| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 35 post(s) |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe.
One scams the playerbase for isk using Lotteries and engages in RMT using isk tokens. The other scams the playerbase for real money to be buried in side projects while halting the game's development while turning a blind eye on RMT.
Another great partnership brought to you by CCP Marketing 2013 |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Btw guyz, dont forget to buy more PLEX here. Oh wait... no here |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
StuckAtTheLock wrote: This is absolutely RMT. You can split hairs however you like but you can't deny that somer's model is to give up 200m isk to gain real cash.
The worst part is not that ccp sanctioned this action publicly- but they encouraged it and labelled it as the most deserving(helpful) community service project. Disgusting.
Well, look at it on the bright side. At least you have puppets like the CSM members and CCP Guard being sent to this thread by the chief marketing officer and company stakeholders to try and pour some water in the fire, just to close themselves in hearts and back out again when the real matters start being discussed  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
Pingu wrote:Read the Icelandic legal position on this for yourself: http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/I found this to be an interesting read too, http://www.frixo.com/sbook/regions/iceland.asp especially these quotes: -According to Articles 183 and 184 of the Criminal Code, in effect since 1998, GÇ£it is a punishable offense to engage in gambling and betting on a professional basis, to encourage others to participate in these activities and to derive direct or indirect income from having the activities take place on oneGÇÖs premises." -For all gambling activities, proper licenses must be obtained from the Ministry of Justice. Revenues must go toward helping not-for-profit charitable causes, such as philanthropic activities and sports clubs. Raffles without the permission of a police commissioner are absolutely forbidden. (see also the original articles http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=190914 ) Do CCP have a gambling license? Nope. Are they likely to get one? Nope. You sure? Yip. The 'encouraging others' part is also very relevant here and makes me wonder who at CCP authorised a link to Somer.
That's what their legal team is working on right now - measuring any possible litigations that can arise from having this lottery service "hosted" inside the game. The isk tokens RMT they can just turn the blind eye on the EULA section that forbids it, it's their game they are the rulemakers and can do whatever they want. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
Must be tough for CSM'ers and Guard to run errands giving out the body to the manifest and trying to clean up the sh*t others make    |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bottom line is - the shots at CCP are called by people whose ultimate goal is to come up with the ultimate ways to rip you off. Hence the lack of transparency. They cannot tell you directly that they wanna rip you off, because if they did, the chances of accomplishing it would be diminuted  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
Let's take a look at what the EULA has to say about it:
EVE Online-« End User License Agreement
6. CONDUCT
B. Selling Items and Objects
You may not transfer, sell or auction, or buy or accept any offer to transfer, sell or auction (or offer to do any of the foregoing), any content appearing within the Game environment, including without limitation characters, character attributes, items, currency, and objects, other than via a permitted Character Transfer as described in section 3 above. You may not encourage or induce any other person to participate in such a prohibited transaction. The buying, selling or auctioning (or any attempt at doing so) of characters, character attributes, items, currency, or objects, whether through online auctions, newsgroups, postings on message boards or any other means is prohibited by the EULA and a violation of CCP's proprietary rights in the Game. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
Dear Samantha,
I have taken my life in order to provide capital for you. It was purely a business decision. I hope you can understand that. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 10:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
Oh cmon guyz give CCP a break they are on vacation and will come back soonGäó  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 10:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
Seriously tho, Guard already sorted out and alligned the previous matter to a point where discussion and suggestions can be made to determine the rewards given to community services and fansites. The prizes still need to be settled and the guidelines that will qualify the entities to receive them still have to be written and publicly disclosed, but that matter is partially out of the way.
However the matter regarding Somer Blinks' use of isk tokens to reward those who buy a GCT through their referral system still needs to be adressed by Guard and/or other CCP representatives. We are aware that if CCP wants to they can turn a blind eye on this matter and interpret and/or change the game's EULA and specifically the rules of conduct about selling items for real money in a way that it won't make Somer Blinks actions illegitimate. However this will further confirm their favoritism and support of Somer Blink's actions within the sandbox and the game, so the question about whether other players will be able to engage in similar conducts still stands and requires their pronunciation on it so that an agreement can be alligned in the same way that was for the community services and fansite rewards issue.
Gogela wrote:
ATTN: CCP Guard
I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible? |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
200
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 12:48:00 -
[11] - Quote
At the current state of things Somer Blink could even start gifting out isk tokens for chocolate or candy bar sales from any other 3rd party site. Buy x product from 3rd party site, get isk token. The only problem with that situation would be that CCP would not turn a blind eye on it because the "product" wouldn't be GTC's anymore and they wouldn't be profiting from its sales. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
206
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 12:58:00 -
[12] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Seriously though, Guard already sorted out and aligned the previous matter to a point where discussion and suggestions can be made to determine the rewards given to community services and fansites. The prizes still need to be settled and the guidelines that will qualify the entities to receive them still have to be written and publicly disclosed, but that matter is partially out of the way. However the matter regarding Somer Blink's use of isk tokens to reward those who buy a GCT through their referral system still needs to be addressed by Guard and/or other CCP representatives. We are aware that if CCP wants to they can turn a blind eye on this matter and interpret and/or change the game's EULA and specifically the rules of conduct about selling game currency/items for real money in a way that it won't make Somer Blink's actions illegitimate. This will however further confirm their favoritism and support of Somer Blink's actions within the sandbox and the game, so the question about whether other players will be able to engage in similar conducts still stands and requires their pronunciation on it so that an agreement can be aligned in the same way that it was for the community services and fansite rewards issue. Gogela wrote:
ATTN: CCP Guard
I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible?
BUMP |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
210
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 17:25:00 -
[13] - Quote
By now they already realised the mess they got themselves into and are assessing the possible solutions for it, taking the time to choose the one that best fits their interests before they make another announcement. We might have to wait a bit. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
216
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 00:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
Thanks for the update CCP Guard.
I understand that it's not up to you to alone to formulate a policy and that you guys want to assess the situation before taking decisions regarding Somer Blink's use of isk tokens to reward GTC purchasers and the legetimacy (or lack of thereof) of other entities/players to engage in similar conduct in the game.
Looking forward to hear the verdict soonGäó. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
218
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 13:16:00 -
[15] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:Why does CCP act like this is such a difficult situation to analyse, like its really hard to balance up the rights and wrongs of it. IT IS EASY. All I presonally want is the following:1) CCP to implement an ' Above the Fray' rule. This means they will never take sides with in game entities again. They will only intervene in the game where the EULA is being broken. 2) CCP item spawning (AKA game meddling) to be immediately limited to:
- Valid reimbursment cases
- AT (and similar CCP run tournament) prizes
- Seasonal gifts (must be gifted to all)
the above list is comprehensive3) All of SOMERblink's iScorps to be taken back and destroyed immediately 4) All promotion and support for SOMERblink to cease (in keeping with the Above the Fray principle). I also would like a sober and simply worded announcement that SOMERblink is able to scam, might be scamming, and can scam in the future. 5) SOMERblink to be ordered to cease its RMT business. I want each SOMERblink account to receive a 1 week suspension and a fine applied to the founder in isk, equal to half of the total isk paid out under the RMT scheme (this is very lenient, and fair as CCP is partly to blame for not apprehending SOMER earlier, he probably thought what he was doing was ok). TOO GREEDY?
Miss Ladybird's suggestion for resolution of the issue seems appropriate, in case CCP's verdict deems Somer Blink's actions illegitimate and forbids other entities/players to engage in similar conduct.
Action number 3), as Careby observed, may be nonetheless impossible to execute without affecting/reimbursing foreign players who might have already bought those ships.
Regarding point 5) it is my opinion that 1 week suspension would be too lenient as punishment for a RMT offense, as that kind of suspension is normally what CCP apllies to simple misconducts like player verbal abuse offenses. Furthermore I agree that not only Somer Blink is to be held accountable for carrying on with the misconduct, but a fact finding process should also be conducted by CCP's internal affairs department to investigate the alleged involvement of CCP employees with Somer Blink. Neglecting the enforcement of the game's EULA rules of conduct (if that turns out to be the case) and even supporting and advertising the fraudulent scheme are unnacceptable actions that should not remain unpunished, in the same way that other similar actions performed by other CCP employees in the past were not.
This is however one of the possible outcome scenarios for CCP. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
Given the current situation I'd say I would unsub, if I hadn't done it almost 2 years ago and plexed my account since then with isk  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:48:00 -
[17] - Quote
Well, at least next year you know on who you have to vote for CSM to make your votes count.
I told you... vote PB for CSM... she will defend our interests... but no one ever listens to big chief raven666wings  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:14:00 -
[18] - Quote
Vote Senator McLaughlin for CSM! Don't get caught on the wrong side of the fence!  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
222
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:26:00 -
[19] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:EDIT: I OWN AN EVE LOTTO SITE https://eve-games.net-RMT-I agree this is a grey area and the language could be clearer, BUT looking at the EULA... the current system I, and other sites, employ DOES seem to be within the rules. It would be nice to have some clearer language though... We implemented our "Credit for GTC Purchase" program for a couple of reasons. 1) We had to, to be competitive with other sites. 2) There is really no other "thing" that we can offer as incentives to our users to purchase time codes from us. We will continue to offer the credits for GTC purchases. Unless it becomes specifically forbidden by a change in language in the EULA, or we are asked to stop by the owners of the game.
Well, that came as a surprise to me as I was not aware that other GTC reseller sites besides Somer Blink's were offering isk bonuses for the GTC purchases. It seems CCP has given us the answer that we are looking for although we had not seen it yet.
The EULA section 6 paragraph B (Conduct - Selling Items and Objects) is clear and in my opinion this is not a matter of "grey areas" or "overshadowed language", but rather a matter of arbitrary interpretation by those who made the rules and have the power to enforce, change or neglect them. One could argue about different interpretations of this specific part of the rules of conduct and defend the legitimacy of the use the isk tokens to reward GTC purchasers, as they are not sold directly for real money but rather "gifted" as a reward through the in-game trading mechanism, but the same could be said about the actions of player's who engaged in other "forms of RMT" and whose accounts are banned everyday by Team Security, since all the character isk or PLEX transactions are necessarily done in-game aswell, and not automatically connected to real money, unless CCP presumes they are.
Aknowledging the use of isk tokens to reward the GTC purchasers through Somer Blink, EVE-GAMES.NET and other websites, CCP has apparently allowed everyone to set up their own GTC resale referral system+isk token reward.
Farmer Pigz REJOICE \o/ Time to cash those fat loads of isk into real money too  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
222
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 04:16:00 -
[20] - Quote
Grey Areas - They're only Grey as long as CCP wants them to be. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
222
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 04:22:00 -
[21] - Quote
Hey guyz!! I gotz a Grey AreaGäó!!! Can you not see Grey there?? Omg you must be colorblind  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
225
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:36:00 -
[22] - Quote
ATTN CCP GUARD
raven666wings wrote: Aknowledging the use of isk tokens to reward the GTC referrals in Somer Blink, EVE-GAMES.NET and other websites, CCP has apparently allowed everyone to set up their own GTC resale referral system+isk token reward. Official confirmation from CCP on this would be nice before we proceed so that we not risk getting accounts banned for misunderstandings.
PLZ CONFIRM THIS FOR US |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
225
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:41:00 -
[23] - Quote
Hey CSM dudes, you wanna be helpful here to the community? Plz tell your godfathers to come down and make a statement to confirm that we can engage in the same conduct as Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other websites out there rewarding isk for GTC referals. Let's get this over it. Feel free to send me a poll asking if I like babanas, watermellons or pineapples too. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
227
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 14:01:00 -
[24] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER. 
Would CCP be profiting from that? Would other CSM members be allowed to do the same? If not you may wanna call it a Grey Area.
PS- Grow a pair and either tell people you allow the same behaviour for all or are only favoring a few. Everybody knows the only grey area here is between the white of an empty CCP wallet and the black of a full one. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
228
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:30:00 -
[25] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: The one thing that is entirely predictable is that no matter what, CSM will get sh*t on. (potential future candidates, take note!)
News at 11.
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: WRT to the politician analogy made a few posts back, keep in mind that CCP isn't a politician, CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right.
CSM gets to tell the King, "Your Majesty, we believe what you are doing is bad for the Kingdom."
And we as the commoners get to tell the King "You can get f*cked" while we unsub our accounts if we don't like the way he's ruling the kingdom (pretty much what you should be doing too instead of kissing his ass). |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
228
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:43:00 -
[26] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
Sorry if CCP's legal department is so incompetent that it takes them months to work out a problem that should have been considered years ago. But that doesn't mean I have to continue paying them while they find their collective asses. That's not rage, BTW, it's simple personal finance. If I'm unhappy with a product, I'm not going to continue to buy it for a yet to be determined number of months in the hope that it will improve. I'll stop buying it, and only buy it if it improves. So again, that's one less dissenting opinion for your eventual, redundant survey.
CCP wants to take time to acess the situation with the stakeholders before stating a public policy on the matter of RMT through GTC isk tokens bonuses. It's becoming obvious this is another maneuver to gain time and hope that this matter will remain in that "grey area" they're trying to create.
We as constumers however are not forced to keep paying for unfair service while waiting indefinitely for a resolution and have the power to refuse this conduct from CCP by unsubbing our accounts.
Furthermore we should only resub them back when the policy regarding the community services, fansites and GTC isk tokens RMT is announced, clear and subject to be applied to every entity/player without exception. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
233
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 16:25:00 -
[27] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Everyone else just calmly gives me their opinions, concerns, and votes.  Giving you opinions, concerns and votes somehow seems highly useful.
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: The one thing that is entirely predictable is that no matter what, CSM will get sh*t on. (potential future candidates, take note!)
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
233
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 16:53:00 -
[28] - Quote
This is what we do to kings where I come from. Not going around kissing his ass. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
235
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 17:27:00 -
[29] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: If they fail, then we can make sure our voice is heard. Until then - be patient.
Yes, we are patient. With our accounts unsubbed. We'll sub them back when the waiting is over. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
236
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:10:00 -
[30] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:I can't set my sites policies based on your interpretation of the EULA. I set policy from CCP's interpretation of the EULA. Please link document or official CCP statement with such interpretation.
EVE-GAMES wrote:I have yet to see an argument that convinces me that what I and other sites are doing is RMT, and so far....neither has CCP What you failed to understand (or are simply pretending to ignore) is that it isn't up to us to interpret and argument about the EULA, that's what CCP has to do and publicly announce a clear policy to be applied equally to every entity/player that wants to engage in the same conduct you and Somer Blink are engaging in.
To safeguard the best interests of all the players and the integrity of the game's sandbox, the highest possible number of accounts should remain unsubbed until such policy is announced. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
237
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote: I don't agree that un-subbing is the answer to getting what you want though, if you are not subbed then why would they care what you have to say on the topic?
It is the only means we have at our disposal as players to make our voice heard.
Din Chao wrote: 1. Unsubbing is a legitimate form of protest, and one that in the past has been effective in getting CCP's attention.
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
238
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 19:22:00 -
[32] - Quote
Herr Kutz wrote:In response to this terrible assumption that isk for clicking a link and buying a GTC is RMT...
Let's leave that response to an official CCP policy statement. Meanwhile our accounts remain unsubbed. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
239
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 22:22:00 -
[33] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote: So after 47 pages of ranting and thinly veiled insults, your ok with it now?
Seems a bit hypocritical to be upset when others do something you perceive as wrong, but if you can profit from it.... suddenly it becomes acceptable.
Again you seem a bit confused about the matter in question. We're not dealing with "player perception" or "grey areas" here. What we're dealing with is a lack of a clear CCP policy about the RMT you and Somer Blink have been doing. In case they come up with a verdict that deems it to be a violation of the current EULA you, Somer Blink and any CCP employee that helped you set up shop or gain influence within the community should still be punished in the same way any other power-abusing CCP employee or RMT'er (that is not giving them GTC sales) was before. That is of course, CCP were down to keep their integrity. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
240
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 00:10:00 -
[34] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3751264#post3751264
Shai 'Hulud wrote:I am holding a raffle for the following 5 tournament reward ships: Cambion Vangel Malice Freki Utu
To enter, you simply buy a 30 day gtc from me for $1000 USD and you will receive a bonus "shai ticket."...
LMFAO might follow the lead and raffle some shiet myself too |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
241
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 05:00:00 -
[35] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287597&find=unreadRead this and substitute 6 billion ISK free with that gtc that costs $105... edit: using some fake currency and fake raffle to avoid rmt entanglements of course...  edit: and check out the 'Tournament Prize Ships Raffle' thread too for your chance to buy, eh, I mean raffle unique ships!
Dayum dude... howcome you undercutting your plex so low??? $8.75 a pop (minus the 1/12 of the GTC value)?? for real?? dayum... I was gonna raffle some plex packs too but not gonna compete with that price... won't go lower than $13 a pop  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
246
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:03:00 -
[36] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:he didn't lotto the character. he lotto'ed a chance to bid on the character.
You're missing the point. Just like MMMitch told you before, he didn't directly raffle the character, he raffled a chance to get a Buyout on it. So he didn't sell it using a Lottery, he still sold it using an Auction and Buyout in the Character Bazaar forum section, just like the normal procedure endorsed by CCP for charachter exchange. The object of the raffle being a character buyout, plexes, ships or isk doesn't matter according to Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other unsanctioned in-game item raffling conducts. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
247
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:21:00 -
[37] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:You're hiding behind details. Details which CCP are more than free to ignore when the inputs and outputs boils down to this:
- Buy Lottery Tickets
- Receive chance of getting a character
Add as many steps & details in between as you like, but it breaks down the same. Must buy lottery ticket to get character.
You're still missing the point. They aren't "hiding behind details". They are using the same procedure used by Somer Blink and others that has not only been unsanctioned, but also supported and advertised by CCP. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
248
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:30:00 -
[38] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote: No I'm not missing the point. I understand that. You are missing what I have been pointing out all along. Character transfers / sales have different rules to ships etc.
Show me where Somer Blink has held a lottery for a character.
Yes, once again you are still missing the point, and I advise you to read the full thread before making such comments.
They do indeed have different rules - and that difference is in the means of selling and transfer (in-game vs character bazaar forum section) - which doesn't mean DNSBlack didn't follow them. He sold the character according to the CCP designated means for character sales/transfers. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
250
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:36:00 -
[39] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character. Not sure I can do any more than that.
Well. you got stuck in the same point and getting repetitive now, besides people already having explained to you why you're wrong. I hope you didn't get brain damage of some sort.
Not sure It will help repeating this to you again:
raven666wings wrote:You're missing the point. Just like MMMitch told you before, he didn't directly raffle the character, he raffled a chance to get a Buyout on it. So he didn't sell it using a Lottery, he still sold it using an Auction and Buyout in the Character Bazaar forum section, just like the normal procedure endorsed by CCP for character exchange. The object of the raffle being a character buyout, plexes, ships or isk doesn't matter according to Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other unsanctioned in-game item raffling conducts, as long as they're all tranferred by the CCP designated trading mechanisms. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
252
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:48:00 -
[40] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote: You're going round in circles. No point continuing. It's summarised thusly:
I suggest CCP can say that holding lottery that you must enter in order to be able to buy a character is flouting the no "lottery style" rule when buying characters.
You say, He's doing exactly the same as Somer (which he isn't because *character*) or it doesn't matter because there are additional steps between lottery and character buying.
The End.
Lol you definitely should have read the thread before fallin here in a parachute. It's is not me or the guys who are setting up raffles that "are going in circles", It was Somer Blink and others. We're simply using our right to engage in the same conduct that has not only been unsanctioned but also supported and advertised by CCP.
PS - You should consider writing english in further posts. What you wrote after "you're going in circles" didn't make any sense. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
253
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 17:12:00 -
[41] - Quote
Hey guyz, look at me, I'm a Somer Blink shill
But.. but.. others cannot do what I do because they will break my RMT monopoly!!! 
The End  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
254
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:25:00 -
[42] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755340#post3755340
CCP Phantom wrote:Offering a (small) ISK bonus for doing community work in a provable way is from my personal perspective fine. Please note that this is my personal opinion and not official ruling.
Please tell us more about your personal opinions. Exactly how many and which other CCP employees share such opinion? |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
257
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:42:00 -
[43] - Quote
He means that if you keep pushing for a fast response they'll just tell you to f*ck off and you won't like it because they're gonna let Somer Blink continue to RMT alone anyway. The rest of the playerbase won't like it aswell and massive discontent/ account unsubs will happen. Which seems an adequate measure to be taken when confronted with the confirmation of favoritism. So they rather try to mantain this in the "grey area" to not risk losing subs. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
258
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:51:00 -
[44] - Quote
I was taught only reach fo tha heat if you bustin'.. so when I lift tis shirt that'z the end of discussion...   
Woot Woot |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
259
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 19:41:00 -
[45] - Quote
The situation as it stands at the moment:
Shai Hulud's and Dark Decay's threads were locked by CCP Phantom using the following message:
CCP Phantom wrote:Quoting the EVE Online Terms of Service: ___ 10. You may not market, sell, advertise, promote, solicit or otherwise arrange for the exchange or transfer of items in the game or other game services unless it is for in-game sales of in-game services or items. ___ Also note the following explanation: ___ 2. Any form of ETC trading outside of the CCP created system is not permitted or supported by CCP. ___ This means, if you try to sell in-game items, for example a 30 day PLEX, for real money, you violate the TOS. If you want to become an authorized ETC reseller, please contact the CCP Customer Support via [email protected]. Please note that RMT attempts can swiftly lead to permanent forum and permanent in-game bans.
which claims to deem their raffles illegitimate due to the rafflers not being authorized GTC wholesale sellers (so that means that were they authorized GTC wholesale sellers, the raffle would have been lefitimate and carried on).
DNSBlack's thread however still remains unlocked and got this post by CCP Dolan:
CCP Dolan wrote:Greetings,
Any form of ETC trading outside of the CCP created system is not permitted or supported by CCP. We are currently investigating if the sort of ETC resale (resale by an unauthorized reseller) is permitted. We appreciate your patience while we investigate this matter.
which doesnt not illegitimize DNSBlack's raffle at the moment, but states that an investigation is being carried to verify "if the sort of ETC resale (resale by an unauthorized reseller) is permitted".
Therefore an arbitrary interpretation of the rules and action duality is present, unless DNSBlack is an autorized GTC wholesale seller (in which case CCP Dolan's mentioned investigation will not apply to him). |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
259
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:10:00 -
[46] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:apparently he has to be an authorized wholesale reseller  it's almost like they are making this **** up as they go along
Lol they clearly are. They f*cked up big time and the longer CCP lets this mess unfold the worse it will get. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
261
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:41:00 -
[47] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Will need to give CCP the benefit of the doubt on the thread locks as both mine and Shai's were ongoing while DNS's was over and there was no need to lock it.
He did the same as me and Shai and used an official reseller to get the buyer his GTC.
We all used the somer defence of raffle and made up currency.
Where we differed was that he never seemed to ask for a massive $2500 for his GTC's and someone just offered it, while I set an actual price for the GTC of $105 instead of $35 that people could accept for a 'free' plex pack and Shai had $1000 for a gtc for a ship raffle.
This could be the other reason why the threads were locked or not?
You are using the same raffle scheme Somer Blink uses, with the exception that you are offering an over-priced GTC and a raffle, instead of offering a referral to a "normally" priced GTC sold by the authorized reseller and a raffle.
You not being an authorized reseller might be a good reason but I'm not sure if they have rules to regulate the price an authorized reseller can ask for a GTC. If they don't he can sell it for whatever value he wants. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
262
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:50:00 -
[48] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: SOMER is not a reseller. They work with an authorized reseller.
All resellers I have seen have the price at $34.99. But why require all resellers to use the same price if you are going to allow them to compete against one another in the first place (by offering isk)?
Yeah right, they offer the "referral to the authorized reseller" and a raffle. That's what I wrote in last post. Shai and Dark could do the same (offer a referral to an authorized reseller sale).
Yeah I know right, that's what I'm talking about. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
272
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 03:20:00 -
[49] - Quote
As someone in DNSBlack's thread of awezome wrote,
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287241
The Greenmachine Greenmachine wrote:RIOT COUNT ME IN
REFUSE/RESIST - F*ck Sh*t Up
Chaos A.D. Tanks on the streets Confronting police Bleeding the plebs Raging crowd Burning cars Bloodshed stars Who'll be alive?!
Chaos A.D. Army in siege Total alarm I'm sick of this Inside the state War is created No man's land What's this sh*t?!
Refuse/Resist Refuse
Chaos A.D. Disorder unleashed Starting to burn Starting to lynch Silence means death Stand on your feet Inner fear Your worst enemy
Refuse/Resist Refuse/Resist |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
274
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 14:18:00 -
[50] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219
CCP Falcon wrote:Lotteries for character sales are not permitted under the Character Bazaar Rules. As such, this thread is locked. Quote wrote: 17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=285492&p=51
Money Makin Mitch wrote:he didn't lotto the character. he lotto'ed a chance to bid on the character.
raven666wings wrote:You're missing the point. Just like MMMitch told you before, he didn't directly raffle the character, he raffled a chance to get a Buyout on it. So he didn't sell it using a Lottery, he still sold it using an Auction and Buyout in the Character Bazaar forum section, just like the normal procedure endorsed by CCP for character exchange. The object of the raffle being a character buyout, plexes, ships or isk doesn't matter according to Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other unsanctioned in-game item raffling conducts, as long as they're all tranferred by the CCP designated trading mechanisms.
raven666wings wrote:You're still missing the point. They aren't "hiding behind details". They are using the same procedure used by Somer Blink and others that has not only been unsanctioned, but also supported and advertised by CCP. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
274
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 14:22:00 -
[51] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.
Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice.
Reference to any endorsement of this by CCP Staff have been removed until an decision is made regarding it rather than misinformation.
Don't put words in my mouth in future.
We don't need to put words in your mouth. Your actions speak louder. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:09:00 -
[52] - Quote
In this particular case I don't think you'll be able to get back at CCP from a legal standpoint. For all effects, they are merely selling their business product, the Game Time Codes (albeit through a 3rd party referral system to increase sales and even rewarding it for the effort).
They are indeed not enforcing their own EULA and Term of Service rules to certain costumer(s), but I don't think that there is anything forcing them to. These EULA and ToS documents are created by these companies to act as legal backup that gives them full legitimacy to do whatever they want with the game and the costumers' accounts, they aren't created to protect the costumers in case the company decides to violate its own rules. There is no rule in the whole documents that forces them to enforce any of the other rules.
However there might be national laws written in the Business Code (either in Iceland or in Britain) that forbid a service providing company to have double standards when serving its costumers. It's a matter of contacting the Icelandic Consumer Defense Agency and inquiring them about the existance of such or related regulations and find out whether a lawsuit under such grounds may be filed. If the costumer service double standards are a violation of any existing Icelanding Business law and CCP's practice can be proven in court, then there is the possibility that the judge will deem them guilty of such practice.
Regarding Somer Blink, the best way to legally get back at him at the moment is to contact the Tax Administration Office of the country where he lives and inform them of his activity. He's most likely not declaring any of the income he's getting from the GTC referrals and just that situation has the potential to confiscate a big part (if not the total) of his profits. Like CCP he wont be suceptible of being sued for illegal gambling because he's merely doing it with fake money inside the game, while receiving a real money fee for the referral of the GTC sales. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:21:00 -
[53] - Quote
Please see U. S. v. Scheinberg et al. in post on previous page.
'The indictment alleges that the companies used fraudulent methods to evade this law, for example, by disguising online gambling payments as purchases of merchandise'[/quote]
You are putting this in the same bag as online gambling with real money, but that's not what's happening here. They are converting the real money into isk and rewarding the 3rd party with real money for the increased GTC sales, but still gambling with fake money only. Only if the isk was converted back to real money would this example apply. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:25:00 -
[54] - Quote
They're gambling with fake money only and there isn't any law that forbids that. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:38:00 -
[55] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:raven666wings wrote:They're gambling with fake money only and there isn't any law that forbids that. People are buying 'Merchandise' with real money, with which to gamble. Not much different than buying poker chips to gamble, except that you will lose 100% of the time unless you convert your winnings into plex to pay for your account. So in this case the bank wins 100% of the time.
You can legally buy the PLEX or GTC's coupled with isk tokens and gable with them inside the game, as long as the gabling service does not reward you with real money. It isn't illegal. For all effects they are selling you the company's service.
Note: I hope you understand I'm trying to evaluate a possible legal standpoint to advocate the players' rights, not CCP or Somer Blink's conducts. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 03:03:00 -
[56] - Quote
Like I wrote before, the only legal ground you could defend here is the double standards verified when providing service to certain clients, by not enforcing the EULA or ToS rules to them. The illegal gambling and money laundering accusations are, in my opinion, not fundamented. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 15:49:00 -
[57] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:Hey raven666wings, I knew I wasn't exactly up against any sort of mental might, but I just thought I'd point out how I was right and you were so very wrong. Love how you moaned on about me not getting the point when the point I was making turned out to be superbly accurate and your point wholly inaccurate. I guess life must be tough for you. Oh and just one more thing...
Your recurrent use of formal fallacies doesn't seem voluntary, what you're presenting really seems incapacity of racional thought (hence the brain damage analogy).
Having a CCP representative lock that thread doesn't mean your right. It means he acted on arbitrary judgement and/or misinterpreted the situation like you did. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 16:42:00 -
[58] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote: Even with me being proven correct, you're still pretending that's not how it is. Delusional isn't a sufficient word here. I'll not bother to reply anymore as at best, you're being thoroughly dishonest and at worst, you need to seek professional help to get you back in touch with reality. I hope you get better soon.
Your recurrent use of formal fallacies doesn't seem voluntary, what you're presenting really seems incapacity of racional thought (hence the brain damage analogy).
Having a CCP representative lock that thread doesn't mean you were right. It means he acted on arbitrary judgement and/or misinterpreted the situation like you did. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 16:49:00 -
[59] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:Delusional isn't a sufficient word here. I'll not bother to reply anymore as at best, you're being thoroughly dishonest and at worst, you need to seek professional help to get you back in touch with reality. I hope you get better soon.
Don't go away yet. Please continue your desperate display of irrational justification for arbitrary judgement actions. It's kind of entertaining to watch. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
281
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 16:54:00 -
[60] - Quote
Gogela wrote:...but it's a scary time for CCP. Getting ready to launch a third game while the second starves to death and this one wanes? Yikes. Their hesitation is understandable.
Dude, I normally agree with your points of view, but im gonna have to disagree on this. You're asking us to show clemency to a corporation ran by a board of capitalists who care about nothing else but the ammount of money in their bank accounts. A corporation that calls itself "Crowd Control Productions". A corporation that presents its costumers with a ruthless "We are a business and our goal is to make money" statement everytime it is questioned about its engagement with "business partners". A corporation that uses dirty tricks to scam the costumers left and right while telling them to accept it because it's for the benefit of "The Corporation". They are hesitating over the side project development and 3rd party deals they have made recently? Excuse me, but .. What do I care? Was it us that told them to engage in such practices?
Gogela wrote:I mean... f*** everything else, we're talking about the future of the company and the livelihoods of a fair number of people. Put yourself in their shoes. Dude please, you're the one making a drama out of this, not the players posting here. You're asking us to keep feeding such corporation with our money? You wanna know what I have to say to that? -F*ck everything else? NO. F*ck the Corportation. I am a costumer and my goal is to get a quality gameplay service on my computer, it's not to waste my money on a biased sandbox, or paying the salaries of people that are trying to find ways to scam me or working on other games that I am not playing. Until the corporation is willing to hear me and give me what I want, i will not give it what it wants. It's as simple as that.
Gogela wrote:So yah this has been bulls***, yah it's SOMER doing 'legit' RMT, and yah we want a response... but the decisions they make from here on out are big, far reaching, and risky no matter what. With a game this complex you just can't tell what will happen no matter what. I for one am not surprised we haven't heard anything yet. They'll probably say something before too long... but getting dramatic about this... not going to do much. The answers are bigger than the players commenting here. Str8up.
No, the answers are not bigger than the players commenting here. The players are, in case you and them forgot, the most important part of this mess because they are the ones who pay for this show. Without money the show won't go on. So "The Corporation" better keep that in mind, start listening to us and do what we want. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
284
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 16:12:00 -
[61] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:AayJay Crendraven wrote:Kate stark wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:i convinced several people to not purchase the new starter packs on steam due to this. at least a handful of people won't be subscribing now whereas they would have before. nobody wants to play an unbalanced game. you guys hit my wallet, so i'm hitting yours now  "if you think them having more isk and sp is unfair.. wait until i tell you that ccp are giving them free stuff to. like trying to ice skate up a hill mate." Some motherf****** are always tryin' to ice skate uphill... damn right that's what i was thinking when i typed that. i do like the blade films even if blade 3 was a giant ipod advert.
Whats behind that door? -Can't tell you, they'll kill me. - Kill you? Motherf*cker I'll kill you, I'll just enjoy better
Blade & Wesley Snipes GÖÑ |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
285
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 02:01:00 -
[62] - Quote
Have you not heard yet? What planet you live on??? Wake up to lyfe dude!
CCP Phantom wrote:Offering a (small) ISK bonus for doing community work in a provable way is from my personal perspective fine. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
286
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 00:35:00 -
[63] - Quote
Btw guys Katarina Reid's GTC sales are on fire!
Lord Valian wrote:You should be receiving Ishukone Watch Scorpions any day now for your service to the community.
Michael Joseph Jackson wrote:I Said You Wanna Be Startin' Somethin' ... LMFAO  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
291
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 17:51:00 -
[64] - Quote
Unsubbed all my 172 alts. Came in looking for a good space sci-fi mmorpg, left when I saw it was a good pile of $hit  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
292
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 20:57:00 -
[65] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Katarina Reid wrote:Headshot Not sure if im allowed to link the letter given to resellers but it says to let Katrina give bonus isk with referrals until she cleans her wallet within 10 days, this way we can keep profiting from this fast GTC sales buck and then continue with Somer Blink RMT breaching the EULA alone. You can still support me for no reward when you buy your ETC's here$660 made for me 377 sale of ETC's $13,195 for CCP 188b given out
Letter translated to english  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
296
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:32:00 -
[66] - Quote
Kestler Jagrafess wrote: Long story short, I'm a CCP/Somer shill posting desperate damage control attempts. Next I'm gonna hire a youtube girl to make a video on it. I realised how far I have messed the game up beyond repair as all the the players are unsubbing and cashing out their isk before they leave.
Fixed that for you  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
303
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 05:08:00 -
[67] - Quote
DNSBlack's thread got locked with a derp post:
CCP Eterne wrote:I am locking this as trading any in-game goods in exchange for ISK, even through ETC reselling or the like. ??? Lol
English translation : I am locking this as only Somer Blink can RMT. |
| |
|