Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1757
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 14:53:00 -
[91] - Quote
Icer Xx wrote:As for the "We" I want to know how many gm's dose it take to look at a log and see something is wrong? there was an entire committee of senior GMs formed today to determine just how much of nothing the logs showed |
Yazzinra
Scorpion Ventures Rim Worlds Protectorate
13
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 16:07:00 -
[92] - Quote
is it possible the error is in the log, not the sentry?
presumably, Maka hits F1 (or whatever key triggers his sentries) causing his sentry drones to fire, this triggers the rest of the fleets sentry drones to fire via drone assist.
the logs misinterpret what happened so instead of Bob does 20 damage, bill does 22 damage, maka does 21 damage, it simple says Maka does 120k damage?
perhaps its the log that is wrong, not the drone?
just a thought that I hadn't read in this thread. |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
226
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 16:09:00 -
[93] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Dusty Daisy wrote:Might not be related but i just had one of my sentry drones hit for 2 damage on a structure i was trying to destroy. That sounds wrong too, but in the exact opposite direction. The lowest possible damage multiplier you're supposed to be able to have is +ù0.5. Unless your sentries do somewhere around 10 HP base damage and/or the structure had some pretty insane resists (they never do), such a low damage shouldn't be possible either. sentries are long broken, a month ago, we had to grind struct (mainly pocos / pos in low)
used a domi with sentrys
said sentrys were able to have a miss for around 1/3 of the shots, beside the fact they were at there exact optimal. on a freaking STRUCTURE!
drones are so broken this is ridiculous, but unfortunately, nothing new here, it's not like it is an ongoing issue for several years... |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
226
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 16:28:00 -
[94] - Quote
Khrane wrote:seth Hendar wrote:Sala Cameron wrote:We've noticed this as well and brought the problem forward to CCP, so they're aware of it. tbh, i petitionned a few ship losses since a year where similar "weird" thing happen. the answer was always the same: working has intended" last one i even provided logs, showing the issue, the only answer i got was that CCP was not taking those as proof because of forged logs..... so yah, they aware, and they don't care....as usual.... This sounds different than your case because here there is a server side kill mail that shows the erroneous damage done by 2 Ishtars in conjunction with a video and client side logs. Three distinct point of views all showing the same thing. i do have a registered server side kill showing that the following loki:
Loki wrote: Loki Electronics - Immobility Drivers Loki Engineering - Capacitor Regeneration Matrix Loki Defensive - Adaptive Shielding Loki Offensive - Covert Reconfiguration Loki Propulsion - Chassis Optimization
Medium Energy Neutralizer II 4x 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II Covert Ops Cloaking Device II
Large Shield Extender II Warp Disruptor II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II 10MN Microwarpdrive II Fleeting Propulsion Inhibitor I
Damage Control II 3x Gyrostabilizer II Tracking Enhancer II
3x Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
was destroyed after receiving 5214 damage
accoring to a GM, this is normal because: "The damage displayed is the combined amount of hit points of your shield, armor and structure, as opposed to your effective hit points, which comes from calculating your total tank"
yet, 11628 + 2688 + 2014 - 5124 = i'm still ******* alive with 6504 HP left on my shield!!!!
(all value are RAW values indeed)
yet the kill is registered on my logs / killboards AND ingame killmail with 5124 damage
fun thing, on the very same fight, a rohk died to an unusally low damage amount too (in the same proportion than my loki), and got the same answer from CCP.
so clearly, a bug occured at this time, and CCP denies |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
18
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 16:39:00 -
[95] - Quote
These sorts of problems are not new.
ThereGÇÖs an old 2005 Farjung vid GÇ£Wave of MutilationGÇ¥ think its #2 were he insta volleys a freighters 100k hull in one shot. Farjung was able to see it when we was editing his vids and he got in contact with the guy and both of them petitioned it (he did not get the ship back as he was ****** anyway) and it probably got put in a queue of things broken that need fixing in a pile on someoneGÇÖs desk. |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
226
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 16:49:00 -
[96] - Quote
Tappits wrote:These sorts of problems are not new.
ThereGÇÖs an old 2005 Farjung vid GÇ£Wave of MutilationGÇ¥ think its #2 were he insta volleys a freighters 100k hull in one shot. Farjung was able to see it when we was editing his vids and he got in contact with the guy and both of them petitioned it (he did not get the ship back as he was ****** anyway) and it probably got put in a queue of things broken that need fixing in a pile on someoneGÇÖs desk. oh i know, i just wanted to point out that:
1- CCP is long aware of it
2- they don't even care
3- even if they know, they stil denies players from legitimate refund of assets lost to a bug |
destiny2
Perkone Caldari State
228
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 16:53:00 -
[97] - Quote
ive lost some ships in some strange ways as for damages but if their not a super or a titan i aint gonna complain :D |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
227
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 17:08:00 -
[98] - Quote
destiny2 wrote:ive lost some ships in some strange ways as for damages but if their not a super or a titan i aint gonna complain :D it's a matter of perspective, go tell that to someone who can berly afford to loose 2 strats in a row.
i can, but this doesn't change the fact that this is borken AND CCP's attitude toward it is "questionnable" to say the least.
i understand such bugs can be a pain to track and fix, and it can take ages, but until they are fxed, GM role is to copensate undue losses resulting from such bugs, yet they don't |
Janna Sway
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
51
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 04:40:00 -
[99] - Quote
Lupo diCotze wrote:Aye - I'm aware that structure come after armor :p Here's the kill mail and the likely fitting of one the the parties. iirc the dmg done on the killmail is the cumulative dmg - rather than the killing blow. Subtracting those large dmg shots from the killmail damage done leaves 7778 which is about par for the other participants. The T2 reinforced bulkheads would have brought structure HP up to around 236k with 3 of them (before resists are taken into account). I'm not saying there isn't an issue with the dmg shown in the log - something appears off - but at 10% armor the resist are much lower. If both shots hit when the armor was still at 10% ish - and if the remainder of the dmg was applied without taking into account the diff resists from the DC on structure - then it kinda adds up. Which in turn helps understand where the problem might be.
I am not familiar with capital ships but understand the basics of fitting ships. May I say, you have fitted your expensive archon in a terrible way. Your Archon is paperthin and it is no wonder that it went *poof* in a matter of seconds. You spend tons of ISK for an archon and you use T1 Armor repairers and hulltank it? Sorry but I hope you have learned about your mistakes you just made and after seeing the fit I really doubt that you lost your ship because of a bug, and if it was a bug, well, with that fit you just asked for disappointment and loss.
If you wanna hulltank (because you want the lows for something else but repair modules), then use T2 hull repairers at least in your mid slots in combination to bulkheads in the lows... If you wanna armor tank, then use T2 Armor repairers at least, but please rather use faction or deadspace stuff, and use Armor tank modules. Always focus on one specific tanking method, either shield tank, armor tank, or if you are really manly, then hull tank for the lulz. But please, even if you are really manly, still do not hulltank.
I guess that one Ishtar would deal around 700-750 DPS by using T2 sentries, and you can be pretty sure that all Ishtars focused you at the same time when you were called as a target, i.e. 14.000 damage per second on a paperthin carrier with no noticeable defenses, relying on 60% resistance strength on the hull, no buffer tank, relying on two T1 armor repairers that cannot deal with the burst damage coming at you.
I am pretty sure that the Ishtars all focused your archon at the same time, thus dealing burst damage, and your fitted ship, with those T1 armor repairers, were rather fitted for dealing with consistent damage coming from for example NPC ships. You counter burst damage with tank buffer and you counter consistent damage that comes in "small" bursts with tank recovery modules like shield booster and armor repairers.
For PvP, where you can most likely expect burst damage coming at you, you should tank with tank-buffer modules, like armor plates and shield extenders. For PvE, where rats deal consistent damage to you in small "bursts" through a large amount of ships, then you tank with tank-recovery modules like armor repairers and shield boosters.
To me it seems like you were out there running anomalies with your archon and the Pandemic Legion fleet just caught you off guard and grilled you. In case you fitted the Archon for PvP purposes, then maybe you should consider flying battlecruisers.
Overall I think you should take back your accusations towards the Pandemic Legion and work on yourself. I am also pretty sure that those guys from Pandemic Legion do not really have the need to cheat in the slightest. They know and understand about what they are doing and know how to melt Archons. |
John Bosch
State War Academy Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 04:44:00 -
[100] - Quote
Because we totally need another thread about this..... |
|
Icer Xx
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
11
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 04:45:00 -
[101] - Quote
/me facedesk
Please just leave. |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1759
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 05:10:00 -
[102] - Quote
Janna Sway wrote:I am not familiar with capital ships but understand the basics of fitting ships. May I say, you have fitted your expensive archon in a terrible way. Your Archon is paperthin and it is no wonder that it went *poof* in a matter of seconds. You spend tons of ISK for an archon and you use T1 Armor repairers and hulltank it? Sorry but I hope you have learned about your mistakes you just made and after seeing the fit I really doubt that you lost your ship because of a bug, and if it was a bug, well, with that fit you just asked for disappointment and loss.
If you wanna hulltank (because you want the lows for something else but repair modules), then use T2 hull repairers at least in your mid slots in combination to bulkheads in the lows... If you wanna armor tank, then use T2 Armor repairers at least, but please rather use faction or deadspace stuff, and use Armor tank modules. Always focus on one specific tanking method, either shield tank, armor tank, or if you are really manly, then hull tank for the lulz. But please, even if you are really manly, still do not hulltank.
I guess that one Ishtar would deal around 700-750 DPS by using T2 sentries, and you can be pretty sure that all Ishtars focused you at the same time when you were called as a target, i.e. 14.000 damage per second on a paperthin carrier with no noticeable defenses, relying on 60% resistance strength on the hull, no buffer tank, relying on two T1 armor repairers that cannot deal with the burst damage coming at you.
I am pretty sure that the Ishtars all focused your archon at the same time, thus dealing burst damage, and your fitted ship, with those T1 armor repairers, were rather fitted for dealing with consistent damage coming from for example NPC ships. You counter burst damage with tank buffer and you counter consistent damage that comes in "small" bursts with tank recovery modules like shield booster and armor repairers.
For PvP, where you can most likely expect burst damage coming at you, you should tank with tank-buffer modules, like armor plates and shield extenders. For PvE, where rats deal consistent damage to you in small "bursts" through a large amount of ships, then you tank with tank-recovery modules like armor repairers and shield boosters.
To me it seems like you were out there running anomalies with your archon and the Pandemic Legion fleet just caught you off guard and grilled you. In case you fitted the Archon for PvP purposes, then maybe you should consider flying battlecruisers.
Overall I think you should take back your accusations towards the Pandemic Legion and work on yourself. I am also pretty sure that those guys from Pandemic Legion do not really have the need to cheat in the slightest. They know and understand about what they are doing and know how to melt Archons.
Thanks for the advice!
|
Kenrailae
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
39
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 05:38:00 -
[103] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Icer Xx wrote:As for the "We" I want to know how many gm's dose it take to look at a log and see something is wrong? there was an entire committee of senior GMs formed today to determine just how much of nothing the logs showed
I think you, Sir, just leveled up!
|
Bloody Slave
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
37
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 05:48:00 -
[104] - Quote
Janna Sway wrote:Lupo diCotze wrote:Aye - I'm aware that structure come after armor :p Here's the kill mail and the likely fitting of one the the parties. iirc the dmg done on the killmail is the cumulative dmg - rather than the killing blow. Subtracting those large dmg shots from the killmail damage done leaves 7778 which is about par for the other participants. The T2 reinforced bulkheads would have brought structure HP up to around 236k with 3 of them (before resists are taken into account). I'm not saying there isn't an issue with the dmg shown in the log - something appears off - but at 10% armor the resist are much lower. If both shots hit when the armor was still at 10% ish - and if the remainder of the dmg was applied without taking into account the diff resists from the DC on structure - then it kinda adds up. Which in turn helps understand where the problem might be. I am not familiar with capital ships but understand the basics of fitting ships. May I say, you have fitted your expensive archon in a terrible way. Your Archon is paperthin and it is no wonder that it went *poof* in a matter of seconds. You spend tons of ISK for an archon and you use T1 Armor repairers and hulltank it? Sorry but I hope you have learned about your mistakes you just made and after seeing the fit I really doubt that you lost your ship because of a bug, and if it was a bug, well, with that fit you just asked for disappointment and loss. If you wanna hulltank (because you want the lows for something else but repair modules), then use T2 hull repairers at least in your mid slots in combination to bulkheads in the lows... If you wanna armor tank, then use T2 Armor repairers at least, but please rather use faction or deadspace stuff, and use Armor tank modules. Always focus on one specific tanking method, either shield tank, armor tank, or if you are really manly, then hull tank for the lulz. But please, even if you are really manly, still do not hulltank. I guess that one Ishtar would deal around 700-750 DPS by using T2 sentries, and you can be pretty sure that all Ishtars focused you at the same time when you were called as a target, i.e. 14.000 damage per second on a paperthin carrier with no noticeable defenses, relying on 60% resistance strength on the hull, no buffer tank, relying on two T1 armor repairers that cannot deal with the burst damage coming at you. I am pretty sure that the Ishtars all focused your archon at the same time, thus dealing burst damage, and your fitted ship, with those T1 armor repairers, were rather fitted for dealing with consistent damage coming from for example NPC ships. You counter burst damage with tank buffer and you counter consistent damage that comes in "small" bursts with tank recovery modules like shield booster and armor repairers. For PvP, where you can most likely expect burst damage coming at you, you should tank with tank-buffer modules, like armor plates and shield extenders. For PvE, where rats deal consistent damage to you in small "bursts" through a large amount of ships, then you tank with tank-recovery modules like armor repairers and shield boosters. To me it seems like you were out there running anomalies with your archon and the Pandemic Legion fleet just caught you off guard and grilled you. In case you fitted the Archon for PvP purposes, then maybe you should consider flying battlecruisers. Overall I think you should take back your accusations towards the Pandemic Legion and work on yourself. I am also pretty sure that those guys from Pandemic Legion do not really have the need to cheat in the slightest. They know and understand about what they are doing and know how to melt Archons.
Indeed, you are NOT familiar with capital ships
/facedesk
/facepalm
OMG, I'm wondering if he/she will edit/delete this post after receiving some friendly advice. I would give it for free but since he/she came only to derail the OP, I won't.
Keep escalating the petition, some Senior GM will take care of it, it's documented by both sides, it's an obvious bug.
And lets feed this thread, not the trolls on it, and hope CCP fix it ASAP.
|
Janna Sway
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
51
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 06:05:00 -
[105] - Quote
facepalm and facedesk until it bleeds.
You trollfitted your ship "to try something out". Well you tried and you got melted. Deal with it. But...You write a ticket to CCP, complaining about loosing your poorly fitted ship. Your case is investigated and no bugs and irregularities were found. You complain now about incompetent GM's and accuse PL of cheat and abuse of some sort. One tip, maybe you should point your finger at yourself and deal with your own mistakes before you accuse others?
You just trolled with your fitting and you got what you deserved, you went *poof* like a frigate. Deal with it. Just write an apology to PL because of your unjustified accusations in the following post and close the thread. No hard feelings, but I am really against accusing people of cheating and trying to find "proofs" out of thin air, and accusing even GM's of being incompetent because they cannot see that what you are seeing. You can be pretty sure that your case had been investigated thoroughly. |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1761
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 06:09:00 -
[106] - Quote
There are no t2, faction or deadspace capital armour reps. There are no faction or deadspace hull reps. There are no capital hull reps. Hull reps are universally terrible. With the damage control, a single bulkhead gives more EHP on the Archon than three t2 1600s. The three bulkheads are better than energised membranes. The carrier was PVP fit, had refit for survivability, had resists, 1.5 million EHP and in triage was repping 10-12k dps. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6219
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 06:09:00 -
[107] - Quote
Apparently CVA uses T2 capital repair mods all the time. |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1761
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 06:10:00 -
[108] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Apparently CVA uses T2 capital repair mods all the time. Who supplied them with the BPO? Someone email Internal Affairs |
Janna Sway
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
51
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 06:25:00 -
[109] - Quote
Well at least I know now that it is a pretty dumb idea to hulltank an Archon. Thank you for proofing that. Furthermore, if you were repairing those 10k DPS, then why on earth you did not spam Armor Membranes as much as possible in order to maximize the repair-efficiency?
This thread is fishy guys. Have fun with your case. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6219
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 06:30:00 -
[110] - Quote
It is fishy, but you've completely misinterpreted the why. |
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6220
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 06:58:00 -
[111] - Quote
I seriously don't understand how someone can look at a log that shows a single volley from a single sentry drone of over 100,000 damage and say "obviously he fit his ship wrong". |
Janna Sway
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
51
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 07:10:00 -
[112] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:I seriously don't understand how someone can look at a log that shows a single volley from a single sentry drone of over 100,000 damage and say "obviously he fit his ship wrong".
100k damage with one T1 Curator shot. Well that's interesting. I don't know guys, just good luck with this. |
Kenrailae
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
39
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 07:10:00 -
[113] - Quote
Janna Sway wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I seriously don't understand how someone can look at a log that shows a single volley from a single sentry drone of over 100,000 damage and say "obviously he fit his ship wrong". 100k damage with one T1 Curator shot. Well that's interesting. :D I don't know guys, just good luck with this.
Generally if you don't know.... don't say anything.
Generally. |
seth Hendar
I love you miners
228
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 09:37:00 -
[114] - Quote
Janna Sway wrote:Lupo diCotze wrote:Aye - I'm aware that structure come after armor :p Here's the kill mail and the likely fitting of one the the parties. iirc the dmg done on the killmail is the cumulative dmg - rather than the killing blow. Subtracting those large dmg shots from the killmail damage done leaves 7778 which is about par for the other participants. The T2 reinforced bulkheads would have brought structure HP up to around 236k with 3 of them (before resists are taken into account). I'm not saying there isn't an issue with the dmg shown in the log - something appears off - but at 10% armor the resist are much lower. If both shots hit when the armor was still at 10% ish - and if the remainder of the dmg was applied without taking into account the diff resists from the DC on structure - then it kinda adds up. Which in turn helps understand where the problem might be. I am not familiar with capital ships but understand the basics of fitting ships. May I say, you have fitted your expensive archon in a terrible way. Your Archon is paperthin and it is no wonder that it went *poof* in a matter of seconds. You spend tons of ISK for an archon and you use T1 Armor repairers and hulltank it? Sorry but I hope you have learned about your mistakes you just made and after seeing the fit I really doubt that you lost your ship because of a bug, and if it was a bug, well, with that fit you just asked for disappointment and loss. If you wanna hulltank (because you want the lows for something else but repair modules), then use T2 hull repairers at least in your mid slots in combination to bulkheads in the lows... If you wanna armor tank, then use T2 Armor repairers at least, but please rather use faction or deadspace stuff, and use Armor tank modules. Always focus on one specific tanking method, either shield tank, armor tank, or if you are really manly, then hull tank for the lulz. But please, even if you are really manly, still do not hulltank. I guess that one Ishtar would deal around 700-750 DPS by using T2 sentries, and you can be pretty sure that all Ishtars focused you at the same time when you were called as a target, i.e. 14.000 damage per second on a paperthin carrier with no noticeable defenses, relying on 60% resistance strength on the hull, no buffer tank, relying on two T1 armor repairers that cannot deal with the burst damage coming at you. I am pretty sure that the Ishtars all focused your archon at the same time, thus dealing burst damage, and your fitted ship, with those T1 armor repairers, were rather fitted for dealing with consistent damage coming from for example NPC ships. You counter burst damage with tank buffer and you counter consistent damage that comes in "small" bursts with tank recovery modules like shield booster and armor repairers. For PvP, where you can most likely expect burst damage coming at you, you should tank with tank-buffer modules, like armor plates and shield extenders. For PvE, where rats deal consistent damage to you in small "bursts" through a large amount of ships, then you tank with tank-recovery modules like armor repairers and shield boosters. To me it seems like you were out there running anomalies with your archon and the Pandemic Legion fleet just caught you off guard and grilled you. In case you fitted the Archon for PvP purposes, then maybe you should consider flying battlecruisers. Overall I think you should take back your accusations towards the Pandemic Legion and work on yourself. I am also pretty sure that those guys from Pandemic Legion do not really have the need to cheat in the slightest. They know and understand about what they are doing and know how to melt Archons. sorry to disapoint you, but you clearly are not a capital pilot. T2 capital mods? yeah, i'd like to see them....
also it seems obvious that this guy refited while entering struct or right before entering struct, probably while he was still in triage, in the hope to survive throught the remaining triage time so his fleetmates can land reps on him (wich is NOT possible as long as triage is runnning). also i like the "ton of isk", archon are not "that" expansive, and i'll assume OP can replace it, following eve rule #1: "don't fly what you can't afford to loose"
you writing that make me think you might be pretty new to this game, so here you have a very good opportunity to learn how capitals works, i suggest you don't waste it, pretty sure some guys in your alliance will be kind enought to explain it to you
also, basically you are saying this guy was "alphaed", and while the mechanic you describe does exist and works, it still register damage for each sentry (in a very very long log of sentry damage at the same second), not one entry with the addition of all the damage |
Jassmin Joy
Adversity. Rote Kapelle
213
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 09:39:00 -
[115] - Quote
Janna Sway wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I seriously don't understand how someone can look at a log that shows a single volley from a single sentry drone of over 100,000 damage and say "obviously he fit his ship wrong". 100k damage with one T1 Curator shot. Well that's interesting. I don't know guys, just good luck with this.
So you wrote all that, and didn't even read the whole point in the thread? just saw a killmail you obviously know nothing about and decided to throw out your pointless "advice"?
Kenrailae wrote:Janna Sway wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I seriously don't understand how someone can look at a log that shows a single volley from a single sentry drone of over 100,000 damage and say "obviously he fit his ship wrong". 100k damage with one T1 Curator shot. Well that's interesting. :D I don't know guys, just good luck with this. Generally if you don't know.... don't say anything. Generally.
They mostly come at night... mostly |
Kenrailae
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
39
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 09:45:00 -
[116] - Quote
Touche, Jassmin. |
Zappity
Kurved Space
617
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 09:54:00 -
[117] - Quote
Icer Xx wrote:So after 4 days of waiting. I get a response saying:
"After having looked at your ticket we have gone over the data we have at our end and we see no irregularities."
Well it seems I should train my dread pilots into an Ishtar then if this is pretty normal thing to happen apparently.
As for the "We" I want to know how many gm's dose it take to look at a log and see something is wrong? I literally laughed out loud at this (and that doesn't happen often because I'm a grumpy bugger).
I'm hoping that the GM policy is to not actually read the petition the first time round. Otherwise I seriously wonder where they find these people.
Bump for a please fix CCP. |
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
638
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 09:57:00 -
[118] - Quote
Janna Sway wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I seriously don't understand how someone can look at a log that shows a single volley from a single sentry drone of over 100,000 damage and say "obviously he fit his ship wrong". 100k damage with one T1 Curator shot. Well that's interesting. I don't know guys, just good luck with this.
You might have.. READ the original post before humiliating yourself like you did. Probably you should biomass your character after so much fail. |
Icer Xx
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
13
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 13:31:00 -
[119] - Quote
I would like to point out that my goal is not to get the archon reimbursed it would be handy if they did but if they don't its fine. The point I wish to address is the bug. Yes I can afford to replace the archon with ease. To answer Janna I Was membrane fit then at about 60% armor I put hardeners on then at 15-20% I put on bulkheads and a damage control but before I could put a 4th bulkhead on I was dead. |
Princess Saskia
Hyperfleet Industries xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
3157
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 13:43:00 -
[120] - Quote
Icer that fit is [TERBL], maybe you should join us? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |