|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 17:57:00 -
[1]
Boost the raven please, torps should hit frigs for full damage.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:00:00 -
[2]
Originally by: iggy6662k2 hell why not bring back the old pulse lasers and crystal damage before they got nerfed
Yes I agree.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:01:00 -
[3]
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=271965 I agree with this thread as well
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:03:00 -
[4]
Originally by: iggy6662k2 we should all get CNR bpos for free tbh
Please stop hiijacking a very serious thread with an obvious joke.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:05:00 -
[5]
The fact that ravens go slower when using the t2 precision missiles is an obvious nerf to caldari. Speed means everything in eve, which is why the typhoon is the best battleship.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:08:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Drunkeh The fact that ravens go slower when using the t2 precision missiles is an obvious nerf to caldari. Speed means everything in eve, which is why the typhoon is the best battleship.
Amarrian BS's can fit more overdrives FYI
This is obviously another unbalanced thing towards the raven. Overdrives should be made midslot items as well as nanofibers.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:11:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Drunkeh on 01/01/2006 18:11:23
Originally by: Foomanshoe
Originally by: iggy6662k2 hell why not bring back the old pulse lasers and crystal damage before they got nerfed
You mean the old beta lasers or the most recent nerf?
Id perfer beta when lasers didnt need crystals and if you used a crystal your laser suddenly became badass, and stamped heat sinks were bugged and a moa could do 1200 damage a shot with beams.
Lasers should be a raven only weapon and should require 0 cap to fire..
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Drunkeh
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Drunkeh The fact that ravens go slower when using the t2 precision missiles is an obvious nerf to caldari. Speed means everything in eve, which is why the typhoon is the best battleship.
Amarrian BS's can fit more overdrives FYI
This is obviously another unbalanced thing towards the raven. Overdrives should be made midslot items as well as nanofibers.
/signed We need a cap mod that gives a 50% recharge rate for the highslots - or if that is unbalanced 10% to shield HP AND 25% to shield & cap recharge. Those two spare hi's are wasted on a raven if you fight at range.
This mod needs to be a raven only mod though.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:15:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Drunkeh on 01/01/2006 18:15:50
Quote: [18:14:28] Avon > raven should ger a "chuck norris" slot tbh
/signed
I also believe that tank ceo would support a raven unnerfing, and should be unbanned so we can hear his views on the subject.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:23:00 -
[9]
Originally by: 0Virtu0 Chuck Norris doesnt need different sized arms to beat up little kids, why should the Raven need different weapons to beat up frigs!?
I normally do not support RL comparisons with eve, but this one is definately a perfect comparison.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:30:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Regat Kozovv
Originally by: Inversa
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Inversa Why should Torps hit frigs
because they are bigger, and in eve Bigger > Better
Torps are anti BS/Capital weapons. Every ship/setup in Eve has a weakness. The weak point of a Torp-Raven is the Frigate wich can outrun Torps. If you want to go against frigs as well fitt some anti-frig weapons.
Finally, someone who understands balance and combined-arms theory. I agree, torpedos are not ment for, and should not be used for anti-frigate duties. They are tools out there for this kinda work. They're called assault launchers.
Assault launchers should be able to fit torps anyways
|
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:35:00 -
[11]
Quote: [18:33:09] Kayosoni > PRECISION CRUISE MISSILES 4tw [18:33:39] Kayosoni > I hit frigates for 10 less than full damage with precision cruise
CCP, this is wrong. This so so blatantly wrong that it should be obvious to anyone, but let me explain.
WHY DO PRECISION CRUISE DO 10 LESS DAMAGE THAN NORMAL VS FRIGS? This is obviously a nerf to the raven.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:44:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Regat Kozovv
Originally by: Drunkeh
Originally by: 0Virtu0 Chuck Norris doesnt need different sized arms to beat up little kids, why should the Raven need different weapons to beat up frigs!?
I normally do not support RL comparisons with eve, but this one is definately a perfect comparison.
No, it's not. Little kids are inferior in every way. Frigates have speed. And you don't use large weapons with poor tracking to counter fast moving craft. Battlships do not use 16in guns and cruise missiles to counter aircraft (real life) and they don't in EVE either. Smal, fast tracking weapons are the order of the day.
.......................................................................
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:45:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Drunkeh on 01/01/2006 18:44:51 still laughing
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 18:56:00 -
[14]
Originally by: 0Virtu0
Originally by: Rod Blaine
Originally by: Inversa
Originally by: Drunkeh Chuck Norris knows 172 ways to kill a man using only his big toe, yet a raven cannot even kill a frig using torps.
Use the turret-slots for anti-frig duty, or fit some assault or heavy launchers. Why is that so hard to do?
It's not hard, but it's imbalanced. Turret ships dont need to git assault launchers to deal with frigs either ! They just call mr T. You get Mr T., we get Chuck Norris, that's balance.
And the missile/turret users can have Vin Diesel, then there will be peace in EvE and we will all live happily ever-after.
Mr T is black. And as proven in Sun Ra's thread, CCP hate black people because they are minmatar. Obviously this solution will not be balanced.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.01 19:04:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Regat Kozovv
Originally by: Drunkeh
Originally by: 0Virtu0 Chuck Norris doesnt need different sized arms to beat up little kids, why should the Raven need different weapons to beat up frigs!?
I normally do not support RL comparisons with eve, but this one is definately a perfect comparison.
No, it's not. Little kids are inferior in every way.
You obviously never met chuck norris when he was a child
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.07 18:42:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Wrath Trihellion All of you who think that the Raven is underpowered Smoketh the *****. Are you retarded?? I am UDIE, that means that I fly a Raven and only a Raven, and even I agree that a properly set up Raven can OMG*tomB style*WTFPWN any BS out there. For those of you who think that they should do Uber dmg to frigs, stfu and get over it, you're sissies. DONT USE TORPS IF YOU WANT TO KILL FRIGS: USE CRUISE. Anyway thats all. Angry posts ftw.
classic burn eden post.
PS lol@ resurrecting this thread
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.10 21:57:00 -
[17]
Originally by: 000Hunter000 Can i get a 'OMGWTFPWNBBQIWINTITANSTYLE' button on my raven please?
Please stop these stupid posts, this is a legitimate issue.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.11 05:13:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Megadon
Originally by: Blind Fear The raven is underpowered. It can only fit 5 WCS while an arma can fit 8.
The raven should get a base +3 to Warp Core Strength.
I didn't even realize this because I only use 1 hand to count! What an epiphany! This is a rip-off. Why the hell can't the raven fit 5+3 Warp Stabs?!?
let it die
Yeah I cant believe it keeps getting resurrected.
|
Drunkeh
|
Posted - 2006.01.11 22:37:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Shadow Mancer Speed means everything in eve, which is why the typhoon is the best battleship
yeah but what do you do with Typhoon when 3 angel webifiers web it and max u get with the Phoon is 5 m/s? Still the best BS out there? I mean this is Raven discussion thread so i don't wanna change the topic but heck...Typhoon is the creation of CCP when they were sooo busy developing RMR. One bug after another, just like RMR, Typhoon is a bug not a BS.
|
|
|
|