Pages: [1] :: one page
Author
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Alowishus
Posted - 2006.02.05 23:32:00 -
[1 ]
I wanted to start fresh here rather than drag up a million year old thread. This is the setup I tried: 4x 125mm 2 (AM, 14km Optimal) 1x 'Malkuth' Standard 1x 1MN AB 2 1x Small Shield Booster 2 1x Anointed EM Ward 1x Fleeting Warp Scrambler (20KM) 1x Named Damage Mod 1x Nano (for lack of anything better in my hangar) The problem is I ran out of cap and I wasn't even running the AB or Warp Disruptor. I was fighting an Arbitrator belonging to a friend and I really think he would have taken me if we didn't stop. I was reading through the other Harpy threads and I noticed a couple things. Rarely do people pack tackle gear. And when they did they used a setup almost identical to mine which I found to be cap limited. So what gives? I had a couple ideas. Bump up to Thorium ammo for the cap bonus and then use two PDUs in low. This brings my optimal to 24km, which is beyond disruptor range, but I think the 125s track well enough to orbit in the 15km range effectively (I like to stay out of web range). I do a lot of solo PvP, a disruptor is a MUST. I'd like to be able to effectively take out cruisers as I had no problems doing so in an untanked Malediction (using speed as a deffense, and also keeping outside of web range). To his credit, my corpmate has an *awesome* Arbitrator setup so I'm sure this was a factor.
0wain Glyndwr
Posted - 2006.02.06 07:48:00 -
[2 ]
Edited by: 0wain Glyndwr on 06/02/2006 07:48:45 Change the nano for a PDU2 imo Only other thing that would help is a Gisti shield booster but not the best thing for PVP
LUKEC
Posted - 2006.02.06 08:16:00 -
[3 ]
Edited by: LUKEC on 06/02/2006 08:18:05 Edited by: LUKEC on 06/02/2006 08:16:51 you will die terrible death to the first inty you will meet. Drop launcher, fit 4x 150mm t2 and make sure you have good web on. I use no guns... i smack to death.
Greyshadow
Posted - 2006.02.06 09:58:00 -
[4 ]
Could you drop the Em hardener and fit a named cap recharger? Obviously you'd need to pick your targets well but at least you could hold your cap. Also drop the nano for a mag stab II "Now you see me, now you don't!"
Flash Landsraad
Posted - 2006.02.06 10:12:00 -
[5 ]
I've taken down many intys with exactly the same setup as that pretty much. I have a fleeting webber instead of the AB however.
Ryysa
Posted - 2006.02.06 10:18:00 -
[6 ]
High: 125mm or 150mm T2's Mid: web, 20km scrambler, t2 small shield booster, em hardener OR AB... but without an EM hardener minmatar/amarr stuff will *****you... Low: magstab II, pdu II nothing special :oAll about target jamming
Greyshadow
Posted - 2006.02.06 11:37:00 -
[7 ]
Edited by: Greyshadow on 06/02/2006 11:38:55 You lot are seriously gonna eat me alive for this setup. High: 4 x 125mm II 1 x Named Rocket Launcher Med: 1 x 1mn AF II 1 x 7.5km -2 Scrambler 1 x Phased Target Painter 1 x F-b10 Cap Recharger Low: 1 x Small Armor Recharger II 1 x Reactive Plating II or Energized Reactive II Thinking about it you could even drop the painter for another F-b10 to keep the cap recharged nicely. "Now you see me, now you don't!"
black sabath
Posted - 2006.02.06 15:17:00 -
[8 ]
This setup helped me to take a ferox on ma own High 3+ 150mmt2 1+ named roket launcher Med 1+small sheild boostert2 1+magnetic scattering amplifiert2 1+20kscrambler 1+capaciter rechargert2 low 1+pdut2 1+capacitor power relayt2 this way wa cap will be fine and his will die faster than a liverpoolsurporter in man u seats but get the new shield skills to atleast lvl 3 on the em on so ya em resistance will be as good as the rest enjoy the hunt
maGz
Posted - 2006.02.06 15:21:00 -
[9 ]
I use this: Highs: 4x 125 IIs & 1x Arbalest Std. Launcher Meds: Gistii AB, Gistii SB, Pith EM Hardner (59.5%) & 20km scram Lows: Mag Stab II & PDU II I know a lot of people will say that the setup suck due to the lag of a webber, however I have yet to die with this setup to a ceptor ______________________
Nikita Fontaine
Posted - 2006.02.06 15:28:00 -
[10 ]
simply... 125mm rail setups on harpy suck... bigtime. use 150mm's and take a good webber and your away. ----------------------------------------------- Great minds think alike but fools seldom differ
k starwind
Posted - 2006.02.06 16:13:00 -
[11 ]
i think that is my sniping setup cant be completly sure 4x 150mm ll small shield booster, sensor booster, tracing computer ll 2x tracking enhancer ll -------------------------------------------------- crazy test setup 4x 150mm ll, 1 standard launcher small shield booster, em hardener, racial jammer, small cap injector magnetic fild stabilizer ll, co-processor ll ---------------------------------------------------
Alowishus
Posted - 2006.02.06 17:43:00 -
[12 ]
If I'm going to be in web range of my target, why not use a blaster setup? Seriously, I'm not sure how you guys are coming to the conclusion that 150mm, with an optimal of over 15km, along with a web, is my solution. Seems blasters would make much more sense if I'm going to be that close. I guess a Harpy just does not fit my style of PvP or my philosophies. It'll be my NPC ship.
Nikita Fontaine
Posted - 2006.02.06 21:13:00 -
[13 ]
The webber is to sa***uard against inteceptors and to aid in fighting close range ships such as the enyo ----------------------------------------------- Great minds think alike but fools seldom differ
Antic
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:12:00 -
[14 ]
Originally by: Alowishus If I'm going to be in web range of my target, why not use a blaster setup? Seriously, I'm not sure how you guys are coming to the conclusion that 150mm, with an optimal of over 15km, along with a web, is my solution. Seems blasters would make much more sense if I'm going to be that close. I guess a Harpy just does not fit my style of PvP or my philosophies. It'll be my NPC ship. Blasters arent that good for pvp on harpys. You are way too slow so you can not dictate range if some ebil inty or X frigate-faster-than-you coms and orbits you outside your blaster range. 150mms gives you a far better strike distancee and makes sure that with an AB or MWD you can keep outside NOS range on bigger ships and still hit them with AM.
Tozmeister
Posted - 2006.02.06 23:28:00 -
[15 ]
"Sa***uard" gets edited? huh? what does f_e_g mean?
Draaken
Posted - 2006.02.07 01:08:00 -
[16 ]
Originally by: Greyshadow High: 4 x 125mm II 1 x Named Rocket Launcher Med: 1 x 1mn AF II 1 x 7.5km -2 Scrambler Originally by: black sabath This setup helped me to take a ferox on ma own High 3+ 150mmt2 1+ named roket launcher (..) low 1+pdut2 1+capacitor power relayt2 What the heck are you guys doing with a rocket launcher when you're using 150mm railguns with an optimal of 14+ km with AM ammo?? (And with a 7.5km scrambler, wtf?!) Also, black sabath, if you'd point me towards the manufacturers of t2 Cap Power Relays, I'll love you long time! ____________________
Kyozoku
Posted - 2006.02.07 01:17:00 -
[17 ]
Originally by: Draaken http://www.mushkin.com/doc/products/memory_detail.asp?ID=273 I should think they're using it because they ran out of room for a standard launcher and figure it's better than an empty slot.
Daivasth
Posted - 2006.02.07 01:24:00 -
[18 ]
Edited by: Daivasth on 07/02/2006 01:25:29 i think *** means****? i dunno... lets see if it gets edited out. EDIT: yep, "ef" "ee" "gi" in sa***uard is edited due to its resemblance to "ef" "a" "gi" anyways, back to the OP. rnt there much better choices for PvP than a slow frigate with the agility of a cruiser that dies to amarr and mimnitar unless u drop cap support? harpy rocks for PvE, but for PvP i think there r many better choices.
Daivasth
Posted - 2006.02.07 01:24:00 -
[19 ]
Edited by: Daivasth on 07/02/2006 01:25:29 i think *** means****? i dunno... lets see if it gets edited out. EDIT: yep, "ef" "ee" "gi" in sa***uard is edited due to its resemblance to "ef" "a" "gi" anyways, back to the OP. rnt there much better choices for PvP than a slow frigate with the agility of a cruiser that dies toEVE Online | EVE Insider | Forums
Daivasth
Posted - 2006.02.07 01:26:00 -
[20 ]
dont mean to double post, but edit doesnt seem to work for me right now. "ef" "ee" "gi" in sa***uard is edited due to its resemblance to "ef" "a" "gi"
Cummilla
Posted - 2006.02.07 01:52:00 -
[21 ]
the basic problem with the harpy is that slot layout forces you to shield tank and you have no bonus in the EM resist area from which to build upon. So basically, it's as if, at least in the area of tanking, you are a tech 1 ship, starting at zero percent EM resist. AND, that same slot layout and the fact that you are an assault frig (cap issues)makes it impossible to get creative and go with a invul 2 or another EM hardener.
Nebuli
Posted - 2006.02.07 03:56:00 -
[22 ]
For fleet support, and sniping intys at 103+ K, I go with, 4 x 150mm II with spike 2 x tracking CPU, 2 x sensor boosters, 1 x damage mod, 1 x tracking enhancer. 103k optimal, wrecking of 200 ish, 2 or 3 sec rof, kills intys incredibly fast :)
Malthros Zenobia
Posted - 2006.02.07 05:34:00 -
[23 ]
Originally by: black sabath This setup helped me to take a ferox on ma own High 3+ 150mmt2 1+ named roket launcher Med 1+small sheild boostert2 1+magnetic scattering amplifiert2 1+20kscrambler 1+capaciter rechargert2 low 1+pdut2 1+capacitor power relayt2 this way wa cap will be fine and his will die faster than a liverpoolsurporter in man u seats but get the new shield skills to atleast lvl 3 on the em on so ya em resistance will be as good as the rest enjoy the hunt You'd get better damage if you can drop the rocket launcher for a 4th 150mm rail imo. Those 40-50dmg rockets aren't all that hot when you can have your 150s firing at the same rate, and doing more dmg with AM, and from further out. Originally by: Istvaan Shogaatsu I'm probably one of the biggest Bush fanboys in Eve... This is like, Darth Vader, can't-reach-climax-without-killing-a-puppy evil.RAWR!11 Sig Hijack!11 - Imaran
Lord Spidey
Posted - 2006.02.07 05:47:00 -
[24 ]
4 light neutron II's + a rocket launcher. Throw in a mag stab 2 and this is an evil setup. Mids compose of ab, small sb, web, and scram. I actually even fit a mn instead of ab but ill have to drop the web for a scram
Pages: [1] :: one page
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page