Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
absolute
|
Posted - 2006.03.01 03:46:00 -
[1]
Thrasher with emp s 309m/s Thrasher with quake s 64.8m/s
Is this a joke?
Ammo's like hail s and quake s are utterly useless on destroyers.
Were is the logic for making small t2 ammo have way more penalty. Because my thrasher has more turret points then a tempest and nearily double the amount of the phoon. Destroyer turret point > all other ships, as a minmatar.
Therefore the logic of more penalty for small ammo is bunk when taking a destroyer as evidence.
THE FIX: Apply the stacking penalty to ammo penalties and set all ammos to what small ammo penalities are at.
problem solved.
-absolute |
Valea Silpha
|
Posted - 2006.03.01 03:55:00 -
[2]
Im pretty sure t2 ammo was never meant to stack and that is being fixed ...
Anyone more in the know care to add ?
|
Ante
|
Posted - 2006.03.01 05:42:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Valea Silpha Im pretty sure t2 ammo was never meant to stack and that is being fixed ...
Anyone more in the know care to add ?
I don't actually remember seeing the devs say anything about t2 ammo penalty stacking. It certainly hasn't been fixed in the up-coming patch...
|
Reatu Krentor
|
Posted - 2006.03.01 08:16:00 -
[4]
the stacking is intended apparently that is why the made the penalty on small ammo larger than on large ammo, as there is ussually less turrets/launchers on the frigs than on the battleships, of course they conveniently forgot about the destroyers and battlecruisers when they did that ... ------------------------------------------ The ammatar are not the enemy, they are the smoke and mirrors of the amarr. |
absolute
|
Posted - 2006.03.01 15:28:00 -
[5]
Seems like they picked the worst way to implement the penalty, I have no problem with it stacking but the difference between large and small is not justified.
The devs are known to use the stacking penalty everywhere, why not in this case. It would fix this entire problem..
|
DenBrown
|
Posted - 2006.10.08 10:06:00 -
[6]
READ THIS!
|
Brechan Skene
|
Posted - 2006.10.08 10:41:00 -
[7]
Try useing Barrage
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |