| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
keepiru
   |
Posted - 2005.09.23 20:01:00 -
[1]
25m kg for 1600 plates.
-------------
Axe the Thorax's drone bay.
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.09.23 20:06:00 -
[2]
7.5m for 800s
1.5m for 400s
-------------
Axe the Thorax's drone bay.
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.09.23 20:11:00 -
[3]
750k kg for 200s
150k kg for 100s
75k kp for 50s, lol
that should be all of them.
any official word on this?
-------------
Axe the Thorax's drone bay.
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.09.23 20:15:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: FalloutBoy
the problem is this nerfs all the cruisers that need speed to do thier job (Rax mainly) and leaves ship like a maller who sit at medium range anyway not nearly as effected. I agree the 1600 plate was too uber, but tbh it wasn't going to be much of a problem anymore since the rax couldn't use it effectively anymore. I say let the mk2 changes happen and see what happens
Too many people screaming about double-1600 mallers?
dunno. Not sure this is totally needed, or that nthis is the right way to go. But its an idea.
Did they change this with a server hotfix? cause i sparred cruisers and BCs all last night, with plates and all, and i cant say i noticed any major penalty.
-------------
Axe the Thorax's drone bay.
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.09.23 20:20:00 -
[5]
well, my 1600-plate maller now goes 345 with an AB II, getting roughly 75% speed boost.
I guess, now plate size has more factors than just what the biggest plate you can whack on.
small plate = less hp, neglibible effect on speed
medium plate = med hp, appreciable effect on speed
oversize plate = loads of hp, nearly impossible to dictate range (1600 on cruisers)
That is, ofc, if they removed the set % penalties. But then nanofibers wouldnt have a reason to exist.
-------------
Axe the Thorax's drone bay.
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.09.23 20:22:00 -
[6]
I think perhaps 800 and 1600 weights are a little high. But its the very 1st values we see, no telling if this will go through to tq at all.
More testing i guess.
-------------
Axe the Thorax's drone bay.
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.09.23 20:23:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Alex Harumichi
Have they removed the -10% speed penalty now that they've done this? Would make sense, I think.
Not right now. Atm all plates of a size have the same mass.
Imo plates with less hp should apply all mass, but i guess as a 1st change its good enough for now.
Now if we could get a dev to say a word about it...
-------------
Axe the Thorax's drone bay.
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.09.23 20:26:00 -
[8]
Very early phases i think.
I award this plate mass project "alpha" status. 
Less mass related to hp, and no set % penalties would make sense.
-------------
Axe the Thorax's drone bay.
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.09.23 20:28:00 -
[9]
Edited by: keepiru on 23/09/2005 20:29:15
Originally by: FalloutBoy
Originally by: Alex Harumichi
Now if we could get a dev to say a word about it...
they anounced thed stealth bomber unnerfing first to soften us up 
Dastardly! They give with one hand and take away with the other
-------------
Axe the Thorax's drone bay.
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.09.23 22:19:00 -
[10]
Originally by: noonehere
I see a problem here....
Wouldn it weigh less to plate a small ship with xxx mm armour
than to plate a BIG ship with xxx mm armour.
Hrm... interesting point.
Perhaps some mass x m of signature formula?
or some straight % of original mass penalty?
-------------
Axe the Thorax's drone bay.
|
| |
|