Good lord please don't sticky this one you're crowding up our think space.

Aside from that, +1 to adding extra boosters. And the cost increase doesn't seem big enough for me to complain about it so, not bad.

Edit: Oh my god you stickied it.

Can you give us a hint of when you're going to balance out ASB's as well?

Bit off topic, my bad.

dual ASB hawks supreme

that is because idk,you are bad and you try to solo them?the same thing you could say about maelstroms or 10mn hawks with c-type booster and super expensive fitts

Hey guys, I expect this will be the last sticky I place there for Odyssey 1.0. Smaller change, although I couldn't find anywhere better to put it.

We're making some changes to the availability of Navy Cap boosters, adding Navy versions of all the remaining cap booster sizes and slightly adjusting the costs of the 100s and 150s to bring them into line with the rest.

We're adding Navy 25, 50 and 75 boosters available in all the FW LP stores. These should be especially useful for users of small and medium ASBs.

We are also increasing the LP and isk costs of the 100 and 150 sizes, with 100s rising from 100LP and 100000isk to 250LP and 250000isk, and 150s rising from 250LP and 250000isk to 375LP and 375000isk. This change brings them in line with the scaling applied to the costs of the other Navy cap boosters.

All of these changes are on SISI now.

>last sticky before odyssey
>haven't touched Torpedoes

I give up

We're not touching torpedoes for Odyssey, we never said we were.

In fact Torpedoes are nowhere near the top of our backlog, since they're very strong in their current state.

We're not touching torpedoes for Odyssey, we never said we were.

In fact Torpedoes are nowhere near the top of our backlog, since they're very strong on stealth bombers only in their current state.

We're not touching torpedoes for Odyssey, we never said we were.

In fact Torpedoes are nowhere near the top of our backlog, since they're very strong in their current state.

I agree i think the problem with them is that HAMS make them look worse than they are ... same range why?????

So Fozzie when are we getting the TE/TD/TC changes for missiles?
And presumably a missile re-balance to go with it
Things like
- rocket range being too high
- rocket explosion radius being far too low
- HAMS battleship like range being nerfed down to cruiser range ... i.e. lasers are meant too have better range.

Hey guys, I expect this will be the last sticky I place there for Odyssey 1.0. Smaller change, although I couldn't find anywhere better to put it.

We're making some changes to the availability of Navy Cap boosters, adding Navy versions of all the remaining cap booster sizes and slightly adjusting the costs of the 100s and 150s to bring them into line with the rest.

We're adding Navy 25, 50 and 75 boosters available in all the FW LP stores. These should be especially useful for users of small and medium ASBs.

We are also increasing the LP and isk costs of the 100 and 150 sizes, with 100s rising from 100LP and 100000isk to 250LP and 250000isk, and 150s rising from 250LP and 250000isk to 375LP and 375000isk. This change brings them in line with the scaling applied to the costs of the other Navy cap boosters.

All of these changes are on SISI now.

yes cos 40km on an unbonused ship makes sense for a short range weapon system

Can you give us a hint of when you're going to balance out ASB's as well?

Bit off topic, my bad.

Please fix the Cap Booster System instead of piling more sh*t on top.

Standardize the system to use a certain charge size instead of having a whole bunch of garbage charges.

Small Cap Booster II / 1 Navy 400 or 200
Medium Cap Boosters / 1 800 sometimes Navy
Heavy Cap Boosters / 800's sometimes Navy

There is no reason to go down, only ASB's use some of the smaller ones. That makes only the largest you can fit good for cap boosters and the smallest good for ASB's.

How about instead for T2 Cap Boosters you do it like this.

4 / 200's for Smalls and 5 / 200's for Navy
4 / 400's for Mediums and 5 / 200's for Navy
4 / 800's for Heavies and 5 / 800's for Navy

You can't fit larger charges in smaller boosters and cycle time decreases for higher meta boosters to T2.

For ASB Small / Medium uses 200's, Large 400's, XL 800's. Just make them load the number of cycles you plan to fit on now with this update, no one will use anything but the best anyway so standardize it.

Please get rid of 25's, 75's, 50's, 100's and 150's and while your at it 50mm and 100mm plates and buff small shield extenders.

These useless modules and ammo do nothing but clutter menus, confuse newbies and get reprocessed by vets.