.07 02:13:00 -
[38] - Quote
Nathan Jameson wrote:Slaveofjita wrote:Ccp already changing poses why do we need them in csm? I think you answered your own question. They're gonna need someone there to guide them through the changes and the bugs that will inevitably come up. Also, the current changes are nice, but they're definitely nowhere near all that needs to be done. It's obvious you've never had to live out of one. Actually I would have said so they don't accidentally forget about it, as soon as Two Steps back is turned. Vote Now My recommendations are:-á 1.James Arget 2.Ayeson 3.Nathan Jameson 4.Cipreh 5.Chitsa Jason 6. Malcanis 7. Mike Azariah 8. Ripard Teg 9. Mangala Solaris 10. Ali Aras |
Frying Doom
2202
|
Posted - 2013.04.07 02:15:00 -
[39] - Quote
Glasgow Dunlop wrote:me vote's been cast I would like to personally thank every one who voted so far, Whether it be for the wonderful wormhole 5 or even a Goon or BoB forbid Trebor.
You are helping to give the CSM more credibility by having a larger (I hope, but after the STV doubt) backing. Vote Now My recommendations are:-á 1.James Arget 2.Ayeson 3.Nathan Jameson 4.Cipreh 5.Chitsa Jason 6. Malcanis 7. Mike Azariah 8. Ripard Teg 9. Mangala Solaris 10. Ali Aras |
Rhavas
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
151
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 04:45:00 -
[40] - Quote
Go vote dammit!
Vote for all of the WH 5 at the top of your ticket to make sure we get 1-2 people on. Author of Interstellar Privateer Shattered Planet Authority James Arget for CSM8! |
|
Frying Doom
2284
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 02:34:00 -
[41] - Quote
Rhavas wrote:Go vote dammit!
Vote for all of the WH 5 at the top of your ticket to make sure we get 1-2 people on. So vote first
James Arget Cipreh Nathan Jameson Chitsa Jason Ayeson
And remember, failure to vote in this CSM election, makes you a Null sec stooge. In STV number of votes required to get elected is tied to the total number of votes, so you don't vote it obviously means you like wormhole stabilizers. Vote Now! My recommendations are:-á 1.James Arget 2.Ayeson 3.Nathan Jameson 4.Cipreh 5.Chitsa Jason 6. Malcanis 7. Mike Azariah 8. Ripard Teg 9. Mangala Solaris 10. Ali Aras 11. Roc Wieler And remember not voting is the same as voting for Null. |
Castor Troyy
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
46
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 05:08:00 -
[42] - Quote
Vote all 5 which candidates...all you girls need to get the sand out of your vaginas and grow up...
You are all being butt pirates...there are important issues that each candidate can be a voice for...some more qualified than others...
But not vote for someone b/c how he plays the game is just petty...and it could possibly cost wspace a seat at the table.
@ Gnaw Stop using the word "eviction" when u describe what chitsa did/does..look up the definition of the word evict
evict (third-person singular simple present evicts, present participle evicting, simple past and past participle evicted) 1. (transitive) To expel (one or more people) from their property; to force (one or more people) to move out
The word you should be using is vandalise
vandalise (third-person singular simple present vandalises, present participle vandalising, simple past and past participle vandalised) 1. To needlessly destroy other peopleGÇÖs property or public property; to commit vandalism.
We have never evicted and settled any system that forced the prior tenants to abandon it...we are mercenaries...look it up
mercenary (plural mercenaries) 1. A person employed to fight in an armed conflict who is not a member of the state or military group for which they are fighting and whose prime or sole motivation is private gain.
We also vandalise systems for fun and "in the name of good fights"...also for reasons of smack talk etc...
Stop whining about what you think we do b/c the words you use to describe it are wrong...this is a game and there is a plethora of different ways to play it...just because we don't play it like you doesn't make it wrong...and vice versa
The bottom line is that for the most part each of these guys have reasonable views on the changes and direction to take wspace...the more we have in there the better off we as a wormhole community will be...put your pettiness aside and vote for all 5...we need all the help we can get. |
Helgrind Wolf
WaKE Inc Company of Spacefarers
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 05:51:00 -
[43] - Quote
voted |
Senn Denroth
Lead Farmers Kill It With Fire
85
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 05:58:00 -
[44] - Quote
Castor Troyy wrote:Vote all 5 which candidates...all you girls need to get the sand out of your vaginas and grow up...
You are all being butt pirates...there are important issues that each candidate can be a voice for...some more qualified than others...
But not vote for someone b/c how he plays the game is just petty...and it could possibly cost wspace a seat at the table.
@ Gnaw Stop using the word "eviction" when u describe what chitsa did/does..look up the definition of the word evict
evict (third-person singular simple present evicts, present participle evicting, simple past and past participle evicted) 1. (transitive) To expel (one or more people) from their property; to force (one or more people) to move out
The word you should be using is vandalise
vandalise (third-person singular simple present vandalises, present participle vandalising, simple past and past participle vandalised) 1. To needlessly destroy other peopleGÇÖs property or public property; to commit vandalism.
We have never evicted and settled any system that forced the prior tenants to abandon it...we are mercenaries...look it up
mercenary (plural mercenaries) 1. A person employed to fight in an armed conflict who is not a member of the state or military group for which they are fighting and whose prime or sole motivation is private gain.
We also vandalise systems for fun and "in the name of good fights"...also for reasons of smack talk etc...
Stop whining about what you think we do b/c the words you use to describe it are wrong...this is a game and there is a plethora of different ways to play it...just because we don't play it like you doesn't make it wrong...and vice versa
The bottom line is that for the most part each of these guys have reasonable views on the changes and direction to take wspace...the more we have in there the better off we as a wormhole community will be...put your pettiness aside and vote for all 5...we need all the help we can get.
Ok so what you're saying is that you were paid to vandalize TL from their home and not actually looking for goodfights? Playing on words doesn't change what it was..
4x votes sent to James, Ayeson, Nathan, Cip. |
Castor Troyy
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 13:44:00 -
[45] - Quote
Senn Denroth wrote: Ok so what you're saying is that you were paid to vandalize TL from their home and not actually looking for goodfights? Playing on words doesn't change what it was..
4x votes sent to James, Ayeson, Nathan, Cip.
Castor Troyy wrote: We also vandalise systems for fun and "in the name of good fights"...also for reasons of smack talk etc...
[IE Not for profit, as in 4 NO ISKIES]
Senn Denroth wrote: 4x votes sent to James, Ayeson, Nathan, Cip.
Lol..don't be mad bro..remember its just a game...read a post completely..and read it again before you rage reply...you miss stuff |
JoostSkywalker
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:13:00 -
[46] - Quote
Castor Troyy wrote:Vote all 5 which candidates...all you girls need to get the sand out of your vaginas and grow up...
You are all being butt pirates...there are important issues that each candidate can be a voice for...some more qualified than others...
But not vote for someone b/c how he plays the game is just petty...and it could possibly cost wspace a seat at the table.
@ Gnaw Stop using the word "eviction" when u describe what chitsa did/does..look up the definition of the word evict
evict (third-person singular simple present evicts, present participle evicting, simple past and past participle evicted) 1. (transitive) To expel (one or more people) from their property; to force (one or more people) to move out
The word you should be using is vandalise
vandalise (third-person singular simple present vandalises, present participle vandalising, simple past and past participle vandalised) 1. To needlessly destroy other peopleGÇÖs property or public property; to commit vandalism.
We have never evicted and settled any system that forced the prior tenants to abandon it...we are mercenaries...look it up
mercenary (plural mercenaries) 1. A person employed to fight in an armed conflict who is not a member of the state or military group for which they are fighting and whose prime or sole motivation is private gain.
We also vandalise systems for fun and "in the name of good fights"...also for reasons of smack talk etc...
Stop whining about what you think we do b/c the words you use to describe it are wrong...this is a game and there is a plethora of different ways to play it...just because we don't play it like you doesn't make it wrong...and vice versa
The bottom line is that for the most part each of these guys have reasonable views on the changes and direction to take wspace...the more we have in there the better off we as a wormhole community will be...put your pettiness aside and vote for all 5...we need all the help we can get.
In WH-space the effiction is the state of destroying or attempting to destroy all assets including the towers. This will cause most wh corps to leave that mentioned system and when they will rebuild it happens in most cases in a different system.
If you think you are not evicting someone when you destroy all their assets and their home. Then you only consider that to soften your own concious. Even doh you can tell yourself that it is not an eviction, in most cases it will have that effect.
Considering otherwise is either a lag of knowledge about whspace and its people or like i said earlier a way to justify your own actions.
Vote for WH space
Vote for James Arget |
Castor Troyy
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 18:49:00 -
[47] - Quote
JoostSkywalker wrote:
In WH-space the effiction is the state of destroying or attempting to destroy all assets including the towers. This will cause most wh corps to leave that mentioned system and when they will rebuild it happens in most cases in a different system.
If you think you are not evicting someone when you destroy all their assets and their home. Then you only consider that to soften your own concious. Even doh you can tell yourself that it is not an eviction, in most cases it will have that effect.
Considering otherwise is either a lag of knowledge about whspace and its people or like i said earlier a way to justify your own actions.
Vote for WH space
Vote for James Arget
lol..come one dude...you know better than that..you know they logged those carriers in, w/ most of their T3s etc...if you don't want to recognize that...them i guess its your lack of knowledge about wspace. These guys are alive and well and building back the few ships that that SD'd [few in comparison to what they saved/lost]
I don't have to justify my actions to anyone..neither do you...my only point was my view on evictions...maybe you have a different opinion about it than i do..that's ok too...but enought with the QQsand boo hoos...these guys werent "evicted" they were invaded got some assests destroyed. They are still in wspace and moving on...you should too...
As far as the topic of this thread goes....
whspace needs as many seats at the table as we can get..just going from the number of endorsments I saw..Chitsa had more than all of the other 4 [im not sure what the final results were..so if i am incorrect sorry in advance]
...hell..I endorsed Ayeson b/c chitsa already had the 200 he needed...the whole point of this is to get as many guys who can be a voice for us no matter what you think about how they play the game or what alliance flag they fly under...they can all do good things for wspace...they are all good candidates..they all have a pretty good knowledge of whspace...
you guys that dont vote for all 5 could end up shooting whspace in the foot...take a step back and read what the posts say what the ideas are and dont look at the author...w/ the exception of some of the topics as far as specifics go...most are all in line w/ the general direction whspace needs to go...and the changes we as a wh community want
EDIT: corrected quotes |
Frying Doom
2291
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:06:00 -
[48] - Quote
Castor Troyy wrote:
you guys that dont vote for all 5 could end up shooting whspace in the foot...take a step back and read what the posts say what the ideas are and dont look at the author...w/ the exception of some of the topics as far as specifics go...most are all in line w/ the general direction whspace needs to go...and the changes we as a wh community want
EDIT: corrected quotes
Still better than the wormhole dwellers that are appearing in GD, saying that they are not voting at all. Vote Now! My recommendations are:-á 1.James Arget 2.Ayeson 3.Nathan Jameson 4.Cipreh 5.Chitsa Jason 6. Malcanis 7. Mike Azariah 8. Ripard Teg 9. Mangala Solaris 10. Ali Aras 11. Roc Wieler And remember not voting is the same as voting for Null. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |