Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lilliana Stelles
862
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 13:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
The name of this module doesn't make any sense at all. Why did you change it?
It literally sounds like a device that transmits capacitors, or capacitance. Both of which are impossible, and make very little sense. Transmitting capacitance would increase the total size of your capacitor... Transmitting capacitors would literally be beaming capacitors into the other ship's cargo hold.
"Remote Energy transfer", "Remote potential differentiation array", or "Induction array" are all reasonable terms to describe what the device actually does: generates a large electrical field to remotely create a larger potential difference in the target capacitor.
Whoever came up with this new name seriously needs a refresher on highschool physics. Incarna from 2009. 3 Years later and what we have doesn't look half as good as this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n41s1Iox18A |
Moose Beard
Paragon Megadynamic Syndicate
13
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 13:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Remote Capacity Modulator Infusion Array |
Legion40k
ZOMBIEBEACHPARTYPATROL
26
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 08:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
not gonna lie it took me a few minutes to figure out the name change even occurred >_>
large energy transfer array: no results. huh. guess ive got my market filter on or something energy transfer: no results WAT >_<
if this change goes ahead it needs to be highlighted in the patch notes, in bold, underlined, maybe font 72.. but the change is completely unnecessary as the current name fits it just fine |
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
555
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 11:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Why did you change that o_O ?
As said before, it makes little sense...
I mean, energy transfer is a pretty obvious term. Not like multitasking for targeting. G££ <= Me |
Coolmer
D00M. Northern Coalition.
7
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 14:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
This rename don't have any sense like someone change that without any knowledge. |
James Tzashi
Tzashi Industries
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 19:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
Yeah I also agree this change is kinda stupid |
Vortox14
Prime Forces The Methodical Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.31 21:46:00 -
[7] - Quote
+1 Change them back! |
iskflakes
679
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 01:48:00 -
[8] - Quote
The old name should remain, as it is more accurate and will cause less confusion. - |
ColdCutz
Frigonometry
90
|
Posted - 2013.09.01 03:28:00 -
[9] - Quote
Change it back, please. You're trying to fix something that isn't broken. |
Vrenth
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
33
|
Posted - 2013.09.03 19:47:00 -
[10] - Quote
ColdCutz wrote:Change it back, please. You're trying to fix something that isn't broken.
What's in a name, that which we call an energy transfer array By any other name would sound as awesome; So energy transfer array would, were it not energy transfer array callGÇÖd, Retain that dear perfection which it owes |
|
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
2007
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 04:09:00 -
[11] - Quote
isn't it even wrong to say that you transmit something remotely? Its like transmitting something remote from b to c while watching from a.
energy transmitter would be sufficient IMO. eve style bounties (done) dust boarding parties imagine there is war and everybody cloaks - join FW |
JetCord
People of Random Nature
14
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 13:37:00 -
[12] - Quote
i do agree that some of the name change are not intuitive and sometime down right confusing |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |