Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
134
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:52:00 -
[31] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Delen Ormand wrote:Ace Uoweme wrote:Torakenat wrote:What facts? Projections are based on theory and are at best educated guesses. A fact is a tangible idea that can be proven. Since, you cannot prove what the future holds for either product without living it, your statement is false and incohorrent. The fact is tether a new product to an established product and most will fail. That's.. not really a fact. Ask Coca-Cola that lessen when they tried to market new Coke as Coke. Name was there, the taste wasn't, and consumers were irate ( the Cola war of the 80s).
That.. still doesn't make it a fact.
|

DRGaius Baltar
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:55:00 -
[32] - Quote
Niko medes wrote:Give it time. Beta is a beta and it has barely been out of launch for a month.
Hell it isn't even in effect in Null yet, lets see what comes of it then.
My friend in the console market time is everything, people get bored quick and there's a lot of competiton out there so CCP cant afford be dicking around for another 4 to 5 yrs on one game trying to figure out how DUST will work. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
664
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Soundwave had a grand vision for integrating flying in space and first person for Eve and DUST is whats leftover after the budget cuts.
From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |

Lost True
Paradise project
2336
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:57:00 -
[34] - Quote
One thing that many ppl don't understand is that abandoning Dust now will not help EVE at all.
Because the money is already invested. And even if we don't need this console crap, we should hope that Dust will be successful. Because if it's not, it'll be a huge money loss for CCP, and EVE will be developing even slower. If not closed. in 2007 i've thought it's a sci-fi simulator, not an "e-sports" game. I'm not a teenager, how would i like it much?
|

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 06:57:00 -
[35] - Quote
Anyway, in the world of people who make projections of this temporal prison we call earth, facts can be derived from present circumstances. DUST is a drain on EVE development and the only reason you aren't angry at it (as you were with WiS) is because your earth lords didn't tell you to be (Mitannit, RaindowJudenIII, whoever, Redditcat).
You know it's true |

Cecil Montague
PCG Enterprises THE ROYAL NAVY
6
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:07:00 -
[36] - Quote
So far I have seen no proof of anything. Unless you have access to CCP's accounts you cannot know how much money Dust is making let alone conjecture that it is "bleeding" EvE dry. People have cited anecdotal evidence about previous similar experiments that aren't actually very similar, mainly due to the fact that linking two different genres on two different platforms into one game world has never been done before.
CCP is not spending your money on DUST. They are spending theirs. The money they earnt by renting access to their game to the players of EvE. Now if they neglect EvE and do not evolve the game to your satisfaction then by all means make your voice heard. We've just had a major (free) expansion and not once has someone said "Odyssey is crap, it must be Dust's fault" in this thread though. So how about we give it a chance.
Edit: Proof read next time Cecil
"There is no such thing as an effective segment of Totality" - Bruce Lee: The only man with a Chuck Norris killmail. |

DRGaius Baltar
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:08:00 -
[37] - Quote
Lost True wrote:One thing that many ppl don't understand is that abandoning Dust now will not help EVE at all.
Because the money is already invested. And even if we don't need this console crap, we should hope that Dust will be successful. Because if it's not, it'll be a huge money loss for CCP, and EVE will be developing even slower. If not closed.
Not necessarily, as long as there is a constant revenue stream it wont die |

Xinivrae
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
417
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:09:00 -
[38] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:If there's just a few people on the forums speaking out against it, it really doesn't matter. They say only 10% of the population can think for themselves .. but in EVE I think the number is much smaller. When DUST fails and it will.... you can think of what EVE could have been. It's not like I'm the first person in 6 years to ask CCP to rethink their trajectory, possibly the only one who still bothers.
Quote:DUST is a drain on EVE development and the only reason you aren't angry at it (as you were with WiS) is because your earth lords didn't tell you to be (Mitannit, RaindowJudenIII, whoever, Redditcat).
You know it's true Ah yes, the enlightened shepherd has come to awaken us sheeple from our ignorance. Clearly if only we were capable of actually thinking, we would be high-fiving each other and telling op how right they are. |

DRGaius Baltar
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:10:00 -
[39] - Quote
Cecil Montague wrote:So far I have seen no proof of anything. Unless you have access to CCP's accounts you cannot know how much money Dust is making let alone conjecture that it is "bleeding" EvE dry. People have cited anecdotal evidence about previous similar experiments that aren't actually very similar, mainly due to the fact that linking two different genres on two different platforms into one game world has never been done before.
CCP is not spending your money on DUST. They are spending theirs. The money they earnt by renting access to their game to the players of EvE. Now if they neglect EvE and do not evolve the game to your satisfaction then by all means make your voice heard. We've just had a major (free) expansion and not once has someone said "Odyssey is crap, it must be Dust's fault" in this thread though. So how about we give it a chance.
Edit: Proof read next time Cecil
Well i'll tell you i sure as hell wouldn't pay RL money for virtual items and i work 40 hrs a week. theres no value in it |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:14:00 -
[40] - Quote
Cecil Montague wrote:players of EVE
Who would probably like that money spent on their hobby rather than some inane, derivative console shooter which is going nowhere. |
|

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1577
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:14:00 -
[41] - Quote
Lost True wrote:One thing that many ppl don't understand is that abandoning Dust now will not help EVE at all.
Because the money is already invested. And even if we don't need this console crap, we should hope that Dust will be successful. Because if it's not, it'll be a huge money loss for CCP, and EVE will be developing even slower. If not closed.
True, but at the same time continuing to pour resources into a lost cause can have a greater long term negative effect. Sometimes you just need to cut your losses before they spiral out of control.
Is this true for Dust? Maybe, maybe not.
CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE-á/ Dynamic New Eden |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:16:00 -
[42] - Quote
Xinivrae wrote:Ah yes, the enlightened shepherd has come to awaken us sheeple from our ignorance. Clearly if only we were capable of actually thinking, we would be high-fiving each other and telling op how right they are. 
I completely agree, I might screencap this or something. You people are so trapped in your fanboism that it's hurting you , someone should do a study. |

Amitious Turkey
The Red Circle Inc.
117
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:16:00 -
[43] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:If there's just a few people on the forums speaking out against it, it really doesn't matter. They say only 10% of the population can think for themselves .. but in EVE I think the number is much smaller. When DUST fails and it will.... you can think of what EVE could have been. It's not like I'm the first person in 6 years to ask CCP to rethink their trajectory, possibly the only one who still bothers.
In Eve it's smaller? Try saying that again when you've played any other game. Eve is the most free-thinking playerbase out there. That's the only reason I've stayed with this game for so long. The game changes because players push the boundaries, not (just) because of CCP's creativity. Yes, they have the potential to royally screw this up, but that's the same with any risk. No one can predict the outcome. Lots of failures are successes in disguise.
Also, how does one determine whether someone can think for himself? That statistic sounds too prone to opinion to be worth quoting.
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:Anyway, in the world of people who make projections of this temporal prison we call earth, facts can be derived from present circumstances. DUST is a drain on EVE development
How long have you played? I've played since the beginning and seen how Eve has developed. If anything, DUST has a head start. I remember when battleships were as rare as titans. How do you think the market looked? Nowhere near as robust as it is now. DUST faces a similar problem as EVE did, but DUST has the EVE market to (help) sustain it (in a limited, roundabout way) until it can sustain itself, whereas EVE never had any access to outside help at all.
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote: and the only reason you aren't angry at it (as you were with WiS) is because your earth lords didn't tell you to be (Mitannit, RaindowJudenIII, whoever, Redditcat).
You know it's true
I've been living under a wormhole POS for the past 2 years. Who the **** are those guys?
I like to lick things.
Haunting the forums since 03. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:21:00 -
[44] - Quote
Amitious Turkey wrote:
ect. other stuff
I've been living under a wormhole POS for the past 2 years. Who the **** are those guys?
The internet and gaming changes, can you accept this as an objective reality? EVE doing well over 10 years ago has no bearing on DUST, ok? It's being created with EVE dollars.. right? All I'm saying. Did you know the people at CCP in charge of EVE right now aren't the same as the ones who developed EVE? Did you know that?
( and it's failing but that hardly needs to be argued eve-offline was already linked for you, you only need your mind beyond that you have it right?) ) |

Castor II
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
105
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:32:00 -
[45] - Quote
And I want to kick you in the teeth.
But we can't all have what we want, can we? |

Malak Dawnfire
Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS
238
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:33:00 -
[46] - Quote
How does Dust effect EVE, exactly? I can't answer that question but I know exactly how EVE effects dust.
Our money went to this?
Edit; Still, as a past console player I wouldn't say abandon Dust, just give it a chance to effect EVE as much as we effect it. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:40:00 -
[47] - Quote
Castor II wrote:And I want to kick you in the teeth.
But we can't all have what we want, can we?
eve message me your location
It's obvious to anyone with an objective mind that DUST is silly, this goes back to before it even launched, and now proof..... If you think 4000 players online on the PSN in CCP numbers is good then every game is a success really. |

Baby ChuChu
Ice Cream Asylum
1502
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 07:52:00 -
[48] - Quote
Eve. Launched than less to glowing reviews. Given a chance. Decade later, one of the most popular MMOs in existence.
Dust 514. Launched than less to glowing reviews. Not more than a month after release, people (specifically fans of Eve) want it taken behind a shed and shot in the face.
Console gamers. When they complain about something, they're whiny little babies.
PC gamers. When they complain about something, they're doing the Lord's work.
Conclusion: I don't know, but I can't stop listening to this song. |

Amitious Turkey
The Red Circle Inc.
118
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:00:00 -
[49] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:Amitious Turkey wrote:
ect. other stuff
I've been living under a wormhole POS for the past 2 years. Who the **** are those guys?
The internet and gaming changes, can you accept this as an objective reality? EVE doing well over 10 years ago has no bearing on DUST, ok? It's being created with EVE dollars.. right? All I'm saying. Did you know the people at CCP in charge of EVE right now aren't the same as the ones who developed EVE? Did you know that? ( and it's failing but that hardly needs to be argued eve-offline was already linked for you, you only need your mind beyond that you have it right?) )
Eve wasn't doing well 10 years ago, compared to how well it's doing now. I'm not one of those bitter vets who can't see the positive differences between then and now. That was my point. :facepalm:
This does have bearing on DUST because the ingame markets are similar and tied together. They are also based on a similar, if accelerated, growth model.
The faces in CCP have changed. That's normal for any company, or any kind of gathering really. Some like the new faces, some don't, some like the changes, some don't. A company isn't doomed to failure because it's core people have changed or when the focus changes; it's doomed when core ideals become unrecognizable. As long as the glimmer of the idea that spawned Eve in 2003 is there, the game, and the company, will continue. Continuation=success.
Of course it's being created with Eve dollars. My money for Starcraft 2 goes to Diablo 3 which I won't touch with a ten-foot pole. It is also going toward WoW, and WoW money is going toward Starcraft 2 production. What's your point? CCP isn't a government collecting tax money. It's their choice where to spend it, and it's our choice to continue paying for it or not.
As for Eve Offline. When Eve was a month old, it barely had 3,000 players online. Few would call that a successful launch. Again, what's your point? May I see your crystal ball? I like to lick things.
Haunting the forums since 03. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
232
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:27:00 -
[50] - Quote
Baby ChuChu wrote:Eve. Launched to less than glowing reviews. Given a chance. Decade later, one of the most popular MMOs in existence. Dust 514. Launched to less than glowing reviews. Not more than a month after release, people (specifically fans of Eve) want it taken behind a shed and shot in the face. Console gamers. When they complain about something, they're whiny little babies. PC gamers. When they complain about something, they're doing the Lord's work. Conclusion: I don't know, but I can't stop listening to this song.
All this talk about DUST has me yearning for more of this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CintJYMqCbU
Or the legend itself...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDsruLR1qag "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|
|

Torakenat
Substandard industries Insidious Associates
59
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:28:00 -
[51] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:Anyway, in the world of people who make projections of this temporal prison we call earth, facts can be derived from present circumstances. DUST is a drain on EVE development and the only reason you aren't angry at it (as you were with WiS) is because your earth lords didn't tell you to be (Mitannit, RaindowJudenIII, whoever, Redditcat). You know it's true
I think you are confusing fact with deductive reasoning/educated guesses/forecasting Should Dust be an area of business concern? Absolutely, as a concerned player any new venture or risk a company makes, whom you enjoy their services is worrisome. However, we do not OWN the company.
We are not INVESTING in the company with our monthly subscriptions. It may seem to many that with simply playing the game we are investing our time and money, however there is no "cash out" option. Services and obligations are forthright dispensed.
As for the direction of the game? Eve is great and I like the direction it is going. If at anytime I feel they are not delivering what I consider enjoyable content, I'll leave. Just because for years I have made monthly contributions, does not mean that EVE is obligated to deliver the same service year after year.
I can understand the passion and drive some fanatical gamers have toward anygame, however I fail to understand that simply because you are a customer you feel entitled and know what's best for the company. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:44:00 -
[52] - Quote
Torakenat wrote:[quote=Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO] I can understand the passion and drive some fanatical gamers have toward anygame, however I fail to understand that simply because you are a customer you feel entitled and know what's best for the company.
There is passion yeah, but some of us live real lives and some of the things we see in EVE actually conflict with things either illusory in our minds or more so as it were. |

Arkenai Wyrnspire
Turalyon Plus
1674
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:50:00 -
[53] - Quote
Oh look, it's a 'Dust is dying' thread. I'm sure we have quite a few of these for both games. Sig'd.-áGallente FW best FW. |

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 08:53:00 -
[54] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Quote: But there's a difference between a symbiotic relationship and a parasitic one. DUST will never be able to bring to EVE what EVE is bringing to it.
If its failing then Eve isn't bringing anything to it? So which is it?
I can't respond to meaningless reddit **** like this all day.
Bye, maybe someone appreciated my concern |

Torakenat
Substandard industries Insidious Associates
60
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:00:00 -
[55] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote: There is passion yeah, but some of us live real lives and some of the things we see in EVE actually conflict with things either illusory in our minds or more so as it were.
I can't respond to meaningless reddit **** like this all day.
But, maybe someone will appreciate if i tried. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
232
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:10:00 -
[56] - Quote
Torakenat wrote:We are not INVESTING in the company with our monthly subscriptions. It may seem to many that with simply playing the game we are investing our time and money, however there is no "cash out" option. Services and obligations are forthright dispensed.
Fail white knighting.
Let me give you a clue, Torakenat about funding:
no players = no money = no game (the devs got to eat).
players + money = game.
That $180/year for a game gives a player a say in what he likes to see in the game, as his money is pooled in with other gamers, which is the capital used to build the game.
In business the company that can deliver a product the cheapest, and treat their customers well, dominates. The company who cusses out their customers and milks them, becomes at best like a niched P2W game or dies on the vine.
"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO
Federal Defense Union
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:22:00 -
[57] - Quote
Most of the people in this thread I think are used to a reddit/instagrm/twitter/tumbr internet to many people this is what the internet is. But I want to tell you, you don't need to castrate yourself here, you don't need to become a slave to hipsterism or a 'bugchaser' (liberals ect) you don't need to suckle at the teet of authority.
You're allowed to question them. For god sake just as a hobby question something in your black nail polish soaked lives. |

Aria Ning
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
13
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:39:00 -
[58] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Torakenat wrote:What facts? Projections are based on theory and are at best educated guesses. A fact is a tangible idea that can be proven. Since, you cannot prove what the future holds for either product without living it, your statement is false and incohorrent. The fact is tether a new product to an established product and most will fail. Why? The tethered product doesn't have it's own identity. It's own brand. It's like Bethesda adding Fallout3 to Skyrim. It wouldn't sell to either market, and probably annoy both. When CCP makes a PC version, maybe then they can unlink the two, and let DUST develop into it's own brand. It doesn't need to piggyback onto EvE for EvE players to play it. Fans will play it because they're CCP fans, genre fans or just want to try something different. And from there it grows it's own wings and becomes it's own. If it existed in 2007 I may have played it then, but Battlefield 2142 got there first, and now I like the brand and play the series (and hoping for BF2143). If DICE added it as a DLC to BF2, I would never have gotten it. Got sick quick of the 1000000000001 modern warfare or WWII games at the time, and wouldn't even give it a second looks. Was there at Wal-Mart one day, and BF2 box and a BF2142 box were side by side. Walked out with BF2142, as that's more interesting.
Your comparisons are Wayyyy off. It's not like WoW trying to tie in Diablo III they're not even in the same world or much less universe same for you bad Fallout 3 and Skyrim Analogy. The more appropriate comparison would be Warcraft series to World of Warcraft and look how that turned out? |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
347
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:47:00 -
[59] - Quote
Dust is a console game, there isn't much crossover in demand, and actually the DUST culture is having a hard time dealing with veteran eve players who play the game. If you have the time and desire to hop on dust and get to a good point, i can only imagine awoxing is much more sweet when you do it to people who don't consider it a part of the game.
Its impact on eve is also minimal, and if they ever merge the economies, I can't see any situation where eve players don't profit unless CCP pulls some bullshit magic to convert eve dollars to dust dollars. |

Aria Ning
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
13
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 09:49:00 -
[60] - Quote
Noooo Noooooo NOOOOOOOOO wrote:Cecil Montague wrote:players of EVE Who would probably like that money spent on their hobby rather than some inane, derivative console shooter which is going nowhere.
So how would you feel if someone paid you for your services and then told you how to spend the money you earned from providing a service?
Yeah same goes for CCP. You paid to play EvE not to tell CCP how to spend their money, sorry but the the money is no longer yours.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |