Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lan Caden
SKULLDOGS RED.OverLord
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 19:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
This nasty creature has been itching to come back.
850-1000 DPS
Hits well with blasters inside 40km
New tracking bonus for blasters
Tackle would diaf or refuse the order to go in
Oh and a nice 180,000 EHP |
Sam Bowein
Sense Amid Madness
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 19:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'd like to see that fitGǪ |
Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 19:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sam Bowein wrote:I'd like to see that fitGǪ yeah no mwd no tackle no cap or anything .... |
Lan Caden
SKULLDOGS RED.OverLord
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 20:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
[Rokh, Blaster] Damage Control II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Tracking Enhancer II
100MN MicroWarpdrive II Photon Scattering Field II Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Void L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Large Core Defence Field Extender I Large Core Defence Field Extender I Large Core Defence Field Extender I
Ogre II x2
165,000 EHP 82/73/80/83 res
Antimatter: 1000 dps 3707 volley 0-24km
Null is out to 40km Void ~20km but this is before the T2 ammo changes which are supposed to be positive
Cap (before hybrid cap changes) is 4m w/o mwd.
This would melt a number of battleships/hurricanes before they could leave a bubble. With null and new tracking bonuses the speed and range advantage of the hurricane weakens.
Claymore/Vulture Lach/Huggin Bas/Slep good warp ins and that's a lot of hurt in a fairly large bubble. |
Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 20:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Large Core Defence Field Extender II oh yes totally .... |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
52
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 20:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
T2 rigs on a T1, non-faction hull is the sign of an EFT warrior. |
Lan Caden
SKULLDOGS RED.OverLord
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 20:26:00 -
[7] - Quote
fixed. :D of course im just doing some EFT but.. it looks good to me. we'll have to wait until the patch comes out to see if it works though. the bonuses to hybrid look amazing and that pairs well with the rokh's optimal range bonus. then its +resist is a no brainer for blob combat. I think well see a Rokh army, unless the caldari/gallente T3BC can do all the same stuff. I just don't see a BC getting these kinds of EHP. |
Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
287
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 21:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
I was trying to push a blaster Rokh when i was in Test, but noooo.... The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |
Arthur Frayn
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 22:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
And yet it could achieve similar dps over a wider range of damage types at a similar range at no capacitor cost with autocannons. |
Solinuas
Beyond Evil and Good
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 22:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
but autokh that sounds rediculous, now Bloke is great! |
|
Berendas
Clandestine Vector THE SPACE P0LICE
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 00:46:00 -
[11] - Quote
Lan Caden wrote:Ogre II x2
Oh, did a reasonable set of drones not do enough DPS for the EFT warrior?
L2PVP |
Lan Caden
SKULLDOGS RED.OverLord
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 07:45:00 -
[12] - Quote
haha you'll see. use whatever you like for the situation. if you all cant see why this is going to beast a battle incoming soon than you're blind.
projectiles really? like the way goons 1400's got nerfed by PL ABT3? The idea is blasters could have tracked the T3's or the AHAC gang, for sure the drake gang. Maybe even work well against the newer, harder hitting, faster BC |
Thaddaus Dieneces
Militant Mermen LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 09:56:00 -
[13] - Quote
The Rohk in pvp is already an amazing ship with blasters, and with the hybrids getting fixed a bit it should be even better. But like any ship in EVE pick your target wisely. I would replace the heavy drones with med drones though. Play with her being active tanked also. "I came in peace, I didn't bring artillery. But I'm pleading with you, with tears in my eyes: If you **** with me, I'll kill you all"
|
Via Shivon
Kriegsmarinewerft Goonswarm Federation
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 09:58:00 -
[14] - Quote
Lan Caden wrote:[Rokh, Blaster] ....
go play more eft and bring those ships then to deklein pls....kkthxbye |
Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
289
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 09:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
Fkn forum...
[Rokh, Block] Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Tracking Enhancer II Damage Control II
Large Shield Extender II Photon Scattering Field II Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II Quad LiF Fueled I Booster Rockets Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution
Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L Neutron Blaster Cannon II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge L
Large Core Defence Field Extender I Large Core Defence Field Extender I Large Core Defence Field Extender I
Valkyrie II x5
984 DPS, 141k EHP The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |
Arthur Frayn
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 11:08:00 -
[16] - Quote
Headerman wrote:Fkn forum...
Congrats on posting a fit that without a cap booster is as functionally useless as Lan Caden's. |
Comy 1
Ore Mongers Indecisive Certainty
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 12:05:00 -
[17] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW7xg2Lxkbk
Remember to have this song in your playlist when flying it. |
Lan Caden
SKULLDOGS RED.OverLord
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 05:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
cap usage is being reduced in the expansion. remember this is for POST blaster boost. and active tank? no.
shield buffer with high dps, good range, solid resistances, great tracking. this is going to happen, like it or not. |
Kamden Line
Scordite Excavating Xenaphobe
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 05:57:00 -
[19] - Quote
Someone has listened to too much Journey. I too, wanted to believe. But the horrible truth is this: Abaddon > Rokh, mostly because it's not as squishy, does more DPS, and won't get called immediate primary for ****** resists.
EFT warrior all you want, but until you actually fly it in PVP, don't talk 'bout it. |
Arthur Frayn
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 10:06:00 -
[20] - Quote
Lan Caden wrote:cap usage is being reduced in the expansion.
Autocannons will still do it better after the patch. You can't admit it because you don't want to break down crying again. |
|
Written Word
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
76
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 14:05:00 -
[21] - Quote
If you think the blaster Rokh has great range, never look up any of the Amarr BS. |
Lan Caden
SKULLDOGS RED.OverLord
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 15:39:00 -
[22] - Quote
i don't think the abbadon will be able to keep up with the rokh in speed/tracking/dps/range after the blaster changes |
Gazmin VanBurin
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 15:48:00 -
[23] - Quote
the Rokh really needs a 7th mid, with a point and a prop mod it only has 4 tank slots, it has no room for a web or any tank comparable to armor BSs |
Dare Devel
Perkone Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 15:54:00 -
[24] - Quote
Lan Caden wrote:i don't think the abbadon will be able to keep up with the rokh in speed/tracking/dps/range after the blaster changes
I would think Abbadon would have a range from 0-90KM between Multi and Scorch in a fleet situation. The DPS would range from 900-close range to 650 long range. Also it is a insta switch of ammo. They have a tank 250k+ EHP.
In terms of DPS, TANK etc a Blaster ROKH will never be able to come even close to a Pulse Abbadon.
I may be corrected. Regards |
Lord Azeroth
Perkone Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 17:01:00 -
[25] - Quote
The Rokh's looks alone should win you some fights...... |
Cillet Baang Scott
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 17:30:00 -
[26] - Quote
It's speculation to assume the rok will be better. As it is, it will take an effin miracle for the rokh to become better than amarr. Noob caldari carebear gone wild need only look at how far behind the rokh is behind the mega to know this. Andthe mega can already armor tank.
Rokh is slow, has low damage, small drone bay and a bad slot layout.
It is possibly the best looking ship tho. But again... all of the above, caldari sucvk at dps battleships, and will always do. |
Amarr Breeze
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 19:50:00 -
[27] - Quote
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=13564938
+LG Crystal set =
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYF0BYX_OuU I dislike all of you. |
Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 22:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
forgot the +400m for booster and rigs |
People's Republic ofChina
My Other Capital Ship is Your Mom
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 23:02:00 -
[29] - Quote
Dare Devel wrote:Lan Caden wrote:i don't think the abbadon will be able to keep up with the rokh in speed/tracking/dps/range after the blaster changes I would think Abbadon would have a range from 0-90KM between Multi and Scorch in a fleet situation. The DPS would range from 900-close range to 650 long range. Also it is a insta switch of ammo. They have a tank 250k+ EHP. In terms of DPS, TANK etc a Blaster ROKH will never be able to come even close to a Pulse Abbadon. I may be corrected. Regards
Perhaps the issue is the ease of damage projection for laser (and projectile, my autocannons are guilty of it too) "close range" weapon systems and not the deficiency in the hybrid platform. While I'd love to scream "Don't nerf me bro!" perhaps the other weapon platforms need a tweak in the downward direction. |
Lan Caden
SKULLDOGS RED.OverLord
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 23:52:00 -
[30] - Quote
Dare Devel wrote:Lan Caden wrote:i don't think the abbadon will be able to keep up with the rokh in speed/tracking/dps/range after the blaster changes I would think Abbadon would have a range from 0-90KM between Multi and Scorch in a fleet situation. The DPS would range from 900-close range to 650 long range. Also it is a insta switch of ammo. They have a tank 250k+ EHP. In terms of DPS, TANK etc a Blaster ROKH will never be able to come even close to a Pulse Abbadon. I may be corrected. Regards
250k+ ehp? uhh no. in order for the abaddon to get 900+ it has about 130k. which is less than the rokh, slower than the rokh, tracks worse than the rokh, and lower dps than the rokh.
deny all you guys want. just book mark this forum because I am saying now (depending on how OP the T3BC's are) we will be seeing rohk gangs smashing slow adapters soon!! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |