Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15637
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 16:34:00 -
[151] - Quote
Billy McCandless wrote:Nova Satar wrote:
People used to joke about needing a safety button on their guns....
wee teh peeple can not bee trussed to yuse the saefty butan proper kan wee hav a PIN numbre or code on teh butan sow wee done turne it off bye aksident No, no, no. There should be an application process to turn the safety off, and it should be strictly regulated. The application process should be determined by whoever runs the Eve Uni application process, but as a starter
- The applicant must pay a non refundable fee of 2B isk before starting the process.
- The applicant must be able to provide good reason, in the form of an essay of no less than 2500 words, for the change to their personal safety switch settings.
- The applicant should be subject to a monthly psychological evaluation, at their own cost. Said evaluations to be carried out by a group of no less than 10 of the internet mental health professionals present on the forums.
- The applicant should hold their own public liability insurance to recompense any pilots that may be harmed due to their actions.
- The processing authority shall reserve the right to remove the ability to change safety settings at any time, for any reason, or just because they feel like it.
|
Usagi Toshiro
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
58
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 16:35:00 -
[152] - Quote
Man, usually it's the carebears that whine when something is made "harder." Now we have a "not-bear" crying because they have to go back to their old mechanic of baiting and taunting?
It's like handing a gun to a guy on a killing spree because the knives he's using are too slow and then taking it back because it works too well, all the while saying "have fun pwning noobs."
(Edit: A word.) |
Priestess Lin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
83
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 16:39:00 -
[153] - Quote
Only idiots ever claimed it was an intended feature.
Carmen Electra wrote:Tears from the "HTFU" crowd, best tears.
so true |
|
CCP Dolan
C C P C C P Alliance
884
|
Posted - 2014.01.28 16:48:00 -
[154] - Quote
Ok this thread has devolved pretty hard, so I'm gonna lock it.
The bottom line is that when we release features, sometimes they have unintended interactions with other features. Sometimes this adds depth to the game by creating a new interaction that doesn't violate any of the base rules of EVE and adds depth, other times it riddles systems with needless exceptions and useless complexity.
There are a few core rules and mechanics in EVE, and the crimewatch system is one of them. We will never actively introduce a feature that circumvents this safety, and any features that break this rule will be fixed at the soonest possible date. Unwillingly entering a limited engagement without accepting a duel, altering your crimewatch safety, or interacting with the UI in some purposeful way will never be a thing. CCP Dolan | Community Representative
Twitter: @CCPDolan
Gooby pls |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |