Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ali Aras
Valkyries of Night Of Sound Mind
319
|
Posted - 2013.08.20 20:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
Here's the schedule for CSM 8's summer summit. We'll be talking about all sorts of things. I've made individual threads for some of the non-NDA'd sessions, linked from this post. For comments on those sessions, please leave 'em in the specific thread.
For other comments about the schedule, the process, or other sessions, leave 'em here!
Wednesday:
- 9:00 - Introductions and Development Theory
- 10:00 - Review of Stakeholder Process
- 11:00 - Security Session
- LUNCH
- 12:30 - Review
- 1:00 - Eve Economy
- 2:00 - PLEX Market
- 3:00 - Future Plans
- 4:00 - State of Balance
- 5:00 - Art
Thursday:
- 9:00 - Team 5-0
- 10:00 - Project 1
- 11:00 - Project 2
- LUNCH
- 12:30 - Review
- 1:00 - Team Superfriends
- 2:00 - Team Game of Drones
- 3:00 -Team Kuromako
- 4:00 - Team True Grit
- 5:00 - DUST 514 Link
Friday
- 9:00 - Sales and Marketing
- 10:00 - Reasonable Things Review
- 11:00 - PvE
- LUNCH
- 12:30 - Review
- 1:00 - Project 3
- 2:00 - UI
- 3:00 - Language Support and the CSM
- 4:00 - FLEX
- 5:00 - FLEX
http://warp-to-sun.tumblr.com -- my blog |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
4153
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 13:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
No session on CREST? :( CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
|
Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
71
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 21:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
Please ask CCP Veritas how the Brain in the box goes, and if he needs a forum thread to cheer him on ?
Eve rule no.1: The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg http://bit.ly/13cGuW0 |
Leskit
The Night Wardens Viro Mors Non Est
41
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 17:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Regarding the "state of balance", can there be more oversight on the balancing process? Whether by the CSM, additional CCP employees... something. Having to go through a complete revision (haulers, gal battleships, hacs) is a waste of time, resources, and it damages the community's view of certain employees and companies. I'm not saying "X is a doing bad job", just that more involvement with other CCP/CSM members may help reduce wasted effort when their knowledge and consideration is taken into account. Trying to balance an entire class against/around one small doctrine is very inefficient and restrictive. You as the CSM have an incredible wealth of knowledge and it should be seen as such not as a "we listened, but we're ignoring it" (if that's how it's working in some cases). One person can leave their subtle imprint on a ship, or maybe even a class or tech level, but they shouldn't be able to re-sculpt a whole class into how they prefer to fly in lieu of other flying styles.
Also ask: beam lasers now do more dps than pulse lasers except in some cases of gleam vs conflagration (less than 5% difference, and in some cases, less than 1% difference). Is this intended? I don't mind high-dps beams, but this would be a first for long range out dps-ing short range.
Lastly, some dev threads have GREAT amounts of involvement and feedback, while others have the OP, a quick answer, then nothing (i'm looking at you, medium long gun re-balance!) Many good things are being posted, and we just don't know if our input and sisi testing/number crunching is worth the effort. |
Myxx
673
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 02:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Incarna needs to be worked on. One of you needs to get them drunk and then proceed to re-iterate the fact that incarna needs to be worked on.
Thanks. |
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
7452
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 15:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Leskit wrote: Also ask: beam lasers now do more dps than pulse lasers except in some cases of gleam vs conflagration (less than 5% difference, and in some cases, less than 1% difference). Is this intended? I don't mind high-dps beams, but this would be a first for long range out dps-ing short range.
Yes it's intended. We thought for a while about whether the deviation from tradition was a problem but concluded that doing it this way will create a much better set of challenges for pilots to solve. The tracking and fitting difficulties of Beams make for good gameplay if and only if you provide a big enough reward for the effort expended overcoming them. Game Designer | Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/ |
|
SMT008
SnaiLs aNd FroGs Verge of Collapse
670
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 16:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Leskit wrote: Also ask: beam lasers now do more dps than pulse lasers except in some cases of gleam vs conflagration (less than 5% difference, and in some cases, less than 1% difference). Is this intended? I don't mind high-dps beams, but this would be a first for long range out dps-ing short range.
Yes it's intended. We thought for a while about whether the deviation from tradition was a problem but concluded that doing it this way will create a much better set of challenges for pilots to solve. The tracking and fitting difficulties of Beams make for good gameplay if and only if you provide a big enough reward for the effort expended overcoming them.
And it works the same way with different size of guns. 425mms do more damage at a longer range, dual 180mms have better tracking, more ammo capacity, lower fitting requirements.
Btw, I would like to bring your attention on T2 Torpedo launchers. The more I think about it, the more I end up with this conclusion :
Not many ships can fit those, as opposed to comparable turrets (800mm II, Neutrons II, Mega Pulses II).
So I'd like to see how many ships in EVE have T2 Torp Launchers fitted (and which ship has them), versus how many ships have other kinds of torp launchers fitted and which ship has them.
You could also do a Cruise vs Torps sort of thing. How many ships have Cruise Launchers fitted, how many have Torp launchers fitted ? Considering the very poor range Torps have (There is currently absolutly no range advantage over HAMs), I can probably predict the results. |
Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
459
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 16:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
please discuss missile rebalance please.. HAMS have same range as Torps why???? .. HAM javelin needs more dps too.
TD/TC/TE for missiles please LM' s and Rockets need a range nerf and their explosion radius nerfed in exchange for a little damage buff
Also please discuss module tiercide please.. And please discuss make ABC's T2 please... Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Destoya
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
149
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 17:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
I have no problems with torp range the way it is. You could argue that unbonused range on Typhoon/Navy Scorp/Fleet Phoonis a little low, but I think it creates an interesting dynamic where those ships need to come close to do damage while the Raven variants and stealth bombers can sit further out.
Not every short range weapon system needs to hit out to 45km like pulses, basically. I would agree that the damage application is something that needs to be looked into though, even if that just means an overall damage boost to torps without touching the velocity/radius to push them towards an anti-BS/Capital role, which I think would work rather well since Cruises are pretty much an analogue to HML as the multipurpose missile of choice. |
Terranid Meester
Tactical Assault and Recon Unit
181
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 17:14:00 -
[10] - Quote
Id say hammer home Incarna and Planetary Interaction iteration onto CCP heads. Or should I say, finish them in the first place. |
|
BearUkraine
Rave Technologies Inc. C0VEN
42
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 19:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
Please ask CCP about Incarna and make few informative notes in summit notes please, because it is realy borring to hear years something like Soon) |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
4155
|
Posted - 2013.08.26 21:12:00 -
[12] - Quote
BearUkraine wrote:Please ask CCP about Incarna and make few informative notes in summit notes please, because it is realy borring to hear years something like Soon)
Please read past CCP statements about Incarna if you think they are saying anything at all like "Soon". CCP has made it very clear for quite some time that Incarna is not being worked on, except for very small tweaks. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
|
Mashie Saldana
BFG Tech
680
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 11:22:00 -
[13] - Quote
Since none of the other threads are suitable, how about adding more skills, a LOT more skills. There are quite a few dedicated PVP's that will run dry on skills to train in the very near future.
Edit - Just because CCP got Incarna wrong the first time doesn't mean they should spend the rest of time doing nothing but spaceships. After a decade stuck in pod goo I have a feeling quite a few pilots actually would like to stretch their legs in something a bit more fun than a closet. Mashie Saldana Dominique Vasilkovsky
|
Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
4219
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 16:51:00 -
[14] - Quote
Which session covers power projection? . |
BearUkraine
Rave Technologies Inc. C0VEN
42
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 18:36:00 -
[15] - Quote
Two step wrote:BearUkraine wrote:Please ask CCP about Incarna and make few informative notes in summit notes please, because it is realy borring to hear years something like Soon) Please read past CCP statements about Incarna if you think they are saying anything at all like "Soon". CCP has made it very clear for quite some time that Incarna is not being worked on, except for very small tweaks. Hello 2 step. Nice to meet you) Actually I read every single summit notes. When was the last one? 1 year ago? maybe something has been changed since that time?) I hope so. |
Flamespar
Woof Club
664
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 23:33:00 -
[16] - Quote
Can you get CCP to indicate whether their new 3 year roadmap includes anything for incarna? It would be nice to end the endless speculation. I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |
Leskit
The Night Wardens Viro Mors Non Est
47
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 00:59:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Leskit wrote: Also ask: beam lasers now do more dps than pulse lasers except in some cases of gleam vs conflagration (less than 5% difference, and in some cases, less than 1% difference). Is this intended? I don't mind high-dps beams, but this would be a first for long range out dps-ing short range.
Yes it's intended. We thought for a while about whether the deviation from tradition was a problem but concluded that doing it this way will create a much better set of challenges for pilots to solve. The tracking and fitting difficulties of Beams make for good gameplay if and only if you provide a big enough reward for the effort expended overcoming them.
When I first saw it I was so glued to tradition that my first thoughts were along the lines of blasphemy. But now that the box has been opened, i'll admit...it's kinda cool. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |