Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Danny John-Peter
Snuff Box
351
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 12:25:00 -
[181] - Quote
Roime wrote:Every single solo battleship I've seen in Black Rise has died a slow, humiliating death to a bunch of assorted small T1 ships, I'd never even consider undocking a solo BS in lowsec simply for the reason it being a 100% certain one-way trip without a single kill. Even Santo's smartbombing Panther died eventually.
It's just as stupid as soloing in a capital ship.
And the reason? You can't force a fight. Which means you are always fighting on their terms, aka lost before the engagement even started.
Properly supported BS fleets are cool and a sure way to get to fight SNUFF. Which is pretty much the only good thing about battleships in general- there's no "if", it's "when" they drop so you don't have to muck around looking for fights, fight comes to you.
The actual pvp part with BSes is boring and slow as ****, so generally people opt for something that requires more than F1 and broadcasting for reps.
sup |
Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
854
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 12:26:00 -
[182] - Quote
Adamski flipflop wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:I think everyone that thinks Battleships are fine should take one out for a solo roam. You will start to understand just how poorly they perform.
. I mean CCP have said a few times that theyre going to re-balance T3s so they have 1 "role" so I dont think battleships being able to do everything is high on their priority list. Where did they ever say they wanted T3 to have one role...
Riotgirl, that first vid you linked, PvP ASB Rokh vs 2 carebear battleships. Second one has the guy dying, I think its pretty telling if you watch him trying to shoot the HAC the whole fight |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5277
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 12:26:00 -
[183] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:Roime wrote:Every single solo battleship I've seen in Black Rise has died a slow, humiliating death to a bunch of assorted small T1 ships, I'd never even consider undocking a solo BS in lowsec simply for the reason it being a 100% certain one-way trip without a single kill. Even Santo's smartbombing Panther died eventually.
It's just as stupid as soloing in a capital ship.
And the reason? You can't force a fight. Which means you are always fighting on their terms, aka lost before the engagement even started.
Properly supported BS fleets are cool and a sure way to get to fight SNUFF. Which is pretty much the only good thing about battleships in general- there's no "if", it's "when" they drop so you don't have to muck around looking for fights, fight comes to you.
The actual pvp part with BSes is boring and slow as ****, so generally people opt for something that requires more than F1 and broadcasting for reps. sup Assign drones, and broadcast for reps. There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |
Treborr MintingtonJr
Quantum Reality R n D The Methodical Alliance
40
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 12:29:00 -
[184] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:what elite pvp machariels The day i learnt about transversal velocity:
https://zkillboard.com/detail/32988150/ |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
8933
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 13:17:00 -
[185] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Adamski flipflop wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:I think everyone that thinks Battleships are fine should take one out for a solo roam. You will start to understand just how poorly they perform.
. I mean CCP have said a few times that theyre going to re-balance T3s so they have 1 "role" so I dont think battleships being able to do everything is high on their priority list. Where did they ever say they wanted T3 to have one role...
We know that they are no longer going to be sporting battleship class tanks and firepower. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3522
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 13:59:00 -
[186] - Quote
I haven't read most of this thread, but I get the gist that some peopel think you should be able to "solo" in a battleship? I don't know why some folks think everything in this mmo must be balanced around their unwillingness or inability to make friends (even imaginary friends called alts), but imo that's just recklessly selfish. Battleships are group/team/fleet ships, you want to solo go find something that has the word "cruiser" in it. |
Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
854
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 14:33:00 -
[187] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:I haven't read most of this thread, but I get the gist that some peopel think you should be able to "solo" in a battleship? I don't know why some folks think everything in this mmo must be balanced around their unwillingness or inability to make friends (even imaginary friends called alts), but imo that's just recklessly selfish. Battleships are group/team/fleet ships, you want to solo go find something that has the word "cruiser" in it. You don't know why because you don't think. |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
3523
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 14:43:00 -
[188] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:I haven't read most of this thread, but I get the gist that some peopel think you should be able to "solo" in a battleship? I don't know why some folks think everything in this mmo must be balanced around their unwillingness or inability to make friends (even imaginary friends called alts), but imo that's just recklessly selfish. Battleships are group/team/fleet ships, you want to solo go find something that has the word "cruiser" in it. You don't know why because you don't think.
lulz, somewhere there is a pot sitting by a kettle that's trying to divide by zero.
|
Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Fatal Ascension
613
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 16:51:00 -
[189] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:I think everyone that thinks Battleships are fine should take one out for a solo roam. You will start to understand just how poorly they perform.
Saying that a T1 battleship was designed only as a fleet ship is nonsense. Battleships were once very good for soloing. They never became the one and only ship to use, but they were an option. CCP has said they'd like to see ships have diverse roles however they continue to allow battleships only a niche role (disposable cheap insured fleet peon) that is easily filled by other classes of ships if necessary.
I doubt there is any role in EVE that requires a T1 battleship, or any role where a T1 battleship is best disregarding cost.
Frigates have a proper role and also ancillary roles, destroyers have roles and also diverse roles, cruisers have many roles, battle cruisers can perform the role of a battleship, tank and spank and also other diverse roles including soloing.
T1 Battleships on the other hand don't have a primary role, nor do they excel, nor are they useful overly in diverse roles. All they are really good at is shooting red crosses in L4's and safe nullsec anoms.
One of my main annoyances with battleships is their scan resolution:
Look at the following Gallante line of ships:
Thorax - 350mm Brutix - 250mm Megathron - 118mm
Looks pretty normal, right?
Now look at it with a sensor booster:
Thorax with sensor booster II - Scan Res Script - 350 to 560 (+210) Brutix with Sensor booster II - Scan Res Script - 250 to 400 (+150) 50mm more than a Thorax. Megathron with Sensor booster II - Scan Res Script - 118 to 190 (+82) with 2 sebos it gets 39mm more than a Brutix with no sebo. So 60mm less than a Brutix.
Lets look at it with cloaks:
Brutix with Improved Cloak II - 150mm Megathron with no cloak - 118mm Megathron with Improved Cloak II - 78mm
Brutix with a cloak locks faster than a megathron with no cloak and only 40mm slower than a Megathron with a sebo with scan script.
Its ridiculous to nerf the lock as much as it has been. 45 seconds to lock a frigate is stupid, especially after a 30 second cloak delay. There should at least be some sort of reasonable cap, perhaps 20 sec cap on lock times. That's plenty of time to warp out.
Per usual, your standard myopic view of ...well everything.
Battleships aren't a solo machine, less so now than since sig radius and explosion velocity were added. Battleships are to slow for solo work, they HAVE been for a long time. This shouldn't be a surprise. Now they are across the board also to slow for gang work, fleet warp won't catch a cold, solo warp and the battleship will likely not make it to a fight. Previous to this patch you could get the aligns down enough to run with most battlecruiser gangs.
Now its hopeless.
So Battleships are pigeon holed into hot drops and bg fleet engagements, they simply aren't fast enough for anything else really. |
Beardon
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis Dragonaors
17
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 18:03:00 -
[190] - Quote
Here we have another case of an unwilling listener. The OP doesn't care about battleships, the OP cares about solo megathrons. People have given great advice about other BS's which fill the desired role, but OP doesn't care, because mega. Part of the entire re-balance effort was to diversify ships into roles, and when one (the mega) doesn't get put in the box you want, we have a case of tears.
It's not any new ground breaking thing that solo work in eve is remarkably difficult, and honestly, expecting a ship to perform well in an area (black rise) dominated by a counter to that ship (frigate blobs) is pretty stupid. You want to find success, you gotta take it to the right places. Wandering in to FW where people salivate over the thought of a BS kill is your biggest mistake, imo. All you're gunna find here is either small ships that you can't catch, blobs of small ships that will rip you in half, or worse, the Militiamen taking the rare opportunity (in FW at least) to hop in their shiny ships and blob you very quickly. Every time we get intel of some idiot in a solo BS (or really any camp) trying to camp the Onnamon / Kinakka gate our alliance sees some of the quickest form ups for fleets ever.
|
|
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
8935
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 18:04:00 -
[191] - Quote
Onictus wrote:
Per usual, your standard myopic view of ...well everything.
Battleships aren't a solo machine, less so now than since sig radius and explosion velocity were added. Battleships are to slow for solo work, they HAVE been for a long time. This shouldn't be a surprise. Now they are across the board also to slow for gang work, fleet warp won't catch a cold, solo warp and the battleship will likely not make it to a fight. Previous to this patch you could get the aligns down enough to run with most battlecruiser gangs.
Now its hopeless.
So Battleships are pigeon holed into hot drops and bg fleet engagements, they simply aren't fast enough for anything else really.
You can get most BS to warp as fast as an assault frigate (got a raven to warp a little faster) and still be effective in combat.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Aralieus
Shadowbane Syndicate
163
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 21:13:00 -
[192] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Riot Girl wrote:I don't remember their names, you can just search google for solo [insert batleship name]. So you just made that up?
I really doubt he just pulled that out of his ass...is it so far outside the realm of possibilities to you that some folks just don't care about K/B's and they just want to pew and BS's are their favorite tools to do so? Some men just want to see the world burn regardless if they come out ahead or not. In some circles its called 'fun'. Oderint Dum Metuant |
Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Fatal Ascension
614
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 21:31:00 -
[193] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Onictus wrote:
Per usual, your standard myopic view of ...well everything.
Battleships aren't a solo machine, less so now than since sig radius and explosion velocity were added. Battleships are to slow for solo work, they HAVE been for a long time. This shouldn't be a surprise. Now they are across the board also to slow for gang work, fleet warp won't catch a cold, solo warp and the battleship will likely not make it to a fight. Previous to this patch you could get the aligns down enough to run with most battlecruiser gangs.
Now its hopeless.
So Battleships are pigeon holed into hot drops and bg fleet engagements, they simply aren't fast enough for anything else really.
You can get most BS to warp as fast as an assault frigate (got a raven to warp a little faster) and still be effective in combat.
Sure, I could, now barring double nanos (which I used to with pests) and/or Nomad sets, its rather hard to accomplish with what I would consider a viable build.
Can I? Sure.
However, its just as easy for me to fly the HAC/BC/whatever that the gang is built around, I'm not that emotionally invested in Battleships, I fly them all of the time, but I won't try to fit a square peg in a round hole.
|
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
8939
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 07:02:00 -
[194] - Quote
Getting a BS to warp as fast as a HAC is rather easy.
Last night a few of us BATs sat down and came up with a few solo raven fits. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
854
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 09:04:00 -
[195] - Quote
I don't see what the 'resistance' to battleships having some ability to solo is about?
If you think about EVE there are really no such thing as battleships, battlecruisers, etc etc. There are only dots in space that have the ability to do things, like fire 8 blasters or get into warp in less then 3 secs.
Battleships are just another dot. If you think about it they're quite a lot less dangerous than some of the other ships out there. In terms of survivability, you have much more chance of surviving an attack in a cruiser, from a battleship than you do from a HAC.
In terms of defeating an opponent, you have much more chance of catching and killing the same cruiser in another cruiser, than you do in trying to catch that cruiser in a battleship.
In terms of damage application, unless you fit for specific targets, which gimps your ability vs other targets, you have much more chance of applying all your damage in a battlecruiser than you do in a battleship.
I've attacked battleships in T3's with full shields and not hit armor before they popped, and I was armor tanked, vs battleships. There are a few exceptions, but they're more specialized ships, such as nuet domis, but that's only because they can field non battleship weapons and have a full rack of highs for utility.
Adjusting mobility so they're able to keep up with a fleet, adjusting lock times so they're not fitting 2 sebos to get 30mm more lock times than an un-sebo'ed BC, adding extra drone bay space would not make them OP, they'd would still have all the negative qualities that allow smaller ships to kill them. |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
8940
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 09:18:00 -
[196] - Quote
Its called balance. If it was easy to kill everything else then everyone would just fly battleships. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1777
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 09:25:00 -
[197] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Its called balance. If it was easy to kill everything else then everyone would just fly battleships.
But, but, teh solo playerz!
Nah, I'm just kidding, I understand game balance. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
Tauranon
Weeesearch Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
368
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 11:06:00 -
[198] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:I don't see what the 'resistance' to battleships having some ability to solo is about?
If you think about EVE there are really no such thing as battleships, battlecruisers, etc etc. There are only dots in space that have the ability to do things, like fire 8 blasters or get into warp in less then 3 secs.
Battleships are just another dot. If you think about it they're quite a lot less dangerous than some of the other ships out there. In terms of survivability, you have much more chance of surviving an attack in a cruiser, from a battleship than you do from a HAC.
In terms of defeating an opponent, you have much more chance of catching and killing the same cruiser in another cruiser, than you do in trying to catch that cruiser in a battleship.
I'm sure Admiral Lutjens would agree with you. Naval Game balance was terrible in the '40s. British cruisers were exploiting for sure.
Quote: In terms of damage application, unless you fit for specific targets, which gimps your ability vs other targets, you have much more chance of applying all your damage in a battlecruiser than you do in a battleship.
I've attacked battleships in T3's with full shields and not hit armor before they popped, and I was armor tanked, vs battleships. There are a few exceptions, but they're more specialized ships, such as nuet domis, but that's only because they can field non battleship weapons and have a full rack of highs for utility.
Any PVP fit battleship will also kill a ratting fit battleship. If I was going to kill a missioning bs by stealing his stuffs or shooting his deployables till he aggressed, I'd probably use a hurricane. ie there is no ship balancing information in killing a ratting BS.
Quote:
Adjusting mobility so they're able to keep up with a fleet, adjusting lock times so they're not fitting 2 sebos to get 30mm more lock times than an un-sebo'ed BC, adding extra drone bay space would not make them OP, they'd would still have all the negative qualities that allow smaller ships to kill them.
If you make battleships have the mobility of a BC, and damage application of a BC, then there is no role for a BC.
|
Keno Skir
Vectis Covert Solutions
467
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 11:07:00 -
[199] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:"Support ships" is a concept IZ just can't quite grasp. Not true I have my ISBoxer Stealth Bomber wing almost fully trained up now.
Weren't you just putting someone down for using a squad instead of going solo..? But you're ISBoxing bombers?
Ye mate.
EDIT : The whole game almost, uses Megathrons for fleet fights atm. If it was better to use Prots then that's what would be in service. Your argument has been repeatedly smashed and you have nothing to back it up aside from conjecture and bluffing.
"that massive lossmail on my killboard? i was winning that til their friends showed up.. so there..." BUDDY TRIALS - 21days + ISK bonus + Starting Assistance : https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=77facad8-d941-45ad-95bc-c1ec90919b6b&action=buddy Feel free to contact me with questions :) |
Mike Whiite
Stupid Stunts The Wolfpack Nexus
240
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 11:35:00 -
[200] - Quote
I think the problem lies in the fact that there is no ballance between Speed/ Agility and Mass/Size a lower mass will give you more speed and agility though a higher mass/engin strenght not related to be able to withstand Webbing and or disrupting.
though one would say that if mass makes my ship go slower in warp (to take the latest change) it would also be harder to move me out of my course. or harder to shut down the enormous warp cores, needed to get that ship in warp.
Looking at T1 ships only (not going in to T2 due to specialisation)
Why is my shuttle able to bump a battles ship out of alignment, and if it is why doesn't it get a scratch?
Why can my frigate shut down the warp core of a battleship with 5 times the core capacity?
Why does the webbing frigate slow down the Battleships instead of dragging the Frigate along?
in these 3 cases you should have a possitive effect from mass/size though EVE doesn't take this in account.
in my eyes they should start by making all e-war in different sizes like neuts and nossies. (bonuses to specialist T2 ships)
it would be even better is they took mass/capacitator/CPU/and Powergrid in account. this would also lead to a more natural ballance between Armor and shield in being Strong and slow to fast and more fragile.
|
|
Bel Tika
Dirty Rotten Scoundrel's
27
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 11:36:00 -
[201] - Quote
so on a side note, Battleships?? are they any good? |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
8941
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 12:05:00 -
[202] - Quote
Bel Tika wrote:so on a side note, Battleships?? are they any good?
Yes, but only if you know what you are doing. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Keno Skir
Vectis Covert Solutions
467
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 12:08:00 -
[203] - Quote
Mike Whiite wrote:Why is my shuttle able to bump a battles ship out of alignment, and if it is why doesn't it get a scratch?
Why can my frigate shut down the warp core of a battleship with 5 times the core capacity?
Why does the webbing frigate slow down the Battleships instead of dragging the Frigate along?
1. If you bumped the shuttle with the bs at 1000m/s it would send the shuttle hurtling away at 1000m/s (ish), if you hit stationary bs with 1000m/s shuttle it would turn a bit and not really move very far. Due to mass... And your ship doesn't take collision damage because it would be game breaking and stupid, imagine the carnage on jita undock.
2. Warp core capacity is not a thing. A scrambler makes the targets warp core not work, unless it has stabs, whatever the size. Makes sense.
3. Because webs effect the target vessel. It isn't a lassoo cowboy.
Any more q's? BUDDY TRIALS - 21days + ISK bonus + Starting Assistance : https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=77facad8-d941-45ad-95bc-c1ec90919b6b&action=buddy Feel free to contact me with questions :) |
Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
854
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 12:10:00 -
[204] - Quote
Keno Skir wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:"Support ships" is a concept IZ just can't quite grasp. Not true I have my ISBoxer Stealth Bomber wing almost fully trained up now. Weren't you just putting someone down for using a squad instead of going solo..? But you're ISBoxing bombers? Ye mate. EDIT : The whole game almost, uses Megathrons for fleet fights atm. If it was better to use Prots then that's what would be in service. Your argument has been repeatedly smashed and you have nothing to back it up aside from conjecture and bluffing. "that massive lossmail on my killboard? i was winning that til their friends showed up.. so there..." You're posting like an idiot lol. They use Megathrons because they're disposable, they have range over the T3 and they're insurable and don't cost skill points. Its not because they're better or even on par with T3's in overall usefulness.
I posted the stats on both ships, those stats are not debatable. Overall the T3 smashes the Megathron in terms of adaptibility, damage application, tank, cap, mobility, sig, tracking... literally everything.
You'd have to be a complete idiot not to see that.
As for the massive loss lol, its a 180 million isk insured ship. I lost more suiciding a Rohk in Jita the same day since suiciding doesn't give insurance payout. If you think 180m is a massive loss you're playing in the kiddie pool.
Also I don't think they're his friends since they're on the same killmail of him that I'm on.
@ Baltec, how would slightly increasing mobility and lock time as well as ability to hold (but not field more drones) cause everyone to use Battleships?
They would still suffer from tracking and damage application against smaller faster targets. They would just not be completely useless in gangs and roams. And I'm not talking about your 200 man gangs, you could fly friggin 200 man rifter gangs and kill anything you come across. Balance goes out the window when you're fielding that many people.
@ Tauranon,
Where did you find in my post that I said that battleships should be able to hit (apply damage) as well as battle-cruisers. I said they "still wouldn't be able to" not that they should be able to.
|
Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
854
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 12:13:00 -
[205] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Bel Tika wrote:so on a side note, Battleships?? are they any good? Yes, but only if you know what you are doing. You wouldn't really know. You're playstyle seems to be get as many people as you can into a blob and kill other people with that blob.
If you want to actually get a feel for a ship, you need to actually try fighting with it. Its like some gronk and his mates beating up a guy on the street and thinking they're hardcore. |
Keno Skir
Vectis Covert Solutions
467
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 12:14:00 -
[206] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:They use Megathrons because they're disposable, they have range over the T3 and they're insurable and don't cost skill points. Its not because they're better or even on par with T3's in overall usefulness.
I posted the stats on both ships, those stats are not debatable. Overall the T3 smashes the Megathron in terms of adaptibility, damage application, tank, cap, mobility, sig, tracking... literally everything.
You'd have to be a complete idiot not to see that.
Your massive contradiction kinda answers for me, but what the hell.
All the points you mentioned about the mega are why it is a better ship to use, and the areas in which the prot are better are CLEARLY NOT ENOUGH TO MAKE PEOPLE USE THEM OVER MEGATHRONS.
Also, having range over a t3 is part of damage application... BUDDY TRIALS - 21days + ISK bonus + Starting Assistance : https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=77facad8-d941-45ad-95bc-c1ec90919b6b&action=buddy Feel free to contact me with questions :) |
Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
854
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 12:22:00 -
[207] - Quote
Keno Skir wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:They use Megathrons because they're disposable, they have range over the T3 and they're insurable and don't cost skill points. Its not because they're better or even on par with T3's in overall usefulness.
I posted the stats on both ships, those stats are not debatable. Overall the T3 smashes the Megathron in terms of adaptibility, damage application, tank, cap, mobility, sig, tracking... literally everything. (except all the things you just mentioned..)
You'd have to be a complete idiot not to see that. Your massive contradiction kinda answers for me, but what the hell. All the points you mentioned about the mega are why it is a better ship to use, and the areas in which the prot are better are CLEARLY NOT ENOUGH TO MAKE PEOPLE USE THEM OVER MEGATHRONS. Also, having range over a t3 is part of damage application... Jesus. Like teaching babies to walk...
Disposable, insurable, don't lose skill points are not ship attributes ffs. They're player preferences.
The only thing that is a ship attribute is the range.
Get it through your head, when you're comparing ships capabilities you don't compare non mechanical non functional things. You compare statistics.
"The USS Nimitz must be a terrible ship, I mean its so much more expensive than a missile frigate. Most countries in the world prefer to use missile frigates therefore the USS Nimitz is a poor performer in comparison" - complete horse **** right? Yes. |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
8941
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 12:23:00 -
[208] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:Bel Tika wrote:so on a side note, Battleships?? are they any good? Yes, but only if you know what you are doing. You wouldn't really know. You're playstyle seems to be get as many people as you can into a blob and kill other people with that blob. If you want to actually get a feel for a ship, you need to actually try fighting with it. Its like some gronk and his mates beating up a guy on the street and thinking they're hardcore.
Before I was in BATs I was terrising CFC space in mega flying with 5 to 10 man gangs. I still fly in small gangs but hey, lets just ignore the guy who has flown mega in every situation going for over 3 years and just take your one badly fitted mega loss. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
854
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 12:28:00 -
[209] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:baltec1 wrote:Bel Tika wrote:so on a side note, Battleships?? are they any good? Yes, but only if you know what you are doing. You wouldn't really know. You're playstyle seems to be get as many people as you can into a blob and kill other people with that blob. If you want to actually get a feel for a ship, you need to actually try fighting with it. Its like some gronk and his mates beating up a guy on the street and thinking they're hardcore. Before I was in BATs I was terrising CFC space in mega flying with 5 to 10 man gangs. I still fly in small gangs but hey, lets just ignore the guy who has flown mega in every situation going for over 3 years and just take your one badly fitted mega loss. Badly fitted my ass. At least I put prop mods on it. I've seen you're terrible double plated no prop mod rail mega lol. Just a lame floating sentry gun for F1 games. |
Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1225
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 12:32:00 -
[210] - Quote
I bought some jeans from the NEX Store and they
Infinity Ziona wrote:Badly fitted my ass.
High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |