| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 89 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 23 post(s) |

M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project Surely You're Joking
227
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 13:59:00 -
[661] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote: Vagabond goes way faster than any other HAC in the game and can perfectly control/mitigate incoming dmg
Vagabond, meet Talos.
Say good bye to Vagabond, say hello to capsule. How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1043
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:00:00 -
[662] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:I dont understand how any of that is relevant.
And you will never will because you're unable to take your blinders off. Playing with words will not solve your real issue with new Vagabond nor will EFT, play with it a bit and ask guys knowing flying them to help you fit it and fly it properly.
*removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

baltec1
Bat Country
7411
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:02:00 -
[663] - Quote
Diesel47 wrote:
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
The dumbest things I have seen so far is you. Ships should never be balanced on how much they cost ever because no matter how much that cost is we can afford it.
Diesel47 wrote: If a ship is going to be 150mil and also terrible, then it just a waste. Look at the eagle. It is "content" but if it removed from the game nothing would change.
The vaga will still be the bane of all frigates and one of the best solo small gang cruisers around. Its losing nothing and ganing a somewhat handy new tool and a slight buff to boot. |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
630
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:03:00 -
[664] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote: Vagabond goes way faster than any other HAC in the game and can perfectly control/mitigate incoming dmg
Vagabond, meet Talos. Say good bye to Vagabond, say hello to capsule. I already posted a fit that will buttraep the Talos, but people then answer "The Talos has backup, hurr durr vaga sucks" |

Deacon Abox
Justified Chaos
163
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:04:00 -
[665] - Quote
Meytal wrote:Smoking Blunts wrote:the sac still sucks, it either dosnt have enough tank or not enough dps.
move the utility high to an extra low.
love this ship, but you are not fixing it enough to make it worth flying In a fleet, the Sac right now can get over 60k EHP while sporting two BCUs, which is quite nice. While very thankful for the bonus change from cap to something useful, I was sort of hoping for a bit of a dps increase to avoid being completely out-stripped by the Cerberus; it already comes in second place to the Cerberus, which is getting a dps buff. However, increased range is also nice. On the other hand, I'm very happy with the Cerberus changes :) I bet you are. Because that Cerb will outrun and outmaneuver that Sac and have more HAM range. The Sac may be able to fit for more ehp but that only delays the inevitable. Basically - Cerb too agile, Sac too much a cow, Cerb can be nano'd for further speed and mobility advantage, Sac will be plated (or maar lol) and have worse mobility that the Cerb.
Oh the Sac has a 50/50 drone bay to the Cerb's 15/15. So maybe use 5 web valks? But then giving up dps or no ecm drones. Or could go light drones of different varieties, whatever. The drone bays are largely irrelevant. Of course the Cerb will be simply a better ship (than either Amarr HAC tbh). Mobility and range is everything in EVE combat now it seems. And if any of these ships deserve a 15/15 drone bay it is the Eagle and Zealot, not the Cerb. |

Danny John-Peter
Stay Frosty.
240
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:05:00 -
[666] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:I dont understand how any of that is relevant. And you will never will because you're unable to take your blinders off. Playing with words will not solve your real issue with new Vagabond nor will EFT, play with it a bit and ask guys knowing flying them to help you fit it and fly it properly.
Please go and look at how many kills I have with Med-AC ships including the Vaga.
Then go look at how many you do.
I think I might have played with them a little bit. |

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
644
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:08:00 -
[667] - Quote
vexor 13 slots navy vexor 14 slots Ishtar 14 slots
surely it should be 15 for the ishtar and all the other hacs 16 slots, would solve a lot of issues just bumping them all up 1 slot, rather than just nerfing the ishtar
omen 14 slots navy omen 15 slots zealot 15 slots OMG when can i get a pic here
|

W0lf Crendraven
The Tuskers
110
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:09:00 -
[668] - Quote
Just to stop all of the deimos does 0 dps at 20km, vaga should do bad dps too.
A blaster deimos in a shield fit does over 450dps without heat at 20km, a railone over 700. |

Diesel47
Bad Men Ltd.
782
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:10:00 -
[669] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Diesel47 wrote:
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
The dumbest things I have seen so far is you. Ships should never be balanced on how much they cost ever because no matter how much that cost is we can afford it. Diesel47 wrote: If a ship is going to be 150mil and also terrible, then it just a waste. Look at the eagle. It is "content" but if it removed from the game nothing would change.
The vaga will still be the bane of all frigates and one of the best solo small gang cruisers around. Its losing nothing and ganing a somewhat handy new tool and a slight buff to boot.
Resorting to insults when somebody disagrees with what you say. How childish. Stop raging.
You are so wrong its actually quite funny, do you even play this game called eve online? |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
631
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:11:00 -
[670] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Danny John-Peter wrote:I dont understand how any of that is relevant. And you will never will because you're unable to take your blinders off. Playing with words will not solve your real issue with new Vagabond nor will EFT, play with it a bit and ask guys knowing flying them to help you fit it and fly it properly. Please go and look at how many kills I have with Med-AC ships including the Vaga. Then go look at how many you do. I think I might have played with them a little bit. I'll just leave this here |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1043
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:12:00 -
[671] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Then go look at how many you do.
You have no idea what an Angle fleet is or what it does 
So lets stay entitled to our positions, yours thinking new Vaga is crap and mine saying new Vaga is fine. Hint: run for you life at the sight of these. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project Surely You're Joking
228
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:13:00 -
[672] - Quote
I think when the Cynabal is nerfed, the Vagabond will again be an OK ship.
However, the Muninn will remain utter crap, until CCP redesign it as a brawler instead of a sniper (a role that the Tornado outclasses the Muninn in every way.) How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
631
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:15:00 -
[673] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:I think when the Cynabal is nerfed, the Vagabond will again be an OK ship.
However, the Muninn will remain utter crap, until CCP redesign it as a brawler instead of a sniper (a role that the Tornado outclasses the Muninn in every way.) Tracking and gun signature bro. HUGE difference between the two. |

Boss McNab
Tactical Chaos Corp
12
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:16:00 -
[674] - Quote
CCP RISE have you consider those changes to the sacrilige that had about 4 pages of people agreeing on?
did you see that.... |

Saint Hecate
Big Diggers Trifectas Syndicate
3
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:16:00 -
[675] - Quote
I personally wish the Ishtars bonuses were reversed. Have the Sentry tracking and optimal be the Gallente cruiser skill relation and have the heavy drone bonuses be the HAC skill relation. Its mostly self serving because i dont want to train HAC 5 at the moment and I love sentries :P
Overall the ships look really fun and this is a great patch for a Cruiser fanatic like myself. Its a good thing to have all 4 cruisers to 5!
Keep the reworks rollin!
Saint |

Danny John-Peter
Stay Frosty.
242
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:19:00 -
[676] - Quote
I have no idea what's going on in this thread at this point.
Essentially, changes look pretty promising, I'm unconvinced the Muninn has much use and the Vaga changes improves none of the actual problems of the Hull (DPS/Projection) so that's about it really.
|

M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project Surely You're Joking
228
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:22:00 -
[677] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:M1k3y Koontz wrote:I think when the Cynabal is nerfed, the Vagabond will again be an OK ship.
However, the Muninn will remain utter crap, until CCP redesign it as a brawler instead of a sniper (a role that the Tornado outclasses the Muninn in every way.) Tracking and gun signature bro. HUGE difference between the two.
That explains why Muninns are everywhere and Tornados are hardly ever used--oh wait...
Guns sig plays a marginal role in damage application compared to missiles, and it hardly makes the Muninn better. Tracking? At 100km anything can be tracked by 1400s, and since the Tornado has about double the range the tracking arguement is irrelevant, the Tornado can fight from further back and therefore track better and avoid damage better.
Muninn still sucks and Tornado still outclasses it. Plus the Tornado costs less and has insurance payouts.
***There is a reason nullsec alliances used the Tornado over the Muninn.*** How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1180
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:24:00 -
[678] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Hi all
Wanted to post and let you know I haven't disappeared or something, just had to go home and sleep and stuff.
I've been reading all of this and will continue to do so. I would not expect any changes at the scale of this last iteration, maybe some small tweaks after a few more days of feedback at the most.
We are a little concerned that some overpowered configurations might be popular following these changes, but I know many of you are still worried they aren't powerful enough. I'll keep reading for now and if we decide to make any changes you will be the first to know.
Thanks!
Please rise the diemos wants to be a mini mega.... Make it so. There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Hybrid tech I ammo boost |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1043
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:25:00 -
[679] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:However, the Muninn will remain utter crap, until CCP redesign it as a brawler instead of a sniper (a role that the Tornado outclasses the Muninn in every way.)
And the main issue here is Tornado class it self not Munnin after changes despite my own personal thought on this ship requiring a bit more of attention.
Munnin can already brawl fit and deliver stupid amounts of dps but it's slow, arty fit it will be like all other HACs:
Rails Deimos vs Rails Talos? no match, Talos wins
Beam Zealot vs Beam/Tack Oracle? no match Oracle wins unless the oracle pilot is really awful at fittings
Rails Eagle vs Rails Naga? no match Naga wins, hell I'm sure naga can hit the Eagle with blasters at ranges the Eagle has to use Rails
The main issue now is more about attack BC's performing with Battleship dps cruiser speed/agility and and small signature but have paper tanks, so it's not about pop at the gate and start shooting primaries hitting you from far distances you can hit but force them to fight you at ranges YOU can get the crap out of them. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

baltec1
Bat Country
7411
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:26:00 -
[680] - Quote
Diesel47 wrote: Resorting to insults when somebody disagrees with what you say.
If you don't want insulting then don't insult people.
Diesel47 wrote: You are so wrong its actually quite funny, do you even play this game called eve online?
It seems I play more than you. It also seems you arnt grasping what is going on here.
CCP are not going to be producing an overpowered monstrosity. Its going to be balanced with t1, the cynable will getting a nerf and t3s are rather heavy one. When all is said an done its going to be a ship with uses. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1043
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:26:00 -
[681] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Please rise the diemos wants to be a mini mega.... Make it so.
Ho yeah, me too !! *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
215
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:31:00 -
[682] - Quote
I miss LR HACs.
Is there any chance that something could be done to bring them back? |

Draekas Darkwater
Frank Exchange of Views Accidentally The Whole Thing
16
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:33:00 -
[683] - Quote
Just a suggestion, but how about swapping the sensor strength buff to a more general buff vs all types of EWar?
Like a 25% reduction to the effectiveness of incoming Electronic warfare, target painters, sensor damps and tracking disruption affects? |

Kane Fenris
NWP
55
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:34:00 -
[684] - Quote
Veshta Yoshida wrote: Base DPS is ~500+ using 220's w. faction ammo (duh!) and twin Gyros.
and nealy nothing of those dps applys at its fiting range (kiete) when useing that ammo.
|

M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project Surely You're Joking
228
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:34:00 -
[685] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:M1k3y Koontz wrote:However, the Muninn will remain utter crap, until CCP redesign it as a brawler instead of a sniper (a role that the Tornado outclasses the Muninn in every way.) And the main issue here is Tornado class it self not Munnin after changes despite my own personal thought on this ship requiring a bit more of attention. Munnin can already brawl fit and deliver stupid amounts of dps but it's slow, arty fit it will be like all other HACs: Rails Deimos vs Rails Talos? no match, Talos wins Beam Zealot vs Beam/Tack Oracle? no match Oracle wins unless the oracle pilot is really awful at fittings Rails Eagle vs Rails Naga? no match Naga wins, hell I'm sure naga can hit the Eagle with blasters at ranges the Eagle has to use Rails The main issue now is more about attack BC's performing with Battleship dps cruiser speed/agility and and small signature but have paper tanks, so it's not about pop at the gate and start shooting primaries hitting you from far distances you can hit but force them to fight you at ranges YOU can get the crap out of them.
Yea ABCs were one of the CCP whoopsies, like Supers and Titans, something they added that EVE would have been better off without.
However, HACs will never be a good alternative to sniper ABCs, unless CCP halves ABC tracking or halves ABC range or something ridiculously gimping. How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |

Desorem
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:36:00 -
[686] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:M1k3y Koontz wrote:I think when the Cynabal is nerfed, the Vagabond will again be an OK ship.
However, the Muninn will remain utter crap, until CCP redesign it as a brawler instead of a sniper (a role that the Tornado outclasses the Muninn in every way.) Tracking and gun signature bro. HUGE difference between the two. Two Huginns will make tracking and gun sig insignificant. And most(read as "all not insane") long range fleets will have at least two. |

M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project Surely You're Joking
228
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:37:00 -
[687] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Diesel47 wrote: Resorting to insults when somebody disagrees with what you say.
If you don't want insulting then don't insult people. Diesel47 wrote: You are so wrong its actually quite funny, do you even play this game called eve online?
It seems I play more than you. It also seems you arnt grasping what is going on here. CCP are not going to be producing an overpowered monstrosity. Its going to be balanced with t1, the cynable will getting a nerf and t3s are rather heavy one. When all is said an done its going to be a ship with uses.
T3s aren't the real problem with HACs, the problem with HACs is they are too expensive for their potential. HACs need more EHP. How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |

Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
1372
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:38:00 -
[688] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:MeBiatch wrote:Please rise the diemos wants to be a mini mega.... Make it so. Ho yeah, me too !! I would just like the Deimos to follow the Gallente combat doctrine. We have the Thorax, a close range high damage brawler. The Exequror Navy Issue, a close range high damage brawler. Then there is the Deimos a mid range kitting ship? Ideas for Drone ImprovementTwitter Account-á @Omnathious |

Hannott Thanos
Notorious Legion
631
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:40:00 -
[689] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote: Rails Deimos vs Rails Talos? no match, Talos wins
Rails Eagle vs Rails Naga? no match Naga wins, hell I'm sure naga can hit the Eagle with blasters at ranges the Eagle has to use Rails
The main issue now is more about attack BC's performing with Battleship dps cruiser speed/agility and and small signature but have paper tanks, so it's not about pop at the gate and start shooting primaries hitting you from far distances you can hit but force them to fight you at ranges YOU can get the crap out of them.
I'll have you know that the Deimos with 200mm Rails and Hammerheads do the same dps at almost exactly the same range as the Talos with Neutrons loaded with Null, has twice the HP in the relevant damage type and moves at the same speed, so The Deimos will win, no match. It can also fit TD and has low sig to reduce the Talos DPS even further.
The Eagle can be fit to have the same range as the Naga, twice the tracking, twice the EHP, but 500 dps vs 750 dps. 100m/s faster though. |

jimmy alt
Creative Export
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:41:00 -
[690] - Quote
Smoking Blunts wrote:the sac still sucks, it either dosnt have enough tank or not enough dps.
move the utility high to an extra low.
love this ship, but you are not fixing it enough to make it worth flying
I have to agree on that the Sac or [this is my own opinion] any Hac should not have a utility high. The Sac's utility high should go to it's Low slot giving it 6. 5 is to low for this armor tanker. The Vega & Muninn utility high should go to there mid slots. Yes a Vega with 5/5/5 + the shield boots buff = better then Cynabal. No one armor tanks Muninn and a extra mid would be grateful. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 89 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |