Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Blastcaps Madullier
Celestial Horizon Corp. ROFL Citizens
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 02:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Several ideas been thinking about recently:
Firstly: there's times when you REALLY want another slot somewhere, so the idea behind this is at a station service you have the option to gain and assign an additional slot anywhere on your ship, however.... The trade off is you HAVE to sacrifice 2 slots somewhere else to do so, ideas to keep this reasonable balanced, ie you have to make a sacrifice to make a gain.
Secondly: T3's one idea I've had for fozzi's rebalance is the subs gives you a total number of slots, however you assign where you want them (to a max of 6 in highs, 8 in mids/lows) this allows players to CHOOSE where they want the slots not have slot positions determined by the subs, Idea is to make T3's more flexable in gerneral terms and allow players to have a choice how their T3's are loaded out. The other idea is add extra subs allowing tank types not usualy associated with that pertic race, IE tengus being able to be armour tanked and getting bonuses off the subs, legions/proteus being able to shield tank effectively etc, but the alternative tank type should NOT be quite as good as the others, ie tengu armour tank subs slightly worse either on EHP slightly than say a armour fit proteus or legion, or slightly worse resists on armour etc. Think people get the gist and ideas :) |
Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3301
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 02:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
How bout no. The guy who was sitting next to me in the first nullsec round table who had obviously not had a shower since before boarding his flight to Iceland, you really stank. You know who you are. |
Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
682
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 02:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Inb4 Doc Fury tells you where this post belongs. This thread has so much content it may be 'Thread of the Year' and it is only January.
|
Blastcaps Madullier
Celestial Horizon Corp. ROFL Citizens
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 02:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:How bout no. To which part of? :) |
Lugia3
End-of-Line
439
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 03:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Blastcaps Madullier wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:How bout no. To which part of? :)
All of it. Yarr |
Riot Girl
Thundercats The Initiative.
1323
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 03:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
8 launcher Tengu. Oh god. |
ACE McFACE
Radical Astronauts Plundering Eve
1389
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 04:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:8 launcher Tengu. 8 high 8 low Proteus with 4 mag stabs You should be notified if someone quotes your post so you can continue the argument! |
Jack Miton
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
2138
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 05:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
Yeah, no. Also, wrong forum. |
Blastcaps Madullier
Celestial Horizon Corp. ROFL Citizens
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 05:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:8 launcher Tengu.
NOPE, if you looked I said SIX not 8 max in highs, which is somewhat standard max for some configs of proteus legions etc
plus if you exclude the ideas of the T3's, what about the idea of sacrificing 2 slots in trade for a single slot you can put else where ie like when you could really use that 1 extra slot in a mid instead of lows etc. |
Blastcaps Madullier
Celestial Horizon Corp. ROFL Citizens
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 06:35:00 -
[10] - Quote
plus one mistake your assuming is on a T3 that the extra slots would also be turret slots, all I stated was slots, NOT weapon slots
|
|
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3622
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 06:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
Nope. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |
Max Godsnottlingson
Bitter Veterans
184
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 06:54:00 -
[12] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:How bout no.
Seconded NO!
If the ship you are using doesn't meet your needs, get one that does.
Damn! That's teh second time this week I have written something supporting a Goonie! What's the world coming too!!? |
Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
184
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 08:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
Blastcaps Madullier wrote:been thinking
Always a hazardous activity. I recommend you refrain from that for your own good.
Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Labs Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene. |
Blastcaps Madullier
Celestial Horizon Corp. ROFL Citizens
96
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 23:35:00 -
[14] - Quote
so rather than just saying no how about suggestions to tweek the idea? :)
|
Carribean Queen
Vadimus Quarrier Works The Big Dirty
21
|
Posted - 2013.07.12 23:58:00 -
[15] - Quote
Blastcaps Madullier wrote:so rather than just saying no how about suggestions to tweek the idea? :)
http://goo.gl/NN1OM |
stoicfaux
2940
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 00:18:00 -
[16] - Quote
Just bite the bullet and let players build custom designs in regards to slot layouts and bonii.
Obviously, there would need to be efficiency tradeoffs, .e.g. an 8 slot, 8 launcher hardpoint Tengu would have to make terrible sacrifices in other areas (tank, speed, other slots.)
In terms of the OP's first idea, a two for one slot deal is too inefficient. I would consider a one for one trade appealing to my inner min-maxer, but my sense of integrity (stop laughing) says it probably wouldn't be a good idea. So two for one isn't worth implementing, and a one for one swap is probably too imbalanced.
|
Ellendras Silver
Bite Me inc Bitten.
60
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 00:20:00 -
[17] - Quote
Blastcaps Madullier wrote:Several ideas been thinking about recently: there's times when you REALLY want another slot somewhere,
not a day goes by that i think about a blowjob from mila kunis, never happend tho |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3623
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 00:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
Blastcaps Madullier wrote:so rather than just saying no how about suggestions to tweek the idea? :)
Can't tweak something whose premise is irredeemably bad.
So, Good God in Heaven, Newbie This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |
Radius Prime
Tax Evading Ass.
93
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 00:39:00 -
[19] - Quote
Blastcaps Madullier wrote:Several ideas been thinking about recently:
Firstly: there's times when you REALLY want another slot somewhere, so the idea behind this is at a station service you have the option to gain and assign an additional slot anywhere on your ship, however.... The trade off is you HAVE to sacrifice 2 slots somewhere else to do so, ideas to keep this reasonable balanced, ie you have to make a sacrifice to make a gain.
Secondly: T3's one idea I've had for fozzi's rebalance is the subs gives you a total number of slots, however you assign where you want them (to a max of 6 in highs, 8 in mids/lows) this allows players to CHOOSE where they want the slots not have slot positions determined by the subs, Idea is to make T3's more flexable in gerneral terms and allow players to have a choice how their T3's are loaded out. The other idea is add extra subs allowing tank types not usualy associated with that pertic race, IE tengus being able to be armour tanked and getting bonuses off the subs, legions/proteus being able to shield tank effectively etc, but the alternative tank type should NOT be quite as good as the others, ie tengu armour tank subs slightly worse either on EHP slightly than say a armour fit proteus or legion, or slightly worse resists on armour etc. Think people get the gist and ideas :)
Flexibility is the name of the game so I wont be conservative and immediately flame the thought. Change can be good. I personally agree with you that fits and ships are rather limited so on the condition they balance it out right and put some thought into it I can only cheer initiatives like this. Variation is good and I would welcome more when it comes to fittings and ships. By this I don't mean your idea as is of course, but something like it, we should remain open to new things that can improve EVE even more.
No change can be allowed to disrupt the balance though so there should be a trial before implementation and developers must cooperate closely with the gamer community so feedback can be heard and adjustments made. Reopen the EVE gate so we can invade Serenity. Goons can go first. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |