| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 108 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 25 post(s) |

Calathorn Virpio
Golden Construction Inc. Legacy Rising
300
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 02:47:00 -
[2461] - Quote
Tonto Auri wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:Im still wondering what changed between now and the devblog a few months ago that stated Amarr battleships were "mostly fine" CCP Rise was hired.
this, this sums it up perfectly
new blood means they have to screw up everything BRING BACK THE JUKEBOX
I attended the School of Hard Nocks, the only place you will ever learn anything of value, sadly most Americans never meet the requirments to attend
|

Calathorn Virpio
Golden Construction Inc. Legacy Rising
300
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 02:49:00 -
[2462] - Quote
Tank Talbot wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:Tank Talbot wrote:LuisWu wrote:Next time I read the "we care about the feedback" bulIsh*t I will laugh so loud that my neighbours are going to kick me out from the building.
Lots of good ideas in this thread, not a single elaborated dev response. I am counseling myself to trust that they are reading, that they are debating what to do amongst themselves, and formulating a response. I want to think they do care. This rather than them sitting around angry with the player base, not caring what we think or want, and simply planning to force through their vision regardless and under the opinion that we will adjust or just go away. Time will tell. PS: YES, I am still hoping they will make my Abaddon lol. Except, the changes are all Rise's pet project, and Rise is the one monitoring this thread, so if we dont like it, and the rest of the balancing teama sks "so what do they think, any suggestyions?" his resposne wll be "they love it, they cant wait for the changes, theys ay its the best theyve ever seen", and no one will bother to check because :why would they:. I am not going to demonize the guy. Let's give him and other employees the benefit of the doubt and see what they have to say. I'll be at Amarr applying holy fire err... shooting arty at the statue with the rest of you otherwise.
lol
i don't have projectile skills....guess i'll be plunking rail rounds at it BRING BACK THE JUKEBOX
I attended the School of Hard Nocks, the only place you will ever learn anything of value, sadly most Americans never meet the requirments to attend
|

Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
141
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 03:51:00 -
[2463] - Quote
I'm finishing T2 rails myself. **** Amarr BS. The two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. ---áHarlan Ellison |

Calathorn Virpio
Golden Construction Inc. Legacy Rising
300
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 04:02:00 -
[2464] - Quote
Tonto Auri wrote:I'm finishing T2 rails myself. **** Amarr BS.
rokh FTW BRING BACK THE JUKEBOX
I attended the School of Hard Nocks, the only place you will ever learn anything of value, sadly most Americans never meet the requirments to attend
|

Avald Midular
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
112
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 04:13:00 -
[2465] - Quote
I have yet to hear anyone support the insanity that is Mega Beams being near the same cap draw as Tachyons (5.8 versus 6.1 cap per second for a full rack with new Lg Energy Wpn tweaks).
Are we all in agreement that the only thing more ridiculous than weapons drawing this much cap is that Mega Beams cost the same as Tachs? |

Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
26
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 07:35:00 -
[2466] - Quote
Tank Talbot wrote:As a rookie pilot, developing a skill plan that will allow me to not only sit a battleship but fly it well, the proposed changes to the Amarr line up are worrisome. Should I have started with a differing race for faster access to better ships for L4 and PVP brawls?... NO patriot of Amarr should be be required to bring farty poop sticks rather than holy fire to divine battle for want of capacitor...
As a fellow Amarrian, I understand where you are coming from. How can I, The Great Beast, the very form of maleficence, conscience foregoing unholy fire for fitting ... ugh ....
However, that is exactly what I recommend you to do. Seriously. Don't wed yourself to Amarr hoping that the devs wake up one day and see the light, no matter how divine your divine light is. Their wakeup call could be 1 year from now, or more than likely, never. Do what I did. Train up other guns and racial hulls. I personally can now use hybrids and artillery, and fly all three of the inferior heathen race's ships.
And let me tell you this. When I first fit my first caldari ship, I almost fell out of my chair laughing at how easy it was to do. But then I bought a gallente talos the other day, and it made fitting a caldari ship seem like a joke. I made literally NO COMPROMISES with fitting this ship. No ancillary current routers. No powergrid modules in the low slots. No cpu modules. Nothing. I was able to fit 3 large shield extenders in the mids (something I couldn't come close to in another ship at my skill level), fill the lows with dps modules, fill the rigs with whatever I wanted, and even use a drone bay to boot.
Just do it. |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
320
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 11:23:00 -
[2467] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:I actually do PVP against battleships, and with battleships. I can tell you I have seen arty Abaddons pretty recently (as in within the last 2-3 months). I haven't seen an arty baddon killmail for while, but fine.
And for what reason do you use arties on your baddon ? Because of cap or because of alpha ?...
And why don't you use Maelstrom in the first place ? I suspect it's because of the resist bonus...
Would you really use beam baddon instead of arties if cap and fitting weren't a problem ? I seriously doubt it... |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
126
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 11:30:00 -
[2468] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I actually do PVP against battleships, and with battleships. I can tell you I have seen arty Abaddons pretty recently (as in within the last 2-3 months). I haven't seen an arty baddon killmail for while, but fine. And for what reason do you use arties on your baddon ? Because of cap or because of alpha ?... And why don't you use Maelstrom in the first place ? I suspect it's because of the resist bonus... Would you really use beam baddon instead of arties if cap and fitting weren't a problem ? I seriously doubt it...
Would I actually fit my own racial guns if I had a real reason to, instead of distastefully fitting Artillery?
Hmm, lemme think about that. Yeah, pretty sure everyone would.
They use arty on the Abaddon because arty is brutally overpowered, and our weapons are brutally underpowered, both by comparison and in a vacuum.
Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Begrezen
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 12:51:00 -
[2469] - Quote
The man who thought about changing the geddon to this crap should be fired... Sad you just care about big blobby fights... |

Aducat Ragnarson
Cult of the Black Goat Dark Taboo
126
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 13:15:00 -
[2470] - Quote
Begrezen wrote:The man who thought about changing the geddon to this crap should be fired... Sad you just care about big blobby fights...
Hm lets take a look... Longrange neuts and drones for the geddon. Yeah this totally looks like a big gang ship, where a couple of more kilometers on the neuts and drones are a big factor in the engagement, as opposed to small gangs where long range neuts would be total crap to catch kiters and drones which can apply their dps even to smaller targets. Yeah the geddon changes were made by someone who cares about big blobby fights. |

Drunken Bum
272
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 13:47:00 -
[2471] - Quote
Tonto Auri wrote:Awesome suggestions here Why is it that a random players suggestions are way, way better then what ccp has proposed? How has this ship balancing gone from so good to so terrible. Spare some change?-á |

Avald Midular
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
113
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 14:04:00 -
[2472] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Bouh Revetoile wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I actually do PVP against battleships, and with battleships. I can tell you I have seen arty Abaddons pretty recently (as in within the last 2-3 months). I haven't seen an arty baddon killmail for while, but fine. And for what reason do you use arties on your baddon ? Because of cap or because of alpha ?... And why don't you use Maelstrom in the first place ? I suspect it's because of the resist bonus... Would you really use beam baddon instead of arties if cap and fitting weren't a problem ? I seriously doubt it... Would I actually fit my own racial guns if I had a real reason to, instead of distastefully fitting Artillery? Hmm, lemme think about that. Yeah, pretty sure everyone would. They use arty on the Abaddon because arty is brutally overpowered, and our weapons are brutally underpowered, both by comparison and in a vacuum.
They're using them for the resists and it's probably easier to fit an armor tank than on a Mael. Either way, they're not fitting a PG mod and going around using the supposedly OP Tachyon's in the blob, so what problem are we pretending to solve by keeping them, and mega-beams to a lesser extent, impossible to fit flexibly like every other weapon? |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
320
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 15:22:00 -
[2473] - Quote
Avald Midular wrote:They're using them for the resists and it's probably easier to fit an armor tank than on a Mael. Either way, they're not fitting a PG mod and going around using the supposedly OP Tachyon's in the blob (with the 25% ship bonus), so what problem are we pretending to solve by keeping them, and mega-beams to a lesser extent, impossible to fit flexibly like every other weapon? The problem of the living room of railguns. |

Drake Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
180
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 15:24:00 -
[2474] - Quote
I still don't understand the logic behind the apoc becoming the attack Bs, isn't that more the role of a ship that's, suppose to get close because of it's bonuses (aka geddon) instead of one that has it's bonuses in applying damage at a range . The title isn't the cause of my dissatisfaction, but the signature radius and speed that comes with it. "The homogenization of EVE began when Gallente and Caldari started sharing a weapon system."-Vermaak Doe |

Pelea Ming
Prostitutes Are Always Wlling
234
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 16:02:00 -
[2475] - Quote
Drake Doe wrote:I still don't understand the logic behind the apoc becoming the attack Bs, isn't that more the role of a ship that's, suppose to get close because of it's bonuses (aka geddon) instead of one that has it's bonuses in applying damage at a range . The title isn't the cause of my dissatisfaction, but the signature radius and speed that comes with it. actually, no, the role of Combat hull from all of these tiericides is being kept to the "Brawler" hulls, those meant to go in close. Your Attack role hulls are meant to make use of range (and at least on the non-BS) some maneuverability and such. I'd recommend an MJD on the Apoc to help with this aspect. |

Drake Doe
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
181
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 16:14:00 -
[2476] - Quote
Pelea Ming wrote:Drake Doe wrote:I still don't understand the logic behind the apoc becoming the attack Bs, isn't that more the role of a ship that's, suppose to get close because of it's bonuses (aka geddon) instead of one that has it's bonuses in applying damage at a range . The title isn't the cause of my dissatisfaction, but the signature radius and speed that comes with it. actually, no, the role of Combat hull from all of these tiericides is being kept to the "Brawler" hulls, those meant to go in close. Your Attack role hulls are meant to make use of range (and at least on the non-BS) some maneuverability and such. I'd recommend an MJD on the Apoc to help with this aspect. Oh I think I see your point, attack hulls are meant to dictate range better while combat hulls are meant to be dedicated brawlers (with a few exceptions). "The homogenization of EVE began when Gallente and Caldari started sharing a weapon system."-Vermaak Doe |

Tank Talbot
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
115
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 18:12:00 -
[2477] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:
Where in Satan questions the sanctity of marriage while attempting to lead the Righteous astray and into embracing the methodology of the heretic rather than fixing the Amarr Battleship inadequacies...
Even heaven and hell are in agreement that there is a problem! You see this CCP?
***
From my perspective, the issue boils down to a desire for a worthy, more cap stable, mission runner and general combatant (why we have combat role ships right?) to compete with the other races' ship line up rather than being stuck with what amounts to "just a hellcat," a pure sniper, and a drone ship. Right now, it feels like there is a big gaping hole in the Amarr line to most posters and they don't want to be forced to cross train to fill it as the other races don't have to. My solution was to "Hyperion-ize" the Abaddon, or to make it a more versatile and cap stable straight up brawler by: dropping a high slot for a mid, increasing the damage bonus to compensate, keeping 7 turrets and perhaps 2 launchers, adding more drone bandwidth and bay, and revamping laser cap costs to keep fiting reasonable for what you field. Other suggestions have been posted. I don't claim mine is the best but it at least starts to address the root problem. We want options to fly whom we like reasonably and not be forced into heathen hulls by default. |

Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
27
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 19:22:00 -
[2478] - Quote
Tank Talbot wrote: Even heaven and hell are in agreement that there is a problem! You see this CCP?
Be not deceived, for the Great Beast shall not be mocked. Again I say unto ye, embrace the path of the slave, the heathen, and the heretic races, for it is with their own methods and devices that they shall be brought to heel (and correspondingly, to hell). For the inferior races contain within themselves the seeds of their own destruction.
So shall it be written. So shall it be done. |

Tank Talbot
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
116
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 19:55:00 -
[2479] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Tank Talbot wrote: Even heaven and hell are in agreement that there is a problem! You see this CCP?
Be not deceived, for the Great Beast shall not be mocked. Again I say unto ye, embrace the path of the slave, the heathen, and the heretic races, for it is with their own methods and devices that they shall be brought to heel (and correspondingly, to hell). For the inferior races contain within themselves the seeds of their own destruction. So shall it be written. So shall it be done.
Pfft... sell out. You just want to protect the "hell"-cat for "your" own ends, leaving us stuck with a null-coaster, rather than see Amarr gain a useful and worthwhile ship for everyone that brings balance to the empire ship options, ends the argument, and leaves mostly satisfied capsuleers all around. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
130
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 19:58:00 -
[2480] - Quote
Tank Talbot wrote:Beast of Revelations wrote:Tank Talbot wrote: Even heaven and hell are in agreement that there is a problem! You see this CCP?
Be not deceived, for the Great Beast shall not be mocked. Again I say unto ye, embrace the path of the slave, the heathen, and the heretic races, for it is with their own methods and devices that they shall be brought to heel (and correspondingly, to hell). For the inferior races contain within themselves the seeds of their own destruction. So shall it be written. So shall it be done. Pfft... sell out. You just want to protect the "hell"-cat for "your" own ends, leaving us stuck with a null-coaster, rather than see Amarr gain a useful and worthwhile ship for everyone that brings balance to the empire ship options, ends the argument, and leaves mostly satisfied capsuleers all around.
Uh, you misunderstand him greatly. He is suggesting we abandon the Amarr battleship lineup entirely to show them that it's not a good change. A strike of sorts.
But since they don't really rebalance things based on what's used and what isn't, (or a few things would have been done differently, that's for sure), I don't see this as likely to succeed. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Tank Talbot
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
116
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 20:24:00 -
[2481] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Tank Talbot wrote:Beast of Revelations wrote:Tank Talbot wrote: Even heaven and hell are in agreement that there is a problem! You see this CCP?
Be not deceived, for the Great Beast shall not be mocked. Again I say unto ye, embrace the path of the slave, the heathen, and the heretic races, for it is with their own methods and devices that they shall be brought to heel (and correspondingly, to hell). For the inferior races contain within themselves the seeds of their own destruction. So shall it be written. So shall it be done. Pfft... sell out. You just want to protect the "hell"-cat for "your" own ends, leaving us stuck with a null-coaster, rather than see Amarr gain a useful and worthwhile ship for everyone that brings balance to the empire ship options, ends the argument, and leaves mostly satisfied capsuleers all around. Uh, you misunderstand him greatly. He is suggesting we abandon the Amarr battleship lineup entirely to show them that it's not a good change. A strike of sorts. But since they don't really rebalance things based on what's used and what isn't, (or a few things would have been done differently, that's for sure), I don't see this as likely to succeed.
I get that actually. Some of the banter is meant tongue in cheek (yes, I really want a better Abaddon and was fighting for it, using the post to my own ends, regardless of truth LOL. Please forgive me that, perhaps a crime of love and politics.) But you also express one of my worries. People giving up on Amarr battleships (and their other ships) because they have been designed out of too many roles leaving everyone else to do everything better for less investment. Talk about killing some rookie's play enthusiasm after skilling for months only to find no one wants their boats along for the show and they are not competitive. How to get new Amarr FW pilots and those that actually fly Amarr? Once people give up on a ship line it will take years to recover any momentum on several fronts. It shouldn't be allowed to happen. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
130
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 20:38:00 -
[2482] - Quote
Quote:I get that actually. Some of the banter is meant tongue in cheek (yes, I really want a better Abaddon and was fighting for it, using the post to my own ends, regardless of truth LOL. Please forgive me that, perhaps a crime of love and politics.) But you also express one of my worries. People giving up on Amarr battleships (and their other ships) because they have been designed out of too many roles leaving everyone else to do everything better for less investment. Talk about killing some rookie's play enthusiasm after skilling for months only to find no one wants their boats along for the show and they are not competitive. How to get new Amarr FW pilots and those that actually fly Amarr? Once people give up on a ship line it will take years to recover any momentum on several fronts. It shouldn't be allowed to happen.
Wait, people fly things above cruiser size in FW for things besides the final system bash? O-o I've been gone too long in that case. Also, for whatever reason, the Amarr side of FW is... to put it nicely, abominable. But everything is what you make of it, I suppose.
Like I said, you have little worry of this happening. The hardcore Amarr pilots will do what they always do; kick ass with the ships that still work.
Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Nariya Kentaya
Always Negative.
552
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 20:42:00 -
[2483] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:I get that actually. Some of the banter is meant tongue in cheek (yes, I really want a better Abaddon and was fighting for it, using the post to my own ends, regardless of truth LOL. Please forgive me that, perhaps a crime of love and politics.) But you also express one of my worries. People giving up on Amarr battleships (and their other ships) because they have been designed out of too many roles leaving everyone else to do everything better for less investment. Talk about killing some rookie's play enthusiasm after skilling for months only to find no one wants their boats along for the show and they are not competitive. How to get new Amarr FW pilots and those that actually fly Amarr? Once people give up on a ship line it will take years to recover any momentum on several fronts. It shouldn't be allowed to happen. Wait, people fly things above cruiser size in FW for things besides the final system bash? O-o I've been gone too long in that case. Also, for whatever reason, the Amarr side of FW is... to put it nicely, abominable. But everything is what you make of it, I suppose. Like I said, you have little worry of this happening. The hardcore Amarr pilots will do what they always do; kick ass with the ships that still work. so they wont be kicking ass at all above cruiser level unless they can kil their opponent in the first 30 seconds of the figth or before they warp? since their mids will be filled with cap batteries to comepnsate for the nonexistent cap and laser cap bonuses, and if you fit tackle, your going to have a hard time keeping your guns up. |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
320
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 20:45:00 -
[2484] - Quote
In fact, I see more amarr and minmatar BS in FW than gallente BS outside of undock. Not that my point of view is relevant, but still. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
130
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 21:05:00 -
[2485] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:In fact, I see more amarr and minmatar BS in FW than gallente BS outside of undock. Not that my point of view is relevant, but still.
No, no it's not relevant.
Amarr BS in FW exist to station bash. That is what they are for. Literally never seen one aside from that, cruiser and/or frigate gangs serve much better.
Quote: so they wont be kicking ass at all above cruiser level unless they can kil their opponent in the first 30 seconds of the figth or before they warp? since their mids will be filled with cap batteries to comepnsate for the nonexistent cap and laser cap bonuses, and if you fit tackle, your going to have a hard time keeping your guns up.
Not disagreeing with you, but it's not specifically that bad. My statement was more of a testament to the stubborn spirit of the Amarr player. Much like the props I give to the Caldari players as well, hanging onto their ships despite awful design changes, and in the case of the Caldari, hideous ship models.
Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

dagley
Reverberation Inc
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 22:23:00 -
[2486] - Quote
More to the point the geddon has had its current role since the start of the game so why change it now?? Just change the domi to a vamp/neut tier 1 bs with good drone capabilities. if you want a geddon with vamp/neut now just get a bhaal???
Plus the apoc needs more of a boost to rival the new tier 3 battlecruisers as the oracle can fit 8 tachs the apoc can't without powergrid mods. Plus does less DPS and less range so what's the point for more isk?
Abaddon is fine as it is people should stop whining as it handles like a bathtub of water in an ocean of glue.
Pro tip to CCP: If it isn't broke don't fix it!!!
Or if it is broke actually fix it properly! |

Kenshi Hanshin
Karl XII's Dragoner Apocalypse Now.
69
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 22:48:00 -
[2487] - Quote
dagley wrote:More to the point the geddon has had its current role since the start of the game so why change it now?? Just change the domi to a vamp/neut tier 1 bs with good drone capabilities. if you want a geddon with vamp/neut now just get a bhaal???
Plus the apoc needs more of a boost to rival the new tier 3 battlecruisers as the oracle can fit 8 tachs the apoc can't without powergrid mods. Plus does less DPS and less range so what's the point for more isk?
Abaddon is fine as it is people should stop whining as it handles like a bathtub of water in an ocean of glue.
Pro tip to CCP: If it isn't broke don't fix it!!!
Or if it is broke actually fix it properly! +10
Kinda fascinating how that is working out...
Maybe the CCP guys like flying Minmatar. Hate Caldari and Amarr. And decided to help their in-game personal-account allies the gallente. Seems like a conflict of interest to me. Also raises the question of their professionalism.
SInce it is finals weeks for many people, CCP here are your grades over the last year:
Retribution Expansion 85% or 'B'
(Reason, didn't like the HML nerf when a change of missile mechanics would be common sense first step)
Retribution Devs 90% or 'A'
Odyssey Expansion 50% or 'F'
(Reason, ship 'reblancing' is bullshit. Winmatar and Gallente are buffed. Amarr and Caldari are shafted to put it gently. UI changes and stargate-cinematic are good. Again missile changes avoid the glaring issue that you seem to be ignoring in a biased manner)
Odyssey Devs 15% or 'F'
Reason: The only points being awarded are for UI and stargate-cinematic changes.
Any of my fellow Eve Players disagree with my grading rubric? |

Nariya Kentaya
Always Negative.
552
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 22:52:00 -
[2488] - Quote
dagley wrote:More to the point the geddon has had its current role since the start of the game so why change it now?? Just change the domi to a vamp/neut tier 1 bs with good drone capabilities. if you want a geddon with vamp/neut now just get a bhaal???
Plus the apoc needs more of a boost to rival the new tier 3 battlecruisers as the oracle can fit 8 tachs the apoc can't without powergrid mods. Plus does less DPS and less range so what's the point for more isk?
Abaddon is fine as it is people should stop whining as it handles like a bathtub of water in an ocean of glue.
Pro tip to CCP: If it isn't broke don't fix it!!!
Or if it is broke actually fix it properly! they wont change the domi, because they want the AMARR to have the vamp/neut/missile+lasers/drone boat.
and ya know what? if this was debated for a few months prior, and the community came to a concensus it was ok, i woudlnt eb mad.
what im amd about was that pre-CCP Rise, they ahd stated that amarr BS were fine, that they werent going to do anything other than minor quality-of-life changes to the amarr lineup for odyssey,a dnt hat if they felt the need fro a disruption battleship, it would be amde into a 4th hull, that was in a DEV BLOG. not even a month and a half later, CCP Rise decides he doesnt like the geddon. |

Tank Talbot
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
119
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 23:34:00 -
[2489] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Wait, people fly things above cruiser size in FW for things besides the final system bash? O-o I've been gone too long in that case. Also, for whatever reason, the Amarr side of FW is... to put it nicely, abominable. But everything is what you make of it, I suppose. Like I said, you have little worry of this happening. The hardcore Amarr pilots will do what they always do; kick ass with the ships that still work.
I wasn't looking to imply people were flying battleships in FW. I was trying to make a point about graduation. Why even start out as Amarr or think about taking their side when you will end up with sucky ships at the top end after months of training when you want to do other things too like run L4 for better income to support yourself... |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
130
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 00:08:00 -
[2490] - Quote
Tank Talbot wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Wait, people fly things above cruiser size in FW for things besides the final system bash? O-o I've been gone too long in that case. Also, for whatever reason, the Amarr side of FW is... to put it nicely, abominable. But everything is what you make of it, I suppose. Like I said, you have little worry of this happening. The hardcore Amarr pilots will do what they always do; kick ass with the ships that still work. I wasn't looking to imply people were flying battleships in FW. I was trying to make a point about graduation. Why even start out as Amarr or think about taking their side when you will end up with sucky ships at the top end after months of training when you want to do other things too like run L4 for better income to support yourself...
Why, indeed...
If I recall, some time ago one of the Dev blogs on WoW (yes, I know I said That-Which-Shall-Not-Be-Named, but bear with me here), was that above all else, they wanted to avoid people feeling like they "lost the game at the character creation screen".
Granted, you can cross train in this game, but the point still stands. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 108 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |