Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Anton Zuber
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 21:01:00 -
[151]
The thing with shares currently is that voting is so incredibly broken that it is simply not worth the risk to pass out shares.
one share can win a vote even if your corp has 100000000000000000 shares. All that shareholder needs to do is propose a vote, if nobody votes against it. 1 share wins.
Some roles are necessary for some kinds of votes, but any member can always vote for the most dangerous vote of all, to become CEO.
There is no accountability for shares. If they're not in your wallet you have NO information whatsoever to know where they might be.
When a vote is passed, it doesn't tell you how many shares voted and how many abstained. it only tells you the percentage of votes for and against ignoring any abstained votes. 100% for, can mean 1 vote, or it can mean 10,000 votes.
Long story short here. voting with shares is so incredibly broken I strongly advise against giving anyone shares, let alone trying to sell them to people or something.
|
SengH
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 21:33:00 -
[152]
Random idea for standings due to FF problems
An export standings to file function for alliance/corp and import standings function would be really nice. Heck maybe to save the trouble even a synchcronize standings checkbox where you type in the corp or alliance name and you automatically synch standings with them.
|
Pepperami
|
Posted - 2006.03.07 02:46:00 -
[153]
Originally by: SengH Random idea for standings due to FF problems
An export standings to file function for alliance/corp and import standings function would be really nice. Heck maybe to save the trouble even a synchcronize standings checkbox where you type in the corp or alliance name and you automatically synch standings with them.
Mhmm, that idea is delicious - synch standings so alliance allies can dock at player controlled stations automagically.. synchronising alliance and corp standings is a pain..
[Art of War][- V -] |
flummox
|
Posted - 2006.03.09 05:40:00 -
[154]
" Corp tickers with zero members should be deleted. Shares too "
i don't agree with the shares being deleted. even if they are completely useless game-mechanics-wise, i still like having my oild corp shares.
also, would 'deleting' a corp that no longer has active members completely remove that info from the game relationally? for example, would it erase my previous employments? if so, i would also not agree with this.
there are other things to consider with deleting an "in-active" corp. an example would be a one-man corp needs to take a month or four hiatus from playing/paying the eve account (for whatever reason)... ... bring me my cheese... |
Dessa DesPlains
|
Posted - 2006.03.09 05:55:00 -
[155]
I'd like to be able to remotely deliver things from the delivery hanger to a divisional hanger. I can remotely manufacture, except when all my tritanium is stuck in the delivery bay. |
Nifel
|
Posted - 2006.03.09 10:07:00 -
[156]
Still need to have the ability to subscribe to XML output on i/o for hangars/pos/corp wallet you subscribe to.
"We wield swords for the sound of laughter that used to be there long ago." RKK Ranking: (MIN13) Jata |
Rask
|
Posted - 2006.03.09 21:46:00 -
[157]
i don't know if it has been said yet,
But I would like shares split into two kinds, voteing and non voting shares.
Or better yet, 3 types of shares and configrable rites for each share type. For instance Class A has rights to initate votes, class B can vote, class C can't vote.
And when makeing dividens, you can say Dividins 100m Class A 50%, Class B 30%, class C 20%
50m would be split amongst the Class A shares, 30m would be split between the Class B shares, and 20m would split across the Class C shares.
my 0.02 isk
|
Johnathan Roark
|
Posted - 2006.03.10 05:18:00 -
[158]
Originally by: Rask i don't know if it has been said yet,
But I would like shares split into two kinds, voteing and non voting shares.
Or better yet, 3 types of shares and configrable rites for each share type. For instance Class A has rights to initate votes, class B can vote, class C can't vote.
And when makeing dividens, you can say Dividins 100m Class A 50%, Class B 30%, class C 20%
50m would be split amongst the Class A shares, 30m would be split between the Class B shares, and 20m would split across the Class C shares.
my 0.02 isk
I dont see the point in this? I would like to be able to offer some sort of Loyalty points to members though.
Corporation Management Improvement |
Istolil Pravus
|
Posted - 2006.03.10 19:02:00 -
[159]
/Signed
Even though i'm a CEO of a lowly 10 person new corp, corp management can get very tedious, especially when you start having more than 2 or 3 offices.
|
Traxman
|
Posted - 2006.03.11 12:26:00 -
[160]
Im happy to see more people that want teh same things as i want it )
For me primary is division wallets (diffrent groups within your corporation that can work on diffrent projects and have its own sub wallet)
Extraction of wallets/transaction log. (We can then build our own program to harvest lots and make usefull market information) Inventory of corp/personal hangar. (Good for bigger corps what htey need to build or what they need to get before running out of item X or just see what we have )
First post includes a lot of stuff that are needed. And Oveur, please make some of this happend this is good tools and info that we manufactors need aswell as thoose that keep track of what are happening in the corp and can make reports of it.
Good post Anton Zuber!
|
|
Anton Zuber
|
Posted - 2006.03.11 18:00:00 -
[161]
" Corp tickers with zero members should be deleted. Shares too "
Flummox raises a point, so I think I should explain a bit better. The main problem with this is that corp tickers and corp names remain tied up permamently. If a corp completely disbands the corp name and corp ticker should be released so that they may be used again.
I agree that a deleted corp should not be removed from your employment history, and any show info inquiry into it should indicate that the corp has been deleted and when.
As for clearing the shares. I see absolutely no point in the shares remaining, although I guess it's harmless enough to leave them in as long as the name and corp ticker are removed.
And as always. thanks for the support everyone.
|
Ramius Monteagne
|
Posted - 2006.03.15 03:59:00 -
[162]
The one thing I would Like to see is greater expansion od the Division capabilities for a corp. Allowing a division to have alot of the same functionalities that a Corp has.
What I mean is that Corps can create a Division, Assign members to that division. A division can rent it's own offices and has it's own set of Titles and roles that work only on Divisional 'Assets' or against Divisional Wallet.
This would mean that a Corp member can potentially have 2 sets of roles, his 'Corp' Roles and his 'Divisional' Roles. Division could get their own Chat channel as well.
How many corps have split off parts o their corp into seperate corporations because of the limitations of 7 hangers and the security settings on them. Usually this is done to allow the 'Fleet' aspect of the corp to have better control over access to their combat ships and equipment. But it also creates a number of administration issues for managing the 2 corporations.
By giving 'Divisions' more power this will also mean that a greater level of trust can be fostered in Corporations. You may not trust XXX to be a Factory Manager for the entire coporation but he can certainly be a Factory Manager for a Division.
I am unsure about allowing corp members to be in more than 1 Division, I can see the benefits, but as a programmer I also know the additional programming and database storage overheads that this will create.
Ramius Monteagne Forge Region Commander Celestial Horizon Corporation A battle plan lasts until the first enemy engagement.
|
VIXIT CORP
|
Posted - 2006.03.15 15:35:00 -
[163]
shares, ando how to get them back?
If a guy leaves a corporation and he/she has shares there is no way to get them back. If a guy quits eve and he/she has shares, his account will be there forever (if i'm not mistaken) so the shares this account has are also lost.
I plea for the fact if you leave a corp your shares will be automaticaly go back to the corp, If an account has not logged on to eve for more then 6 months his shares must go back to corporation.
I'v lost several shares this way, it still sais corp has xxxx shares, but i know a few accounts from my corp who really quited EVE but htey still own shares, so they are lost.
I a noob caracter has a share and he decides to delete the caracter the share is lost but not retracted from the total amount of shares of the corporation.
and of course (asked at the last day of eve fanfast): division accounts!
Greetings VIXIT CORP
|
Reiisha
|
Posted - 2006.03.17 21:32:00 -
[164]
Better member management.
Right now it's a pain to look at the corp members list. It's just a member list, nothing else.
We need a lot of improvements there, such as: - when has the member last logged in, and for how long - how long has he been logged in since he joined the corp - personal notes from the member - notes from the director/ceo - titles coupled with permissions listing - personal audit logs
These are just some of the things i can come up with that i really miss in terms of managing corp members. They can help with activity checking or other security related issues a lot mroe than a corp mail can, and it would make permission management a lot easier aswell.
|
Xachar
|
Posted - 2006.03.18 00:39:00 -
[165]
More skills for a greater number of people to be allowed in a corp, current cap of 1300 is restricting for some.
|
Johnathan Roark
|
Posted - 2006.03.18 04:58:00 -
[166]
Originally by: Reiisha Better member management.
Right now it's a pain to look at the corp members list. It's just a member list, nothing else.
We need a lot of improvements there, such as: - when has the member last logged in, and for how long - how long has he been logged in since he joined the corp - personal notes from the member - notes from the director/ceo - titles coupled with permissions listing - personal audit logs
These are just some of the things i can come up with that i really miss in terms of managing corp members. They can help with activity checking or other security related issues a lot mroe than a corp mail can, and it would make permission management a lot easier aswell.
Part of this is already in under "Find Member In Role" tab. It needs some work and UI clean up though.
Corporation Management Improvement |
Johnathan Roark
|
Posted - 2006.03.18 05:17:00 -
[167]
Originally by: Xachar More skills for a greater number of people to be allowed in a corp, current cap of 1300 is restricting for some.
I dont even want to think what managing 1300 members is like.
Corporation Management Improvement |
Andrue
|
Posted - 2006.03.19 11:13:00 -
[168]
Deliveries screen:Can it show jumps from current location, plz?
Would make it a lot easier when chaining pick-ups. -- (Battle hardened miner)
[Brackley, UK]
WARNING:This post may contain large doses of reality. |
Tripoli
|
Posted - 2006.03.20 00:34:00 -
[169]
Corp members should be able to have the ability to grant other members titles. As far as I can tell, right now only the CEO and Directors can. ---
Skill Collector Level 275 skills trained. |
Rawne Karrde
|
Posted - 2006.03.20 01:30:00 -
[170]
being able to set a Message of the day for corp chat.
|
|
Johnathan Roark
|
Posted - 2006.03.20 03:51:00 -
[171]
Originally by: Tripoli Corp members should be able to have the ability to grant other members titles. As far as I can tell, right now only the CEO and Directors can.
That could get dangerous. Maybe a Role can Grant Title1, etc
Corporation Management Improvement |
morgan puck
|
Posted - 2006.03.20 13:59:00 -
[172]
Don't know if this has been mentioned in this thread but, Being able to breakdown and see deliveries by regions & sell the items remotely the deliveries aswell, rather than being physically in station would be good... sorry if this has aready been posted
|
K Shara
|
Posted - 2006.03.20 16:27:00 -
[173]
some very very nice ideas.
shares should come in 2 types. - voting and profit.
CEO / Director notes for members
|
Sergius Ganthor
|
Posted - 2006.03.22 00:23:00 -
[174]
Originally by: Mesuno
and need I scream for it again. DIVISIONAL WALLETS.
Sort of old, and I haven't read any of the recent posts, but I'd really like to see this as well. (Sorry if it's in the works)
---- Sergius Ganthor CEO, NiTen Securities, Ltd. Proudly Minmatar owned, Minmatar run. |
Stryder Unknown
|
Posted - 2006.03.25 04:30:00 -
[175]
Theres really 2 options.
1: Fix the current Division system Spend alot of time fixing the current "broken" divisional system, which could mean alot of work. I don't know if it's the case but if a programming project has had "Spacers" for this long, it's possible that the original Dev team that had plans for the divisional system might have wandered to greener pastures, leaving it a little obscure for a new sub-team to undertake.
This means alot of time planning database arrays to be ergonomic enough not to cause DB overloading etc. which will mean if it was decided we won't see it finished next week.
2: Create "Divisional" Alliances My thoughts are based on the current Alliance system which could either be used as a work around (if it didn't cost 1bil ISK to setup and millions to run each month) or to create a system similar to the Alliance System for formatting corporations.
You'd simply create a Division like you would a new corporation, however you wouldn't have to declare a name for it or a Logo. It's account system would function just like a Standalone corporation.
The Difference would be you would gain a "Division Channel" in chat and a "Division" mailing list. These would deal with any Chatter or communication within that Division.
The Corporation Channel and Corporation Mailing list would be a bit like the Alliance system, where you would have Multiple Divisions making up the corporation and the corp channel being the common chat channel between all of them.
Division's would not be able to Leave the Corporation system like a Corporation would an Alliance, however Divisions could be closed down. This would mean there would have to be a "root" corporation structure, where Corporate members and corporate owned products/modules etc would have to be placed should a division close.
I think this system would work because it's very similar to the already used Alliance system and it would mean that alot of the redundant broken features of the Corporation screen and wallet could be cleared out.
|
Xahro
|
Posted - 2006.03.27 18:31:00 -
[176]
Quote: Evelopedia - NPE Project
The one and only official "wiki-pedia" for EVE online. Fully integrated into the EVE client and EVE websites, allowing tooltips, hints and how-to's to be linked contextually within the game.
I saw this on the In Development page. My questions is, would be possible to extend this for corps? Basicly allow a live document that can be edited but visiblity would be restricted to corporation members only? Maybe making editing be restricted to specific roles.
This would allow corps to have news boards / intel sharing means withough spamming corp chat / mail.
|
Anton Zuber
|
Posted - 2006.03.28 07:27:00 -
[177]
Things remain quiet for now. As some of you may know I'm no longer a CEO myself so I can't conveniently test any new changes as they come in right now.
So please, try to keep me and or this thread posted on any updates that need to be made. I will continue to try to keep the list accurate and up to date as best I can. Thanks.
|
Tolmech
|
Posted - 2006.03.30 19:52:00 -
[178]
Hanger inventory export by station, with transparency for containers. Allow us to bring our stock control into our own websites/off eve toolsets, big help for large corps. If you want to do this currently its a manual task and doing it with lots of corp stations, managers and production queues its near impossible. csv, txt export, whatever lets just get those numbers out pweeeeese.
|
Hafthor
|
Posted - 2006.04.01 20:06:00 -
[179]
Didn't see this mentioned in the OP so here goes.
Searchable corp assets Searchable Deliveries Deliveries shown on map Jumps to shown in Deliveries like in Assets Total m3 shown in Assets and Deliveries (not absolutely necessary but would make hauling these a lot easier) Multiple locking of Blueprints please, please ohh please for the love of isk make this happen (multiunlock too ofcourse)
Very sorry if this has been posted before, just in a bit of a hurry so I couldn't check the thread for updates.
-------------------------- "Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far" |
Loni Jones
|
Posted - 2006.04.03 20:56:00 -
[180]
Winning with one vote is impossible in most corporations due to one not so minor detail. Anytime vote notifications are sent out there are also proxy ballots sent out that usually read, 'If not returned, the xxx (insert officer of choice) retains the proxy for these shares'. Thus in order for a person to win a vote they would need to notify at least the CEO and board, and overcome the inertia of all of the proxied votes. This might make passing votes too hard, so 30% of the votes might be assumed to return 'Abstain' votes.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |